International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8841709 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8841709

Vincent Khan Payne, Tsonang Tassongwa Florence Cécile, Yamssi Cedric, Noumedem Anangmo Christelle Nadia, Ouaba José, "Risk Factors Associated with Prevalence of Candida albicans, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Trichomonas vaginalis among Women at the District Hospital of Dschang, West Region, Cameroon", International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2020, Article ID 8841709, 6 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8841709

Risk Factors Associated with Prevalence of Candida albicans, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Trichomonas vaginalis among Women at the District Hospital of Dschang, West Region, Cameroon

Academic Editor: Joseph Falkinham
Received21 Apr 2020
Revised25 Jun 2020
Accepted10 Jul 2020
Published05 Aug 2020

Abstract

Background. Vaginal or genitourinary infections are a major cause of morbidity, sterility, and increase in the vulnerability to cancers and HIV/AIDS infection. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of vaginal infections of C. albicans, G. vaginalis, and T. vaginalis among women in the locality of Dschang, West Region of Cameroon. Method. A prospective study was carried out in the District Hospital of Dschang. After obtaining informed consent, one thousand and one (1001) samples of vaginal swabs were collected. Biological diagnosis was carried out on fresh samples, Gram stained, and then cultivated in Sabouraud agar in a Petri dish, in order to isolate and identify the various infectious agents. Results. Five hundred and twenty-five (525) women were diagnosed positive, hosting at least one of these microorganisms, making an overall prevalence of 52.44%. Two hundred and fifty-six (256) women (25.57%) were infected with C. albicans, and 171 (17.08%) with G. vaginalis. Ninety-five (9.49%) were infected with both C. albicans and G. vaginalis, 2 (0.20%) with C. albicans and T. vaginalis, and 1 (0.1%) with G. vaginalis and T. vaginalis. Conclusion. Drastic measures should be taken in order to improve life styles to regress the frequency of these infections. Results obtained in this study, will help to educate and shed more light on the prevalence of vaginal infections in the West Region of Cameroon.

1. Introduction

Vaginal organ infections have an important socioeconomic impact in developing countries in general and in Cameroon in particular. They represent one of the major sources of morbidity and sterility and increase the exposure to cancers and HIV/AIDS infection [1]. Vaginitis and vaginosis are the most important among infectious diseases found in medical centres today. There are many sources of morbidities (sterility, abortions, and premature deliveries) among women of productivity age [2].

Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Candida albicans are responsible for 90% of vaginitis in Iran [1]. Vaginitis is a local inflammatory process taking place at the level of the vaginal cavity, which is due to the presence of one or more infectious agents (bacteria, parasites, fungi, etc.). Vaginitis can either be specific or nonspecific. For specific vaginitis, the pathogenic agent in many cases has exogenous origin. The reaction is made visible by a purulent discharge in which the pathogenic agent can be identified. Most of the time, vaginitis are caused by Trichomonas vaginalis or Candida albicans, but many other microorganisms, such as commensal microorganisms (Lactobacillus or Gram + Bacillus) can bring about the same kind of pathology in certain cases [3]. Bacterial vaginosis (normally without inflammation) comes from an imbalance of the vaginal flora with the shift of lactobacilli by anaerobic commensal microorganisms. This disequilibrium leads to the loss of lactobacilli and to a change of vaginal pH.

Bacterial vaginosis is more frequent in sexually active women. This vaginosis can either be symptomatic or asymptomatic [4]. Genital infections have become a huge health problem in Cameroon with devastating consequences. Premature deaths, destabilization of the family, increased number of orphans, increased medical and funeral expenses, increased absenteeism from work, decreased productivity and massive loss of jobs, reduction of qualified manpower, and increased misery and poverty are very glaring. Studies on vagina infection have been conducted in several countries [2], but there is insufficient data from Cameroon, with regard to prevalence and associated risk factors among women. There is a dearth of knowledge on the aetiology of genital infections in Dschang. Thus, in line with global prevention efforts, the present investigation was undertaken to determine the risk factors associated with prevalence of Candida albicans, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Trichomonas vaginalis among women of reproductive age at the District Hospital of Dschang.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Presentation of the Area of Study

This study was cross-sectional and was conducted in the District Hospital of Dschang in 2018, targeting women coming for consultation. It received daily about 40 women from different sociocultural backgrounds for consultation.

2.2. Sampling and Target Population

Our sample was made up of 1001 women between 15 and 55 years of age, who manifested, or not, the symptoms of vaginal infections. Women on imidazole antibiotics and antifungal were excluded from the study, as well as those who had sexual intercourse a day before or who did their personal hygiene (douching) and those in their menstrual period. The questionnaire given to these patients helped us to identify the risk factors. Such data included the age, area of residence, religion, tribe, marital status, type of marriage, occupation and that of spouse, the number of sexual partners, whether or not a patient has suffered from a genital infection in the past, and the presence or absence of discharge.

2.2.1. Swab

Cervicovaginal swabs were collected from each woman through insertion of a sterile speculum into the posterior side wall of the vagina. The individual was requested to lie down in gynaecological position on a bed previously disinfected, with the help of two swabs, one of which allowed us to take secretion samples at the level of the cervix and the second one on the vaginal wall [5].

The macroscopic observation of the vaginal organ helped us to detect some abnormalities on the vagina and also to appreciate the colour and the leucorrhoea consistency, and finally a drop of secretion was placed on a NaOH solution at 10%. Microscopic observations were done by a direct microscopy, Gram staining, and finally culture using Petri dishes.

2.2.2. Fresh State and T. vaginalis Identification

T. vaginalis was identified by morphological characteristics as well as the mobility as described by Cheesbrough [6].

2.2.3. Identification of Gardnerella vaginalis

A current international consensus establishes the diagnosis of Gardnerella when three of the following criteria are met [3]:(i)Vaginal pH greater than 4, 5.(ii)Positive test of NaOH.(iii)Presence of clue cells in microscopic examination.(iv)Malodorous and adherent leucorrhoea [4]

2.2.4. Isolation and Identification of Candida albicans

Sabouraud agar medium was used for isolation and the filamentation test for identification, according to Catalan et al. [3].

2.3. Parameters Studied
2.3.1. Prevalence

The prevalence (P) was calculated using the formulawhere P is prevalence.

2.3.2. Statistical Analysis

The results were analysed with the statistical analysis program R.

3. Results

Three types of microorganisms, causative agents of vaginitis, and vaginosis were identified. Of 1001 samples collected, 525 patients were positive for at least one microorganism, together making up a total prevalence of 52, 44%. Tables 14 represent the prevalence of vaginal infections with respect to some risk factors. It appears from these tables that the prevalence of C. albicans is systematically higher than G. vaginalis. The population mostly affected (Table 1) by G. vaginalis were of the age range, 15 to 25 years (18.07%), followed by those of age range from 36 to 45 years (17.91%), whereas those mostly affected by C. albicans were of age range from 26 to 35 years (40.60%).


Agents15–25 (n = 653)26–35 (n = 266)36–45 (n = 67)46–55 (n = 15)Total no. examined
NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)

Single infectionsC. albicans15623.897829.321826.87426.67256
G. vaginalis11818.073914.661217.9213.33171
T. vaginalis000000000
Multiple infectionsC. albicans and G. vaginalis588.883011.28710.450095
C. albicans and T. vaginalis10.1510.3800002
G. vaginalis and T. vaginalis10.150000001
C. albicans, G. vaginalis, and T. vaginalis000000000
Total334148376525

C: Candida, G: Gardnerella, T: Trichomonas, NE: number examined, and P: prevalence.

Infectious agentsSymptomatic (n = 233)Asymptomatic (n = 768)Total
NEP (%)NEP (%)

Single infectionsC. albicans16068.6619124.86351
G. vaginalis11047.2115620.31266
T. vaginalis00000
Multiple infectionsC. albicans and G. vaginalis6527.90303.9195
C. albicans and T. vaginalis00202
G. vaginalis and T. vaginalis00101
C. albicans, G. vaginalis, and T. vaginalis00000


Infectious agentsMM (n = 175)MP (n = 58)Singles (n = 768)Virgin (36)Total
NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)

Single infectionsC. albicans5531.431424.1418724.351336.11256
G. vaginalis2514.291118.9713517.5812.77171
T. vaginalis0000000
Multiples infectionsC. albicans and G. vaginalis1810.07712.07709, 110095
C. albicans and T. vaginalis000022, 60002
G. vaginalis and T. vaginalis000011, 30001
C. albicans, G. vaginalis, and T. vaginalis000000000
Total9855.793255.1839554.941438.88525

MM: married monogamous; MP: married polygamous.

Infectious agentsCondom (n = 391)Pills (n = 46)No contraceptive (n = 564)Total
NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)

Single infectionsC. albicans8822.512656.5214225.18256
G. vaginalis225.63613.0414325.35171
T. vaginalis0000000
Multiple infectionsC. albicans and G. vaginalis112.81510.707914.0195
C. albicans and T. vaginalis000020.352
G. vaginalis and T. vaginalis000010.181
Total12130.943780.4336765.07525

Table 2 shows the prevalence in symptomatic and asymptomatic women. It appears from this table that C. albicans and G. vaginalis presented prevalence of 68.66% and 47.21%, in symptomatic women, respectively. Nevertheless, 24.86% (C. albicans) and 20.31% (G. vaginalis) were asymptomatic women.

The study involved 768 single women (nonvirgin) and 233 married women of whom 175 were involved in monogamous marital relationship and 58 in polygamous marital relationship (Table 3). Married women from monogamous marriages were the most infected by C. albicans (31.43%), while those from polygamous marriages were mostly infected by G. vaginalis (18.97%).

Single women are more infected by G. vaginalis (17.62%) than virgin women (2.78%). Likewise, virgin women showed low prevalence (11%) of C. albicans, compared to single women (18%).

Table 4 shows that the prevalence of C. albicans (22.51%) is greater than G. vaginalis (5.63%) in women using contraceptives (condom). Nevertheless, it is even higher (56.52%) among those using pills.

Concerning personal hygiene (Table 5), women who did their vaginal douching were more exposed to G. vaginalis (28.66%) than C. albicans (23.67%) contrary to those who did not do it at all (12.13% and 26.39%, respectively), and concerning all the other factors, the prevalence of C. albicans was higher than that of G. vaginalis. Women using undergarments made from synthetic materials were more infected than those using cotton underwear. For these first two cases, the prevalence of C. albicans was indeed higher than G. vaginalis.


Infectious agentsWCType of underwearVaginal douchingTotal
Pot (n = 311)Hole (traditional) (n = 565)Synt (n = 149)Cotton (n = 852)Yes (n = 300)No (n = 701)
NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)NEP (%)

Single infectionsC. albicans8828.2913643.734731.5420924.537123.6718526.39256
G. vaginalis5718.339731.193020.1314116.558628.668512.13171
T. vaginalis0000000000000
Multiple infectionsC. albicans and G. vaginalis258.045317.042416.11718.335418.00415.8595
C. albicans and T. vaginalis0020.640020.230020.282
G. vaginalis and T. vaginalis10.320000100010.141
Total17154.9828850.9710167.7942148.4121170.3331444.79525

C: Candida, G: Gardnerella, T: Trichomonas, NE: number examined, P: prevalence, and Synt: synthetic.

4. Discussion

Higher prevalence of vaginal infection in all the age groups could be due to the fact that women are more sexually active and some of them have many sexual partners, whether they are married or not, in addition to the poor hygiene conditions. These results are in accordance with those of Kamga et al. [7] and Achondou et al. [8] in Cameroon.

The high prevalence of these infections could be due to the anatomy of the female vaginal organ which favours penetration and the installation of the infection and poor personal hygiene. In fact, poor personal hygiene contributes to the change in pH from its normal state of acidity (3) to 3.5 [6], which could lead to the alteration of the normal flora; tight and synthetic underwear (in nylon) prevent aeration of the vagina, produce heat in the vaginal region, and then favour the proliferation of microorganisms. It is also due to unprotected sexual practices: for some of them, unprotected sexual intercourse with a healthy man can cause less harm. This vaginosis develops because the sperm, too alkaline, reduces acidity in the vaginal milieu. However, infected men naturally transmit the microorganisms to their partner due to the anatomy of female vaginal organ which acts like a reservoir. That is why 100% of women are generally infected by T. vaginalis when their partner is infected too [9].

The transmission of T. vaginalis and G. vaginalis is mainly sexual. But a nonsexual transmission can be evoked by the fact that microorganisms remain alive on bedding and toilette seats, as well as into bathing water [9]. It is possible with that to explain the cases of infection by T. vaginalis and G. vaginalis among virgin women.

The prevalence of G. vaginalis (26.67%) is higher than that reported by Fusi-Ngwa et al. [10] in the same locality (1.6%). It is still higher than that reported in other localities. In Nigeria, Azargoon and Darwshzadeh [11] had reported 16.00% among pregnant women. In Brazil, Murta et al. [12] reported 23.6% of prevalence of G. vaginalis among women.

This prevalence (26.67%) is similar to that reported by Nwadioha et al. [13] among women at Kano Hospital (Aminu Kano) in Nigeria, which was 26.05%, and to that reported by Rao et al. [14] among rural women in India. However, this prevalence remains lower, compared to the 86% reported by Fernández-Limia et al. [15] and to the 86% reported by Oyewole et al. [16] among women in Sagamu, Ogun State in Nigeria. Differences in prevalence reported in different settings could be due to environmental, behavioral, and socioeconomic status and stressor differences with geographical variation.

The prevalence of C. albicans in our study was 35.26%. These results are higher than those reported by Kalantari et al. [2], Adeolu et al. [4], Ángel-müller et al. [17], Haltas et al. [18], and Fusi-Ngwa et al. [10], but lower than those reported by Chervenkova et al. [19] and Mathew et al. [20]. However, they remain between the range of 17 to 39% reported by Nyirjesy [21]. The high prevalence of G. vaginalis and C. albicans among patients living with vaginal infections confirms the fact that these microorganisms play an important role in the pathogenesis. The pathogenesis of these infections is very complex and has not been well elucidated. Nevertheless, it is evident that certain factors such as adenosine, cytotoxins, enzymes of G. vaginalis and C. albicans, and certain anaerobic bacteria impact this process [3].

Pregnancy causes hormonal variations which deteriorate the metabolism, increase the rate of glucose, affect vaginal pH, weaken the immune system, and make the pregnant women more susceptible to infections [22]. It is certainly what could explain the increase in C. albicans infections among pregnant women (31.19%) over nonpregnant women (24.16%). On the other hand, the prevalence of G. vaginalis is low in pregnant women. This can be due to the fact that they are not very much sexually active during this period [23].

Two hundred and thirty-three (23.28%) of the patients were symptomatic, that is, 23.28% of the whole sample. Among them, 12.02% had no pathogen. In this case, an investigation of organisms, which grow slowly or with difficultly, is necessary to know the origin of the disease. It can also be due to the fact that many of these patients make their personal hygiene using various types of chemical products (disinfectants) and inappropriate soaps to wash their vaginal organs [24].

Foul-smelling leucorrhoea, vaginal itches, and vaginitis are the most frequent complaints among women in the age of procreation in many countries in the world. Most of the women living with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) have vaginitis and frequent vaginal discharges [4]. In this study, we received 233 symptomatic patients (87.98%) presenting at least one germ and 768 asymptomatic patients (41.28%) presenting at least one germ. 12.02% of the symptomatic patients presented recurrent symptoms of nonspecific vaginitis.

The prevalence of multiple infections was lower in this study than that reported by others [7, 8]. However, G. vaginalis was frequently associated with C. albicans (9.49%). These results are similar to those reported by Shey Nsagha et al. [23]. This could justify the fact that G. vaginalis and C. albicans were not located at the same area. G. vaginalis is usually located at the level of the vagina normal flora, whereas C. albicans is generally found at the level of the vaginal wall, and also they do not use the same resources. Triple infections were totally absent in our study.

Sexually active women in this study were 511 (52.96%) infected. This could be explained by the fact that many among them have many sexual partners and do not use condoms, in addition to perhaps very poor personal hygiene. However, the frequency of these infections (36.11% of C. albicans, and 2.78% of G.) among virgin women is also important. These results are similar to those of Richoz [9]. This could be explained by the fact that they have not yet been taught how to or mastered the basic rudiments of douching; they use joint toilettes and co-use towels, underwear, and so on.

Use of the pill generated a prevalence of 80.43%. In fact, contraceptive pills are made up of progestative and oestrogenic hormones that are antagonists in structure and in function with progesterone and oestrogen. It inhibits the synthesis of oestrogens, deteriorates the metabolism of glucose, and affects the vaginal pH, making the individual concerned to become more vulnerable to infections [3].

5. Conclusion

Vaginal organ infections are now gaining greater recognition as an important source of reproductive problems. Determining the aetiology of these patients and their risk factors is important to establish the treatment strategy in the healthcare units. We therefore recommend that women should be routinely screened for vagina infections to reduce complications related to these infections.

Abbreviations

C. albicans:Candida albicans
G. vaginalis:Gardnerella vaginalis
T. vaginalis:Trichomonas vaginalis.

Data Availability

Data and material are available to other researchers upon request.

Ethical Approval

The protocol of this study was reviewed and approved by the Cameroon National Ethics committee before implementation.

Each participant was given detailed information about the project which they read and freely accepted to participate in. Those who accepted signed the informed consent form and returned it to the surveyor before receiving the questionnaire to be self-administered.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

TTFC, MM, and VKP planned the study. TTFC and YC designed and coordinated the field work, data collection, and analysis as well as contributed to the write-up of the manuscript. VKP, YC, and OJ read and corrected the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are so grateful to the District Hospital of Dschang where samples were collected and the Laboratory of Microbiology of FASA where analyses were done. The authors also thank all the women who agreed to participate in this study.

References

  1. T. Ashraf-Ganjoei, “Risk factors for bacterial vaginosis in women attending a hospital in Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 410–415, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. N. Kalantari, S. Ghaffari, and M. Bayani, “Trichomonas, Candida, and Gardnerella in cervical smears of Iranian women for cancer screening,” North American Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. Catalan, A. Milovanovic, M. Minz, and M. F. Petavy-Marnier, Vaginites et Vaginoses. Coll. Cahier de Formation Biologie Médicale, Biofarma, Bandung, Indonesia, 2000.
  4. A. J. Adeolu, I. O. Okonko, N. N. Odu, and A. F. Kolade, “Detection and prevalence of genital pathogens among attendees of Sti Clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Ibadan, southwestern Nigeria,” World Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 152–161, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. Usanga, L. Abia-Bassey, P. Inyang-etoh, S. Udoh, F. Ani, and E. Archibong, “Trichomonas vaginalis infection among pregnant women in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria,” The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Cheesebrough, District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries. Part 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
  7. Y. M. Kamga, J. P. Ngunde, and J.-F. K. T. Akoachere, “Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated risk factors in pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the Kumba Health District (KHD), Cameroon,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 19, p. 166, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. E. Achondou, F. F. Fumoloh, A. C. Aseneck, A. R. Awah, and A. M. Utokoro, “Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among sexually active women attending the CDC central clinic Tiko, south west region, Cameroon,” African Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 96–101, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. R. Schwebke, C. A. Muzny, and W. E. Josey, “Role of Gardnerella vaginalis in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: a conceptual model,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 210, pp. 338–343, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. K. Fusi-Ngwa, V. K. Payne, and A. Asakizi, “Prevalence and etiology of sexually transmitted infections in a gynecologic unit of a developing country,” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 526–531, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Azargoon and S. Darvishzadeh, “Association of bacterial vaginosis, Trichomonas vaginalis and vaginal acidity with outcome of pregnancy,” Archives of Iranian Medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 213–217, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  12. E. F. C. Murta, M. A. H. de Souza, E. Araújo Júnior, and S. J. Adad, “Incidence of Gardnerella vaginalis, Candida sp. and human papilloma virus in cytological smears,” Sao Paulo Medical Journal, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 105–108, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. I. Nwadioha, D. Z. Egah, E. B. Banwatt, and O. O. Alao, “Microbial agents of abnormal vaginal discharge pregnant mothers attending primary health care centres of Jos, Nigeria,” Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. S. Rao, S. Devi, A. Shriyan, M. Rajaram, and K. Jagdishchandra, “Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a rural setup: comparison of clinical algorithm, smear scoring and culture by semi quantitative technique,” Indian journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–50, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  15. O. Fernández-Limia, C. Villar, A. T. Fariñas, A. Betancourt, E. de Armas, and R. Faure, “Prevalence of trichomoniasis, bacterial vaginosis and candidiasis in women attending a sexual transmitted infections and gynaecologic clinic using an immunologic latex agglutination test,” The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 6, no. 2, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  16. I. O. Oyewole, G. N. Anyasor, and E. C. Michael-Chikezie, “Prevalence of STI pathogens in HIV- infected and non-infected women: implications for acquisition and transmission of HIV in Nigeria,” Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 163–166, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  17. E. Ángel-müller, A. Rodríguez, L. Núñez-Forero et al., “The prevalence of and factors associated with C. trachomatis, N. gonorrheae, T. vaginalis, C. albicans infection, syphilis, HIV and bacterial vaginosis in females suffering lower genital tract infection symptoms in three healthcare attention sites in Bogotá, Colombia, 2010,” Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. Haltas, R. Bayrak, and S. Yenidunya, “To determine of the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis, Candida sp, mixed infections (bacterial vaginosis + Candida sp), Trichomonas vaginalis, Actinomyces sp in Turkish women from Ankara, Turkey,” Ginekologia Polska, vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 744–748, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. Chervenkova, M. Sredkova, S. Tanchev, and B. Plevneli, “A clinical and microbiological study of bacterial vaginosis and vaginitis in pregnant women,” Obstetrics and Gynecologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. R. Mathew, J. Kalyani, R. Bibi, and M. Mallika, “Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in antenatal women,” Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 113–116, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  21. P. Nyirjesy, “Vulvovaginal candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis,” Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 637–652, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Jawezt, Melnich, and Adelberg, “Medical microbiology,” in Appeletion and Lange Medical Book, Prentrice-Hall International, East Norwalk, CT, USA, 19th edition, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  23. D. Shey Nsagha, D. Zofou, J. C. Nguedia Assob et al., “The epidemiology of Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerellavaginalis and Candida albicans co-infections in women attending the Yaounde University Teaching Hospital,” American Journal of Epidemiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 28–31, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Tostain, C. Armand, F. Blanc, R. Castro, and G. Li, “Cystite aigue et autres maladies inflammatoires bénignes de la vessie féminine,” in EMC Néphrologie-Urologie, Elsevier, Paris, France, 1999. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Vincent Khan Payne et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1056
Downloads265
Citations

Related articles