International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: From Materials to Devices

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 613064 |

Jesus Baldenebro-Lopez, Norma Flores-Holguin, Jose Castorena-Gonzalez, Jorge Almaral-Sanchez, Daniel Glossman-Mitnik, "Theoretical Study of Copper Complexes: Molecular Structure, Properties, and Its Application to Solar Cells", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2013, Article ID 613064, 7 pages, 2013.

Theoretical Study of Copper Complexes: Molecular Structure, Properties, and Its Application to Solar Cells

Academic Editor: Theodoros Dimopoulos
Received13 Oct 2012
Revised26 Jan 2013
Accepted03 Feb 2013
Published10 Mar 2013


We present a theoretical investigation of copper complexes with potential applications as sensitizers for solar cells. The density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT were utilized, using the M06 hybrid meta-GGA functional with the LANL2DZ (D95V on first row) and DZVP basis sets. This level of calculation was used to find the optimized molecular structure, the absorption spectra, the molecular orbitals energies, and the chemical reactivity parameters that arise from conceptual DFT. Solvent effects have been taken into account by an implicit approach, namely, the polarizable continuum model (PCM), using the nonequilibrium version of the IEF-PCM model.

1. Introduction

A survey of our energy supply options reveals that the sun is the only clean energy source in sufficiently abundant supply to meet global demand, yet less than 0.1% of our energy needs are met through the direct conversion of sunlight [1]. For this reason, considerable attention and extensive research efforts have been devoted over the last years to dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) as valuable and low-cost alternatives to silicon and other inorganic semiconductor-based photovoltaic devices [24]. The DSSC devices are composed of a nanocrystalline TiO2 film adsorbed by organic or inorganic dyes as the sensitizer. When the dye molecule is excited by the absorption of sunlight, an electron is readily injected into the conduction band of . The electron is then transported to the external circuit, and the dye molecule is regenerated by redox reaction coupled to ion pair in electrolyte [5].

One of the key components of a DSSC is the sensitizer [6], which is responsible for light absorption and the generation of electric charges [7], thus exerting a significant influence on the power conversion efficiency () [8]. The most common sensitizers are Ru(II) complexes based on 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) ligands, such as cis-di(thiocyanato) bis(bpy-4,4′-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) (N3 [9] and N719 [10]). These complexes have reached over 11% power conversion efficiency [11]; but the rarity and high cost of the Ru may limit their practical usage. Alonso-Vante and coworkers [12] discovered that copper(I) complexes have similar photophysical properties with Ru complexes, indicating that the iterative chemical optimization of common metal complexes sensitizers can be comparable to that of Ru complexes [13]. Copper(I) complexes display a wide variety of excited states and especially photophysical and photochemical processes; particularly, copper(I)-polypyridine complexes exhibit low-lying MLCT transitions that can participate, among others, in electron transfer processes [14]. Copper-based dye sensitizers might be good substitutes to meet the requirements for next-generation DSSC devices. However, only a few studies have reported work on DSSCs coupled with copper-based dye sensitizers [1518]. In this research, we propose the study of five molecular systems of the type with bipyridine ligands; in order to calculate from the theoretical point of view their geometric and spectroscopic properties, as well as chemical reactivity.

2. Molecular Modeling

Molecular calculations were carried out with density functional theory (DFT) [1921] and time-dependent (TD) DFT [2224] in the Gaussian09 program [25]. The hybrid-meta-GGA functional considered in this study is the M06 [26] due to the ability to study properties of organometallic compounds; our group has done a preliminary study [27]. The LANL2DZ (D95V on first row) for C, H, O, and N atoms [28] and DZVP for Cu atom [29] basis sets were used for the geometrical optimizations, as well as electrical and optical properties of all of the copper-based dye sensitizers considered, both in the gas phase and in solution. Ultraviolet-visible spectra (UV-Vis) have been simulated using the TD-DFT approach and analyzed through the SWizard program [30, 31], through pseudo-Voigt band shape with relative weight of Gaussian functions; solvent effects have been taken into account by an implicit approach, namely, the polarizable continuum model (PCM) [32] using the nonequilibrium version of the IEF-PCM model [33]; the equations were solved for 20 excited states.

Using the DFT framework makes it possible to find the chemical reactivity descriptors values, such as electron affinity (), ionization potential (), electronegativity (), hardness (), and electrophilic index (); all these values were obtained using system energy calculations. The electronegativity, hardness, and electrophilic index are defined as where denotes the chemical potential and is calculated as −.

3. Results and Discussion

Optimized molecular structures of copper complexes in the presence of solvent are shown in Figure 1. A selection of geometric parameters of these five molecules is listed in Table 1 (for more details, see supplementary material available online at The molecular structures in gas phase and in solution are qualitatively similar; however, the greatest change is observed in bond angles and dihedral angles. The 5,5′ position of the carboxylic acid on the bipyridine ligands for CuL4 copper complex favors the increase of distance between the copper atom and the nitrogen atoms with respect to 4,4′ positions of the other complexes, because of the position of the acceptor. Substitution of the carboxilic acid with methyl ester groups do not change radically the distance of the metal center to the ligand.

ParameterGas phaseIn presence of solvent

Cu-N1 2.0459 2.0310 2.0318 2.0321 2.0320 2.0445 2.0250 2.0289 2.0299 2.0300
Cu-N2 2.0493 2.0282 2.0318 2.0321 2.0320 2.0364 2.0274 2.0290 2.0300 2.0301
Cu-N3 2.0475 2.0332 2.0318 2.0321 2.0320 2.0427 2.0243 2.0289 2.0300 2.0301
Cu-N4 2.0481 2.0284 2.0318 2.0321 2.0320 2.0386 2.0261 2.0289 2.0299 2.0300
C1-O1 1.2342 1.2314 1.2355 1.2383 1.2359 1.2468 1.2444 1.2408 1.2446 1.2453
C1-O2 1.3691 1.3675 1.3586 1.3647 1.3706 1.3509 1.3502 1.3555 1.3649 1.3636
N1-Cu-N2 81.67 81.87 81.92 81.56 81.58 81.87 81.85 81.97 81.72 81.77
N1-Cu-N3 129.67 124.35 124.78 124.99 124.98 127.57 125.02 125.37 125.56 125.53
N3-Cu-N4 81.47 81.80 81.91 81.56 81.58 81.87 81.93 81.97 81.72 81.77
N2-Cu-N4 129.16 124.99 124.78 124.99 124.98 132.13 125.26 125.37 125.56 125.53

MeOH solution, bChloroform solution.

Absorption spectra for the proposed copper complexes are shown in Figure 2. These spectra were performed in the presence of solvent, under the same optimization conditions. The calculated value of the absorption wavelength () is an important parameter, which indicates that these molecular systems should be considered for use as a functional material (as dye in this case) in a DSSC, the value of this parameter meets the requirement of the absorption property whose wavelength of maximum absorption () should not be greater than 920 nm as established in the literature [34]. All studied sensitizers reach their above 500 nm, the largest value corresponds to the CuL4 sensitizer with 562 nm.

Table 2 shows the results of TD-DFT calculations performed using the M06 functional and the basis sets; including the corresponding wavelengths (in nm), the energies (in eV), the oscillator strength (), and the orbitals involved in the transitions. This information shows that the peak of the wavelength of maximum absorption is due to charge transfer between the metal atom and the ligand molecule, which may be explained more clearly in Figure 3. The excitation contains a mixture of HOMO→LUMO, HOMO − 1→LUMO, and HOMO − 1→LUMO + 1, this leads to consider them as degenerate orbitals.

Copper complexλ (nm)E (eV) Assignment; H = HOMO, L = LUMO, and L + 1 = LUMO + 1

CuL45622.210.048H−1 → L (61%) H → L (26%) H−1 → L + 1 (10%)
4952.510.026H−1 → L + 1 (75%) H → L + 1 (17%)
3523.520.057H−1 → L + 3 (51%) H → L + 3 (29%) H−1 → L + 4 (11%) H → L + 4(7%)
CuL65052.450.243H → L (66%) H−1 → L + 1 (29%)
4133.000.030H → L + 2 (54%) H−2 → L (21%) H−1 → L + 2 (16%) H → L + 3 (6%)
3813.250.028H−1 → L + 3 (78%) H−2 → L + 1 (7%) H−3 → L (7%)
3193.890.092H−4 → L (52%) H−3 → L (21%) H−6 → L (18%)
CuL75002.480.267H−1 → L + 1 (+52%) H → L (+47%)
3913.170.045H → L + 3 (65%) H−1 → L + 2 (32%)
3153.940.285H−4 → L + 1 (46%) H−6 → L (43%)
CuL85352.320.391H−1 → L + 1 (52%) H → L (45%)
4282.900.112H → L + 3 (60%) H−1 → L + 2 (37%)
3583.460.025H−1 → L + 4 (56%) H → L + 5 (40%)
3283.780.303H−5 → L (47%) H−6 → L + 1 (40%) H−7 → L (5%)
CuL95362.310.376H−1 → L + 1 (52%) H → L (45%)
4302.880.102H → L + 3 (61%) H−1 → L + 2 (37%)
3293.770.280H−5 → L (48%) H−6 → L + 1 (39%)

The charge transfer efficiency from the sensitizer to the nanocrystalline oxide is extremely important in the solar cell design. Since the crucial electronic excitations occur from the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO), it is, therefore, important to form efficient charge-separated states with the HOMO localized on the donor subunit and the LUMO on the acceptor subunit. Figure 3 shows as the HOMO orbital density is located over around the copper atom in complexes; meanwhile, the density of the LUMO orbital is in the ligand, tending to move toward the carboxyl acid and methyl ester groups. This is beneficial in accordance with the above mentioned.

Figure 4 shows the HOMO-LUMO molecular orbitals’ energetic position. These results are of great importance, since they can be used during synthesis to determine the solubility and chemical reactivity of the molecule, as reported in different studies [35, 36]. Additional factors to consider is the sensitizer LUMO level that is greater than the conduction band level of nanocrystalline oxides that are commonly used in such devices, also the HOMO level can be observed below the redox potential of the electrolyte [37]; both considerations are important to the design of the sensitizer. The CuL4 complex has the smaller energy gap (3.093 eV); however, the values for the other complexes studied are close to this. Molecular orbitals energy levels were calculated in the presence of solvent.

Chemical reactivity parameters such as ionization potential (), electron affinity (), electronegativity (), chemical hardness (), and electrophilicity index () for the studied molecular systems (Table 3) were obtained by energy calculations (neutral and ionic state), taking into account the ground state geometry optimization.

Copper complexChemical reactivity descriptors (eV)


According to Table 3, complexes with carboxylic acid as anchor groups exhibit greater electron affinity, electronegativity, and electrophilicity index than those containing methyl ester groups. The trend in ionization potential for the copper complexes is . The results indicate that CuL6 and CuL7 copper complexes are harder than the rest of the systems studied; this can be interpreted as systems with greater resistance to change with the number of electrons.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the molecular structure and properties of five molecular systems proposed as sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells have been calculated. The applied methodology for this study is based on the density functional theory, using the M06 hybrid meta-GGA functional and the LANL2DZ and DZVP basis sets.

The molecular systems characterization includes the calculation of geometric parameters, ultraviolet-visible spectra, electronic excited states, molecular orbitals, and chemical reactivity parameters. The longer wavelength of maximum absorption and the smallest energy gap is for the CuL4 complex. For all cases, the HOMO orbital density is located over around the copper atom; meanwhile, the density of the LUMO orbital is in the ligand. Moreover, the molecular orbitals levels are appropriate considering the position of the conduction band of nanocrystalline oxides and the redox potential of the electrolyte. Analyzing these data makes it possible to find potential applications for these copper complexes in photovoltaic devices.


This work has been supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, S.C. (CIMAV), Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, and Dirección de Investigación y Posgrado by PROFAPI 2012/040. J. Baldenebro-Lopez gratefully acknowledges a fellowship from CONACYT. D. Glossman-Mitnik and N. Flores-Holguin are researchers of CIMAV and CONACYT.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary material provides additional information on optimized molecular structure, total energy and Infrared (IR) spectra for the copper complexes in presence of solvent (CuL4 and CuL6 in MeOH solution; CuL7, CuL8 and CuL9 in Chloroform Solution). These values were calculated with M06 density functional combined with the LANL2DZ and DZVP basis sets.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. P. G. Bomben, K. C. D. Robson, B. D. Koivisto, and C. P. Berlinguette, “Cyclometalated ruthenium chromophores for the dye-sensitized solar cell,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 256, pp. 1438–1450, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. F. De Angelis, S. Fantacci, and R. Gebauer, “Simulating dye-sensitized TiO2 heterointerfaces in explicit solvent: absorption spectra, energy levels, and dye desorption,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 813–817, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Shibano, T. Umeyama, Y. Matano, and H. Imahori, “Electron-donating perylene tetracarboxylic acids for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Organic Letters, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1971–1974, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Wang, M. Wu, X. Lin, A. Hagfeldt, and T. Ma, “Optimization of the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells based on Pt-like TiC counter electrodes,” The European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2012, no. 22, pp. 3557–3561, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S.-H. Liu, H. Fu, Y.-M. Cheng et al., “Theoretical study of N749 dyes anchoring on the (TiO2)28 surface in DSSCs and their electronic absorption properties,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 31, pp. 16338–16345, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. Dragonetti, A. Valore, A. Colombo et al., “A new thiocyanate-free cyclometallated ruthenium complex for dye-sensitized solar cells: beneficial effects of substitution on the cyclometallated ligand,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 714, pp. 88–93, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Katono, T. Bessho, M. Wielopolski et al., “Influence of the anchoring modes on the electronic and photovoltaic properties of D−π-A dyes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 32, pp. 16876–16884, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  8. X. Lu, Q. Feng, T. Lan, G. Zhou, and Z.-S. Wang, “Molecular engineering of quinoxaline-based organic sensitizers for highly efficient and stable dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 3179–3187, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio et al., “Conversion of light to electricity by cis-X2bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) charge-transfer sensitizers (X = Cl-, Br-, I-, CN-, and SCN-) on nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 6382–6390, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. K. Nazeeruddin, F. de Angelis, S. Fantacci et al., “Combined experimental and DFT-TDDFT computational study of photoelectrochemical cell ruthenium sensitizers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 48, pp. 16835–16847, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. C. Vougioukalakis, A. I. Philippopoulos, T. Stergiopoulos, and P. Falaras, “Contributions to the development of ruthenium-based sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 255, no. 21-22, pp. 2602–2621, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  12. N. Alonso-Vante, J.-F. Nierengarten, and J.-P. Sauvage, “Spectral sensitization of large-band-gap semiconductors (thin films and ceramics) by a carboxylated bis(1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I) complex,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, no. 11, pp. 1649–1654, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Deng, Q. Xiu, L. Guo, L. Zhang, G. Wen, and C. Zhong, “Branched chain polymeric metal complexes containing Co(II) or Ni(II) complexes with a donor-π-acceptor architecture: synthesis, characterization, and photovoltaic applications,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 3383–3390, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  14. L. Barrientos, C. Araneda, B. Loeb, and I. G. Crivelli, “Synthesis, spectroscopic and electrochemical characterization of copper(I) complexes with functionalized pyrazino[2,3-f]-1,10-phenanthroline,” Polyhedron, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1287–1295, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Sakaki, T. Kuroki, and T. Hamada, “Synthesis of a new copper(I) complex,[Cu(tmdcbpy)2]+ (tmdcbpy = 4,4′,6,6′-tetramethyl-2,2′-bipyridine-5,5′- dicarboxylic acid), and its application to solar cells,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, no. 6, pp. 840–842, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. Hattori, Y. Wada, S. Yanagida, and S. Fukuzumi, “Blue copper model complexes with distorted tetragonal geometry acting as effective electron-transfer mediators in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 26, pp. 9648–9654, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Bessho, E. C. Constable, M. Graetzel et al., “An element of surprise-efficient copper-functionalized dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemical Communications, pp. 3717–3719, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y.-Y. Lin, T.-H. Chu, S.-S. Li et al., “Interfacial nanostructuring on the performance of polymer/TiO2 nanorod bulk heterojunction solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 10, pp. 3644–3649, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, “Inhomogeneous electron gas,” Physical Review, vol. 136, no. 3B, pp. B864–B871, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,” Physical Review, vol. 140, no. 4A, pp. A1133–A1138, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
  22. K. Burke, J. Werschnik, and E. K. U. Gross, “Time-dependent density functional theory: past, present, and future,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 123, no. 6, 9 pages, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. E. Stratmann, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, “An efficient implementation of time-dependent density-functional theory for the calculation of excitation energies of large molecules,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 109, no. 19, pp. 8218–8224, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Bauernschmitt and R. Ahlrichs, “Treatment of electronic excitations within the adiabatic approximation of time dependent density functional theory,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 256, no. 4-5, pp. 454–464, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. Gaussian 09 Revision A. 02, M. J., G. W.Trucks, H. B. Schlegel et al., Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2009.
  26. Y. Zhao and D. G. Truhlar, “The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 120, no. 1–3, pp. 215–241, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Baldenebro-López, J. Castorena-González, N. Flores-Holguín, J. Almaral-Sánchez, and D. Glossman-Mitnik, “Computational molecular nanoscience study of the properties of copper complexes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 16005–16019, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  28. T. H. Dunning Jr. and P. J. Hay, Methods of Electronic Structure Theory, Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
  29. C. Sosa, J. Andzelm, B. C. Elkin, E. Wimmer, K. D. Dobbs, and D. A. Dixon, “A local density functional study of the structure and vibrational frequencies of molecular transition-metal compounds,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 96, no. 16, pp. 6630–6636, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. I. Gorelsky, “Swizard program,” 2012, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. I. Gorelsky and A. B. P. Lever, “Electronic structure and spectra of ruthenium diimine complexes by density functional theory and INDO/S. Comparison of the two methods,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 635, no. 1-2, pp. 187–196, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, and R. Cammi, “Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 2999–3094, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Cossi and V. Barone, “Time-dependent density functional theory for molecules in liquid solutions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 4708–4717, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. A. Green, Solar Cells: Operating Principles, Technology and Systems Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1982.
  35. F. de Angelis, S. Fantacci, and A. Sgamellotti, “An integrated computational tool for the study of the optical properties of nanoscale devices: application to solar cells and molecular wires,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, vol. 117, no. 5-6, pp. 1093–1104, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y.-X. Weng, Y.-Q. Wang, J. B. Asbury, H. N. Ghosh, and T. Lian, “Back electron transfer from TiO2 nanoparticles to FeIII(CN)63: origin of non-single-exponential and particle size independent dynamics,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 93–104, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  37. X. Lu, S. Wei, C.-M. L. Wu, S. Li, and W. Guo, “Can polypyridyl Cu(I)-based complexes provide promising sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells? A theoretical insight into Cu(I) versus Ru(II) sensitizers,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 3753–3761, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Jesus Baldenebro-Lopez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.