Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Volume 2011, Article ID 543894, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/543894
Research Article

Fine Structure Constant, Domain Walls, and Generalized Uncertainty Principle in the Universe

1Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
2INFN-Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy

Received 1 December 2010; Accepted 13 March 2011

Academic Editor: Charles E. Chidume

Copyright © 2011 Luigi Tedesco. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J.-P. Uzan, “The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 403–455, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. P. A. M. Dirac, “A new basis for cosmology,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 165, pp. 199–208, 1938. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. A. M. Dirac, “Cosmological models and the large numbers hypothesis,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 338, pp. 439–446, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  4. E. Witten, “Reflections on the fate of spacetime,” Physics Today, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 24–31, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. A. M. Dirac, “The large numbers hypothesis and the Einstein theory of gravitation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 365, no. 1720, pp. 19–30, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. D. Barrow, “Constants and variations: from alpha to omega,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 283, no. 4, pp. 645–660, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. V. Petrov, “The Oklo natural nuclear reactor,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 20, p. 937, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  8. R. Naudet, Oklo, des Reacteurs Nucleaires Fossiles: Etude Physique, Editions du CEA, Paris, France, 2000.
  9. J. D. Barrow, The Constant of Nature: From Alpha to Omega, Jonathan Cape, London, UK, 2002. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. Y. V. Petrov, A. I. Nazarov, M. S. Onegin, V. Y. Petrov, and E. G. Sakhnovsky, “Natural nuclear reactor at Oklo and variation of fundamental constants: computation of neutronics of a fresh core,” Physical Review C, vol. 74, no. 6, Article ID 064610, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. K. Webb, V. V. Flambaum, C. W. Churchill, M. J. Drinkwater, and J. D. Barrow, “Search for time variation of the fine structure constant,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 884–887, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. K. Webb, M. T. Murphy, V. V. Flambaum et al., “Further evidence for cosmological evolution of the fine structure constant,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 9, Article ID 091301, 4 pages, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, V. V. Flambaum et al., “Possible evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from QSO absorption lines: motivations, analysis and results,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 327, no. 4, pp. 1208–1222, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, V. V. Flambaum, C. W. Churchill, and J. X. Prochaska, “Possible evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from QSO absorption lines: systematic errors,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 327, no. 4, pp. 1223–1236, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, V. V. Flambaum, J. X. Prochaska, and A. M. Wolfe, “Further constraints on variation of the fine-structure constant from alkali-doublet QSO absorption lines,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 327, no. 4, pp. 1237–1243, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, V. V. Flambaum, M. J. Drinkwater, F. Combes, and T. Wiklind, “Improved constraints on possible variation of physical constants from HI 21-cm and molecular QSO absorption lines,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 327, no. 4, pp. 1244–1248, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. K. Webb, M. T. Murphy, V. V. Flambaum, and S. J. Curran, “Does the fine structure constant vary? A third quasar absorption sample consistent with varying α,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 283, no. 4, pp. 565–575, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, and V. V. Flambaum, “Further evidence for a variable fine-structure constant from Keck/HIRES QSO absorption spectra,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 345, no. 2, pp. 609–638, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. J. Marciano, “Time variation of the fundamental "constants" and Kaluza-Klein theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 52, pp. 489–491, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. D. F. Mota and J. D. Barrow, “Local and global variations of the fine-structure constant,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 349, no. 1, pp. 291–302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Srianand, H. Chand, P. Petitjean, and B. Aracil, “Limits on the time variation of the electromagnetic fine-structure constant in the low energy limit from absorption lines in the spectra of distant quasars,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, no. 12, Article ID 121302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. A. Levshakov, M. Centurión, P. Molaro, and S. D'Odorico, “VLT/UVES constraints on the cosmological variability of the fine-structure constant,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 434, no. 3, pp. 827–838, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. A. Levshakov, M. Centurión, P. Molaro et al., “Most precise single redshift bound to Δα/α,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 449, no. 3, pp. 879–889, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, and V. V. Flambaum, “Comment on "limits on the time variation of the electromagnetic fine-structure constant in the low energy limit from absorption lines in the spectra of distant quasars",” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 23, Article ID 239001, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, and V. V. Flambaum, “Revision of VLT/UVES constraints on a varying fine-structure constant,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 384, no. 3, pp. 1053–1062, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. C. Berengut and V. V. Flambaum, “Astronomical and Laboratory searches for space-time variation of fundamental constants,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 264, no. 1, Article ID 012010, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. G. Veneziano, “A stringy nature needs just two constants,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 2, p. 199, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. E. Witten, Physics Today, vol. 24, 1986.
  29. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Superstring collisions at planckian energies,” Physics Letters B, vol. 197, no. 1-2, pp. 81–88, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “String theory beyond the Planck scale,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 303, no. 3, pp. 407–454, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Can spacetime be probed below the string size?” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. Konishi, G. Paffuti, and P. Provero, “Minimum physical length and the generalized uncertainty principle in string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 276–284, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, pp. 145–165, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  34. G. Amelino-Camelia, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Ellis, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “On the space-time uncertainty relations of Liouville strings and D-branes,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 12, no. 27, pp. 2029–2035, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  36. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. J. Adler and D. I. Santiago, “On gravity and the uncertainty principle,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 1371–1381, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Brau, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and the hydrogen atom,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 32, no. 44, pp. 7691–7696, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. R. J. Adler, P. Chen, and D. I. Santiago, “The generalized uncertainty principle and black hole remnants,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2101–2108, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  40. S. Kalyana Rama, “Some consequences of the generalised uncertainty principle: statistical mechanical, cosmological, and varying speed of light,” Physics Letters B, vol. 519, no. 1-2, pp. 103–110, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  41. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi, “Effect of the minimal length uncertainty relation on the density of states and the cosmological constant problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, Article ID 125028, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Hossenfelder et al., “Signatures in the Planck regime,” Physics Letters B, vol. 575, pp. 85–99, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  43. G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Arzano, Y. Ling, and G. Mandanici, “Black-hole thermodynamics with modified dispersion relations and generalized uncertainty principles,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2585–2606, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  44. K. Nozari and B. Fazlpour, “Generalized uncertainty principle, modified dispersion relations and the early universe thermodynamics,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1661–1679, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  45. C. Bambi and F. R. Urban, “Natural extension of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, Article ID 095006, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  46. M.-I. Park, “The generalized uncertainty principle in (A)dS space and the modification of Hawking temperature from the minimal length,” Physics Letters B, vol. 659, no. 3, pp. 698–702, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  47. W. Kim, E. J. Son, and M. Yoon, “Thermodynamics of a black hole based on a generalized uncertainty principle,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 1, p. 35, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. C. Bambi and K. Freese, “Dangerous implications of a minimum length in quantum gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 19, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  49. T. W. B. Kibble, “Topology of cosmic domains and strings,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1387–1398, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  50. A. Vilenkin, “Cosmic strings and domain walls,” Physics Reports, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 263–315, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  51. A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994.
  52. Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, “Cosmological consequences of a spontaneous breakdown of a discrete symmetry,” Zhurnal Eksperimental'noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, vol. 67, p. 3, 1974, translated in: Soviet Physics JETP, vol. 40, no. 1, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  53. M. Bucher and D. Spergel, “Is the dark matter a solid?” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 4, Article ID 043505, 11 pages, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  54. R. A. Battye, M. Bucher, and D. Spergel, “Domain wall dominated universes,” http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9908047.
  55. A. Friedland, H. Murayama, and M. Perelstein, “Domain walls as dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 043519, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. L. Campanelli, P. Cea, G. L. Fogli, and L. Tedesco, “Dynamics of ferromagnetic walls: gravitational properties,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 14, no. 3-4, pp. 521–541, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  57. L. Conversi, A. Melchiorri, L. Mersini, and J. Silk, “Are domain walls ruled out?” Astroparticle Physics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 443–449, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. J. C. R. E. Oliveira, C. J. A. P. Martins, and P. P. Avelino, “Cosmological evolution of domain wall networks,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 8, Article ID 083509, 7 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. P. P. Avelino, J. C. R. E. Oliveira, and C. J. A. P. Martins, “Understanding domain wall network evolution,” Physics Letters B, vol. 610, no. 1-2, pp. 1–8, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. P. P. Avelino, C. J. A. P. Martins, and J. C. R. E. Oliveira, “One-scale model for domain wall network evolution,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 8, Article ID 083506, 11 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. P. P. Avelino, C. J. A. P. Martins, J. Menezes, R. Menezes, and J. C. R. E. Oliveira, “Frustrated expectations: defect networks and dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 12, Article ID 123519, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. P. P. Avelino, C. J. A. P. Martins, J. Menezes, R. Menezes, and J. C. R. E. Oliveira, “Defect junctions and domain wall dynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 12, Article ID 123520, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. B. Carter, “Stability of winding cosmic wall lattices with X type junctions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 15, Article ID 154001, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  64. R. A. Battye, E. Chachoua, and A. Moss, “Elastic properties of anisotropic domain wall lattices,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 12, Article ID 123528, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. R. A. Battye and A. Moss, “Anisotropic perturbations due to dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 4, Article ID 041301, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. R. A. Battey and A. Moss, “Scaling dynamics of domain walls in the cubic anisotropy model,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, Article ID 023528, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  67. M. Eto, T. Fujimori, T. Nagashima, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “Dynamics of domain wall networks,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 12, Article ID 125025, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. F. Nasseri, “Fine structure constant in the spacetime of a cosmic string,” Physics Letters B, vol. 614, no. 3-4, pp. 140–142, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. E. R. Bezerra De Mello, “Comment to: "Fine structure constant in the spacetime of a cosmic string" [Phys. Lett. B 614 (2005) 140],” Physics Letters B, vol. 621, no. 3-4, pp. 318–319, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. F. Nasseri, “Reply to: "Comment to: 'Fine structure constant in the spacetime of a cosmic string" [Phys. Lett. B 621 (2005) 318],” Physics Letters B, vol. 629, no. 2–4, pp. 111–113, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. L. Campanelli, P. Cea, and L. Tedesco, “Time variation of the fine structure constant in the spacetime of a cosmic domain wall,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1013–1017, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  72. F. Nasseri, “Corrections to the fine structure constant in D-dimensional space from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 618, no. 1–4, pp. 229–232, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. F. Nasseri, “Corrections to the fine structure constant in the spacetime of a cosmic string from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 632, no. 2-3, pp. 151–154, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. G. de A. Marques, “Comment to: "Corrections to the fine structure constant in the spacetime of a cosmic string from the generalized uncertainty principle" [Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 151],” Physics Letters B, vol. 638, no. 5-6, pp. 552–553, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. F. Nasseri, “Reply to: "Comment to: 'Corrections to the fine structure constant in the spacetime of a cosmic string from the generalized uncertainty principle' " [Phys. Lett. B 638 (2006) 552],” Physics Letters B, vol. 645, no. 5-6, pp. 470–471, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational field of vacuum domain walls,” Physics Letters B, vol. 133, no. 3-4, pp. 177–179, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  77. F. Nasseri, “Time variation of the gravitational coupling constant in decrumpling cosmology,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0512139.
  78. M. S. El Naschie, “New elementary particles as a possible product of a disintegrating symplictic vacuum,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 905–913, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  79. K. Nozari and B. Fazlpour, “Spacetime non-commutativity, generalized uncertainty principle and the fine structure constant,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 777–781, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. J. K. Webb, J. A. King, M. T. Murphy, V. V. Flambaum, R. F. Carswell, and M. B. Bainbridge, “Evidence for spatial variation of the fine structure constant,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3907.
  81. J. C. Berengut and V. V. Flambaum, “Manifestations of a spatial variation of fundamental constants on atomic clocks, Oklo, meteorites, and cosmological phenomena,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3957.
  82. J. C. Berengut, V. V. Flambaum, J. A. King, S. J. Curran, and J. K. Webb, “Is there further evidence for spatial variation of fundamental constants?” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 12, Article ID 123506, 8 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar