Table of Contents
International Journal of Navigation and Observation
Volume 2011, Article ID 137671, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/137671
Research Article

A Multihypothesis Sequential Probability Test for Fault Detection and Identification of Vehicles' Ultrasonic Parking Sensors

Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, UAE

Received 28 April 2011; Revised 30 July 2011; Accepted 3 October 2011

Academic Editor: Shaojun Feng

Copyright © 2011 Mamoun F. Abdel-Hafez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. V. Nikiforov, “New optimal approach to global positioning system/differential global positioning system integrity monitoring,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1023–1033, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. W. Parkinson and P. Axelrad, “Autonomous GPS integrity monitoring using the pseudorange residual,” Navigation, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 255–274, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Watanabe and D. M. Himmelbrau, “Instrument fault detection in systems with uncertainties,” International Journal of System Science, vol. 13, pp. 483–500, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. F. Abdel-Hafez, “The autocovariance least-squares technique for GPS measurement noise estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 2, Article ID 5299067, pp. 574–588, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. A. White, P. S. Maybeck, and S. L. DeVilbiss, “Detection of interference/jamming and spoofing in a DCPS-aided inertial system,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1208–1217, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. M. Sabatini, “A digital-signal-processing technique for ultrasonic signal modeling and classification,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. M. Sabatini, “Digital signal-processing technique for compensating ultrasonic sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 869–874, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Angrisani, A. Baccigalupi, and R. Schiano Lo Moriello, “A measurement method based on Kalman filtering for ultrasonic time-of-flight estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 442–448, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Soika, “Sensor failure detection framework for autonomous mobile robots,” in Proceeding of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1735–1740, September 1998.
  10. D. Bank, “An error detection model for ultrasonic sensor evaluation on autonomous mobile systems,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive, pp. 288–293, 2002.
  11. P. Frank, L. Palkovics, and L. Gianone, “Using wheel speed and wheel slip information for controlling vehicle chassis systems,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC '00), 2000.
  12. S. L. Miller, B. Youngberg, A. Millie, P. Schweizer, and C. Gerdes, “Calculating longitudinal wheel slip and tire parameters using GPS velocity,” in Proceedings of the American Controls Conference, pp. 1800–1805, June 2001.
  13. F. J. J. Hermans and M. B. Zarrop, “Model based statistical change detection for automotive applications,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, pp. 105–110, September 1996.
  14. M. L. Schwall and J. C. Gerdas, “Multi-modal diagnostics for vehicle fault detection,” in Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 1753–1762, November 2001.
  15. M. L. Schwall and J. C. Gerdes, “A probabilistic approach to residual processing for vehicle fault detection,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 2552–2557, May 2002.
  16. H. E. Tseng and L. Xu, “Robust model-based fault detection for roll rate sensor,” in Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1968–1973, December 2003.
  17. O. Buehler and J. Wegener, “Evolutionary functional testing of an automated parking system,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control Technologies and the 9th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, pp. 1–8, 2003.
  18. N. Messai, P. Thomas, D. Lefebvre, and A. E. Moudni, “Neural networks for local monitoring of traffic magnetic sensors,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 67–80, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Shirayayev, Optimal Stopping Rules, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  20. T. L. Lai, “Sequential multiple hypothesis testing and efficient fault detection-isolation in stochastic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 595–608, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Chan and J. L. Speyer, “A sequential probability test for RAIM,” in Proceedings of the ION GNSS International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, pp. 1798–1802, September 2004.
  22. A. Wald, Sequential Analysis, Wiley Mathematical Statistics Series, Wiley Mathematical Statistics SeriesJohn Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1947.
  23. Y. Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li, and T. Kirubarajan, Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation, Theory, Algorithms, and Software, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  24. C. W. Baum and V. V. Veeravalli, “Sequential procedure for multihypothesis testing,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1994–2007, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. V. P. Dragalin, A. G. Tartakovsky, and V. V. Veeravalli, “Multihypothesis sequential probability ratio tests—part I: asymptotic optimality,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2448–2461, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. V. P. Dragalin, A. G. Tartakovsky, and V. V. Veeravalli, “Multihypothesis sequential probability ratio tests—part II: accurate asymptotic expansions for the expected sample size,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1366–1383, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet