|
| No. | Catalyst | Reaction conditions | Irradiation type | Hydrogen evolution (μmol/h) | Apparent quantum efficiency | References |
|
| (1) | Eosin Y sensitized 1.0 wt% CuO/TiO2 | Catalyst: 20 mg; 70 mL 15% diethanol amine (DEA) H2O; DEA as sacrifice electron donors | A 200 W halogen lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | 10.56 | 5.1% | [16] |
| (2) | Eosin Y sensitized 0.5 wt% Pt/N-TiO2-300°C | Catalyst: 0.100 g; 80 mL 0.79 mol/L triethanolamine (TEA) solution as sacrifice electron donors; pH 7.0; initially N2-saturated | A 400 W high pressure Hg lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | Average about 80 | Unclear | [17] |
| (3) | Eosin Y–Fe3+(1 : 1)–1.0 wt% Pt/TiO2 | Catalyst: 0.100 g; 80 mL 0.79 mol/L TEA solution as sacrifice electron donors; pH 7.0; initially N2-saturated | A metal halide lamp (400 W) with a cut-off filter ( nm) | 275 | 19.1% | [18] |
| (4) | Eosin Y sensitized 1.0 wt% Pt/Ti-MCM-41 zeolite | Catalyst: 40 mg; 80 mL 15% TEA H2O; TEA as sacrifice electron donors; pH 7.0; initially Ar atmosphere | A 300 W tungsten halogen lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | ~10 | 12.01% | [19] |
| (5) | Eosin Y sensitized 0.5 wt% Pt/SrTiO3 | Catalyst: 0.2 g; 150 mL 15% DEA H2O; DEA as sacrifice electron donors; pH 11.6; initially Ar atmosphere | A 300 W Xe arc lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | ~3 | Unclear | [20] |
| (6) | Eosin Y sensitized 1.0 wt% Rh/TiO2 | Catalyst: 20 mg; 70 mL, 15% DEA H2O; DEA as sacrifice electron donors; initially Ar atmosphere | A 200 W halogen lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | 14.63 | 7.10% | [21] |
| (7) | Eosin Y sensitized 0.1 wt% Pt/TiO2 | Catalyst: 0.3 g; 250 mL, 15% DEA H2O; DEA as sacrifice electron donors; initially Ar atmosphere | A 300 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | Average about 65 | 10% | [22] |
| (8) | Eosin Y sensitized 1.0 wt% Pt/multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) | Catalyst: 20 mg; 80 mL, 15% TEA H2O; TEA as sacrifice electron donors; initially Ar atmosphere | A 300 W tungsten halogen lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | 54.20 | 12.14% | [23] |
| (9) | Merocyanine sensitized 1.0 wt% Pt/TiO2 | Catalyst: 50 mg; 100 mL 95% AN-H2O; acetonitrile and I anions as sacrifice electron donors | A 300 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | Average about 17 | ~2% | [33] |
| (10) | Merocyanine and coumarin dyes sensitized 1.0 wt% Pt/TiO2 | Catalyst: 50 mg; 100 mL 95% AN-H2O; acetonitrile and I anions as sacrifice electron donors | A 300 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | Unclear | 1.8% for M–Pt/TiO2 and 2.5% for C–Pt/TiO2 | [31, 32] |
| (11) | Ru complex sensitized 0.1 wt% Pt/NS-K4Nb6O17 | Catalyst: 5.0 mg; aqueous solution (2.0 mL) containing 10 mM EDTA as an electron donor; initially Ar atmosphere | A xenon lamp (300 W) with a cut-off filter ( nm) | 3.6 | 10.5% | [63] |
| (12) | 3.1 wt% WS2 sensitized 1 wt% Pt/TiO2 | Catalyst: 0.2 g, 200 mL aqueous solution; Na2S as the hole scavenger | A 350 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | 2.13 | Unclear | [9] |
| (13) | Carboxylate versus phosphonate in Ru-complex-sensitized 3.0 wt% Pt/TiO2 | Catalyst: 15 mg; EDTA as sacrifice electron donors | A 450 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter ( nm) | Maxima about 132 | 22.4% | [57] |
| (14) | Sensitization of TiO2 film with zinc-substituted cytochrome | EDTA as a sacrificial electron donor | 100 W tungsten halogen lamp with filters ( nm) | About 1020 for the first 20 min of illumination | % | [64] |
| (15) | Ru-, Rh-, and Ir-doped SrTiO3 loaded with Pt cocatalysts (0.1 wt%) | Catalyst: 300 mg; 380 mL of 10 vol% aqueous MeOH | A 300 W Xe lamp with cut-off filters ( nm) | Maxima about 117 | 5.2% at 420 nm | [65] |
|
