Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Otolaryngology
Volume 2014, Article ID 168684, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/168684
Review Article

Importance of “Process Evaluation” in Audiological Rehabilitation: Examples from Studies on Hearing Impairment

1Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
2Linnaeus Centre HEAD, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioral Science and Learning, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden
3The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden
4Eriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, 20 Rørtangvej, 3070 Snekkersten, Denmark

Received 2 May 2014; Accepted 25 August 2014; Published 3 September 2014

Academic Editor: Leonard P. Rybak

Copyright © 2014 Vinaya Manchaiah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Oliver, “Theories of disability in health practice and research,” British Medical Journal, vol. 317, no. 7170, pp. 1446–1449, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. DePoy and S. F. Gilson, Studying Disability: Multiple Theories and Responses, Sage Publications, California, Calif, USA, 2011.
  3. N. B. Anderson, “Levels of analysis in health science: a framework for integrating sociobehavioral and biomedical research,” in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, S. McCann and J. M. Lipton, Eds., vol. 840, pp. 563–576, Academy of Sciences, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. F. Smart, “Challenging the biomedical model of disability,” in Advances in Medical Psychotherapy and Psychodiagnosisr, vol. 12, pp. 41–44, American Board of Medical Psychotherapists, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Suls and A. Rothman, “Evolution of the biopsychosocial model: prospects and challenges for health psychology,” Health Psychology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 119–125, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Thomas, “How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches,” Disability and Society, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 569–583, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. U. Bronfenbrenner, The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1979.
  8. N. Luhmann, Introduction to Systems Theory, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012.
  9. S. M. Tensions, “Tensions, perspectives and themes in disability studies,” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 67–81, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Danermark, “Different approaches in the assessment of audiological rehabilitation: a meta-theoretical perspective,” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. S112–S117, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Granberg, “ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss Preparatory studies,” in Proceedings of the ICF Consensus Conference 2012, Eriksholm, Denmark, 2012.
  12. A. Laplante-Lévesque, L. Hickson, and L. Worrall, “Stages of change in adults with acquired hearing impairment seeking help for the first time: application of the transtheoretical model in audiologic rehabilitation,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 447–457, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Oakley, V. Strange, C. Bonell, E. Allen, and J. Stephenson, “Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions,” British Medical Journal, vol. 332, no. 7538, pp. 413–416, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Grant, S. Treweek, T. Dreischulte, R. Foy, and B. Guthrie, “Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting,” Trials, vol. 14, no. 1, article 15, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. V. K. C. Manchaiah and D. Stephens, “Perspectives on defining “hearing loss” and its consequences,” Hearing, Balance and Communication, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Campbell and J. Stanley, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Evaluations in Social Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1963.
  17. R. Cox, M. Hyde, S. Gatehouse et al., “Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. S106–S115, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Stephens, G. Jones, and I. Gianopoulos, “The use of outcome measures to formulate intervention strategies,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 21, no. 4 supplement, pp. 15S–23S, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Grimmer-Somers, S. Milanese, and S. Kumar, “Managing the quality of allied health services in Australia: is it a case of “more we learn the less we know?”,” Journal of Healthcare Leadership, vol. 4, pp. 71–81, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  20. World Health Organisation, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  21. V. K. C. Manchaiah, D. Stephens, and R. Meredith, “The patient journey of adults with hearing impairment: the patients' views,” Clinical Otolaryngology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. V. K. C. Manchaiah and D. Stephens, “The patient journey: living with acquired hearing impairment,” Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, vol. 44, pp. 29–40, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. V. K. C. Manchaiah and D. Stephens, “The “patient journey” of adults with sudden-onset acquired hearing impairment: a pilot study,” The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 475–481, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. K. C. Manchaiah, D. Stephens, and T. Lunner, “Communication partners journey through their partners hearing impairment,” International Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 2013, Article ID 707910, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. P. S. Segerstrom, T. C. A. Anant, and E. Dinopoulos, “A schumpeterian model of the product life cycle,” American Economic Review, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1077–1091, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Klepper, “Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle,” The American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 562–583, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Mant, “Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care,” International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 475–480, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Gatehouse and W. Noble, “The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ),” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 85–99, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. Noble, R. Tyler, C. Dunn, and N. Bhullar, “Hearing handicap ratings among different profiles of adult cochlear implant users,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 112–120, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Barnes and D. Mercer, Doing Disability Research, Disability Press, Leeds, UK, 1997.
  31. A. Laplante-Lévesque, L. V. Knudsen, J. E. Preminger et al., “Hearing help-seeking and rehabilitation: perspectives of adults with hearing impairment,” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 93–102, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Ida Institute, “A possible patient journey,” Ida Institute, Denmark, 2009, http://idainstitute.com/tool_room/self_development/patient_journey/.
  33. Ida Institute, Communication Partner Journey, Ida Institute, Nærum, Denmark, 2010, http://idainstitute.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Tools%20for%20Website%202011/Partner%20Journey%20-%20Ida%20Institute%20Tool.pdf.
  34. V. K. C. Manchaiah, D. Stephens, and T. Lunner, “Information about the prognosis given to sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients: implications to “patient journey” process,” Audiological Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 109–113, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. O. Prochaska and C. C. di Clemente, “Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change,” Psychotherapy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 161–173, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. O. Prochaska and W. F. Velicer, “The transtheoretical model of health behavior change,” American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. World Health Organization, Engage in the Process of Change; Facts and Methods, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012.
  38. B. Danermark, “Interdisciplinary research and critical realism: the example of disability research,” International Journal of Critical Realism, vol. 1, pp. 56–64, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  39. R. Bhaskar, A Realist Theory of Science, Verso, London, UK, 2008.
  40. R. Bhaskar and B. Danermark, “Interdisciplinarity and disability research—a critical realist perspective,” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, vol. 4, pp. 278–297, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  41. A. F. Chalmers, What Is This Thing Called Science?University of Queensland Press, Queensland, Australia, 3rd edition, 1999.
  42. I. Hacking, Social Construction of What?Harvard University Press, 2008.
  43. B. Danermark, M. Ekström, L. Jakobsen, and J. C. Karlsson, Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences, Taylor & Francis, 2002.
  44. P. C. Kerr and R. I. D. Cowie, “Acquired deafness: a multi-dimensional experience,” British Journal of Audiology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 177–188, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Stephens and R. Hétu, “Impairment, disability and handicap in audiology: towards a consensus,” Audiology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 185–200, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Friedrich Nietzsche, Stanford, Calif, USA, 2011, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche/.