|
β | Reference | Study design N | Treatment groups | Outcome | Effect | P |
|
Catheter locking agents | | | | | | | | |
|
Heparin | Thomas, 2007 [7] | P
| Heparin (1000βU/mL) | | Heparin (10β000βU/mL) | Catheter dysfunction (per 1000 HD sessions) | Low H/high H 6.7 versus 7.6 | NS |
Thrombolytic therapy (per 1000 HD session) | Low H/high H 26.6 versus 8.2 | <0.001 |
|
Heparin | Holley, 2007 [8] | R
| Heparin (1000βU/mL) | | Heparin (10β000βU/mL) | Thrombolytic therapy (per 6 months) | Low H/high H 63% versus 31% | <0.001 |
|
Citrate (4%) | Buturovic, 1998 [9] | RCT
| Citrate 4% | Heparin (1666βU/mL) | Polygeline (3.5%) | Catheter survival (days) | C/H/P 51/23/32 | <0.01 |
|
Citrate (4%) |
Lok, 2007 [10] | P
| Citrate 4% | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) | Thrombolytic rate (per 1000 days) | C/H 3.3 versus 5.5 | <0.001 |
Catheter removal for poor flow (per 1000 days) | C/H 1.65 versus 2.98 | 0.042 |
|
Citrate (4%)β |
Grudzinski, 2007 [11] β | R β | Citrate* 4%β | | Heparin** (10β000βU/mL) β | Thrombolytic rate (per 1000 days) | C/H 3.23 versus 4.10 | 0.07 |
Catheter removal for poor flow (per 1000 days) | C/H 1.88 versus 1.81 | NS |
|
Citrate (4%) | MacRae, 2008 [12] | RCT
| Citrate 4% | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) | Thrombolytic therapy (6 months) | C/H 41% versus 45% | NS |
|
Citrate (5%)β |
Hendrickx, 2001 [13] β | RCT β | Citrate 5%β | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) β | Thrombolytic therapy (per HD session) | C/H 8% versus 1% | NS |
Aspiration of thrombus (6 months) | C/H 14% versus 7% | <0.001 |
|
Citrate (30%) | Stas, 2001 [14] | P
| Citrate 30% | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) | Aspiration of thrombus | C=H | NS |
|
Citrate (30%)β |
Weijmer, 2005 [15] β | RCT β | Citrate 30%β | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) β | Thrombolytic Therapy (6 months) | C/H 47% versus 44% | NS |
Catheter removal for poor flow (per 1000 days) | C/H 3.2 versus 3.6 | NS |
|
Citrate (47%) | Bayes 1999 [16] | P
| Citrate, 46.7% | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) | Blood flow rate | C=H | NS |
|
Citrate (47%) | Power, 2009 [17] | RCT
| Citrate, 46.7% | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) | Thrombolytic therapy (per 1000 days) | C/H 8.2 versus 4.3 | <0.001 |
|
Tissue plasminogen activatorβ |
Schenk, 2000 [18] β | P β | r-TPA (1βmg/mL interdialytic lock) β | | Heparin (1000βU/mL) β | Blood flow rate mL/min | TPA/H 237 versus 208 | 0.001 |
Thrombolytic therapy (4 months) | TPA/H 0% versus 20% | β |
|
Tissue plasminogen activatorβ |
Gittins, 2007 [19] β | P β | r-TPA (1βmg/mL interdialytic lock) β | | Heparin (1000βU/mL) β | Aspiration of thrombus | H > rTPA: O.R. 2.4 | 0.001 |
Clot volume | H > rTPA: O.R. β=ββ1.9 | <0.001 |
|
Tissue plasminogen activator | Hemmelgarn, 2011 [20] | RCT
| r-TPA (1βmg/mL interdialytic lock midweek heparin 5000βU/Ml in other 2 sessions) | | Heparin (5000βU/mL) | Catheter malfunction | rTPAββ<ββheparin HR 1.91 | 0.02 |
|
β | β | β | β | | β | Catheter-related bacteremia (episodes/1000 catheter days) | rTPA<Heparin 0.40 versus 1.37 | 0.02 |
|
Modified catheters | | | | | | | | |
|
Heparin- coated cathetersβ | Clark, 2009 [21] β | R β | Heparin-coated catheter (+ heparin lock 5000βU/mL) β | | Noncoated catheter (+ heparin lock 5000βU/mL) β | Primary patency (at 3 months) | HCC/NCC 82% versus 76% | NS |
Thrombosis rate (per 1000 days) | HCC/NCC 0.8 versus 0.4 | NS |
|
Heparin- coated cathetersβ |
Jain, 2009 [22] β | R β | Heparin-coated Catheter (+ Hepain lock 5000βU/mL) β | | Non-coated Catheter (+ Hepain lock 5000βU/mL) β | Cumulative catheter survival (at 6 months) | HCC/NCC 48% versus 41% | NS |
Thrombolytic therapy (per 1000 days) | HCC/NCC 1.8 versus 1.8 | NS |
|
Oral agents | | | | | | | | |
|
Warfarin (mini dose)β |
Mokrzycki, 2001 [23] β | RCT β | Warfarin (1βmg) β | | Placeboβ | Primary catheter patency (at 1 year) | W/P 58% versus 48% | NS |
Assisted primary catheter patency (at 1 year) | W/P 20% versus, 18% | NS |
|
Warfarin (low intensity)ββ |
Wilkieson, 2011 [24] ββ | RCT ββ | Warfarin (INR 1.5β1.9) ββ | | Placeboββ | Primary catheter patency | W/P 46% versus 47% | NS |
Catheter removal for dysfunction | W/P HRββ=ββ0.87 | NS |
|
Warfarin (low intensity) | Zellweger, 2005 [25] | P
| Warfarin (INR 1.5β2.0) (high-risk pts) | | Controls (low-risk pts) | Primary catheter patency (at 9 months) | Anticoagulation (adequate versus inadequate) 47% versus 8% | 0.01 |
|
Warfarin (high intensity)β |
Obialo, 2003 [26] β | P β | Aspirin 325βmg/d β | Warfarin (INR 2-3) | Controlβ | Primary catheter patency (number of days) | A/W/C 114/111/68 | <0.001 |
Catheter survival (at 4 months) | A/W/C 91%/73%/29% | <0.001 |
|
Warfarin (medium intensity) and ticlodipineβ | Coli, 2006 [27] β | RCT β | Primary prevention Warfarin (INR 1.8β2.5) + ticlodipine 250βmg/day (1Β°W + T) β | | Secondary prevention (INR 1.8β2.5) + Ticlodipine 250βmg/day (2Β°W + T) β | Catheter dysfunction (1 year) |
1Β°W + T/2Β°W + T 12% versus 52% | <0.01 |
Catheter dysfunction (events per pt/year) | PWT/RWT 0.16 versus 1.65 | <0.001 |
|