Research Article | Open Access
Armands Gritsans, Felix Sadyrbaev, "Boundary Value Problems for a Super-Sublinear Asymmetric Oscillator: The Exact Number of Solutions", International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2013, Article ID 705984, 9 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/705984
Boundary Value Problems for a Super-Sublinear Asymmetric Oscillator: The Exact Number of Solutions
Properties of asymmetric oscillator described by the equation (i), where and , are studied. A set of such that the problem (i), (ii), and (iii) have a nontrivial solution, is called α-spectrum. We give full description of α-spectra in terms of solution sets and solution surfaces. The exact number of nontrivial solutions of the two-parameter Dirichlet boundary value problem (i), and (ii) is given.
Asymmetric oscillators were studied intensively starting from the works by Kufner and Fučík; see  and references therein. Simple equations like (2) given with the boundary conditions allow for complete investigation of spectra. It is known that the spectrum of the problem (2), (4) is a set of hyperbola looking curves in the -plane. On the other hand, there is a plenty of works devoted to one-parameter case of equations given together with the two-point boundary conditions. Due to nonlinearity of one should consider solutions with different . Bifurcation diagrams in terms of and , or and , can serve then to evaluate the number of solutions [2–4].
In this paper we consider differential equations of the form where , and . Here and are nonnegative parameters, , . This equation describes asymmetric oscillator with different nonlinear restoring forces on both sides of . If , then equation becomes famous Fučík equation Properties of the Fučík spectrum are well known (the Fučík spectrum is a set of all pairs where , such that the Dirichlet problem—(2) with boundary conditions —has a non-trivial solution).
The aim of our study in this paper is to describe properties of the spectrum of the problem
For this we study first the time maps for the related functions (Section 2), then we give the analytical description of the spectrum (Section 3), and formulate the properties of the spectrum (Section 4), including the asymptotics. In Section 5 we consider the solution sets and solution surfaces which bear information on multiplicity of solutions to the problem. Analysis of properties of solution surfaces (Section 6) can give us estimations of the number of solutions to the problem (Section 7). These estimations contain also information of properties of solutions such as the number of zeros and evaluations of .
2. Time Maps
Proposition 1. Suppose , and . (1) For any the formula is valid: where . (2) The function for the problem (5) is where . (3) The function for fixed and is strictly decreasing function of and possesses the properties (4) The function for fixed and is decreasing function of . (5) The function for fixed and is increasing function of .
Proof. By standard computations.
Remark 2. for , irrespective of .
Remark 4. A solution of (3) is a -function. Therefore is continuous. If and are two consecutive zeros of , then since a solution in the interval is symmetric with respect to the middle point. Therefore for any zero point and signs of alternate.
Theorem 5. The -spectrum for the problem consists of the following -branches: The notation , respectively: , refers to solutions which satisfy the initial conditions (resp.: ) and have exactly zeros in the interval .
Proof. We prove the theorem only for solutions which have exactly one zero in and satisfy the initial condition .
Consider the case . The first zero of appears at and . The second zero is at . One has that for solutions with exactly one zero in the relation holds, which defines the branch .
Suppose . The first zero now is at . The second one is at and therefore .
The branches and are given by the equivalent relations and , respectively, and therefore coincide.
Proof for solutions with different nodal structure is similar.
4. Properties of the α-Spectrum
Proposition 7. (1)The branches and coincide.(2)The branches and do not intersect unless .(3)The branches and do not intersect unless .(4)The branches and do not intersect unless .(5)Any branch where and is either “+” or “−” is a graph of monotonically decreasing function .(6)The branches and intersect once.
Proof. It follows from (11) that coincides with , since both sets (branches) are defined by symmetric relations: , and follows from (11), but follows from the relations (11) and (7). Indeed, any point of intersection satisfies the system It follows that or The above relation defines a curve which is a graph of monotonically increasing function , where is a constant computable from (16). This curve emanates from the origin and intersects the graph of monotonically decreasing from to 0 function from only once.
Let be a unique solution of the equation ; similarly, let be a unique solution of the equation .
Proposition 8. Suppose . (1) The branch is located in the sector and is a hyperbola looking curve in plane with vertical asymptote and horizontal asymptote . (2) The branch is located in the sector and is a hyperbola looking curve in plane with vertical asymptote and horizontal asymptote . (3) The branch is located in the sector and is a hyperbola looking curve in plane with vertical asymptote and horizontal asymptote .
Remark 9. So the positive part of the -spectrum in the extended -plane may be schematically described by the chain Similarly, the negative part of the -spectrum in the extended -plane may be described as follows:
Proposition 10. Let and be fixed. It is true that
5. Solution Sets and Solution Surfaces
Let us distinguish between solutions of the problems (3) and (4) with different number of zeros in the interval . Let be a set of all triples such that there exists a nontrivial solution of the respective problems (3) and (4), which has exactly zeros in , but be a set of all triples such that there exists a nontrivial solution of the respective problems (3) and (4), which has exactly zeros in
Definition 12. will be called a positive -solution surface, but -a negative -solution surface.
5.1. Description and Properties of a Solution Set
We will identify the cross section of a solution surface with the plane ( is fixed) with its projection to the -plane. This projection is in fact the respective branch of the spectrum of the problem (3), (4), and (9).
Theorem 13. (1) Solution surfaces are unions of respective -branches: (2) A solution set of the problems (3) and (4) is a union of all -solution surfaces and is a union of all -branches: (3) Solution surfaces and coincide. (4) Solution surfaces and do not intersect unless . (5) For given the solution surfaces and are centroaffine equivalent under the mapping : where , , .
Proof. , , , and follow from definitions of , , , , and Proposition 7.
First observe that for we have by making use of the formula (6) that The above formula is applicable to and to .
For given and set . Suppose : Applying the rescaling formula (28), where replaces , to the previous equation one has therefore . Since , one has , and the surfaces and are centroaffine equivalent under the mapping .
Remark 14. Since solution surfaces and are centro-affine equivalent, they have similar shape. Therefore it is enough to study properties of the solution surface , in order to know properties of other odd-numbered solution surfaces. The same is true for .
5.2. Cross-Sections of Solution Surfaces with the Planes α = Const
A cross-section of any solution surface or by the plane locates in the sector .
The analytical description of envelopes, corresponding to branches of spectra, follows.
6. Envelopes of Solution Surfaces
Any solution surface for (3) is defined by one of the following relations: We use the unifying formula and consider
Treat as a parameter. The family of envelopes for can be determined from the system
For the case of (3) one gets where
Consider the system and exclude the parameter . One obtains that where (1) For , and the equation of the envelope is (2) For , , the equation of the envelope is (3) For , , the equation of the envelope is
Proposition 15. For given and the location of the envelopes is as follows: (1), (2), (3) (a) if , then , (b) if , then , (c) if , then , (4) , (5) ,where means that for any .
Proof. First consider For any , then .
Remark 16. Layout of envelopes depends on (see Figure 2).
(a) the case and . Since , the envelopes are ordered as
(b) the case and . Since , the envelopes are ordered as
(c) the case and . Since , the envelopes are ordered as
7. The Number of Solutions by Geometrical Analysis of Solution Surfaces
We can detect the precise number of solutions to the problem for given positive . We can evaluate the initial values for solutions on a basis of geometrical analysis of solution surfaces and the respective envelopes. The nodal structure of solutions can be described also.
Let be the family of rays, covering the first quadrant of the -plane. Consider the cross-section of a solution surface (32) by the plane in the -space, for example, the curve , which is defined by the relations and This 3D curve can be regularly parameterized as where . These formulas define homeomorphism , where .
Let be projection of to the plane, that is: The curve can be regularly  parameterized as where . These formulas define homeomorphism .
Proposition 17. There exists a unique parameter such that the line (a)does not intersect the curve if ,(b)intersects the curve only once if ,(c)intersects the curve exactly at two points if .
Proof. (a) Consider equation , which turns to
It can be found from the above that is the only root of the equation . Hence at the point the curve has a unique tangent line parallel to the axis.
(b) Since the given parametrization of the curve is regular, then and in some neighborhood of the point the curve can be represented as the graph of the function . Now find The next step is to detect the sign of the expression The routine calculations show that the expression in parentheses is equal to Hence the function has the strict local minimum at the point .
(c) It follows from the relations that if a parameter goes from to , then a point goes from the point to the point .
(d) It follows from the above argument that if the parameter goes from to then a point goes from to , then turns to the right, and goes to . Since the parametrization of the curve is without self-intersection points, one can deduce that the curve is a union of two branches (i.e., graphs of the functions and , where which do not intersect and are continuously “glued” at the point .
Before presenting “the exact number of solutions” result we make the following conventions: (1) solution means a nontrivial solution of the problems (3) and (4),(2) means the envelope, where and is either + or − or ,(3) we mean by -solution a solution of the problem (3), (4): (a) a solution with if ; (b) a solution with if ; (c) two solutions with and if .
Proposition 18. Consider an envelope The problems (3) and (4) have (a)no -solutions with zeroes in if ,(b)exactly one -solution with even number zeroes in if or and ,(c)exactly two -solutions with zeroes in if is odd, and or is even, and or ,(d)exactly four -solutions with odd number of zeroes in if and .
Proof. It can be verified analytically that , where
Recall that the curve is the projection of the 3D curve to the -plane. Taking in mind Proposition 17 we can assert that there exists a unique parameter , see (53), such that the line parallel to the axis in the -space going through the point , where and , and the curve (hence the solution surface also) (i)does not intersect if ,(ii)intersects only once if ,(iii)intersects exactly at two points if , (see Figure 3).
Depending on the value of one can detect the number of -solutions as the theorem states. For example, in the case (d): if is odd, and , then the mentioned above line intersects the solution surface exactly twice. Since the mentioned above line intersects the solution surface exactly twice also. Hence the problem (3), (4) has exactly four solutions with zeros in .
Now we are able to prove the main theorem. In this theorem we suppose that and for all and will use auxiliary envelopes and .
Theorem 19. Suppose . (1)If and , then the exact number of nontrivial solutions to the problems (3) and (4) is(a) if ,(b) if , (c) if ,(d) if , (e) if ,(f) if . (2)If and , then the exact number of nontrivial solutions to the problems (3) and (4) is (a) if , (b) if ,(c) if , (d)if . (3)If and then the exact number of nontrivial solutions to the problems (3) and (4) is(a) if ,(b) if ,(c) if , (d) if , (e) if ,(f) if .
Proof. First notice that if and then there exists exactly one -solution without zeros in , in fact, accordingly to conventions, two solutions without zeros in , and of opposite sign values of .
We consider only the case . Similarly two other possible cases and can be treated.
It follows from Proposition 15 that the envelopes are ordered as
Let us consider the case (1), when , and the subcase (a): for .(i)if then there are solutions without zeros;(ii)if , then there are two solutions without zeros, two -solutions with 1 zero (that is, four solutions with 1 zero), two “+”-solution with 2 zeros and two “−”-solutions with 2 zeros; totally there are (nontrivial) solutions;(iii)if , then in addition to 10 solutions mentioned in the previous step, there are also two -solutions with 3 zeros (that is, four solutions with 3 zeros), two “+”-solutions with 4 zeros and two “−”-solution with 4 zeros; totally there are (nontrivial) solutions and so on;(iv)if , then totally there are (nontrivial) solutions.
The other cases can be considered analogously.
- A. Kufner and S. Fučík, Nonlinear Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1980.
- P. Korman, “Global solution branches and exact multiplicity of solutions for two point boundary value problems,” in Handbook of Differential Equations, Ordinary Differential Equations, A. Canada, P. Drabek, and A. Fonda, Eds., vol. 3, pp. 547–606, Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
- P. Korman and Y. Li, “Generalized averages for solutions of two-point Dirichlet problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 478–484, 1999.
- P. Korman, Y. Li, and T. Ouyang, “Exact multiplicity results for boundary value problems with nonlinearities generalising cubic,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Series A, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 599–616, 1996.
- A. Gritsans and F. Sadyrbaev, “On nonlinear Fučík type spectra,” Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 2008.
- A. Gritsans and F. Sadyrbaev, “Nonlinear spectra: the Neumann problem,” Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2009.
- A. Gritsans and F. Sadyrbaev, “Nonlinear spectra for parameter dependent ordinary differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 253–267, 2007.
- F. Sadyrbaev, “Multiplicity in parameter-dependent problems for ordinary differential equations,” Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 503–514, 2009.
- R. Schaaf, Global Solution Branches of Two Point Boundary Value Problems, vol. 1458 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1990.
- A. Gritsans and F. Sadyrbaev, “Time map formulae and their applications,” in Proceedings LU MII “Mathematics, Differential Equations”, vol. 8, pp. 72–93, Riga, Latvia, 2008.
- C. G. Gibson, Elementary Geometry of Differentiable Curves, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
Copyright © 2013 Armands Gritsans and Felix Sadyrbaev. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.