Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 575217, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/575217
Research Article

Universal Forms for One-Dimensional Quantum Hamiltonians: A Comparison of the SUSY and the De La Peña Factorization Approaches

1Department of Physics, National University of La Pampa, La Pampa, Argentina
2National University of La Plata (UNLP), IFLP-CCT-CONICET C. C. 727, 1900 La Plata, Argentina
3Departament de Física, IFISC-CSIC, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
4Instituto Carlos I de Física Teórica y Computacional, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain

Received 6 May 2009; Revised 28 June 2009; Accepted 24 August 2009

Academic Editor: Roger Grimshaw

Copyright © 2009 L. Canderle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme, Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA, 2001. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme, “Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics,” Physics Reports, vol. 251, no. 5-6, pp. 267–385, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. B. K. Bagchi, Supersymmetry in Quantum and Classical Mechanics, vol. 116, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. G. Junker, Supersymmetric Methods in Quantum and Statistical Physics, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1996. View at MathSciNet
  5. E. Witten, “Search for a realistic Kaluza-Klein theory,” Nuclear Physics. B, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 412–428, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. L. Infeld and T. E. Hull, “The factorization method,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–68, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. J. Oscar OrtizA. Ballesteros et al., “On the factorization method in quantum mechanics,” p. 285, University of Burgos.
  8. L. de la Peña and R. Montemayor, “Raising and lowering operators and spectral structure: a concise algebraic technique,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 855–860, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. J. Lekner, “Reflectionless eigenstates of the sech2 potential,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1151–1157. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. N. Saito and Y. Kayanuma, “Resonant tunnelling of a composite particle through a single potential barrier,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 6, no. 20, pp. 3759–3766, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Boyanovsky and R. Blankenbecler, “Fractional indices in supersymmetric theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1821–1824, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. R. Akhoury and A. Comtet, “Anomalous behavior of the Witten index—exactly soluble models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 246, no. 2, pp. 253–278, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. C. V. Sukumar, “Supersymmetry, potentials with bound states at arbitrary energies and multisoliton configurations,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2297–2316, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. D. Baye, “Supersymmetry between deep and shallow nucleus-nucleus potentials,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 58, no. 26, pp. 2738–2741, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. F. Cooper, J. N. Ginocchio, and A. Wipf, “Derivation of the S-matrix using supersymmetry,” Physics Letters A, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 145–147, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. R. D. Amado, F. Cannata, and J.-P. Dedonder, “Supersymmetric quantum mechanics, phase equivalence, and low energy scattering anomalies,” Physical Review C, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2077–2081, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. A. A. Andrianov, M. V. Ioffe, F. Cannata, and J.-P. Dedonder, “Second order derivative supersymmetry, q deformations and the scattering problem,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 2683–2702, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. B. N. Zakhariev and V. M. Chabanov, Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei, vol. 25, pp. 1561–1597, 1994.
  19. B. N. Zakhariev and V. M. Chabanov, “The qualitative theory of elementary transformations of one- and multichannel quantum systems in the inverse-problem approach. The construction of transformations with given spectral parameters,” Physics of Particles and Nuclei, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 111–130, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Barone, F. Esposito, C. J. Magee, and A. C. Scott, “Theory and applications of the sine-gordon equation,” La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 227–267, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Homma and S. Takeno, “Numerical evidence of the existence of approximate Kink-Antikink states and breather-like modes in sine-form discrete double sine-Gordon equation,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 618–621, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Rubinstein, “Sine-Gordon equation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 258–266, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Rajaraman, “Some non-perturbative semi-classical methods in quantum field theory (a pedagogical review),” Physics Reports, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 227–313, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar