`International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical SciencesVolume 2012, Article ID 645736, 5 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/645736`
Research Article

## Taylor's Expansion Revisited: A General Formula for the Remainder

Department of Algebra and Mathematical Analysis, University of Almería, Almería, 04120 Andalucía, Spain

Received 22 March 2012; Accepted 31 May 2012

Academic Editor: Harvinder S. Sidhu

Copyright © 2012 José Juan Rodríguez Cano and Enrique de Amo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We give a new approach to Taylor's remainder formula, via a generalization of Cauchy's generalized mean value theorem, which allows us to include the well-known Schölomilch, Lebesgue, Cauchy, and the Euler classic types, as particular cases.

#### 1. Introduction

Taylor’s polynomial is a central tool in any elementary course in mathematical analysis. Nowadays, its importance is centred on its applications, for instance, to asymptotic analysis or to obtain satisfactory numerical or integral inequalities (see, e.g., [15]). The core of these results comes from manipulations on the explicit formula of the remainder, that is, the error estimation when considering the Taylor’s polynomial expansion instead of the function.

In this paper, we provide a new explicit formula for the remainder that generalizes classic ones, namely, Schölomilch, Lebesgue, Cauchy, and Euler's remainders.

Inspired by the explicit expression for an arbitrary polynomial B. Taylor (1712) used to write where is a real parameter and the coefficients are given by their derivatives of -order Therefore, in a heuristic way, he introduced, three centuries ago, the expression for an arbitrary function . Later, but during the same century, A. L. Cauchy gave the name of analytic to a type of functions which stands for their series expansions. (It is well known that Cauchy worked to introduce the concept of convergence of series.)

An obvious problem is to calculate the formula for the remainder in an explicit form (not only to know that there exists a polynomial such that that is, the function has a contact of order greater that in a neighborhood of a point ). It is also well known that this explicit expression provides an upper bound for the error when we consider instead of near to .

After Taylor, authors such as Euler, Lagrange, Cauchy, or Scholömilch have considered functions satisfying where measures the error when it is not possible to represent in an analytic form (e.g., when has derivatives up to the -order, but no further). If , then the above expression is called the McLaurin series of .

In this paper, we are interested in Taylor’s polynomials to obtain a new and more general explicit form for the remainder .

In Section 3.1, via slight modifications on Cauchy’s general mean value theorem (CGMVT) for functions with continuous derivatives of order on , we obtain a very general expression for each of the corresponding classic expressions for the remainder as particular cases (Section 3.2).

#### 2. Notation and Preliminaries

Throughout the paper, denotes the set of real numbers and the set of the positive integers, is a closed and bounded interval with endpoints and , denotes the class of all real functions with continuous derivative of -order defined on , and the extreme cases: the class of all continuous functions defined on and For given and , we denote by for Taylor’s polynomial of -order centred at of the function . For the sake of simplicity, we refer to it as . A function is said to be analytic at if there exists such that

#### 3. A General Formula for the Remainder

##### 3.1. A General Taylor’s Theorem

The classic technique for obtaining Taylor’s polynomial with a remainder that consists of applying a more general result than the CGMVT is widely known.

Proposition 3.1 (-CGMVT). Let such that and exist and are continuous on the open interval . Then, there exists such that

Note that with this notation, the CGMVT is the corresponding -CGMVT. Now, a slight modification in the hypothesis of the above proposition allows a more general statement.

Lemma 3.2 (--GMVCT). Let and . If , then there exists such that

Proof. We consider auxiliary functions They satisfy the CGMVT for functions in . Moreover, we have the following identities: Therefore, the result immediately follows.

Theorem 3.3 (of Taylor). Let and , having no zeros in (i.e., for all in ). Suppose that there exists . Then, there is such that

Proof. Put satisfying the following conditions: Now, using the --CGMVT, we obtain .

##### 3.2. Particular Cases

In this subsection, we show how the remainder formula can be reduced to each particular case. Firstly, if we define the function with a constant real value, namely , then Schölomilch’s version for the remainder follows (see [6]): (This formula is usually obtained directly from the -CGMVT doing , because , , and ).

When in , this formula gives the Lagrange remainder type (see [69]): Using newly , if we do , the Cauchy formula appears for the remainder (see [10]): Now, we return to , and putting and , we obtain Euler’s integral expression (see [11]): Of course, doing in , we have a general McLaurin type series:

#### References

1. M. Akkouchi, “Improvements of some integral inequalities of H. Gauchman involving Taylor's remainder,” Divulgaciones Matemáticas, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 2003.
2. H. Gauchman, “Some integral inequalities involving Taylor's remainder. I,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID 1, 5 pages, 2003.
3. H. Gauchman, “Some integral inequalities involving Taylor's remainder. II,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 3, no. 2, Article ID 26, 9 pages, 2002.
4. Z. Liu, “Note on inequalities involving integral Taylor's remainder,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID 72, 6 pages, 2005.
5. M. Neher, “Improved validated bounds for Taylor coefficient and for Taylor remainder series,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 152, pp. 393–404, 2003.
6. J. Rey Pastor, P. Pi Calleja, and C. A. Trejo, Análisis Matemático, Tomo I. Kapelusz, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1952.
7. T. M. Apostol, Mathematical Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1974.
8. K. Kuratowski, Introducción al Cálculo, Limusa-Wiley, Mexico City, México, 1970.
9. W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, USA, 1964.
10. J. M. Ortega, Introducción al Análisis Matemático, Labor Universitaria, Barcelona, Spain, 1993.
11. J. Dixmier, Cours de Mathematiques du Primer Cycle, Gauthiers-Villars, Paris, France, 1967.