Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2008, Article ID 415861, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/415861
Methodology Report

Polymer Photovoltaic Cell Using /G-PEDOT Nanocomplex Film as Electrode

Key laboratory of Luminescence and Optical Information, Beijing Jiaotong University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100044, China

Received 1 August 2008; Revised 21 October 2008; Accepted 20 November 2008

Academic Editor: Fahrettin Yakuphanoglu

Copyright © 2008 F. X. Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Gadisa, K. Tvingstedt, S. Admassie et al., “Transparent polymer cathode for organic photovoltaic devices,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 156, no. 16-17, pp. 1102–1107, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. F. Zhang, M. Johansson, M. R. Andersson, J. C. Hummelen, and O. Inganäs, “Polymer photovoltaic cells with conducting polymer anodes,” Advanced Materials, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 662–665, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Aernouts, P. Vanlaeke, W. Geens et al., “Printable anodes for flexible organic solar cell modules,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 451-452, pp. 22–25, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. H. Spanggaard and F. C. Krebs, “A brief history of the development of organic and polymeric photovoltaics,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 83, no. 2-3, pp. 125–146, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. K. Pandey, J.-M. Nunzi, H. Wang et al., “Reverse biased annealing: effective post treatment tool for polymer/nano-composite solar cells,” Organic Electronics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 396–400, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Padinger, R. S. Rittberger, and N. S. Sariciftci, “Effects of postproduction treatment on plastic solar cells,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–88, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Y. Kim, J. H. Jung, D. E. Lee, and J. Joo, “Enhancement of electrical conductivity of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-styrenesulfonate) by a change of solvents,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 126, no. 2-3, pp. 311–316, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. H. J. Snaith, H. Kenrick, M. Chiesa, and R. H. Friend, “Morphological and electronic consequences of modifications to the polymer anode ‘PEDOT:PSS’,” Polymer, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 2573–2578, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. L. Lai, M. Y. Chan, M. K. Fung, C. S. Lee, and S. T. Lee, “Concentration effect of glycerol on the conductivity of PEDOT film and the device performance,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 104, no. 1-2, pp. 26–30, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. K. M. Jönsson, J. Birgerson, X. Crispin et al., “The effects of solvents on the morphology and sheet resistance in poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-polystyrenesulfonic acid (PEDOT-PSS) films,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. S. Lee, J. Y. Kim, D. E. Lee et al., “Flexible and transparent organic film speaker by using highly conducting PEDOT/PSS as electrode,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 457–461, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. W. Huh, Y. M. Kim, Y. W. Park et al., “Characteristics of organic light-emitting diodes with conducting polymer anodes on plastic substrates,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 4, Article ID 044502, 6 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M.-S. Kim, M.-G. Kang, L. J. Guo, and J. Kim, “Choice of electrode geometry for accurate measurement of organic photovoltaic cell performance,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 13, Article ID 133301, 3 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. C. Piliego, M. Mazzeo, B. Cortese, R. Cingolani, and G. Gigli, “Organic light emitting diodes with highly conductive micropatterned polymer anodes,” Organic Electronics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 401–406, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. H. Kim, A. J. Mäkinen, N. Nikolov, R. Shashidhar, H. Kim, and Z. H. Kafafi, “Molecular organic light-emitting diodes using highly conducting polymers as anodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, no. 20, pp. 3844–3846, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Y. Kim, S. H. Kim, H.-H. Lee et al., “New architecture for high-efficiency polymer photovoltaic cells using solution-based titanium oxide as an optical spacer,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 572–576, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Waldauf, M. Morana, P. Denk et al., “Highly efficient inverted organic photovoltaics using solution based titanium oxide as electron selective contact,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, no. 23, Article ID 233517, 3 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar