International Journal of Nephrology

International Journal of Nephrology / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 987415 |

Monika Tooulou, Pieter Demetter, Anwar Hamade, Caroline Keyzer, Joëlle L. Nortier, Agnieszka A. Pozdzik, "Morphological Retrospective Study of Peritoneal Biopsies from Patients with Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis: Underestimated Role of Adipocytes as New Fibroblasts Lineage?", International Journal of Nephrology, vol. 2015, Article ID 987415, 10 pages, 2015.

Morphological Retrospective Study of Peritoneal Biopsies from Patients with Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis: Underestimated Role of Adipocytes as New Fibroblasts Lineage?

Academic Editor: Jaime Uribarri
Received10 Jun 2015
Accepted16 Jul 2015
Published19 Aug 2015


Background. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare but serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Besides the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), recently peritoneal adipocytes emerged as a potential source of fibrosis. We performed immunohistochemistry to approach EMT and to localize peritoneal adipocytes in peritoneal biopsies from PD-related EPS patients. Material and Methods. We investigated tissue expression of podoplanin, cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (mesothelium), calretinin (adipocytes), alpha-smooth muscle actin [α-SMA] (mesenchymal cells), interstitial mononuclear cell inflammation, and neoangiogenesis (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, and CD31 immunostainings, resp.). Results. Three patients (1 man/2 women; 17, 64, and 39 years old, resp.) developed EPS after 21, 90, and 164 months of PD therapy. In patients with EPS, we observed (1) loss of AE1/AE3 cytokeratin+ mesothelial cells without any evidence of migration into the interstitium, (2) disappearance of adipose tissue, (3) diffuse infiltration of calretinin+ cells in the areas of submesothelial fibrosis with a huge number of α-SMA and calretinin+ fusiform cells, and (4) increased vascular density. Conclusion. We report that the involvement of EMT in peritoneal fibrosis is difficult to demonstrate and that the calretinin+ adipocytes might be an underestimated component and a new source of myofibroblasts in peritoneal remodeling during PD-related EPS.

1. Introduction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a first choice and successful home-based dialysis modality for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), with great advantages for their quality of life: preservation of residual renal function, no vascular access requirement, and possibility of continuing scholar or professional activities [1, 2]. Moreover, the International Society of Nephrology and International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis strongly advise PD therapy for acute kidney injury, especially in a pediatric population [3]. Despite the abovementioned benefits, PD therapy deserves some particular attention. Indeed, long-term PD may prompt the remodeling of peritoneal membrane and loss of mesothelial cells monolayer, increase in vascular density with diabetes-like vascular abnormalities (typical PD-associated venular subendothelial hyalinosis), vascular calcifications, and interstitial fibrosis [4]. These pathological structural changes of the peritoneal membrane are most frequently followed by functional consequences resulting in progressive loss of peritoneal membrane ultrafiltration capacity leading to discontinuation of PD therapy [5, 6].

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is still worrying and is an uncommon life-threatening complication of peritoneal dialysis with an incidence of 0.5 to 2.5% and a high mortality rate (25% to 55%) [7]. Following the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines, diagnosis criteria of EPS include the association of clinical symptoms, radiological and histological findings [8]. The main pathological feature of EPS consists in a marked peritoneal fibrosis; however it lacks specificity as various degrees of submesothelial thickening have been reported in patients with chronic kidney disease [9, 10]. The pathophysiology of EPS is still unknown [11]. Nowadays, it appears that peritoneal fibrosis cannot be entirely explained on the basis of the simple model of wound healing (a three-phase model including injury of mesothelial cells, inflammation, and repair) [7, 12, 13]. This epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation (EMT) process, first described in kidney fibrosis, states that the mesothelial cells change into a mesenchymal phenotype, migrate to submesothelial areas, and differentiate into “activated myofibroblasts,” the cells responsible for fibrosis. The EMT was proposed to be involved mainly in the early stage of peritoneal fibrosis [14]. Recent data demonstrate that the resident peritoneal interstitial cells are early activated following the aggression of mesothelial cells (or epithelium), the inflammatory infiltrate, and profibrosing cytokine microenvironment. Currently, new data suggest that peritoneal adipocytes could also contribute to this pathological process [15].

In our study, we approached the EMT process and adipocytes involvement in peritoneal fibrosis in a morphohistological retrospective analysis of 6 peritoneal tissue biopsies (3 cases with PD-related EPS, 2 cases with normal peritoneal tissue, and 1 case with acute peritonitis, for a histological study during an acute inflammatory process). Our presented data show that the resident peritoneal adipocytes represent an underestimated source of peritoneal myofibroblasts in PD-induced EPS.

2. Material and Methods

The study was evaluated and approved by the Local Ethic Committee (Erasme Hospital number P2014/184). We included peritoneal biopsies samples of the 3 patients with EPS diagnosed between 1995 and 2013 in our center. We selected the 2 control patients with normal peritoneum (randomly selected in our database of patients who had abdominal surgery in our center and with normal renal function). We also analyzed 1 case with acute peritonitis, with normal renal function (so without any ESKD or peritoneal fibrosis), in order to evaluate the hypothesis of early crosstalk between inflammatory cells, mesothelial cells, and adipocytes. For EPS diagnosis, we applied the clinical and biological criteria adapted from Nakamoto [16]: (i) stage 1 (pre-EPS), characterized by loss of ultrafiltration, high transport status, hypoproteinaemia, bloody dialysate, ascites, and peritoneal calcifications; (ii) stage 2 (inflammatory), increase in C-reactive protein level and white blood cell count, fever, weight, and appetite loss; (iii) stage 3 (encapsulating or progressive), disappearance of signs of inflammation and appearance of signs of ileus (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and constipation), abdominal mass with ascites, and (iv) stage 4 (obstructive or cocooning). We used the formalin-fixed peritoneal tissue embedded in paraffin blocks available in the files of the pathology department of our hospital. Medical records analysis of included cases provided epidemiological data (age, gender), PD characteristics (dialysis modality, type of solution, and PD duration), clinical, radiological, and laboratory parameters at EPS diagnosis, time between renal transplantation and the onset of EPS symptoms, and prescribed immunosuppressive agents. Treatment modalities and outcomes of EPS were also recorded and included.

2.1. Standard Stainings and Immunohistochemistry

Standard stainings (Masson’s trichrome and haematoxylin-eosin (HE)) were used to illustrate peritoneal fibrosis, mesothelial cells, and inflammatory infiltrate. The entire sample of each peritoneal tissue specimen was analyzed by optical microscopy using low (×40 and ×100), medium (×200), and high (×400) magnifications (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

The study of tissue expression of podoplanin, AE1/AE3 cytokeratin (mesothelial phenotype), calretinin (expressed by mesothelial cells and adipocytes), vimentin (mesenchymal phenotype), α-SMA (myofibroblasts), CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68 (immunophenotyping of inflammatory cells), and CD31 (endothelial cells marker) was performed on sections of 4 μm thickness using an immunohistochemistry analysis technique (Ventana XT-Discovery, Tucson, USA). Immunoperoxidase procedures counterstained with hematoxylin were applied. We chose the following human tissues as positive controls for immunohistochemistry of used antibodies: tonsil for immunostaining of anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD20, and anti-CD68 antibodies (3-membrane and 1-membrane-cytoplasm patterns, resp.); colon for anti-AE1/AE3 cytokeratin antibodies (cytoplasm pattern); vessels for anti-α-SMA and anti-CD31 antibodies (cytoplasm pattern); sarcoma for anti-vimentin antibodies (cytoplasm pattern); and adipose tissue for anti-calretinin antibodies (nuclear and cytoplasm pattern). The negative controls were performed in the absence of primary antibodies and showed no staining (Table 1).

(time in minutes)

Secondary antibody: monoclonal
PodoplaninMesothelium, lymphatics endothelium H1 (20)1/50Covance, Princeton, New Jersey, USA

Secondary antibody: polyclonal
AE1/AE3MesotheliumH1 (20)1/800Dako, Glostrup, Denmark
CalretininMesotheliumH1 (20)1/150Menarini, Zaventem, Belgium
CD8Cytotoxic/suppressor T cells subpopulationH1 (20)1/800Dako, Glostrup, Denmark
CD20B cellsH1 (30)1/3000Dako, Glostrup, Denmark
CD68Monocytes/macrophages H1 (30)1/100Menarini, Zaventem, Belgium

Secondary antibody: peroxidase
CD4Helper T cells subpopulationH2 (20)1/50Klinipath, Duiven, Netherlands
CD31EndotheliumH2 (30)1/1000Menarini, Zaventem, Belgium
VimentinMesenchymal cells/1/100Klinipath, Duiven, Netherlands
α-SMAMyofibroblasts/1/100Menarini, Zaventem, Belgium

H1: citrate buffer, pH 6.0; H2: EDTA buffer, pH 8.0.
2.2. Quantification of Immunostainings

The semiquantitative score for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, calretinin, vimentin, and α-SMA expression was applied as follows: strong expression (+++), moderate expression (++), low expression (+), or no expression (0).

The quantitative analysis of CD4 expression (subpopulation of T helper cells and infiltration macrophages), CD8 expression (subpopulation of cytotoxic/suppressor T cells), CD20 (B cells population), and CD68 (circulating monocyte and macrophages) was performed by calculating the number of positive cells per field (high magnification, ×400).

For quantitative analysis of CD31 expression (vascular density), we counted CD31 positive vessels per field (medium magnification, ×200).

We analyzed 20 fields at random in each case using an optical microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. Clinical, Biological, and Radiological Characteristics of Studied Patients

The clinical and biological characteristics at diagnosis of EPS are summarized in Table 2. We identified a 17-year-old man (case  1) and two women aged 64 years (case  2) and 39 years (case  3) treated with PD (for 21, 90, and 164 months, resp.), who developed EPS after shift to hemodialysis (case  1) and after first (case  2) and second kidney transplantation (case  3).

Case EPS 1Case EPS 2Case EPS 3

Sex/age at diagnosis (years)M/19 F/64 F/39
Primitive nephropathyCAKUTDiabetes MPGN
Status at EPS diagnosisHDKTxKTx
Time from peritoneal dialysis arrest to EPS diagnosis (months)51855
Peritoneal dialysis modalityCAPDCAPDCAPD
Time on peritoneal dialysis (months)2190164
Peritonitis episodes ()3ND8
MicroorganismsS. aureus (3)NDE. coli (3)
S. aureus (3)
P. aeruginosa (2)
Glucose overexposureYesNoYes
Chlorhexidine useNoNoNo

Clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of EPS
Clinical symptoms/hemoperitoneum Yes/no Yes/yesYes/yes
Abdominal CT findingsIntestinal subocclusion
Loculated ascites
Peritoneal thickening and calcifications
Loculated severe ascites
Peritoneal thickening and calcifications

Treatment of EPS
Azathioprine (mg/day)507550
Tamoxifen (mg/day)/2010
Dexamethasone (mg/day)/328
Current stateHDDied (septicemia)KTx
Follow-up (months)237ND57
Outcome Nausea
Abdominal pain
NDRecurrent ascites, bacterial peritonitis (2)

EPS: encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis; M: man; W: woman; CAKUT: congenital abnormality of kidney and urinary tract; MPGN: membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; HD: haemodialysis; KTx: kidney transplantation CAPD: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; ND: no data available.

In all cases, the diagnosis was suspected because of digestive symptoms, systemic inflammation, and normocytic anemia. Furthermore, cases 2 and 3 had hemorrhagic ascites. Their abdominal CT scan showed, in addition to abundant ascites, diffuse peritoneal calcifications, with parietal and visceral involvement (Figure 1). Positron emission tomography with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) was available only in one case (case  3) and demonstrated significant FDG uptake by the parietal peritoneal membrane (Figure 1).

3.2. Histological and Immunohistochemical Findings

Compared with the normal peritoneal tissue biopsies (controls), massive submesothelial thickening corresponding to fibrosis was associated with the disappearance of the mesothelium in all EPS cases (Figure 2). In controls, we observed a distinct monolayer of cubic mesothelial cells closely attached to one another and affixed to the thin basement membrane, which was in direct contact with a waste area of adipose tissue. In the control 3 biopsy (acute peritonitis), mesothelium was well preserved but we found a marked hyperplasia of mesothelial cells attached to the basement membrane and the apposition of inflammatory connective tissue containing predominantly polymorphonuclear neutrophils infiltrate (Figure 2).

3.3. The Mesothelial Cells in Controls, Acute Peritonitis, and EPS Biopsies

In all 3 control peritoneal biopsies, the thin layer of mesothelial cells strongly expressed podoplanin, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and calretinin (mesothelial markers) (Figure 3, Table 3); these data are consistent with literature [17].

Control 1Control 2Case of acute peritonitisCase EPS 1Case EPS 2Case EPS 3

Markers of mesothelial cells phenotype
 Interstitium 000(+++)(+++)(+++)
 Interstitium 00(+/−)(++)(+)(+)

Immunohistochemical phenotyping of inflammatory infiltrating cells

Markers of endothelial cells phenotype

Markers of mesenchymal cells phenotype
 Interstitium 00(+)(+++)(+++)(+++)

Markers of myofibroblasts
Alpha SMA00(+)(+++)(+++)(+++)

EPS: encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis; SMA: alpha-smooth muscle actin. ND: no data available (insufficiency of biopsy material). Semiquantitative score analysis: expression; high: (+++), moderate: (++), low: (+), and absent: 0. Score of quantitative evaluations: () mean number of cells or (#) vessels per field (details of all immunostaining analysis are described in Material and Methods).

Podoplanin expression was also found in the endothelial cells of lymphatic vessels and mesothelium (Figures 3(a)–3(d)). In case with acute peritonitis, mesothelial cells did not express podoplanin. Only in case  1 of EPS, hyperplastic podoplanin positive mesothelial cells were clearly identified in the interstitium, which had a completely remodeled architecture. In this case, an acute inflammatory component was present at the time of peritoneal biopsy. Interestingly, in case  3 of EPS, we objectified increased podoplanin expression by deep vascular structures. This may suggest an increase in lymphatic vessels density.

High expression of cytokeratin AE1/AE3 by mesothelial cells was observed in the 3 controls but was lacking in all cases of EPS (Figures 3(e)–3(h), Table 3). In the acute peritonitis case, mesothelial cells did not express cytokeratin AE1/AE3. Despite basement membrane rupture, we did not find AE1/AE3+ cells migrating to interstitial areas. Only in case  1 of EPS, hyperplastic cytokeratin AE1/AE3+ mesothelial cells were clearly identified in the remodeled interstitium. These cells did not present typical for myofibroblasts fusiform morphology.

Expression of calretinin in mesothelium was similar to AE1/AE3. Interestingly, expression of calretinin by adipocytes, although in low intensity (+), was constant in all of our 3 controls and acute peritonitis. Nevertheless, we clearly objectified an interstitial accumulation of calretinin positive spindle cells in the 3 EPS cases (Figures 3(i)–3(l), Table 3).

3.4. Interstitial Infiltration by Polymorphonuclear Cells in Acute Peritonitis and by Mononuclear Cells in EPS Biopsies

In comparison with controls, we found diffuse mononuclear cells infiltration containing macrophages, T cells, and few B cells in all EPS cases. We observed a marked heterogeneity between the EPS cases, with a highly variable degree of mononuclear cell infiltration, containing mainly CD68+ and CD8+ cells. Those cells were absent in the interstitium from patient with acute peritonitis that contained several polymorphonuclear cells (Figure 4, Table 3).

3.5. The Mesenchymal Cells in Controls, Acute Peritonitis, and EPS Biopsies

The constitutional expression of α-SMA was mainly found in the vessels and in some rare interstitial cells. In all cases, many spindle cells expressed vimentin and α-SMA and corresponded to mesenchymal cells and myofibroblasts accumulation (Figure 5). A significant increase in vascular density (CD31 positive endothelial cells) was observed in all EPS cases, as compared with controls (Figure 6, Table 3).

4. Discussion

The main finding of our study was the discovery of fusiform calretinin positive cells in areas of severe submesothelial fibrosis in all EPS patients. In normal peritoneal tissue biopsy, weak calretinin staining was found in adipocytes and more enhanced in mesothelial cells according to literature [18]. Calretinin (29 kDa calbindin) is a vitamin D-dependent calcium-binding protein coded by the CALB2 gene and emerges as a multifunctional protein associated with cells development, proliferation, differentiation, and cell death [19].

Our EPS cases were recognized after discontinuation of PD, suggesting the need for vigilance of the nephrologists taking care about transplanted or on hemodialysis patients previously treated by PD [7]. As the incidence of EPS increases with time after renal transplantation [11], the immunosuppressive regimen involvement in the pathogenesis of posttransplant EPS remains an unresolved question.

Several other risk factors have been identified such as high glucose concentration dialysate, long duration of PD, young age, and the use of beta-blockers or cyclosporine and peritonitis [7, 11, 16]. One constant in these factors is the duration of PD, confirmed recently by two independent groups [20, 21]. Indeed, more severe fibrosis is observed in transplanted patient with longest PD vintage and who had a high glucose exposure.

Besides the duration of PD therapy, the number of peritonitis episodes is still a significant risk factor [20, 21]. For this reason, in our morphohistological study we included a case of acute peritonitis not related to PD or ESKD, in order to evaluate the hypothesis of early crosstalk between inflammatory cells and resident peritoneal membrane cells (adipocytes and mesothelial cells). These interactions could be an early link between the PD-related peritonitis (acute inflammation) and peritoneal fibrosis [22]. Interestingly, we found some morphological similarities between mesothelial cells hyperplasia observed in acute peritonitis and in EPS cases, which is in accordance with the findings by others [17]. The reason for mesothelial cells hyperplasia is unknown; however it may be postulated that the cells are activated secondarily by cytokines (released by inflammatory cells) or by hypertonic solutions.

Peritoneal thickening and lowering in the lumen/vessels diameter ratio related to uremia have been reported in patients with chronic kidney diseases [10]. The EMT process has been proposed as a chief pathway of peritoneal fibrosis, mainly in its early stage [23], so early before beginning PD [10]. Despite extensive studies on EMT [14, 23, 24], many aspects of peritoneal membrane remodeling and EPS remain poorly understood [25, 26] suggesting that additional novel mechanisms and pathways need to be explored [13]. Interpretation of our data is unfortunately limited by the small number of studied biopsies as well as the fact that they were obtained at advanced stages of EPS. Indeed, agreeing to Nakamoto [16], cases  1, 2, and 3 corresponded to pre-EPS and inflammatory and progressive or encapsulating EPS, respectively. Moreover, we observed a highly variable degree of interstitial inflammation. Similar to previous report [17], we did not find a transmembrane migration of mesothelial cells into the interstitium, a pivotal phase of EMT. Our results did not confirm that peritoneal interstitial fibroblasts derive from EMT.

The role of EMT in peritoneal fibrosis has been adapted from mechanisms reported in kidney fibrosis (KF). However today, this model begins to be questioned [2730]. In fact, resident cells (fibroblasts) are considered as the main source as only 5% of myofibroblasts derived from EMT in experimental models of KF [31]. As in the renal fibrosis, already present resident peritoneal cells should be considered as a potential source for myofibroblasts generation. Indeed, peritoneal adipocytes are pluripotent cells and they are active players in fibrosis [3234]. Therefore, peritoneal calretinin positive adipocytes might be a new and actually underestimated source of myofibroblasts. As compared with controls, the submesothelial adipose tissue containing several calretinin positive adipocytes completely disappeared; nonetheless numerous fusiform calretinin positive cells were observed in the areas of peritoneal fibrosis in EPS biopsies. Intriguingly, in case of acute peritonitis, we found that a submesothelial layer of inflammatory cells closely bordered adipocytes. Unfortunately because of insufficient quantity of peritoneal tissue biopsies, the expression of adipose cells mRNA was not performed. Besides dialysate, several cytokines and growth factors such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) a pivotal profibrotic cytokine secreted by injured mesothelial cells and/or inflammatory cells could be involved in adipocytes differentiation into the peritoneal fibroblasts [35]. In fact, strong evidence suggests a possible crosstalk between the PD solutions, adipose tissue, and peritoneal fibrosis [15, 32]. Moreover, adipocytes mediate numerous physiological processes, secreted adipokines (leptin, adiponectin), cytokines (TNFα, IL-6), and growth factors including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) [32]. Leptin stimulates lipolysis and inhibits lipogenesis [32]. In human peritoneal mesothelial cells, it has been reported that glucose increased the leptin mRNA expression and its synthesis. Concomitantly, the leptin receptor was upregulated in mesothelial cells and leptin induced the release of TGF-β by mesothelial cells. Interestingly, glucose markedly amplified this process [36]. It must be taken into account that adipocytes could be potentially in direct contact with the glucose contained in PD solution after disruption of mesothelium integrity. Indeed shedding of mesothelial cells into the peritoneal cavity by alteration of cell junctions and basement membrane denudation are induced by recurrent mechanical stress related to the daily variations in intra-abdominal pressure and to turbulences of in- and outflow of PD solutions (volume, number of cycles) [1, 7]. Above data could be a plausible way to explain the observed loss of adipose tissue as our cases were exposed to high glucose concentration PD solutions during a long time.

In conclusion, we report that the involvement of EMT in peritoneal fibrosis is difficult to demonstrate. The calretinin positive cells accumulate in the submesothelial fibrosis so that adipocytes might be an underestimated component and a new source of myofibroblasts in peritoneal remodeling during EPS related to PD.


Parts of this work have been presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Belgian Society of Nephrology (October 2014, Brussels, Belgium) and at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology (November 2014, Philadelphia, USA).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. S. J. Davies, “Peritoneal dialysis—current status and future challenges,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 399–408, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Bargman, “Peritoneal dialysis should be the first choice for renal replacement therapy in the elderly,” Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 668–670, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. Cullis, M. Abdelraheem, G. Abrahams et al., “Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 494–517, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. T. Krediet and D. G. Struijk, “Peritoneal changes in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 419–429, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. A. Brown, W. Van Biesen, F. O. Finkelstein et al., “Length of time on peritoneal dialysis and encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: position paper for ISPD,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 595–600, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  6. O. Devuyst, P. J. Margetts, and N. Topley, “The pathophysiology of the peritoneal membrane,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1077–1085, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Goodlad and E. A. Brown, “Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: what have we learned?” Seminars in Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 183–198, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Kawaguchi, A. Saito, H. Kawanishi et al., “Recommendations on the management of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in Japan, 2005: diagnosis, predictive markers, treatment, and preventive measures,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 25, supplement 4, pp. S83–S95, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  9. K. Honda and H. Oda, “Pathology of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 25, supplement 4, pp. S19–S29, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. Honda, C. Hamada, M. Nakayama et al., “Impact of uremia, diabetes, and peritoneal dialysis itself on the pathogenesis of peritoneal sclerosis: a quantitative study of peritoneal membrane morphology,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 720–728, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. R. Korte, D. E. Sampimon, M. G. H. Betjes, and R. T. Krediet, “Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: the state of affairs,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 528–538, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. A. Wynn, “Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. S. Duffield, M. Lupher, V. J. Thannickal, and T. A. Wynn, “Host responses in tissue repair and fibrosis,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 8, pp. 241–276, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. S. Aroeira, A. Aguilera, J. A. Sánchez-Tomero et al., “Epithelial to mesenchymal transition and peritoneal membrane failure in peritoneal dialysis patients: pathologic significance and potential therapeutic interventions,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 2004–2013, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Aoki, K. Udo, H. Morimoto et al., “Adipose tissue behavior is distinctly regulated by neighboring cells and fluid flow stress: a possible role of adipose tissue in peritoneal fibrosis,” Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 322–331, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Nakamoto, “Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis—a clinician's approach to diagnosis and medical treatment,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 25, supplement 4, pp. S30–S38, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  17. N. Braun, D. M. Alscher, P. Fritz et al., “Podoplanin-positive cells are a hallmark of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1033–1041, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. M. M. Cates, B. N. Coffing, B. T. Harris, and C. C. Black, “Calretinin expression in tumors of adipose tissue,” Human Pathology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 312–321, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. Schwaller, “Calretinin: from a ‘simple’ Ca2+ buffer to a multifunctional protein implicated in many biological processes,” Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, vol. 8, article 3, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. De Sousa-Amorim, G. Del Peso, M. A. Bajo et al., “Can EPS development be avoided with early interventions? The potential role of tamoxifen—a single-center study,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 582–593, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  21. C. Goodlad, F. W. K. Tam, S. Ahmad, G. Bhangal, B. V. North, and E. A. Brown, “Dialysate cytokine levels do not predict encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 594–604, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. N. Schilte, J. W. A. M. Celie, P. M. Ter Wee, R. H. J. Beelen, and J. van den Born, “Factors contributing to peritoneal tissue remodeling in peritoneal dialysis,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 605–617, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  23. G. Del Peso, J. A. Jiménez-Heffernan, M. A. Bajo et al., “Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells is an early event during peritoneal dialysis and is associated with high peritoneal transport,” Kidney International, vol. 73, no. 108, pp. S26–S33, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Selgas, A. Bajo, J. A. Jiménez-Heffernan et al., “Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of the mesothelial cell—its role in the response of the peritoneum to dialysis,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 21, supplement 2, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Kawaguchi and A. Tranaeus, “A historical review of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis,” Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 25, supplement 4, pp. S7–S13, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. M. Bargman, “Advances in peritoneal dialysis: a review,” Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 545–549, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. V. S. Lebleu, G. Taduri, J. O'Connell et al., “Origin and function of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1047–1053, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. B. D. Humphreys, S.-L. Lin, A. Kobayashi et al., “Fate tracing reveals the pericyte and not epithelial origin of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. S. Duffield and B. D. Humphreys, “Origin of new cells in the adult kidney: results from genetic labeling techniques,” Kidney International, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 494–501, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. A. Eddy, “Overview of the cellular and molecular basis of kidney fibrosis,” Kidney International Supplements, vol. 4, pp. 2–8, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. L. Falke, S. Gholizadeh, R. Goldschmeding, R. J. Kok, and T. Q. Nguyen, “Diverse origins of the myofibroblast—implications for kidney fibrosis,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 11, pp. 233–244, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Sun, J. Tordjman, K. Clément, and P. E. Scherer, “Fibrosis and adipose tissue dysfunction,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 470–477, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Yin, W. Cai, J. Sheng, and Y. Sun, “Hypoxia induced changes of SePP1 expression in rat preadipocytes and its impact on vascular fibroblasts,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  34. R. R. Driskell, B. M. Lichtenberger, E. Hoste et al., “Distinct fibroblast lineages determine dermal architecture in skin development and repair,” Nature, vol. 504, no. 7479, pp. 277–281, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Cho, C. M. Hawley, and D. W. Johnson, “Clinical causes of inflammation in peritoneal dialysis patients,” International Journal of Nephrology, vol. 2014, Article ID 909373, 9 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. C. K. Leung, L. Y. Y. Chan, S. C. W. Tang, K. M. Chu, and K. N. Lai, “Leptin induces TGF-β synthesis through functional leptin receptor expressed by human peritoneal mesothelial cell,” Kidney International, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 2078–2086, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Monika Tooulou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles