- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
International Journal of Otolaryngology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 865731, 11 pages
Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking Is Related to Linguistic Abilities
1Department of ENT/Audiology and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
3Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
Received 21 June 2012; Revised 31 August 2012; Accepted 4 September 2012
Academic Editor: Harvey B. Abrams
Copyright © 2012 Thomas Koelewijn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citations to this Article [19 citations]
The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.
- Adriana A. Zekveld, Mary Rudner, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, and Jerker Ronnberg, “The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise,” Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 2225–2234, 2013.
- Jana Besser, Thomas Koelewijn, Adriana A. Zekveld, Sophia E. Kramer, and Joost M. Festen, “How Linguistic Closure and Verbal Working Memory Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise-A Review,” Trends in Amplification, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 75–93, 2013.
- William J. Bologna, Monita Chatterjee, and Judy R. Dubno, “Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals,” Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. EL352–EL358, 2013.
- Adriana A. Zekveld, Dirk J. Heslenfeld, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Niek J. Versfeld, and Sophia E. Kramer, “The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load,” NeuroImage, 2014.
- Adriana A. Zekveld, Mary Rudner, Sophia E. Kramer, Johannes Lyzenga, and Jerker Ronnberg, “Cognitive processing load during listening is reduced more by decreasing voice similarity than by increasing spatial separation between target and mas,” Frontiers In Neuroscience, vol. 8, 2014.
- Thomas Koelewijn, Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham, Adriana A. Zekveld, and Sophia E. Kramer, “The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing,” Hearing Research, 2014.
- Patrik Sörqvist, and Jerker Rönnberg, “Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model,” PsyCh Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 42–57, 2014.
- Niklas Halin, John E. Marsh, Andreas Haga, Mattias Holmgren, and Patrik Sorqvist, “Effects of Speech on Proofreading: Can Task-Engagement Manipulations Shield Against Distraction?,” Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2014.
- Thomas Koelewijn, Adriana A. Zekveld, Joost M. Festen, and Sophia E. Kramer, “The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 1596–1606, 2014.
- Adriana A. Zekveld, and Sophia E. Kramer, “Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: Insights from pupillometry,” Psychophysiology, 2014.
- K. L. Tremblay, and C. W. Miller, “How Neuroscience Relates to Hearing Aid Amplification,” International Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 2014, pp. 1–7, 2014.
- Sherri L. Smith, and M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, “Associations between speech understanding and auditory and visual tests of verbal working memory: effects of linguistic complexity, task, age, and hearing loss,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015.
- Antje Heinrich, Helen Henshaw, and Melanie A. Ferguson, “The relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015.
- Gaven Lin, and Simon Carlile, “Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 9, 2015.
- Briony Banks, Emma Gowen, Kevin J. Munro, and Patti Adank, “Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 2015–2024, 2015.
- Emily Buss, Lori J. Leibold, and Joseph W. Hall, “Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 968–977, 2016.
- Christian Füllgrabe, and Stuart Rosen, “On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 07, 2016.
- Elke Huysmans, Elske Bolk, Adriana A. Zekveld, Joost M. Festen, Annette M. B. de Groot, and S. Theo Goverts, “The Influence of Linguistic Proficiency on Masked Text Recognition Performance in Adults With and Without Congenital Hearing Impairment,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 547–559, 2016.
- Sandra Gordon-Salant, and Stacey Samuels Cole, “Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 593–602, 2016.