Review Article
Production of Biosurfactants by Ascomycetes
Table 2
Different statistical strategies used for the optimization of biosurfactant production by ascomycetes.
| Fungi | Type of biosurfactant | Process optimization | Optimized condition | E24 (%)/ST (mN/m) | Reference |
| Aspergillus ustus (MSF3) | Glycoprotein | pH, temperature, salt concentration, carbon nitrogen sources, and metals (univariate and response surface methodology) | pH 7/3% NaCl/glucose and cheapest raw/ratio C : N 3 : 2 | 75% | [77] | Penicillium 8CC2 | — | Sources of carbon and nitrogen, pH, and production time using factorial design with repetition at the central point | Soybean oil, 20 g/L−1; yeast extract, 30 g/L−1; pH6 | 79.82% | [42] | Fusarium fujikuroi | α, β-Trehalose | pH, incubation time, agitation, and inoculum (Plackett–Burman + central rotational compound arrangement) | Temperature, agitation, and incubation time variables, significantly temperature 47 ◦C, 120 rpm for 7 days of incubation | PB: 24.08 mN/m | [59] | CCRD: 20.08 mN/m | Fusarium oxysporum | — | Agroindustrial substrate, carbon source, nitrogen, pH, and agitation factorial design | Waste significantly influenced | 67.74% | [61] |
|
|
E24 (%)- emulsification index, ST- surface tension. |