International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 2716584 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2716584

Anupama Sapkota, Aishwarya Thapa, Anupa Budhathoki, Muskan Sainju, Prativa Shrestha, Sagar Aryal, "Isolation, Characterization, and Screening of Antimicrobial-Producing Actinomycetes from Soil Samples", International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2020, Article ID 2716584, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2716584

Isolation, Characterization, and Screening of Antimicrobial-Producing Actinomycetes from Soil Samples

Academic Editor: Clemencia Chaves-López
Received16 Oct 2019
Accepted10 Mar 2020
Published27 Mar 2020

Abstract

Actinomycetes are Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic fungus-like filamentous bacteria which remain on the top of the natural antibiotic producers. Due to the climatic and geographical diversity of Nepal, a wide range of microorganisms with potent source of antimicrobials are available. The objective of this study was to isolate, identify, and screen the potential antimicrobial-producing actinomycetes from soils covering different altitude range of Nepal. Forty-one isolates of actinomycetes were isolated from 11 soil samples collected from different locations in Nepal with altitude ranging from 1500 to 4380 meters. The isolates were identified on the basis of morphological study, different sugar utilization, protein utilization, and hydrolysis tests. They were also characterized on the basis of temperature and pH. Primary screening for antimicrobial activity was carried out against several test organisms: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) by the perpendicular streaking method, and secondary screening was carried out by the agar well diffusion method using ethyl acetate for solvent extraction. 70.7% of the isolates were identified as Streptomyces spp., 19.5% as Nocardia spp., and 9.5% as Micromonospora spp. 43.34% of actinomycete isolates was found to be potent antimicrobial producers from the primary screening among which 46.34% were effective against Gram-positive and 12.19% against Gram-negative test organisms. Isolate C7 (Micromonospora spp.) showed the best broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity during secondary screening. A total of 11 different types of pigments were observed to be produced by different isolates, of which, the yellow pigment was the most prominent. The association between elevation, pH, and pigment with the antimicrobial production was found to be insignificant. This finding can be of importance for further investigation towards obtaining broad-spectrum antibiotics for therapeutic purpose.

1. Introduction

Actinomycetes are the heterogeneous group of microorganisms, which have thread-like filaments in the soil [1]. They are extensively distributed in natural habitat and entailed in different biological and metabolic processes, for instance, useful for producing extracellular enzymes [2]. In addition, almost 90% of actinomycetes genera have been isolated from soil, which are innocuous for different fields: industrial and pharmaceutical sectors [3]. Besides, actinomycetes produce instinctive pigments on the media which are red, green, yellow, brown, and black in color [4]. It has been posited that Streptomyces are putative organisms that encompasses the production of antibiotics followed by Nocardia and Micromonospora, which are inferior in nature when compared to Streptomyces in the ability to produce antibiotics [5].

Researchers have done many studies on isolation and screening of antimicrobial-producing actinomycetes. It has propounded that most of the novel antibiotics have been found by screening of isolates from soil [6]. However, due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens, antimicrobial resistant is on the rise, which is pernicious to the health of the large population of community. Moreover, it has been a serious problem in the treatment of infectious disease, so, the expatiating on this topic is needed to discover new novel antibiotics that help in controlling the problem [7, 8].

As we know, Nepal is a geographically diverse country which is divided into three regions: the mountain region, the hilly region, and the terai region. Based on their variation in altitude and soil type and their contents, there is a possibility of observing similar microflora, which conjectures to vary the distribution of antimicrobial-producing actinomycetes [9]. So, the present study was done to isolate and screen the antimicrobial-producing actinomycetes from soil samples, which were collected from different locations with varying altitudes starting from 1500 masl to 4380 masl of Nepal. Thus, this project helps in analyzing and reporting distribution of the antimicrobial activities of microorganisms collected from sample sites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil Sample Collection

Eleven soil samples from different altitude range of Nepal (organically cultivated fields, rhizospheric area, and river banks) were processed during the research. The samples were named with alphabet A, B, and so on with increasing order of their altitude. Similarly, the isolates from each respective sample were labeled as A1, A2, and so on. The soil was collected within the depth of 10–12.5 cm. The samples were collected in sterile polythene bags, closely tightened, and were taken to the laboratory.

2.2. Isolation of Actinomycetes

One gram of soil sample was taken and serially diluted up to 10−2 using distilled water as a diluent. The mixture was shaken vigorously using a vortex; 0.1 ml of each dilution was placed on starch casein agar (composition: soluble starch: 10 g, K2HPO4: 2 g, KNO3: 2 g, casein: 0.3 g, MgSO4.7H2O: 0.05 g, CaCO3: 0.02 g, FeSO4.7H2O: 0.01 g, agar: 15 g, and filtered sea water: 1000 ml and pH: 7.0 ± 0.1), and the inoculum was spread properly using a sterile glass spreader. The inoculated plates were allowed to stand at room temperature for 5–10 minutes to allow the liquid to be absorbed and were incubated at 28°C for 7 days.

2.3. Identification

Identification of the actinomycetes was done on the basis of macroscopic and microscopic examination and physiological tests as suggested by Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd Edition, Vol 5, The Actinobacteria, Part A.

2.4. Macroscopic Characterization

The isolated actinomycetes were observed for aerial mycelium, submerged mycelium, color, and diffusible pigments.

2.5. Microscopic Observation

Microscopic examination was performed by cover slip and Gram-staining method. Sterile cover slip was inserted into the solidified starch casein agar medium plate at an inclination of 45° with the agar surface. Actinomycete isolate was inoculated along the surface of the medium that meets the surface of the buried cover slip. It was incubated at 28°C for four days. The cover slip was removed using sterile forceps and placed on an individual clean glass slide, which were then observed at oil immersion objective [10].

2.6. Biochemical Tests

For all the isolates, a loopful of colony of pure culture of about 7 days of incubation was placed in starch casein broth and incubated at 28°C for 4 days. After the appearance of turbidity, the culture suspension was used for different sugar utilization tests, protein utilization test, and catalase and oxidase tests. Different hydrolysis tests, namely, starch hydrolysis, casein hydrolysis, lipid hydrolysis, and gelatin hydrolysis tests, were performed.

3. Primary Screening

Primary screening of actinomycetes was performed on the Mueller–Hinton agar medium employing the perpendicular streak method. In the sterile agar medium, the pure isolate of actinomycetes was streaked along the diameter of the plate. The plate was incubated at 28°C for 7 days. Pure colony of test bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), E. coli (ATCC 25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603) was transferred into fresh nutrient broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours until the visible turbidity. After adjusting the turbidity equal to that of 0.5 McFarland with the cell count of 1.5 × 108, the test organisms were streaked perpendicular to the isolate. The plates were further incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, and the antimicrobial activity was estimated from the zone of inhibition of test organism [11].

4. Secondary Screening

4.1. Production of Crude Extract

Based on the results of primary screening, each isolate was subjected to submerged fermentation in the ISP2 medium (composition: yeast extract: 4 g, malt extract: 10 g, dextrose: 4 g, agar: 15 g, and filtered sea water: 1000 ml and pH: 7.3) and Kuster’s agar (composition: glycerol: 10 g, casein: 0.3 g, KNO3: 2 g, K2HPO4: 2 g, soluble starch: 0.5 g, asparagine: 0.1 g, FeSO4.7H2O: 0.01 g, CaCO3: 0.02 g, MgSO4.7H2O: 0.05 g, agar: 15 g, and filtered sea water: 1000 ml and pH: 7.0 ± 0.1) in a shaker incubator at 120 rpm for 7 days at 28°C. The extract was separated by centrifugation at 13000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was mixed with equal volume of ethyl acetate and left overnight. Subsequently, the upper layer of ethyl acetate was again separated and evaporated at 40°C. The concentrated solvent was used for assay [12].

4.2. Agar Well Diffusion Method

Five wells of 6 mm diameter were made on the agar plate with the help of sterile cork borers. The test organism was swabbed on the agar surface and 100 μL of crude extract was poured in the wells. Ethyl acetate and antibiotic discs (oxacillin, nitrofurantoin, and ciprofloxacin) were used for negative and positive control, respectively. The plates were allowed to stand for few minutes and incubated at 37°C without inverting for 24 hours.

5. Results

In this study, 11 soil samples collected from different locations in Nepal with varying altitude of 1500 to 4380 m. The description of soil samples with the number of isolates is presented in Table 1.


Soil sampleAltitude (m)LocationPhysical characteristics of soilNo. of actinomycete isolatesNo. of active actinomycete isolates
pHColorConsistency

A1500Sundarijal7.56GreyMoist83
B2000Kalinchowk6.97BrownMoist00
C2200Nagarkot6.79Light brownMoist44
D12156Chandragiri6.86BrownDry11
D22485Chandragiri6.72BrownDry00
E1750Chitlang6.51BlackDry83
G3800Khopra6.10BrownDry00
H2743Jomsom5.50GreyDry135
I3500Tipling5.54BrownDry00
J3710Muktinath5.73GreyDry63
K4380Gosainkunda5.83BlackMoist10

A total of 41 isolates were then identified as Streptomyces spp. (29 isolates), Nocardia spp. (8 isolates), and Micromonospora spp. (4 isolates) on the basis of microscopic observation and biochemical tests, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2.


SampleCatalaseOxidaseGelatinaseAmylaseLipaseCaseinase

A1++
A3
A4++
A5+++
A6+++
A7+++
A8++++
A11
C1++
C2+
C7++++
C8+++
D1++++
E1++++
E3++++
E4++
E5++++
E7+++
E8++++
E14++++
E15+++++
H1++++++
H2++++++
H3++++
H4++++++
H5+++++
H6++++++
H7++++++
H11+++++
H12++++
H13++++++
H15+++++
H16+++++
H17++++++
J1+++
J4+++++
J6++++
J8++++
J10++++
J12++++
K1++++

Most isolates gave different pigmentation, as shown in Figure 2. The color of colonies varied accordingly from yellow (48%), brown (10%), gray (13%), and greenish brown (6%) and 3% had blue, light violet, greenish yellow, blackish grey, grayish white, light pink, and greyish black to white pigments. Figure 3 shows the production of pigment by A5, A6, A7, and A8 isolates.

The identified isolates were then subjected to primary screening as presented in Table 3. Out of 41 pure isolates, 19 isolates showed antimicrobial activity against the test organisms during primary screening by the perpendicular streaking method. 12.19% of total isolates was found to be active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative test organisms.


SampleIdentified asZone of inhibition (mm)
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923)E. coli (ATCC 25922)Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)

A1Nocardia spp.0000
A3Streptomyces spp.0000
A4Streptomyces spp.0000
A5Streptomyces spp.0000
A6Streptomyces spp.9000
A7Streptomyces spp.14000
A8Micromonospora spp.8000
A11Streptomyces spp.0000
C1Streptomyces spp.2019180
C2Streptomyces spp.3010100
C7Micromonospora spp.159120
C8Streptomyces spp.1815100
D1Streptomyces spp.3000
E1Streptomyces spp.0000
E3Nocardia spp.0000
E4Nocardia spp.1510100
E5Streptomyces spp.0000
E7Streptomyces spp.10000
E8Streptomyces spp.0000
E14Streptomyces spp.8000
E15Streptomyces spp.0000
H1Streptomyces spp.0000
H2Streptomyces spp.14000
H3Nocardia spp.0000
H4Nocardia spp.0000
H5Streptomyces spp.0000
H6Streptomyces spp.20000
H7Streptomyces spp.0000
H11Streptomyces spp.0000
H12Nocardia spp.11000
H13Streptomyces spp.0000
H15Nocardia spp.10000
H16Streptomyces spp.26000
H17Streptomyces spp.0000
J1Streptomyces spp.0000
J4Micromonospora spp.0000
J6Streptomyces spp.15000
J8Nocardia spp.0000
J10Nocardia spp.10000
J12Streptomyces spp.15000
K1Streptomyces spp.0000

Among 19 active isolates, 13 isolates showed zone of inhibition against the test organisms in the secondary screening, as shown in Table 4. All of the 13 isolates showed activity against Staphylococcus aureus, 5 against Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 7 against E. coli. 7 isolates produced antimicrobial activity against more than one test organism.


SampleIdentified asTest organisms
S. aureusE. coliK. pneumoniaeP. aeruginosa

A7Streptomyces spp.13000
C1Streptomyces spp.1515150
C2Streptomyces spp.1012140
C7Micromonospora spp.1725180
C8Streptomyces spp.2018160
E4Nocardia spp.2016110
E7Streptomyces spp.15000
E14Streptomyces spp.8000
H15Nocardia spp.10000
H16Streptomyces spp.10000
J6Streptomyces spp.191700
J10Nocardia spp.14000
J12Streptomyces spp.141200

6. Discussion

The study was carried out to discover the antimicrobial-producing actinomycetes from various geographical regions with altitudinal variation in Nepal. A total of 11 soil samples from locations with altitude ranging from 1500 to 4380 masl were studied. Forty-one actinomycete strains were isolated and identified which were genus Streptomyces (70.7%), Nocardia (19.5%), and Micromonospora (9.5%).

The highest number of actinomycetes was isolated from soil sample collected from Jomsom. The survival of the microorganisms even in former harsh and challenging habitation might be due to their adaptation to the environment and ability to produce resistant structures such as spores [9].

All the isolates were slow-growing, aerobic, glabrous, and folded with diverse colored aerial and substrate mycelia. Most of them produced pigments, namely, brown, yellow, blue, bluish green, and purple, on starch casein agar (SCA). In a study, amongst 7 different media used, the isolate AR-ITM02 (Streptomyces spp.) showed pigment-producing ability on SCA only which may be due to enough amount of nutrient available in the media [13]. In another study, 5 different pigments like green, orange, white, yellow, and brown were extracted from actinomycete isolates and were purified and tested for antimicrobial activity which showed that all extracted pigments inhibited growth of E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Salmonella typhi except the yellow pigment which showed inhibitory effect against only Gram-negative bacteria [14].

In the current study, when the total isolates were subjected to primary screening, 46.34% were found to be active against the test organisms. All active isolates showed antibiotic activity against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), whereas only 5 of them showed activity against E. coli (ATCC 25922) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603). None showed activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853). In a study, among 117 actinomycete isolates, antibacterial activity was observed in only 12.82% of the isolates [15]. In another study, 6 out of 20 strains showed activity against Gram-positive test organisms and only 4 strains showed activity against Gram-negative organisms [16]. Similarly, out of 106 isolates, only 36 showed activity against test organisms among which 2 were active against only Gram-negative organism, 8 against Gram-positive organisms, and 26 against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms [17].

According to Shirling and Gottlieb [18], the reason for different sensitivity between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria could be explained with respect to the morphological differences between these microorganisms. Gram-negatives have an outer polysaccharide membrane making the cell wall impermeable to lipophilic solutes; however, the Gram-positives have only an outer peptidoglycan layer which is not an effective permeability barrier.

During secondary screening of active isolates using the ethyl acetate extract, only 13 isolates showed zone of inhibition. In a study, the purified ethyl acetate extract of culture broth of S. sannanensis SU118 led to the recovery of a potent antibacterial agent active against Gram-positive bacteria [19]. In another study, the ethyl acetate: methanol extract was found to be more effective with antimicrobial activities than those extracted using the water solvent. This might be due to the solubilization of the active compound in the organic solvent compared to the aqueous solvent and also due to the increased concentration of the metabolite in the solvent-extracted mixture [20].

The active isolates showed different activity during primary and secondary screening. According to Bushell et al. [21], during the screening of secondary metabolite, actinomycete isolates which show antibiotic activity on agar but not in liquid culture are often encountered. This might be due to the differences in the substrate composition of the culture media, inoculum size, or incubation time in primary screening and submerged fermentation. It may also be possible that the active compounds released by actinomycetes become inactive or chemically modified or bind to the component of broth. Also, many of the actinomycetes are poor fermenters [9, 22].

Different environmental constrains and growth conditions influence the growth and diversity of actinomycetes, temperature being one of them. It has profound effect in the physiology, morphology, sporulation, biochemistry, and also antimicrobial metabolite production of organisms. In the study, the optimum temperature for the growth of actinomycetes was found to be in the mesophilic range.

In this study, 78.04%, 73.17%, 80.48%, and 41.46% of the isolates produced gelatinase, caseinase, amylase, and lipase, respectively. 78.04% of the isolates were able to show more than one enzymatic activity. In a similar study conducted by Jeffrey [23], approximately 98.4% of the total isolates produced one or more enzymatic activity. The potential of actinomycetes to secrete broad-range enzymes may have resulted from the natural selection in order to survive in a competing environment [24].

7. Conclusions

An attempt to isolate different strains of actinomycetes possessing antimicrobial activity from different soil samples of Nepal was made. Forty-one isolates were obtained from 11 soil samples and identified as Streptomyces spp. (70.7%), Micromonospora spp. (19.5%), and Nocardia spp. (9.5%). The best broad-spectrum antibiotic activity from secondary screening was shown by isolate C7. Seven isolates were able to show broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. At present, there is a need to find out novel antimicrobial-producing strains as the pre-existing drugs have failed due to the development of resistance among the microorganisms. The present study is also a little contribution towards this need. The isolates which showed broad-spectrum activity against the test microorganisms can be considered as candidates in regards of searching for potential antimicrobial compounds.

Data Availability

Further data related to this study can be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

AS and AT designed the project. AS, AT, AB, MS, and PS carried out the experiments, participated in the data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. SA helped to design the study, manage necessary arrangements during laboratory investigations, and supervised the complete study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Department of Microbiology, St. Xavier’s College, Maitighar, Kathmandu, Nepal, for providing the laboratory facilities.

References

  1. A. A. Bhatti, S. Haq, and R. A. Bhat, “Actinomycetes benefaction role in soil and plant health,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 111, pp. 458–467, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Ghorbani-Nasrabadi, R. Greiner, H. A. Alikhani, J. Hamedi, and B. Yakhchali, “Distribution of actinomycete in different soil ecosystems and effect of media composition on extracellular phosphatase activity,” Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 223–236, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. M. A. Bawazir and M. Shantaram, “Ecology and distribution of actinomycetes in nature—a review,” International Journal of Current Research, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 71664–71668, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Narain, S. Abhay, S. Sen, S. Mondal, N. Manigandan, and B. J. Yogesh, “Study and classification of red pigmented actinomycetes from the Bannerghatta national park soil,” Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 2320–5083, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. Manandhar and S. Sharma, Practical Approach to Microbiology, National Book Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal, 3rd edition, 2017.
  6. A. Baniya, S. Singh, M. Singh et al., “Isolation and screening of antibiotics producing Streptomyces spp from the soil collected around the root of Alnus nepalensis from Godawari,” Nepal Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Ganesan, R. H. A. David, A. D. Reegan et al., “Isolation and molecular characterization of actinomycetes with antimicrobial and mosquito larvicidal properties,” Beni-Seuf University Juournal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 209–217, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. C. Rotich, E. Magir, C. Bii, and N. Maina, “Bio-prospecting for broad spectrum antibiotic producing actinomycetes isolated from virgin soils in Kericho county, Kenya,” Advances in Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. D. Gurung, C. Sherpa, V. P. Agrawal, and B. Lekhak, “Isolation and characterization of antibacterial actinomycetes from soil samples of Kalapatthar, mount Everest region,” Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 10, pp. 173–182, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Goodfellow, P. Kampfer, H. J. Dusse et al., Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2012.
  11. M. Rai, N. Bhattrai, N. Dhungel, and P. K. Mandal, “Isolation of antibiotic producing actinomycetes from soil of Kathmandu valley and assessment of their antimicrobial activities,” International Journal of Microbiology and Allied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 22–26, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. Yadav, U. T. Shrestha, K. B. Tiwari, G. S. Sahukal, and V. P. Agrawal, “Streptomycin-like antibiotic from Streptomyces spp isolated from mount Everest base camp,” Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, pp. 73–75, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. S. Parmar, C. Singh, P. Saini, and A. Kumar, “Isolation and screening of antimicrobial and extracellular pigment producing actinomycetes from Chambal territory of Madya Pradesh region, India,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 157–160, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. Tandale, M. Khandagale, R. Palaskar, and S. Kulkarni, “Isolation of pigment producing actinomycetes from soil and screening their antibacterial activities against different microbial isolates,” International Journal of Current Research in Life Sciences, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 2397–2402, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  15. N. Kumar, K. S. Ravi, S. K. Mishra, A. K. Singh, and U. C. Pachouri, “Isolation and screening of soil actinomycetes as source of antibiotics active against bacteria,” International Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 12–16, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Wahab, S. Shumaila, S. A. Subhan, S. T. Ali, and T. Y. Mujahid, “Isolation and identification of actinomycetes isolated from Karachi soil and screening of antimicrobial compounds,” International Journal of Current Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 12760–12765, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  17. B. Pandey, P. Ghimire, and V. P. Agrawal, “Studies on the antibacterial activity of the actinomycetes isolated from the Khumbu region of Nepal,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 12, pp. 421–423, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  18. E. B. Shirling and D. Gottlieb, Methods, Classification, Identification and Description of Genera and Species, vol. 2, The William and Wilkin company, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1966.
  19. L. S. Singh, H. Sharma, and N. C. Talukdar, “Production of potent antimicrobial agent by actinomycete Streptomyces sannanensis strain SU118 isolated from phoomdi in Loktak lake of Manipur, India,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 14, p. 278, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Nurkanto, H. Julistiono, A. Agusta, and W. Sjamsuridzal, “Screening antimicrobial activity of actinomycetes isolated from Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia,” Makara Journal of Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. E. Bushell, J. Smith, and H. C. Lynch, “A Physiological model for the control of erythromycin production in batch and cyclic fed batch culture,” Microbiology, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 475–480, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Pandey, I. Ali, K. S. Butola, T. Chatterji, and V. Singh, “Isolation and characterization of actinomycetes from soil and evaluation of antibacterial activities of actinomycetes against pathogens,” International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  23. L. S. H. Jeffrey, “Isolation, characterization and identification of actinomycetes from agriculture soils at Semongok, Sarawak,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 3697–3702, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. E. Boroujeni, A. Das, K. Prashanthi, S. Suryan, and S. Bhattacharya, “Enzymatic screening and random amplified polymorphic DNA finger printing of soil Streptomycetes isolated from Wayanad district in Kerala, India,” Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 12, pp. 43–50, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Anupama Sapkota et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views9486
Downloads2073
Citations

Related articles