Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Optics
Volume 2019, Article ID 4906109, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4906109
Research Article

Combined Reduced Phase Dual-Directional Illumination Digital Holography and Speckle Displacements for Shape Measurement

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden
2Experimental Mechanics, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Davood Khodadad; es.uro@dadadohk.doovad

Received 1 November 2018; Accepted 22 January 2019; Published 7 February 2019

Academic Editor: John T. Sheridan

Copyright © 2019 Davood Khodadad. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We present a digital holographic method to increase height range measurement with a reduced phase ambiguity using a dual-directional illumination. Small changes in the angle of incident illumination introduce phase differences between the recorded complex fields. We decrease relative phase difference between the recorded complex fields 279 and 139 times by changing the angle of incident 0.5° and 1°, respectively. A two cent Euro coin edge groove is used to measure the shape. The groove depth is measured as ≈300  . Further, numerical refocusing and analysis of speckle displacements in two different planes are used to measure the depth without a use of phase unwrapping process.

1. Introduction

Noninvasive characterization of surface shape and deformation is very important in many industrial applications such as on-line quality control and reverse engineering [1]. Digital holography is well known for producing high precision noninvasive shape measurements [2]. It gives the possibility to numerically propagate the field to different distances from the detector, in order to do the numerical postprocessing [26]. However, when phase variation spans more than 2π in a measured field, it results in phase ambiguity. To remedy this problem, different methods have been presented [715]. Numerical methods are often used to solve the problem [9]. However, they are usually time consuming and are not suitable for real-time measurements. Multiwavelength Interferometry (MWI) is another solution which, in the form of a single shot (multiplexed), can be used for real-time measurement purposes [7, 1015]. The maximum measurable range in MWI is limited by the synthetic beat wavelengths of a system. However, chromatic aberration in MWI and pseudophase changes in the multiplexed (single shot) form are inevitable sources of error that need to be suppressed and calibrated [4, 1621]. Dual-directional illumination quantitative phase imaging with a single wavelength light source is another unwrapping solution [2226]. Two independent interferograms with different illumination directions can be recorded by changing the angle of incident laser light with a tilting mirror. The method is based on reducing the measured phase to less than 2π. As the method uses a single wavelength light source, there is no error due to the chromatic aberrations. Although this method usually requires two different images to be obtained consecutively within a certain time interval, they can also be obtained in a single shot method in order to be used in real-time measurements [26]. In addition to the above methods, when measuring the shape of an optically rough object, the movement of the speckle pattern in different refocusing distances can be analyzed [2730]. Correspondence between speckle displacements and phase gradients [5, 31] can be utilized to find the shape without problems with phase unwrapping.

In this study, we combined a reduced phase dual-directional illumination and analysis of speckle displacement methods to be used together for a large stepped sample without phase wrapping in the reconstructed data. A combination of two methods can make a robust system since the analysis is not only based on phase differences but is also based on speckle displacements.

2. Theory of Reduced Phase Dual-Directional Illumination Holography

For measurement of the shape we take the difference between the reconstructed phases which are recorded before and after a small tilt of the object illuminating beam. Consider the simplified set-up depicted in Figure 1(a). The mirror reflects the laser beam to the object surface with an initial angle of . For simplicity, we adopt two-dimensional analysis. The reconstructed phase will then be expressed bywhere and mean the surface height from the reference plane. In the second stage, we tilted the mirror at an angle of from the initial angle of incidence . The reconstructed phase in this stage will then beHence the phase difference becomes in terms of and as Therefore we can determine the object shape that results from the difference between the reconstructed phases and which are recorded before and after a small tilt introduced in the object illumination beam. is related with the change in optical path length sensitivity of the set-up which is given by the geometrical optics arrangement; actually it is determined by the illumination and observation direction. Here, in this set-up, the observation direction is fixed and the illumination direction is changed by the angle of .

Figure 1: Schematic of simplified set-up for dual-direction illumination shape measurement (a). The measured coin edge (b). The squared area has been recorded and used for measurement.

The sensitivity of the set-up (height range measurement) for having unwrapped phase can be then calculated aswhich leads to the maximum range of height that can be measured without phase wrapping asComparing (5) with the conventional maximum range of height shows that we increase the height range by the factor of . Therefore we have a scaling (phase reduction) factor of .

Therefore the shape of the object will be measured byIf the illumination angle is parallel with the optical axis, and the phase reduction factor will then be . Therefore (5) will change to

3. Experimental Results

We choose a 2 cent Euro coin to measure the groove depth of its edge. A laser beam with the wavelength of 532.35 nm was used to illuminate the test object. The interference pattern was recorded by a high resolution CCD camera (Vistek, Eco655) with 2448×2050 pixels of the size 3.45×3.45 m pitch with a set-up magnification of . The angle of incident was with respect to the optical axis, and its changes were and 1° leading to the height sensitivity and 37 m, respectively. These changes resulted in the distribution of the reconstructed phase difference shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Reduced phase distribution as a result of small change in the angle of incident. Scaling (phase reduction) factor is 279 in (a) and 139 in (b).

Using and 1°, the phase reduction factors are 279 and 139. In Figure 2(a) height sensitivity is almost twice of Figure 2(b). This is why the number of wraps in Figure 2(a) is two times less than Figure 2(b). An arbitrary cross section from the unwrapped phase map is used to measure the depth of the groove in the coin edge. Figure 3 shows a plot of the cross section over height profile. We measured the groove depth of m for the coin.

Figure 3: A vertical cross section over the measured shape of the groove in coin edge.

We have also used speckle displacements to measure the height (depth), independent of phase information which leads to a solution without being in a need for unwrapped phase information; see [30, 31]. The complex amplitudes from the recorded holograms were then acquired and used to calculate two more sets of complex amplitudes using numerical refocusing. One field is set 10 mm behind the object and the other 10 mm in front of the object. We hence have six complex amplitudes acquired at two illumination directions (55° and 55.5°) originating from three different planes, which are used to acquire information of the depth on the object edge. Position of the focus plane plays a crucial role in order to detect the shape of the object. According to the speckle displacement behavior, on the surface of the object, when it is on the focus plane, there are no speckle displacements. The reason is that speckle displacements induced by the phase gradients do not appear in the focus plane; see [5, 29]. It is worth mentioning that, in the speckle displacement based method, the dominant parameter affecting the accuracy of the measurement is the accuracy of the speckle displacement calculation that is a function of the speckle correlation itself [3234]. This is why the numerical refocusing must be well below the range of the longitudinal speckle size in order to ovoid higher decorrelations.

Figure 4 shows the speckle displacements in pixels in three different planes while average correlation is 0.78. Different parts of the object show different sizes of the speckles since they are located in different planes because of object surface height change. Since the speckle displacements follow linear behavior, fitting first order of the polynomial function to the speckle displacements as a function of refocusing distance retrieves the shape of the object. Consequently, the depth (height) of the object can be calculated without being in a need for phase unwrapping process. Figure 5 shows the results from the speckle displacement analysis. Height profile is seen in (a) with an inverted cross section over a horizontal direction (b) which shows the measured depth. Depth groove of is calculated using speckle displacements method.

Figure 4: The speckle displacement map 10 mm behind the object, on the object plane, and 10 mm in front of the object in (a), (b), and (c), respectively.
Figure 5: Depth measurement using speckle displacement calculations. (a) is the height profile and (b) is an inverted cross section over a horizontal line.

4. Conclusion

We have shown that, by introducing a small change on the angle of incident, it is possible to scale the phase difference between two recorded complex fields. Therefore, adjustment of phase reduction factor will give a possibility to keep the phase difference in the range of ; thus there is no phase wrapping ambiguity that makes it possible to measure height discontinuities. Further, it is shown that it is possible to use speckle displacements as a result of change in the sensitivity vector [2729] originating from small change of the angle of incident. Using speckle displacements provides a method that is independent of phase unwrapping. The presented results are preliminary which shows measurement difference of 40 m. However, an accurate measurement can be achieved using noise and error reduction algorithms that are out of the scope of this study.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The research was performed as part of the employment of the author at Luleå University of Technology, during his visiting research at Universität Stuttgart. The work is also presented as an abstract in 2018 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS-Toyama). The author would also like to thank Dr. Alok Kumar Singh from the Institute für Technische Optik, Universität Stuttgart, for valuable discussions.

References

  1. Y. Li and P. Gu, “Free-form surface inspection techniques state of the art review,” Computer-Aided Design, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 1395–1417, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. P. Rastogi and A. Sharma, “Systematic approach to image formation in digital holography,” Optical Engineering, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1208–1214, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Xu, C. C. Aleksoff, and J. Ni, “High-precision three-dimensional shape reconstruction via digital refocusing in multi-wavelength digital holography,” Applied Optics, vol. 51, no. 15, pp. 2958–2967, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Khodadad, “Phase-derivative-based estimation of a digital reference wave from a single off-axis digital hologram,” Applied Optics, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1663–1669, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Khodadad, A. K. Singh, G. Pedrini, and M. Sjödahl, “Full-field 3D deformation measurement: Comparison between speckle phase and displacement evaluation,” Applied Optics, vol. 55, no. 27, pp. 7735–7743, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. C. Aleksoff, “Multi-wavelength digital holographic metrology,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Optics + Photonics, p. 7, 2006.
  7. C. Wagner, W. Osten, and S. Seebacher, “Direct shape measurement by digital wavefront reconstruction and multiwavelength contouring,” Optical Engineering, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79–85, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Gass, A. Dakoff, and M. K. Kim, “Phase imaging without 2π ambiguity by multiwavelength digital holography,” Optics Expresss, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1141–1143, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J.-F. Weng and Y.-L. Lo, “Integration of robust filters and phase unwrapping algorithms for image reconstruction of objects containing height discontinuities,” Optics Express, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 10896–10920, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Wada, M. Kato, and Y. Ishii, “Multiple-wavelength digital holographic interferometry using tunable laser diodes,” Applied Optics, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2053–2060, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Carl, M. Fratz, M. Pfeifer, D. M. Giel, and H. Höfler, “Multiwavelength digital holography with autocalibration of phase shifts and artificial wavelengths,” Applied Optics, vol. 48, no. 34, pp. H1–H8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. J. Mann, P. R. Bingham, V. C. Paquit, and K. W. Tobin, “Quantitative phase imaging by three-wavelength digital holography,” Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 9753–9764, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Yousefi-Banaem, S. Kermani, O. Sarrafzadeh, and D. Khodadad, “An improved spatial FCM algorithm for cardiac image segmentation,” in Proceedings of the 13th Iranian Conference on Fuzzy Systems, IFSC 2013, pp. 1–4, Iran, 2013. View at Scopus
  14. B. Tayebi, J. Han, F. Sharif, M. R. Jafarfard, and D. Y. Kim, “Compact single-shot four-wavelength quantitative phase microscopy with polarization- and frequency-division demultiplexing,” Optics Express, vol. 25, pp. 20172–20182, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. R. Jafarfard, S. Moon, B. Tayebi, and D. Y. Kim, “Dual-wavelength diffraction phase microscopy for simultaneous measurement of refractive index and thickness,” Optics Expresss, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2908–2911, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Ferraro, L. Miccio, S. Grilli et al., “Quantitative Phase Microscopy of microstructures with extended measurement range and correction of chromatic aberrations by multiwavelength digital holography,” Optics Express, vol. 15, no. 22, pp. 14591–14600, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. G. Abdelsalam, R. Magnusson, and D. Kim, “Single-shot, dual-wavelength digital holography based on polarizing separation,” Applied Optics, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 3360–3368, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. De Nicola, A. Finizio, G. Pierattini et al., “Recovering correct phase information in multiwavelength digital holographic microscopy by compensation for chromatic aberrations,” Optics Expresss, vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 2706–2708, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Leclercq and P. Picart, “Method for chromatic error compensation in digital color holographic imaging,” Optics Express, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 26456–26467, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Khodadad, P. Bergström, E. Hällstig, and M. Sjödahl, “Single shot dual-wavelength digital holography: calibration based on speckle displacements,” International Journal of Optomechatronics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 326–339, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Khodadad, P. Bergström, E. Hällstig, and M. Sjödahl, “Fast and robust automatic calibration for single-shot dual-wavelength digital holography based on speckle displacements,” Applied Optics, vol. 54, no. 16, pp. 5003–5010, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. I. Yamaguchi, J.-I. Kato, and S. Ohta, “Surface shape measurement by phase-shifting digital holography,” Optical Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 85–89, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. Tayebi, M. R. Jafarfard, F. Sharif, Y. S. Bae, S. H. H. Shokuh, and D. Y. Kim, “Reduced-phase dual-illumination interferometer for measuring large stepped objects,” Optics Expresss, vol. 39, no. 19, pp. 5740–5743, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Tayebi, M. R. Jafarfard, F. Sharif, Y. S. Song, D. Har, and D. Y. Kim, “Large step-phase measurement by a reducedphase triple-illumination interferometer,” Optics Express, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11264–11271, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. Tayebi, M. R. Jafarfard, F. Sharif, and D. Y. Kim, “Effect of The Angle Accuracy in Reduced-Phase Dual-Illumination Interferometer,” in Proceedings of the SPIE/COS Photonics Asia, p. 6, Beijing, China, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. T. Tahara, A. Maeda, Y. Awatsuji et al., “Single-shot dual-illumination phase unwrapping using a single wavelength,” Optics Expresss, vol. 37, no. 19, pp. 4002–4004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Sjodahl, E. Hallstig, and D. Khodadad, “Multi-spectral speckles: Theory and applications,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speckle Metrology, Speckle 2012, 10 pages, Spain, 2012. View at Scopus
  28. D. Khodadad, Multiplexed Digital Holography incorporating Speckle Correlation, Luleå tekniska universitet, 2016.
  29. M. Sjodahl, “Dynamic properties of multispectral speckles in digital holography and image correlation,” Optical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 10, Article ID 101908, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Khodadad, E. Hällstig, and M. Sjödahl, “Shape reconstruction using dual wavelength digital holography and speckle movements,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Optical Metrology 2013, 11 pages, 2013. View at Scopus
  31. D. Khodadad, E. Hällstig, and M. Sjödahl, “Dual-wavelength digital holographic shape measurement using speckle movements and phase gradients,” Optical Engineering, vol. 52, no. 10, Article ID 101912, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Sjödahl, “Electronic speckle photography: Increased accuracy by nonintegral pixel shifting,” Applied Optics, vol. 33, no. 28, pp. 6667–6673, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Sjódahl, “Accuracy in electronic speckle photography,” Applied Optics, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 2875–2885, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. P. Kelly, J. E. Ward, U. Gopinathan, B. M. Hennelly, F. T. O'Neill, and J. T. Sheridan, “Generalized Yamaguchi correlation factor for coherent quadratic phase speckle metrology systems with an aperture,” Optics Expresss, vol. 31, no. 23, pp. 3444–3446, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus