Clinical Study

Impaired Urine Dilution Capability in HIV Stable Patients

Table 2

Comparison between HIV tenofovir group (T) and HIV nontenofovir group (nT) at baseline (B) and at maximum dilution (D) (Chaimowitz’ test): eGFR, fractional excretion (FE), and plasma and urine osmolarity values—median and range.

HIV tenofovir
baseline
HIV tenofovir
dilution
P valueHIV nontenofovir
baseline
HIV nontenofovir
dilution
P valueP value
T (B) versus nT (B)
T (D) versus nT (D)

eGFR (MDRD) (mL/min/1.73 m2)103.9 (65–125)103.9 (72–134)NS98 (79.4–139)100 (79.4–141)NSNS
FE sodium (%)0.59 (0.25–1.8)0.78 (0.48–1.27)NS0.52 (0.4–1.0)0.87 (0.36–1.56)0.01NS
FE potassium (%)4.9 (3.3–11.1)7.8 (1.18–19)NS6.4 (0.8–13)13.3 (3.5–18)0.0050.04
FE chloride (%)0.68 (0.47–3.7)1.4 (1.1–1.7)NS0.58 (0.28–5.7)1.6 (0.81–5.0)NSNS
FE phosphate (%)14 (6–20)15.6 (3.79–24)NS15.5 (3–23)10.75 (0.6–19)NSNS
FE calcium (%)0.68 (0.34–1.5)1.4 (0.99–1.7)0.020.58 (0.46–1.3)2.0 (0.19–2.8)0.020.04
FE magnesium (%)2.05 (0.8–3)2.7 (2.2–7.48)NS1.53 (0.44–4.9)4.2 (0.45–5.0)0.04NS
FE urea (%)47 (21–60)46 (27–300)NS57 (20–460)65 (44–110)NSNS
FE uric acid (%)4.7 (4.1–7.9)7.9 (6.0–10.0)NS4.4 (0.36–8.7)10 (2.0–29)NSNS
Plasma osmolarity (mOsm/L)282.5 (279–292)278.5 (270–283)0.009285 (277–298)278 (273–289)0.005NS
Urine osmolarity (mOsm/L)418.5 (142–759)138.5 (38–594)0.005659 (369–854)92 (37–323)0.003NS