Research Article  Open Access
Tamer Khatib, Wilfried Elmenreich, "Optimum Availability of Standalone Photovoltaic Power Systems for Remote Housing Electrification", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2014, Article ID 475080, 5 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/475080
Optimum Availability of Standalone Photovoltaic Power Systems for Remote Housing Electrification
Abstract
The availability of PV systems is discussed to determine the optimum availability at which standalone PV systems must be designed. Optimization methods and PV systems software, such as HOMER and PV.MY, were used for this purpose. Six PV systems with six availability levels were analyzed, in terms of wasted energy, cost of energy, battery usage, and power shortages, using real meteorological data. Results show that PV systems with 99% availability are recommended, because of their high reliability and favorably wasted energy.
1. Introduction
Considering that PV systems are clean, environmentfriendly, and secure energy sources, PV system installation has played an important role worldwide. However, the drawback of PV systems is their high capital cost, compared to conventional energy sources. Currently, many studies were conducted that focus on the optimization of standalone PV systems, so that the number of PV modules, capacity of storage battery, and capacity of inverter were optimally selected. Standalone PV systems are widely used in remote areas without access to electricity grid. These systems had proven their feasibility, compared with conversional standalone power systems (e.g., diesel generators), especially for remote applications, because of the difficulty in accessing the remote areas and the cost of transportation. However, a PV system must be designed to meet the desired load demand at a defined level of availability [1].
Many sizing works for PV system can be found in the literature. Based on [1], three major PVsystemsizing procedures are available, namely, intuitive, numerical (simulation based), and analytical methods, in addition to some individual methods. However, most of these methods depend on system availability. For example, in [2], a wellcompleted optimization of PV systems in Algeria was implemented by dividing the regions into four zones using sky clearness index. The optimization of PV systems was based on different levels of system availability and a simulation program which calculates the possible sizes of a PV system at a specific system availability and load demand. Thereafter, the optimum PV system configuration is selected based on system capital cost. In [3], an elegant optimization method for PV system was presented. A PV system mathematical model was developed to optimize its size based on welldefined solar energy data and load demand. The developed model contains models for PV array, storage battery, and charge regulator. However, the optimization considers the combined minimum cost with maximum system availability taking into account the uncertainty in solar energy and the variation in the demanded energy by the load.
The optimization of a PV system was done for three sites in the UK using the sizing curves derivation in [4]. To avoid any load interruption, the PV array size was designed based on the worst monthly average solar energy. As for finding the minimum storage requirement, the same method used in plotting the sizing curves of the PV array was used for the battery. The minimum storage requirement was calculated each year of the used historical data. However, PV array size was calculated based on the worst month method, which may cause oversizing in the PV generator, especially in months having average solar energy higher than the worst month. The considered system availability in this study was 100%. In [5], an optimization of a PV system was presented based on long term solar radiation series for UK. In this study, the average of the obtained solar radiation series was calculated and divided in two climatic cycles. One of these climatic cycles contains days with average solar radiation equal to or higher than the calculated overall solar radiation average, whereas other climatic cycles contain days that have average solar radiation lower than the calculated overall average solar radiation. Thereafter, the necessary size of the PV generator and the storage battery was calculated based on all the climatic cycles to construct the generalsizing curve at specific system availability. Finally, the resultant sizing curve was fitted to an exponential function to derive a mathematical formula that can be used to calculate PV system size directly. In [6], a comprehensive sizing of standalone PV systems for Malaysia was presented. A simulation was performed, depending on the energy flow in a PV system [7]. By this simulation, the possible sizes of a PV/battery system at different system availabilities for five main locations were obtained and plotted to establish a mathematical correlation between PV array capacity and system availability and between PV array capacity and storage battery capacity. After calculating the coefficients for each region, the averages of these coefficients were calculated to establish a model for all Malaysia. From the examples of PV system optimization that were given, it can be concluded that the PV systems were designed at different levels of availability of 90% to 100%.
The main objective of the present paper is to study the effect of system availability on system size and cost to recommend an optimum availability level at which PV systems must be designed.
2. Standalone PV System Availability
Each standalone PV system, like any other power systems, has a specific level of availability. This reliability level affects system performance, production, feasibility, and investment [8–14]. According to the Sandia National Laboratory in [15], the availability of a standalone PV system can be defined as the percentage of time at which a power system is capable of meeting the load requirements. The number of hours that the system is available, divided by 8 760 h, gives the annual system availability. A system with 95% availability is expected to meet the load requirement of 8 322 h during an average year for the entire useful life of the system. An annual availability of 99% means that the system can operate the load for 8 672 h of the 8 760 h [15]. In [16], the PV system availability is defined as the percentage of time at which a PV system is capable of meeting the load requirements.
The availability of a PV system can be described by statistical values. In [17], the availability of PV systems is defined as a statistical value, called loss of load probability (LLP), which is given by The numerator in (1) is the sum of the energy demanded which the PV system cannot cover in a year’s time. On the other hand, the denominator is the sum of the energy demanded in a year’s time. After calculating the LLP, the availability () of the PV system can be expressed as Some researchers used another statistical value to describe the availability of a PV system, namely, loss of power supply probability (LOSP). In [18, 19], LOSP is described as a probability function, where is the probability that the state of charge at any accumulative time within the time period will be equal to or less than the minimum permissible level ().
According to this formula, the availability of a PV system can be calculated as However, increasing PV system availability increases the size of the system and, consequently, the capital cost of the system. In [20], the effect of the availability of PV system on PV array cost is deeply studied. According to [20], the system size and cost increased rapidly while trying to obtain the last few percentages of availability. The relation between PV array cost (size) and system availability was almost liner until 80%, at which it became logarithmic thereafter. In addition, the Sandia National Laboratory, in [15], illustrated the relation between the peak sunshine hours of the system and the needed storage capacity for the system at two levels of system availability. According to [15], the storage needed from a PV system that has 99% availability is higher than that from a PV system with 95% availability. Moreover, the difference between the needed storage capacities becomes much higher as the number of peak sunshine hours becomes lower than 4.
Based on that, increasing availability of the PV system increased the size of the PV array and the needed storage capacity. On these bases, knowing the optimum availability at which the PV system must be designed is important. In [15], two levels of availability are recommended: 95% and 99%. However, these authors stated that the 95% availability is more recommended. Meanwhile, in [20], it is suggested that the nature of the load of the PV system determines its availability. For example, telecommunication repeater stations will be considered as a critical load. Thus, 99% availability is demanded, whereas other noncritical loads can be designed based on 95% availability. In [2], the availability of PV systems in the range of 90% to 100% is recommended. Meanwhile, in [3], the availability of PV systems in the range of 92% to 99.9% is recommended. In [4], it is recommended that PV systems must be designed at 100% availability. In addition, in [5], it is suggested that PV system availability must be higher than 95% and that an LLP value of zero cannot be assigned. In [6], the PV system availability in the range of 95% to 99% is recommended, whereas a 98% availability of PV system is recommended in [7]. Finally, the HOMER software, which is a widely used PV system optimization tool, designs standalone PV systems at 100% availability.
On these bases, the availability of PV systems is mostly recommended in the range of 95% to 100%. However, an exact availability level is not yet determined even by the present study. A more specific availability level must be defined among the availability levels that are in the range of 95% to 100%. In the next section, a brief analysis of a PV system designed at six availability levels is performed to try to find the optimum availability at which PV systems must be designed.
3. Searching for the Optimum PV System Availability
In this section, a brief analysis of a PV system designed at six availability levels (95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, and 100%) is performed to find the best system availability at which PV systems must be designed. Figure 1 shows the used load demand. The total load demand was 6.135 kWh/day with a maximum power of 0.52 kW. The average load power was 0.255 kW and the load factor was 49%.
In this section, the method proposed by [6] was used to design the PV system at different availability levels. In addition, the tool presented in [21] was used to simulate these systems using hourly solar radiation and ambient temperature records for Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia. The proposed method and the HOMER software were used to design the PV system at 100% availability. Then, the methods proposed in [6, 21] were used to design and analyze the designed PV systems
According to HOMER, a PV system with a 4 kWp PV array and 1500 Ah/12 V storage battery is needed to meet the desired load demand at zero loss of load probability (100% availability). On the other hand, for the method in [6], a PV system with 4.3 kWp and 1316 Ah/12 V storage battery is needed to meet the desired load demand. The difference between the result given by HOMER and that by the proposed method is attributed to two reasons: the nature of the meteorological variable used and the specification assumption of the device. As for the former, the method in [6] used real hourly meteorological data, whereas HOMER used monthly averages and converted it into hourly data using embedded models. As for the latter, many differences exist in the defined specifications for the modeled devices, such as conversion efficiency of the PV module, charging efficiency of the battery, and other factors.
Table 1 shows the specifications and statistics of six PV systems designed at six availability levels. The table shows the availability level (), PV array capacity (), storage battery capacity (), energy generated by the PV array in a year’s time (), number of loss load hours (LOLH), damped energy (), cost of energy generated by the PV system (CoE), and number of hours in the year that the SOC of the battery was higher than 80% (SOC_{80%}). As for LOLH, the simulation counted each hour within which an energy deficit occurs, despite the fact that some of the hourly demands can be partially covered.

From the table, the system with 100% availability consisted of a 4.3 kWp PV array and a 1316 Ah/12 V storage unit. The system generated 6882 kWh per year, whereas 4645 kWh was damped, which means that 67.5% of the energy generated was wasted. The cost of energy generated by such a system is 0.6 USD/kWh. In addition, the battery SOC was higher than 80% in about 89.9% of a year’s time, which indicates that the battery was not the kind used during a year’s time.
As for the system with 99% availability, a 2.5 kWp PV array and a 324 Ah/12 V storage battery are the recommended energy source sizes. In a year’s time, 4000 kWh was generated, whereas 45% of this energy was damped. The cost of the energy generated by the system is 0.27 USD/kWh. The battery SOC in 31% of a year’s time was higher than 80%, which means that the battery was well used compared with the previous case. The number of hours at which the system cannot meet the load demand was 199, which translates to 2.2% of a year’s time.
As for the remaining system options, the performances of these systems were close to each other, whereas the needed PV array and battery capacity were in the range of 2.3 kWp to 2 kWp and 270 Ah/12 V to 240 Ah/12 V. The generated energy was in the range of 3201 kWh/year to 3681 kWh/year, whereas the percentage damped energy was in the range of 34% to 40%. On the other hand, the cost of the energy generated by these systems was in the range of 0.22 USD/kWh to 0.25 USD/kWh, whereas the percentage of the days within which the battery SOC was higher than 80% was in the range of 28% to 30%. The LOLH values of these systems were in the range of 4.4% to 11.1%, which are high values, especially, compared with the previous systems.
Figure 2 shows a comparison among these systems in terms of wasted energy (damped energytogenerated energy), battery usage (SOC_{80%} to the number of hours in a year’s time), and LOLH percentage (LOLH to the number of hours in a year’s time). The figure shows that systems with availability in the range of 99% to 95% had almost similar battery usages. Hence, systems with 98% to 99% availability are recommended in this regard. As for LOLH, systems with availability values in the range of 98 to 100 are recommended. Finally, systems with availability values in the range of 97% to 98% are recommended, in terms of wasted energy. On the basis of these results, systems with availability values of 98% and 99% are most recommended.
Referring to the CoE in Table 1, it is noted that, by using the system with 99% availability, the supplier lost 298 kWh/per year in damped energy, compared with the system with 98% availability. Moreover, the generation of energy costs the supplier 0.02 USD per kWh more, compared with the system with 98% availability. On the other hand, the LOLH value increased by 187 h in the system with 98% availability, compared with the system with 99% availability. Thus, despite the fact that the system with 98% availability was cheaper in terms of unit cost and damped energy, it is less reliable compared with the system with 99% availability. Upon this basis, PV systems with 99% availability are recommended due to their high reliability and favorable running costs.
4. Conclusion
Optimum PV system availability was studied and presented in this paper. Six PV systems with different reliability levels were studied using solar energy and ambient temperature records for Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia. The performance analysis was in terms of wasted energy, cost of energy, battery usage, and power shortages using real meteorological data. The results show that PV systems with 99% availability are recommended due to their high reliability and favorably wasted energy.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by Lakeside Labs, Klagenfurt, Austria, and funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Carinthian Economic Promotion Fund (KWF) under Grant KWF 202142374335470 (Project MONERGY) and 202142293534445 (Project Smart Microgrid). The authors would like to thank Lizzie Dawes for proofreading the paper.
References
 T. Khatib, A. Mohamed, and K. A. Sopian, “A review of photovoltaic systems size optimization techniques,” Renewable and Sustainable Reviews, vol. 22, pp. 454–465, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. H. Arab, B. A. Driss, R. Amimeur, and E. Lorenzo, “Photovoltaic systems sizing for Algeria,” Solar Energy, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 99–104, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 G. B. Shrestha and L. Goel, “A study on optimal sizing of standalone photovoltaic stations,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 373–378, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Fragaki and T. Markvart, “Standalone PV system design: results using a new sizing approach,” Renewable Energy, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 162–167, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Markvart, A. Fragaki, and J. N. Ross, “PV system sizing using observed time series of solar radiation,” Solar Energy, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Khatib, A. Mohamed, K. Sopian, and M. Mahmoud, “A new approach for optimal sizing of standalone photovoltaic systems,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 391213, 7 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Arun, R. Banerjee, and S. Bandyopadhyay, “Optimum sizing of photovoltaic battery systems incorporating uncertainty through design space approach,” Solar Energy, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 1013–1025, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Zhang, W. Li, S. Li, Y. Wang, and W. Xiao, “Reliability assessment of photovoltaic power systems: review of current status and future perspectives,” Applied Energy, vol. 104, pp. 822–833, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Fucci, L. Lancellotti, and C. Privato, “A procedure for assessing the reliability of short circuited concentration photovoltaic systems in outdoor degradation conditions,” Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 182–187, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Zini, C. Mangeant, and J. Merten, “Reliability of largescale gridconnected photovoltaic systems,” Renewable Energy, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2334–2340, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. M. Moharil and P. S. Kulkarni, “Reliability analysis of solar photovoltaic system using hourly mean solar radiation data,” Solar Energy, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 691–702, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. K. Kaldellis, P. Koronakis, and K. Kavadias, “Energy balance analysis of a standalone photovoltaic system, including variable system reliability impact,” Renewable Energy, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1161–1180, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Sharma and S. S. Chandel, “Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems: a review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 27, pp. 753–767, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Lee, D. Soto, and V. Modi, “Cost versus reliability sizing strategy for isolated photovoltaic microgrids in the developing world,” Renewable Energy, vol. 69, pp. 16–24, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Sandia International Laboratory, Standalone Photovoltaic Power Systems, Sandia International Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1995.
 T. Ball and V. Risser, “Standalone terrestrial photovoltaic power systems,” in Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Tutorial Notes, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Tsalides and A. Thanailakis, “Lossofload probability and related parameters in optimum computeraided design of standalone photovoltaic systems,” Solar Cells, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 115–127, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Ofry and A. Braunstein, “The loss of power supply probability as a technique for designing standalone solar electrical (Photovoltaic) systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1171–1175, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
 I. Abouzahr and R. Ramakumar, “Loss of power supply probability of standalone photovoltaic systems: a closed form solution approach,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. R. Wenham, M. A. Green, and M. E. Watt, Applied Photovoltaics, Earthscan, London, UK, 2007.
 T. Khatib, A. Mohamed, and K. Sopian, “A software tool for optimal sizing of PV systems in Malaysia,” Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 969248, 16 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Tamer Khatib and Wilfried Elmenreich. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.