Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Microbiology
Volume 2019, Article ID 5729568, 9 pages
Research Article

Magnitude of Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Bacteria Isolated from Urinary Catheterized Inpatients of Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia

1Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
2School of Medical Laboratory Science, Jimma University, P.O. Box 378, Jimma, Ethiopia
3School of Medical Laboratory Science, Jimma University, P.O. Box 788, Jimma, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Tesfaye Kassa; te.ude.uj@assak.eyafset

Received 8 September 2018; Revised 21 December 2018; Accepted 20 January 2019; Published 10 February 2019

Academic Editor: Joseph Falkinham

Copyright © 2019 Netsanet Awoke et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Biofilm formation is one of the features of most bacteria. Catheterization in medicine is a source of highly resistant bacterial infections, and those bacteria respond poorly to antimicrobial therapy. Bacterial biofilm features were not described from catheterized inpatients in Ethiopia as its formation is known to afford antimicrobial resistance and challenge patient management. The aim of this study was to isolate catheter-associated urinary bacterial pathogens, their biofilm formation, and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among inpatients of Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC) in Southwest Ethiopia. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC from February to August 2016. A total of 143 study participants were enrolled consecutively in this study. Urine samples were collected from catheterized patients and processed using a standard bacteriological protocol for isolation and identification. Evaluation of in vitro biofilm formation and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of uropathogenic bacteria was done using microtiter plates and disk diffusion method, respectively. Data were cleaned, coded, and entered into SPSS version 20 for analysis. All statistical test values of were considered statistically significant. From all study participants, mean age was 44 years. Sixty bacterial strains were recovered from 57 urinary catheterized inpatients among which 54 of them were monomicrobial (94.7%). The remaining six bacterial strains were recovered from three study participants each with two bacterial isolates. The predominant bacterial isolates were Gram-negative bacteria with E. coli turning out first. About 80% of bacterial isolates were biofilm formers. The majority of the bacteria were resistant to commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. In conclusion, the majority of bacterial uropathogen isolates were Gram-negative, biofilm formers, and resistant to commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. Relatively ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and amikacin were highly effective against most isolated bacteria.

1. Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) account up to 40% of all hospital acquired infections around the globe, and more than 80% of nosocomial UTIs are usually associated with catheterization [13]. High prevalence of catheterization in a hospital setup leads to a large cumulative burden of catheter-associated UTIs with the resultant rise in morbidity and mortality [4]. The common uropathogenic bacteria known are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus spp., and some other Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [5, 6]. On the contrary, the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, particularly E. coli and Klebsiella species, are very common [710]. The high magnitude of antimicrobial resistance among catheter-associated UTIs has important economic implications particularly in developing countries where resources are lacking [3, 10].

Bacterial biofilm is a complex community of microorganisms with production of extracellular polysaccharide matrix on damaged tissue and surface of indwelling medical devices including urinary catheter. Despite catheter is generally critical indwelling medical device and indispensable in medicine, its prolonged use in hospitalized patients expose them to infection. This process allows bacteria to enter to the bladder and form biofilm either through migrating along the intra- or extraluminal parts of the catheter surface [11, 12]. This bacterial feature of biofilm production is very important in contributing to catheter-associated UTIs in hospital setting.

Bacterial biofilm development, on the other hand, is highly associated with the bacteria to afford inherent antimicrobial resistance such as the host’s defense mechanisms and exogenous antimicrobial agents. This resistance makes the bacteria to be a major challenge for patient recovery [11]. It has been determined that biofilm-forming bacteria have shown resistance to antimicrobials as much as 1000 times more than their planktonic counterparts [1, 13]. Chronic and complicated UTIs can result in discomfort to the patient and prolonged hospital stay. This in turn ultimately increases hospital burdens, health care costs for diagnosis and treatment as well as higher morbidity and mortality of patients [1, 1416].

The magnitude of catheter-associated UTIs problems remains underestimated largely in developing countries, whereas it is a persistently common problem [17, 18]. This is because of inadequate surveillance and absence of regular reporting system to national level. Its diagnosis and surveillance activities to guide preventions and interventions require expertise, facilities, and other resources [19]. On the other hand, detection of biofilm development of microorganisms in medicine has been progressing very slowly. This may be for the fact that overall knowledge about microorganisms living in biofilm communities is less among health professionals. This may be the perception that bacteria are single-celled organisms living an individual lifestyle [20]. For this reason, biofilm-related researches are important to bring front for the health professional attentiveness and future study initiation in Ethiopia.

Although community-acquired UTIs have been investigated in different groups of patients in Ethiopia, only very few studies have investigated and documented on the etiological agents of catheter-associated UTIs and their susceptibility pattern to antimicrobial agents [21, 22]. The updated pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility report helps in proper patient management as there were reports of variability in time and space. Moreover, there was no study on biofilm profiles of uropathogenic bacteria from catheterized patients in this study location in Jimma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the distribution of urinary bacterial pathogens, their associated risk factors for acquisition of infection, biofilm formation, and drug susceptibility patterns to commonly used antimicrobial agents among urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia.

2. Materials and Methods

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in gynecology/obstetrics, surgical, and medical wards between February and August 2016, among urinary catheterized inpatients in JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia. The university center is a teaching institution and referral for 15 million populations with 650 beds in Southwest Ethiopia and provides specialized health services having surgical, medical, gynecological, maternity, pediatric, and other clinical and diagnostic departments. The hospital is providing services for approximately 15,000 inpatients, 160,000 outpatient attendants, 11,000 emergency cases, and 4500 deliveries per year from the catchment of about 15 million population (general background information on Jimma University Specialized Hospital, later named JUMC 2014:, accessed date: Oct 10, 2015).

2.1. Patient Recruitment

A total of 143 urinary catheterized inpatients were consecutively identified who was willing to participate in the study. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from the patient records and attending physicians using predesigned semistructured questionnaire adapted through reviewing published literatures and surveillance protocols [23, 24]. Initially, patients to be catheterized were screened for UTI by testing urine before and after urinary catheterization for clinical reasons. UTI-negative patients and who stayed on catheter for at least 48 hrs were included from the wards during the study period. Urine sample was collected prior to catheter removal from distal edge of the catheter tube with a sterile syringe after the sampling port of the catheter had been properly disinfected. Then, the urine was placed in a sterile, wide mouthed, dry, leak-proof plastic container from each study participants. Finally, the urine specimens were transported to medical microbiology laboratory of Jimma University immediately and analyzed within 2 hours.

2.2. Culture and Identification Procedures

Urine was inoculated directly onto blood agar, MacConkey agar, and Mannitol salt agar (media from Oxoid Ltd. Co, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) using a calibrated inoculating loop capable to transfer 0.001 ml. Inoculated culture media were incubated in aerobic atmosphere at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours [25]. Identification of bacterial isolates were made based on their characteristic appearance on the respective media, Gram-staining, and biochemical reactions including catalase, coagulase, oxidase, indole production, citrate utilization, H2S production, motility, and other tests [25].

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion technique following standard procedures on Muller–Hinton agar (Oxoid Ltd. Co, Hampshire, England) for only monomicrobial isolates, and zone of inhibition was compared with the standard value according to the criteria set by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [26]. Multiple-drug resistance (MDR) was defined as bacterial resistance to three or more antimicrobial agents in different categories [7, 8, 26].

2.4. Quantitative Biofilm Formation Testing

All in vitro bacterial biofilm formations were studied only for those monomicrobial isolates. The ability of individual bacterial strain to form biofilm was evaluated by cultivating the bacteria on a 96-well clear flat-bottom polystyrene plastic microtiter plate (Tarsons, London, United Kingdom) as described elsewhere [2729]. Briefly, standardized bacterial suspension in sterile normal saline adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard was prepared. Tryptic soya broth supplemented with 1% glucose was used to prepare bacterial suspension in 1 : 100 dilutions to add a final volume of 200 µl per each well. This experiment was performed for each isolate in triplicates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The optical density (OD) was measured by using automated ELISA Autoreader (model 340, SpectroMax®) at a wavelength of 570 nm. The cutoff optical density (ODc) was calculated and defined as three standard deviations above the mean OD of the negative control. Isolates was classified as follows: bacterial OD < ODc = biofilm nonformer; OD > ODc, but <2 ODc = weak biofilm former; OD > 2 ODc but <4 ODc = moderate biofilm former and >4 ODc = strong biofilm former as described by Stepanović and his colleagues [29].

2.5. Quality Control

Standard reference strains including S. aureus (ATCC-25923), E. coli (ATCC-25922), and P. aeruginosa (ATCC-27853) were obtained from Ethiopia Public Health Institute laboratory and used as a quality control throughout the study for culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing [16]. Moreover, control strains of S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 (biofilm nonformer or negative control) and E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (biofilm former or positive control) were used for in vitro biofilm evaluation procedures [28, 29].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were coded and entered into SPSS version 20 for analysis. The chi-squared test, odds ratio with 95% CI, was used to screen possible associated factors among different variables. All statistical test values of were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of Bacterial Uropathogen

A total of 60 bacterial isolates were recovered from 57 (39.8%) study participants, and monomicrobial isolates were recovered from 54 (94.7%) participants. Six isolates were recovered from three catheterized inpatients each with the following isolates as a mixed infection: S. aureus and Enterobacter spp.; E. coli and Klebssiella spp.; and Klebssiella spp. and S. aureus. Of the total 60 bacterial isolates, 46 (76.7%) were Gram-negative with E. coli (19/60, 31.7%) being the predominant isolate (Table 1).

Table 1: Distribution of uropathogenic bacterial isolates among urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, from February to August 2016.
3.2. Distribution of Catheter-Associated Bacteriuria with Respect to Clinical Profiles

Among illnesses diagnosed during admission, patients with urogenital abnormality had highest catheter-associated bacteriuria (50.6%) with chi-square value (χ2) = 11.57 and . On the other hand, the higher prevalence of catheter-associated bacteriuria (45.3%) was observed among patients having underlining illness than study participants without this (36.7%); however, the observed difference was not significant, (χ2) = 1.03, . On the basis of study participants who had received antimicrobials, 27 (35.1%) of them have significant bacteriuria. In diabetic patients, catheter-associated bacteriuria (61.5%) was observed to be higher than those without the illness (37.7%) (Table 2). Patients on catheterization for about seven or more days had greater chance to develop catheter-associated bacteriuria (74.3%) compared with those with catheterization for less than four days, χ2 = 24.846 at . With respect to patients’ hospital stay, study participants who had been hospitalized for 10 or more days developed higher catheter-associated bacteriuria (62.3%) than those with less than ten days stay, (Table 2).

Table 2: Distribution of catheter-associated significant bacteriuria with respect to clinical profiles of inpatients at JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, from February to August 2016.
3.3. Pattern of Biofilm-Forming Uropathogenic Bacteria

From all bacterial isolates among urinary catheterized patients, forty-three (79.7%) of them were biofilm formers. From among Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial isolates, 34 (81%) and 9 (75%) of them were biofilm formers, respectively, with no significance difference () (Table 3).

Table 3: Biofilm formation patterns of bacterial isolates among urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, from February to August 2016.

All clinical profiles of the patients including primary diagnosis upon admission, the presence of underlying illnesses, diabetes status, patients who received antimicrobial drugs, medical reason for catheterization, duration of catheterization, and length of hospital stay were not associated with biofilm formation patterns of bacterial isolates in this study ().

3.4. Antimicrobial-Resistance Profile of Bacterial Isolates

All bacterial isolates were 100% resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and cephalexin. Gram-positive bacterial isolates have shown increased resistance to amoxicillin clavulanic acid (66.7%), tetracycline (67%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) (75%). Furthermore, resistance of these Gram-positive isolates was seen to erythromycin, oxacillin, and gentamicin, each accounting for 92% and 100% resistance to penicillin (Table 4). Similarly, Gram-negative isolates had higher resistance to amoxicillin clavulanic acid (66.7%), SXT (76%), gentamicin (80.1%), and tetracycline (81.0%) (Table 5).

Table 4: Antimicrobial-resistance pattern of Gram-positive bacteria isolated from urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, from February to August 2016.
Table 5: Antimicrobial-resistance pattern of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, from February to August 2016.

When all levels of biofilm-forming (strong, moderate, and weak) uropathogenic bacteria were brought together, those formers had higher antimicrobial resistance compared with nonbiofilm formers to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (74.4% vs. 36.4%), ciprofloxacin (46.5% vs. 9.1%), ceftriaxone, and gentamicin with a value of less than 0.05. However, in the remaining antimicrobial agents tested including nitrofurantoin, there was no significant difference in their action among biofilm and nonbiofilm former bacteria as shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Antimicrobial-resistance patterns between biofilm and nonbiofilm former bacterial isolates from urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, 2016.

Multidrug-resistant features to different categories of antimicrobials were found among twenty-seven (62.8%) of biofilm-forming bacterial isolates with the majority of the drugs being commonly prescribed antimicrobials in this study area (Table 7).

Table 7: Multiple-drug resistant patterns of biofilm-forming bacterial uropathogens isolated from inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, from February to August 2016.

4. Discussion

Urinary catheterization is one of the routine procedures used among patients through flexible tubes in healthcare facilities. As a result, catheter-associated UTI is becoming one of the major hospital-acquired infections reported globally. Its increased use in various cases and longer duration of catheterization allows the bacteria to colonize and adhere the urinary tract system [1, 15]. The bacteria in the process can infect the system to increase in prolonging hospital length of stay and ultimately increases burden and health care costs [14, 15]. Therefore, the present study was conducted to assess the distribution of catheter-associated bacterial pathogens, their biofilm formation capability, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC.

The spectrum of bacterial pathogens causing UTI may vary with time, the patient population, and study area. However, in most of the cases, Gram-negative bacteria were reported as common bacterial isolates [15, 30]. Similarly, in this study, Gram-negative bacteria were found to be the dominant etiologic agents (76.7%) of all bacterial isolates. Other researchers have also reported similar results [15, 2123, 3133].

In this study, the common uropathogenic bacterial species isolated were E. coli (31.6%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (23.3%). Similar studies have been reported elsewhere from Egypt [5], Kenya [34], and Bosnia [33] and three studies in Ethiopia [21, 22, 32]. The predominance of these bacteria in the gut as normal flora may result in an infection of the urinary tract by contaminating the urethra and ascends into the bladder. Furthermore, these pathogens may be acquired by cross-contamination from near patients since there were averagely more than six patients per ward room. Moreover, hospital personnel and exposure to contaminated equipment or surfaces may risk catheter-associated infection [1, 12]. Contrary to E. coli finding as the leading etiology, other studies conducted in Sudan [35], Nigeria [36, 37], and in Ethiopia [21] reported that P. aeruginosa or S. aureus was the frequent bacterial isolate. This difference in distribution of bacterial isolates may be due to difference in study area, duration of catheterization, and sample size.

Despite there is a lack of standardization in the measurement of in vitro bacterial biofilm formation worldwide, the feature of bacteria adherent to form biofilm can be appreciated by cultivation of bacteria on a plastic polystyrene microtiter plate [27, 29]. In the current study, about 80% of all bacterial isolates were capable to form biofilm formation with each of Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates to 81% and 75%, respectively. This finding is comparable with studies carried out in Iraq [6] and three studies in India [6, 38, 39] where 69–72% of bacterial isolates were biofilm formers. However, lower biofilm-forming bacteria than that in our finding were reported in Egypt with 59.1% [5].

In the current study, P. aeruginosa and Proteus spp. were 100% biofilm formers followed by E. coli (77.8%) and S. aureus (80%). Similar patterns of biofilm formation were reported in studies conducted in India [38, 39]. In contrast, a study carried out in Egypt reported that higher biofilm production was among CONS (57.1%) followed by Pseudomonas (50.0%), Klebsiella (44.4%), S. aureus (42.9%), and E. coli (31.6%) [5]. This difference in biofilm-formation patterns among bacterial isolates may be due to differences in strain types, number of bacterial isolates, sample sizes, geographic locations, and methodological variations to assess biofilm formation.

The problems of bacterial drug resistance were globally documented particularly in healthcare-associated infections, and it is becoming one of health-security concerns [3, 19, 40, 41]. In this study, nearly two-third bacterial isolates showed multiple-drug resistance. This finding is similar to previous reports that showed resistance to various categories of antimicrobial drugs including penicillin and tetracycline at various geographic locations elsewhere including in Ethiopia [21, 22, 32, 33, 37, 42]. The possible explanation for higher resistance of bacteria to those drugs may be widespread and indiscriminate use as well as its ease of accessibility over the counter in pharmacies, which can lead to a shift to increase in resistant microbes [19, 40, 41]. In this study, 54% of the patients were empirically treated with at least one of those commonly prescribed antimicrobials.

In this study, more than two-thirds of the isolates were resistant to SXT (76%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (66.7%), tetracycline (81.0%), and gentamicin (80.1%) among Gram-negative bacteria. Studies carried out in different locations reported resistance to SXT (87.3–100%), amoxacillin-clavulanic acid (86%), gentamicin (81–91%), and tetracycline (89.1–100%) [22, 30, 32, 33, 37, 42]. Moreover, the Gram-negative bacteria isolated in this study were resistance to ceftriaxone (54.7%) and ciprofloxacin (40.4%). This finding is comparable to reports from the previous studies conducted in Ethiopia [22]. However, higher resistance to cephalosporin and fluoroquinolones was reported from various studies in the range between 56–100% and 66.7–81.1%, respectively [30, 37, 4244]. This increase in resistance might result from poorly guided and frequent use of antimicrobial prophylaxis and empiric therapy with cephalosporin and fluoroquinolones in the last few years contributing to this likely rise in ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin resistance [1, 12]. Besides, the present study indicated that nitrofurantoin and amikacin had relatively low resistance to Gram-negative bacteria about 38.1%, and 19.1%, respectively. Thus, nitrofurantoin and amikacin are good choice for empirical management of catheter-associated UTIs in our setting.

All Gram-positive bacteria in this study were 100% resistant to penicillin G, ampicillin, amoxicillin, and cephalexin and 92% resistant to erythromycin and oxacillin. Similar observations were reported in some previous studies in the same study setting in Ethiopia [22, 32], Nigeria [37], and India [30]. On the other hand, the majority of the Gram-positive isolates were resistant to gentamicin (92%), SXT (75%) and tetracycline and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (each 67%). However, these bacteria were relatively less resistant to ciprofloxacin (33.3%) and ceftriaxone (50%). This may be in contrast with the previous report in Ethiopia that showed higher resistance to ciprofloxacin (100%) [32]. Hence, this research finding in our location may not guarantee future use of these drugs as the shift towards higher resistance may happen quickly.

In this study, catheterization for seven or more days was identified as a risk factor for development of bacteriuria among urinary catheterized inpatients of JUMC. Similar findings have been reported in various countries around the world [23, 31, 34, 4551] including Ethiopia [32]. This may be because the longer time the catheter remains in the urinary system, it is highly likely bacteria can colonize, accumulates in the residual urine in the bladder, adhere or aggregate, and form complex communities of bacterial species called biofilms [11, 20].

In this study, the overall biofilm-forming bacterial isolates had higher antimicrobial resistance than that of nonbiofilm formers to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (74.4% vs. 36.4%) and ciprofloxacin (46.5% vs. 9.1%), respectively. Similar studies carried out in different locations showed that biofilm formers have higher resistance features compared with those of nonbiofilm formers to amoxicillin clavulanic acid [19, 38, 52]. Moreover, multidrug resistance was observed among biofilm-forming bacterial isolates than their counter parts to amoxicillin and cephalexin. This higher antimicrobial resistance among biofilm former may emerge from increased properties of efflux mechanism. In addition, it may be also associated with higher plasmid transfer, modified target genes, and metabolic pathway that allow for resistance to antimicrobials [5, 11]. About two-third (62.8%) of the biofilm former isolates were multidrug resistant to at least three or more antimicrobials. This is an alarming record where selection of efficacious antimicrobial may need to be guided by culture-based methods and in vitro susceptibility studies.

5. Conclusions

This study revealed that the overall prevalence of catheter-associated bacteriuria was 39.8%, and the predominant bacterial isolates were Gram negative such as E. coli and Klebsiella spp. About 80% of bacterial isolates from catheter-associated UTI were biofilm formers. In addition, this study indicated that bacterial isolates had higher prevalence of resistance to commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. Relatively, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and amikacin seem to be useful against most isolated Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and can be used as drug of choice for the empirical management of catheter-associated UTIs. Awareness is required to minimize occurrence of biofilm-forming uropathogens among urinary catheterized patients by health professionals.

Data Availability

The raw data from inpatients used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


The funder is not involved in the manuscript writing, editing, approval, or decision to publish.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors were involved in the work and shaped this manuscript without the influence of supporting institution.


We are grateful to the Jimma University Medical Center Director and Administration for allowing us to conduct this research work. Our grateful thanks also go to all study participants in this research. We also acknowledge Dr. Getachew Seyoum for the help in editing this article. We would like to thank the School of Graduate Studies of Jimma University for financial support for this research.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1: distribution of biofilm formation pattern bacteria with respect to clinical profiles of inpatients of JUMC, Southwest Ethiopia, February to August 2016. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. C. V. Gould, C. A. Umscheid, R. K. Agarwal, G. Kuntz, D. A. Pegues, and Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), “Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. M. Hooton, S. F. Bradley, D. D. Cardenas et al., “Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the infectious diseases society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 625–663, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. ECDC, European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention on Annual Epidemiological Report on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections, ECDC, Stockholm, Sweden, 2014.
  4. L GreeneJ. Marx and S. Oriola, Guidelines to the Elimination of Catheter-Associated UTIs (CA-UTIs), APIC Guide, Arlington, TX, USA, 2008.
  5. N. Mahmoud, A. Abdallah, S. B. Elsayed, and M. M. Yassin, “Biofilm forming bacteria isolated from UTI, relation to catheterization and susceptibility to antibiotics,” International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 172–178, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. T. Salih and N. F. Al-ani, “Microbiological aspects in biofilm produced by some uropathogens isolated from patients with indwelling bladder catheters,” Rafidain Journal of Science, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Arnoldo, R. Migliavacca, L. Regattin et al., “Prevalence of urinary colonization by extended spectrum-beta-lactamase enterobacteriaceae among catheterized inpatients in Italian long term care facilities,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 124, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. I. Hidron, J. R. Edwards, J. Patel et al., “Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2006-2007,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 996–1011, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Melzer and C. Welch, “Outcomes in UK patients with hospital-acquired bacteraemia and the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 89, no. 1052, pp. 329–334, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. World health organization/WHO, Global Report on Antibiotic Resistance, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014,
  11. J. Mohammed, B. M. Abubakar, H. Yusuf et al., “Bacterial biofilm: a major challenge of catheterization,” Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 213–223, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. D. Maki and P. A. Tambyah, “Engineering out the risk of infection with urinary catheters,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 342–347, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. S. Stewart and J. William Costerton, “Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms,” The Lancet, vol. 358, no. 9276, pp. 135–138, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Clec’h, C. Schwebel, A. Français et al., “Does catheter-associated UTI increase mortality in critically ill patients?” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1367–1373, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. A. Tambyah, V. Knasinski, and D. G. Maki, “The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. V. D. Rosenthal, A. Dwivedy, M. E. Rodríguez Calderón et al., “Time-dependent analysis of length of stay and mortality due to urinary tract infections in ten developing countries: INICC findings,” Journal of Infection, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 136–141, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. WHO, Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: A First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care is Safer Care, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  18. WHO, Report on the Burden of Endemic Health Care-Associated Infection Worldwide Clean Care is Safer Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  19. A. G. Dusé, “Infection control in developing countries with particular emphasis on South Africa,” Southern African Journal of Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 37–41, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. J. G. Leid, “Bacterial biofilms resist key host defenses,” Microbe, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 66–70, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Melaku, M. Kibret, and B. Abera, “AntibioGram of nosocomial UTIs in Felege Hiwot referral hospital, Ethiopia,” African Health Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 134–139, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Z. Tesfahunegn, D. Asrat, Y. Woldeamanuel, and K. Estifanos, “Hospital acquired surgical site and catheter related UTIs among patients admitted in Mekelle Hospital, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Medical Journal, vol. 47, pp. 117–127, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Tissot, S. Limat, C. Cornette, and G. Capellier, “Risk factors for catheter-associated bacteriuria in a medical intensive care unit,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 0260–0262, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. C. King, L. Garcia Alvarez, A. Holmes, L. Moore, T. Galletly, and P. Aylin, “Risk factors for healthcare-associated urinary tract infection and their applications in surveillance using hospital administrative data: a systematic review,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 219–226, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Cheesbrough, “District laboratory practice in tropical countries,” in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, pp. 62–115, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  26. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance Standards for Antibiotics susceptibility Testing, Twenty-First Informational Supplement, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, USA, 2014.
  27. G. D. Christensen, W. A. Simpson, J. J Younger et al., “Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 996–1006, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. M. Kwasny and T. J. Opperman, “Static biofilm cultures of Gram-positive pathogens grown in a microtiter format used for anti-biofilm drug discovery,” in Current Protocols in Pharmacology, vol. 50, pp. 1–27, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Stepanović, D. Vuković, V. Hola et al., “Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci,” APMIS, vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 891–899, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. Bouza, R. S. Juan, P. Muñoz, A. Voss, and J. Kluytmans, “A European perspective on nosocomial urinary tract infections II. Report on incidence, clinical characteristics and outcome (ESGINI-04 study),” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 532–542, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Sayal, K. Singh, and P. Devi, “Detection of bacterial biofilm in patients with indwelling urinary catheters,” CIBTech Journal of Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 9–16, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  32. L. Teshager, D. Asrat, S. Gebre-Selassie, and S. Tamiru, “Assessment of bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of catheter-associated UTIs in comparison with non-catheterized UTIs,” Ethiopian Medical Journal, vol. 46, pp. 55–62, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Piljic, H. PorobicJahic, D. Piljic, S. Ahmetagic, and R. Jahic, “Chateter-associated urinary tract infections in adults,” Materia Socio Medica, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 182–186, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. K. I. Hannah, R. Gunturu, M. Joyce, and O. Theresa, “The incidence of nosocomial UTIs: kenyatta national hospital-intensive care unit,” Barat Interdisciplinary Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 12–21, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. Ahmed and S. Mohsin, “Pattern of nosocomial urinary tract infections among Sudanese patients,” British Microbiology Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 53–61, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. I. U. Nwankwo, I. U. Godwin, and E. Nwankwo, “Bacterial profile in patients with indwelling urinary catheters in federal medical center, Umuahia, Abia state, Nigeria,” Sky Journal of Microbiological Research, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 28–31, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Taiwo and A. Aderounmu, “Catheter associated UTI: etiologic agents and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Ladoke Akintola university teaching hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria,” African Journal of Biomedical Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 141–148, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. P. Ponnusamy, V. Natarajan, and M. Sevanan, “In vitro biofilm formation by uropathogenic Escherichia coli and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 210–213, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Golia, V. Hittinahalli, S. Karjigi, and M. Reddy, “Correlation between biofilm formation of uropathogenic E. coli and its antibiotic resistance pattern,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 166–175, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. G. S. Tansarli, S. Athanasiou, and M. E. Falagas, “Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility of enterobacteriaceae causing urinary tract infections in africa,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 3628–3639, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. Eggleston, R. Zhang, and R. J. Zeckhauser, “The global challenge of antimicrobial resistance: insights from economic analysis,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 3141–3149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Mohiuddin, J. A. Haq, M. M. Hoq, and F. Huq, “Microbiology of nosocomial infection in tertiary hospitals of Dhaka city and its impact,” Bangladesh Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 32–38, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. D.-s. Xie, R.-p. Lai, and S.-f. Nie, “Surveys of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in a university hospital intensive care unit in China,” Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 296-297, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. N. Madani, V. D. Rosenthal, T. Dendane, K. Abidi, A. A. Zeggwagh, and R. Abouqal, “Health-care associated infections rates, length of stay, and bacterial resistance in an intensive care unit of Morocco: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC),” International Archives of Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 29, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Leone, J. Albanèse, G. Franck, S. Christophe, and B. Karine, Risk Factors of Nosocomial Catheter-Associated UTI in a Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
  46. N. Bhatia, M. K. Daga, S. Garg, and S. K. Prakash, “Urinary catheterization in medical wards,” Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–90, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. D. S. G. Kulkarni, D. S. H. Talib, D. M. Naik, and D. A. Kale, “Profile of urinary tract infection in indwelling catheterized patients,” IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 132–138, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. N. Taneja, S. Appanwar, M. Biswal, B. Mohan, M. M. Aggarwal, and A. K. Mandal, “P018 : a prospective study of catheter associated UTIs and rationalisation of antibiotic use in a tertiary care centre in North India,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 18, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. J. H. Lee, S. W. Kim, B. I. Yoon, U.-S. Ha, D. W. Sohn, and Y.-H. Cho, “Factors that affect nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in intensive care units: 2-year experience at a single center,” Korean Journal of Urology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. Temiz, N. Piskin, H. Aydemir et al., “Factors associated with catheter-associated urinary tract infections and the effects of other concomitant nosocomial infections in intensive care units,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 344–349, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. O. Anthony, O. T. Oluwalana, O. Bolatito, O. Olaniran, O. Adesola, and O. Titus, “Urinary pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility in patients with indwelling urinary catheter,” Sierra Leone Journal of Biomedical Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. K. M. Shahidu, A. Asma, F. Farahnaaz, and A. Sunjukta, “Determination of antibiotic resistance pattern of biofilm producing pathogenic bacteria associated with UTI,” International Journal of Drug Development and Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 312–319, 2013. View at Google Scholar