International Journal of Optics

International Journal of Optics / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 6023646 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6023646

Himani Kohli, Sangeeta Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Satish Chouhan, Manan Oza, "Design of Programmable LED Based Phototherapy System", International Journal of Optics, vol. 2019, Article ID 6023646, 8 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6023646

Design of Programmable LED Based Phototherapy System

Academic Editor: Wonho Jhe
Received23 Jan 2019
Revised05 May 2019
Accepted15 May 2019
Published02 Jun 2019

Abstract

Light based systems are frequently used in the field of medicine for diagnostic and surgical procedures, medical photography, phototherapy, etc. Phototherapy involves the use of light energy for the treatment of physical or mental illnesses. Illumination parameters such as wavelength and dose of therapy can be varied to have distinct effects on cells and tissues. This has necessitated the need to design a system which is programmable for various parameters related to therapy and can also be used by people at large for biomedical applications. The paper presents the design and implementation of a portable, hand-held and programmable Light Emitting Diode (LED) based phototherapy system using embedded technology. The system is designed around the ARM based TM4C123GH6PM microcontroller processor. The microcontroller has been programmed to allow for selection of various parameters such as frequency, duty cycle, and time of exposure. The matrix keypad interface and liquid crystal display (LCD) offer the ease of human interface. An LED driver circuit has been efficiently designed to modulate the output power of LED. Further, Super Bright LED (SLED) of wavelength 633 nm has been successfully tested and results of optical characterization including spectral and spatial response have been presented in the results section. The designed system successfully achieves the programmable parameters required for dose optimisation required for enhancing the therapeutic effects of a phototherapy system.

1. Introduction

Low Level Light Therapy (LLLT) or phototherapy is a noninvasive technique of exposing an injured tissue to light (continuous or pulsed monochromatic light) of wavelength ranging from 600 to 1000 nm in order to relieve pain, reduce inflammation, and enhance wound healing [1]. The source of light used in this technique could be the LASER or the small, cost effective SLED, or LED [2]. The main components of phototherapy include source wavelength, pulse frequency, power density, and irradiation time. The power density required for the treatment of various kinds of injuries can vary from 1 mW/cm2 to 100 mW/cm2 [3]. The irradiation time of this novel therapy can range from a few minutes to several hours. The treatment span could vary from a few days to several weeks depending upon the type of injury or wound. Laser based therapy is thermal in nature whereas there is no such reported effects due to LED. Therapeutic effects of LLLT that have been reported are increased cellular proliferation, migration and adhesion, enhanced neovascularization, promotion of angiogenesis, and increased collagen synthesis [48]. Cell proliferation has been reported in vitro in several types of cells: fibroblasts, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and even lymphocytes [911]. Phototherapy is also known as photo biomodulation because of the biological effects caused by the photon on exposure to the treated tissues. The primary mechanism behind phototherapy is energy absorption from a light source. Consequently, a photochemical reaction is initiated when the chromophore react with the light entering a tissue. The major factors affecting light absorption are wavelength of the light source and tissue chromophore (haemoglobin and melanin). Chromophore absorb wavelength below 600 nm while water molecules do the same for infrared light wavelength greater than 1100 nm. Thus, 600-1100nm is optical window for effective tissue penetration. Considering the biological window, LED of wavelength ranging between 600 and 650nm has been selected for biomedical applications such as wound healing.

Till date, many research studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of LLLT but none have been able to determine the parameters effective for wound healing applications. The major drawback is the nonavailability of a standard instrument which can be programmed for variable parameters such as frequency, duty cycle, and exposure time. Thus, one needs to develop a programmable and tunable instrument which can be used for laboratory experiments leading to a detailed investigation and analysis of the parameters required for the therapeutic treatment.

In this paper we have presented the design and analysis of programmable LED based system using embedded technology. In this design it is possible to vary the mode of operation such as continuous or pulsed. Also, it is possible to control the frequency of operation and duty ratio for optimal use in healing applications.

2. Design and Development of LED Based Phototherapy System

The design and development of the portable, programmable LED based phototherapy system are now discussed in detail.

2.1. System Overview

The portable LED based phototherapy system comprises of three distinct units as illustrated in Figure 1. The units are: Pulse generator (processor module and user interface module), current driver circuit and the LED module. Processor is the core of pulse generator that instructs the system to operate in either continuous or pulsed mode. The keypad is used to accept user defined variables, i.e., frequency, duty cycle, and time of exposure. These illumination parameters are displayed on the LCD for user feedback and transmitted to microcontroller unit for pulse generation. The portable battery is used to power the designed system.

The time duration for the operation of the device is also programmable. Finally, the output of the control system is routed to LED driver circuit which generates sufficient power to drive the LED module.

2.1.1. Pulse Generator

The pulse generator module is designed around the Texas Instruments TM4C123GH6PM microcontroller as its core controller and an interface module comprising of matrix keypad and LCD display which meets the design requirements of the system.

A microcontroller is a complete computer integrated onto a single silicon chip. This means that microcontroller has on-chip memories (RAM and ROM), a central processing unit (CPU), an arithmetic and logic unit (ALU), timers, watchdog timers, pulse width modulation modules, analog-to-digital converters, general purpose input/output ports, etc. The TM4C123GH6PM [12] is a low power, high performance 32-bit microcontroller manufactured by Texas Instruments using high-density, nonvolatile memory technology and is compatible with the industry standards. The on-chip flash allows in-system programming along with the conventional nonvolatile memory programmer. The system is designed to operate in continuous as well as pulsed mode. It allows the frequency selection ranging from 1 Hz to 1 KHz. While operating in pulse mode, the duty cycle can be varied from 1% to 99%. The duration of exposure can be set from 1 to 99 minutes.

4x4 Matrix Keypad. Matrix keypad consists of an interconnected set of push buttons. The fundamental advantage of the 4x4 matrix keypad is that the sixteen keys require only eight general purpose input/ output (GPIO) pins to interface effectively, four GPIO pins for the rows and four GPIO pins for the columns. Keypad pins 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the column pins and keypad pins 5, 6, 7, and 8 are the row pins. The column pins are initialized as output pins and are successively set to logic high while the rest are set to logic low. Alternately, the row pins are initialized as input pins and are used to detect the press of a key. This process returns a coordinate value for the specific key that has been pressed, which is decoded to return the value which the key indicates (as opposed to the positional coordinate associated with the pressed key). This process relies on the fact that the time requirement to scan for the press of a key is at least an order of magnitude less than the time requirement to physically press a key. The row pins of the 4x4 matrix keypad are interfaced to general purpose input/output (GPIO) port E pins 0 to 3 (PE 0 – 3) of the TM4C123GH6PM microcontroller development board whereas the column pins of the keypad are interfaced to GPIO port C pins 4 to 7 (PC 4 – 7).

20x4 Liquid Crystal Display Module. The 20x4 liquid crystal display module incorporates a HD4478U liquid crystal display controller and driver along with a 20x4 dot-matrix liquid crystal display capable of displaying four rows of twenty characters each, a Random-Access Memory (RAM) unit and a Read Only Memory (ROM) unit. The RAM unit is divided into two discrete units, namely, Display Data RAM (DDRAM) and Character Graphics RAM (CGRAM). The DDRAM stores the microcontroller generated data to be displayed on the LCD screen. The CGRAM, on the other hand, stores any custom nonstandard characters a user may define. The ROM unit, called Character Graphics ROM (CGROM), stores the standard character data for the 5x7 dot-matrix characters and predefined commands used to control the operation of the LCD controller. The contents of this memory unit cannot be edited by the user interface.

The sixteen pins of the LCD module are connected as follows.

The LCD (Pin 0), R/W (Pin 4), and LED- (Pin 15) pins are connected to ground. The (Pin 1) is connected to the 5V power supply. The (Contrast Adjustment) (Pin 2) is connected to the wiper of a 10 kΩ potentiometer whose other terminals are connected to and ground. The Register Select (RS) (Pin 3) is connected to GPIO Port A pin 2 (PA 2). The Read/Write (R/W) (Pin 4) is connected to ground. The Enable (En) (Pin 5) is connected to GPIO Port A pin 3 (PA 3). Data pins (DB 0 – 7) (Pins 6 – 13) are interfaced to GPIO Port B pins (PB 0 – 7). The LED+ (Brightness Adjustment) (Pin 14) is connected to through a 150 Ω resistor.

The supply from portable battery is connected across and ground pin of the TM4C123GH6PM microcontroller and an external reset push button is provided across the reset pin and ground. The square pulsed wave is generated at the GPIO Port D pin 6.

2.1.2. Software Design

The program was written in C using the Advanced RISC Machines (ARM) instruction set developed on the Keil μVision version 4 Integrated Development Environment (IDE) which incorporates a text editor, linker, compiler, and debugger all in one development environment.

The TM4C123GH6PM microcontroller works at a bus frequency of 16 MHz using the on-chip oscillator. Alternatively, a crystal oscillator of 16 MHz may also be utilized which is much more accurate than the on-chip oscillator. By applying the phase locked loop (PLL), the TM4C123GH6PM can be configured to run at 80 MHz. The TM4C123GH6PM also boasts of a number of on-chip hardware timers which is a much more accurate way of generating delays as compared to firmware based delay generation techniques. We have programmed two such hardware timers: one to generate pulsed wave ON time and OFF time delays, and the other to generate the various in-system delays such as 1μs, 10μs, and 10 ms delays used in the LCD operation subroutines.

2.1.3. System Task Design and Software Flow

The flowchart represents the algorithm of software design of Pulse Generator unit of LED based phototherapy system is outlined in Figure 2. The primary function calls the various subroutines to perform specific tasks. The main function initializes the GPIO gating control (clock), calls the phase locked loop (PLL) function to operate the microcontroller at 80 MHz, initializes the output port for pulsed wave generation, and initializes the LCD module and keypad. Subroutines have been written for the individual functions required for the operation of the LCD as well as for scanning of individual keys and user defined variables by the 4x4 matrix keypad. It also calls the functions to accept user defined variables, i.e., frequency, duty cycle, and time. These variables are stored and used in the generation of the pulsed square wave.

Port A pins 2 and 3 are initialized as output control pins to the LCD, while Port B is initialized as LCD output register port. Port C pins 4 to 7 are initialized as output column pins to the 4x4 matrix keypad, and Port E pins 0 to 3 are initialized as input row pins to the 4x4 matrix keypad. Port D pin 6 is initialized as the output for the pulsed square wave.

2.2. LED Driver Circuit

LEDs are current controlled devices, such that even the slightest fluctuation in the terminal voltage across the LED causes a steep increase in the current flowing through it. Thereby, it is very easy to exceed the current limit of the LED, if the selected voltage source is not ideally chosen. The LED driver functions as a controlling element to provide the LED with stable potential difference across its terminals, or constant current through it.

An LED driver may be a simple and inexpensive current controlling resistor, an active constant current source, or a tightly controlled voltage regulator. The resistor is by far the simplest and most inexpensive approach for designing a driver circuit. However, it has a few drawbacks; specifically, it is quite inefficient as a current controlling element because it dissipates any excessive current as heat. Also, the resistor is not able to provide protection from voltage spikes from a nonideal power source. Alternately, a voltage regulator may be of two kinds, a linear voltage regulator or a switching regulator, such as an SMPS. A linear voltage regulator performs essentially the same function as a resistor but requires a minimum voltage drop of 1.5V. Switching regulators are much more efficient but may not be as accurate as linear regulators, requiring very precisely manufactured components with high tolerances which are expensive and difficult to source. A constant current source circuit, however, provides protection from voltage spikes and controls the current flowing through the LED, as opposed to very tightly controlling the voltage across the LED. With proper selection of power source, it can provide an efficiency of up to 95%.

2.2.1. Description and Working

As illustrated in Figure 3, the LED driver circuit is a modified current limiter circuit and comprises a feedback loop, consisting of a MOSFET Q1 and a BJT Q2, to constantly regulate the current flowing through the load, i.e., the LED. Variable resistor is used to set the current limit of the circuit, while resistor acts as a pull-up resistor to smooth out any oscillations delivered to the load during the off time of the pulsed gate drive to the MOSFET, and resistor provides protection to the output pin of the microcontroller development board to drive the load.

Power is delivered to the load, i.e., the LED, by a 5V portable power source while current regulation through the LED is achieved by means of three components, namely, MOSFET Q1, BJT Q2, and resistor . As gate drive is applied to MOSFET Q1, power is delivered to the load through MOSFET Q1 and resistor , which provides the secondary function of applying current regulation voltage as base drive to the BJT Q2. The voltage drop across resistor defines the base drive voltage delivered to the base of the BJT Q2.

If the voltage across , i.e., voltage at the base of BJT Q2 (defined by the constant resistance of the resistor and the current flowing through the LED) exceeds the maximum base-to-emitter off voltage of the BJT Q2, it turns on and begins to conduct current through its emitter-to-collector junction, thereby reducing the gate drive voltage of MOSFET Q1 and reducing the current flowing through the LED.

The component requirement and selection criteria for the design of current driver circuit are enumerated as follow.

MOSFET Q1, IRL3803 is a logic level MOSFET [13]. This means that a Gate-to-Source voltage, , of 3.3V will produce a substantial Drain current, , and a negligible Drain-to- Source resistance (on). This is in direct contrast to a regular MOSFET which requires a larger Gate-to-Source voltage, , to produce a negligible Drain-to-Source resistance (on), approximately 5V to 7V. This is also significant because the selected TM4C123GH6PM microcontroller works at a 3.3V high logic level. The choice of MOSFET IRL3803 results in a simplified design in comparison to that with a regular MOSFET as that would have required a separate circuit such as digital logic shifter to shift the 3.3V high logic from the microcontroller to an acceptable gate drive for the MOSFET.

BJT Q2, 2N3904, is a regular small signal Bipolar Junction Transistor. Any BJT would be acceptable as long as its Base-to-Emitter voltage, , is acceptably small in magnitude.

Variable resistor has a power rating of at least one-quarter Watt. This is selected such that the circuit will perform optimally for a large range of power settings.

The real time PCB implementation of the LED based phototherapy system is represented in Figure 4(a). In order to perform various in-vivo and in-vitro studies of this phototherapy system with great ease, a compact and light weight prototype has been developed and is illustrated in Figure 4(b).

3. Results

3.1. Electrical Output of LED Driver Module

The device offers the flexibility of adjusting the frequency, duty cycle, and time duration. Real time waveforms of pulsed output of LED driver circuit are illustrated in Figure 5 for various combination of frequencies and duty cycle (D) such as f = 5 Hz, D = 50%; f = 10 Hz, D = 75%; f = 50 Hz, D = 25%, and f = 100 Hz, D = 50%.

3.2. LED Characterization

In this section, we present the various measurements carried out to characterize the LED that is being used for the phototherapy application.

(a) Spectral Response. The spectral properties of the LED have been studied in detail using the LMS-6000 spectroradiometer. The plot of the relative spectral power distribution as a function of wavelength is given in Figure 6. It can be observed that the peak wavelength is at λp =633.9 nm. The observed Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) is 17.6 nm. The measured spectral flux of the LED is 28.708 lm at V=2.2V and I=200mA and efficiency is 66.63 lm/W.

The International Commission on Illumination (CIE) chromaticity diagram, which is yet another way to study color, is given in Figure 7. The dominant wavelength, as determined from drawing a line through the color coordinates of the reference illuminant and the measured chromaticity coordinates of the LED is 623.6 nm.

(b) Spatial Response. The radiation pattern is a plot of spatial distribution of LED light intensity in the polar coordinate system [14, 15]. Study of this property is particularly important to determine the efficacy of the LED device for biomedical applications. The measurement for spatial radiation pattern of the LED has been carried out using the goniometer. In the experimental setup, the sensor is fixed and the LED has been rotated around it to measure the radiation pattern as depicted in Figure 8. It is observed that the radiation pattern is spread out and nondirectional.

Figure 9 illustrates the relative intensity plot in the 3D Cartesian plane using an optical arrangement of a CCD detector with data acquisition and image processing software and the LED [16]. The corresponding 2D plot for radiant flux has been carried out using NOVA II OPHIR handheld meter and is given in Figure 10. Predictably, there is peak power output at θ =00 which wanes off on either side of the maxima.

4. Conclusion and Future Work

A programmable LED based phototherapy device comprising of a pulse generator, a LED driver circuit, and a high powered LED has been developed and described in this work. A pulse generator specifically designed to drive the LED system with a design flexibility of varying time and duty cycles at low frequencies (1 Hz - 1 KHz) has been developed. The use of microcontroller to actualize the ever needed flexibility in design, eliminating the need of changing the software whenever a variable pulse is needed, has been achieved by this design. A pulse generator system with both keypad and LCD interface makes the device user friendly. The output frequency of the pulses of the microcontroller has been found to be extremely accurate. The driver circuit for the high power LED is low cost and only requires four discrete components. The various measurements have been carried out to characterize the LED which include spectral and spatial distribution of LED. In future work, the system will be upgraded to model the desired radiation pattern and optimize it for photo-therapy application. The described system provides easy programmability of variable illumination parameters required for phototherapy such as frequency, duty cycle, time of exposure, and power density, thus making this system apt for standardisation of treatment protocol for in vivo and in vitro studies. In the initial phase of our study, the system will be tested for the reduction of the infectious bacteria using microbial culture.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Director DIPAS, DRDO for his keen interest and permission for experimental and publication purposes. They are also thankful to the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Government of India for financial support. They are also thankful to Prof. Enakshi K. Sharma (Dept of Electronic Science, University of Delhi) and her team for assistance in spectrum measurements of LED.

References

  1. Y.-Y. Huang, A. C.-H. Chen, J. D. Carroll, and M. R. Hamblin, “Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy,” Dose-Response, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 358–383, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. E. D. A. Chaves, A. C. C. Piancastelli, A. R. de Araújo, and M. Pinotti, “Effects of low-power light therapy on wound healing: LASER x LED,” Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 616–623, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. A. Jenkins and J. D. Carroll, “How to report low-level laser therapy (LLLT)/photomedicine dose and beam parameters in clinical and laboratory studies,” Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 785–787, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. T. Hopkins, T. A. McLoda, J. G. Seegmiller, and G. D. Baxter, “Low-level laser therapy facilitates superficial wound healing in humans: A triple-blind, sham-controlled study,” Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 223–229, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. A. Calin, T. Coman, and M. R. Calin, “The effect of low level laser therapy on surgical wound healing,” Romanian Reports in Physics, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 617–627, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  6. R. Kilík, L. Lakyová, J. Sabo et al., “Effect of equal daily doses achieved by different power densities of low-level laser therapy at 635 nm on open skin wound healing in normal and diabetic rats,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 269253, 9 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. L. Nussbaum, F. L. Heras, K. P. H. Pritzker, T. Mazzulli, and L. Lilge, “Effects of low intensity laser irradiation during healing of infected skin wounds in the rat,” Photonics and Lasers in Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. Mantineo, A. M. Morgado, and J. P. Pinheiro, “Low level laser therapy on injured rat muscle,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 3rd Portuguese Meeting in Bioengineering (ENBENG), pp. 1–4, SPIE, Braga, Portugal, Feburary 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Moore, T. D. Ridgway, R. G. Higbee, E. W. Howard, and M. D. Lucroy, “Effect of wavelength on low-intensity laser irradiation-stimulated cell proliferation in vitro,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. P. C. de Sousa, “Effect of LED phototherapy of three distinct wavelengths on fibroblasts on wound healing: a histological study in a rodent model,” Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 547–552, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Viravaidya-Pasuwat, C. Koaykul, and S. Wong-In, “Effect of light-emitting diode wavelengths on human dermal fibroblasts for phototherapy,” in Proceedings of the 7th Biomedical Engineering International Conference, BMEiCON 2014, Japan, November 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  12. “Tiva TM C Series TM4C123G LaunchPad Evaluation Board User’s Guide,” 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. “IRL3803PbF IRL3803PbF,” pp. 1–9, 2004, http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irl3803.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  14. I. Moreno and C.-C. Sun, “Modeling the radiation pattern of LEDs,” Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1808–1819, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Kaljun and J. Žerovnik, “Function fitting the symmetric radiation pattern of a LED with attached secondary optic,” Optics Express, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 29587–29593, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Rykowski, K. P. Streubel, H. Jeon, and H. Kostal, “Novel approach for LED luminous intensity measurement,” in Proceedings of the Integrated Optoelectronic Devices 2008, p. 69100C, San Jose, CA, USA, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Himani Kohli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1708
Downloads793
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.