Abstract

Nano-ZnO supported on bentonite was prepared to form composite photocatalyst by sol-gel method. The photocatalyst was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). C.I. Acid Red 35 was used as simulating contaminant to be treated by ultraviolet light synergistic with nano-ZnO/bentonite. The results show that 5.7 nm ZnO particle was acquired and uniformly dispersed on the surface of the bentonite at calcination temperature of 200°C. The removal of C.I. Acid Red 35 could reach 84.9% after 200 min under optimum ZnO/bentonite dosage of 0.6 g L−1. The 60% ZnO content in ZnO/bentonite composite exhibited a great photocatalytic activity to treat C.I. Acid Red 35. The photocatalytic process followed pseudo-first-order kinetics and the best apparent rate constant was 0.00927 min−1 with correlation coefficient (R2) of above 0.98.

1. Introduction

Printing and dyeing process is one of the most important chemical industries and makes human being in a colorful world. However, this industry can produce numerous poisonous and harmful wastewater with high chroma, high salinity, and great chemical oxygen demand. Photocatalytic oxidation technology can effectively remove organic pollutants from water, especially from dyeing wastewater [13]. Zinc oxide (ZnO) powder, an n-type semiconductor materials, has acquired much attention in the field of decomposition of various organic pollutants [4] for its wide band gap ( eV), high electron-hole binding energy (60 meV), good piezoelectric [5], small particle size (nanolevel), and excellent photocatalytic activity [6]. Khan et al. synthesized ZnO quantum dots exhibiting a high efficiency in the decomposition of methyl orange under UV irradiation [7]. Ameen et al. employed a simple solution method of direct synthesis of ZnO-flower nanomaterials which showed a very fast degradation of crystal violet dye with 96% removal under UV irradiation with 80 min reaction time [8]. In order to improve the photocatalytic efficiency, nanostructure ZnO was prepared by sol-gel method [9] and presented a high activity because of the quantum size effect.

Although nanolevel ZnO shows a satisfactory performance for degradation of organic contamination, it is a problem that nanocatalyst is difficult to be separated and recovered from aqueous after photocatalytic reaction, which severely limits the application of this system into water treatment. In order to overcome this shortcoming, nano-ZnO was loaded on some supporters (clay soil, glass marble, CNT yarn, activated carbon, metal screening, etc.) to avoid the separation and recover nanocatalyst [1012]. Bentonite, as a carrier, has many advantages, such as low cost [10], great stabilization, big surface area, good adsorption performance, and high ion exchange [13]. If nano-ZnO is immobilized on bentonite, it will be good for settlement and recovery of catalyst. The supporter, bentonite, can improve dispersion of nano-ZnO and reduce its dosage. On the other hand, bentonite can increase adsorptive capacity of organic contaminant to improve catalytic rate [14]. There were many literatures that bentonite as an excellent carrier was applied in the field of catalysis. For example, Hamzah et al. [15] used bentonite-TiO2 for hydrogenolysis of glycerol in aqueous media. Motshekga et al. [10] used bentonite to improve Ag-ZnO catalytic activity.

In this study, the composite, photocatalyst of nanolevel ZnO loaded on bentonite (nano-ZnO/bentonite), was prepared by sol-gel technology. The nano-ZnO/bentonite was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The nano-ZnO/bentonite was used as photocatalyst to decompose an azo dye, C.I. Acid Red 35, in aqueous.

2. Experimental

2.1. Nano-ZnO/Bentonite Preparation

1.16 g LiOH·H2O was dissolved in 100 mL anhydrous ethanol at room temperature. 4.4 g Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O was dissolved in 100 mL anhydrous ethanol at 80°C in an ultrasonic bath. A certain amount of bentonite was added to Zn(CH3COO)2-ethanol solution to form cloudy solution. The LiOH-ethanol solution was added to the cloudy solution under vigorous stirring at 50°C for 60 mins. The reaction mixture became ZnO sol which was supported on the surface of the bentonite. The mixture was stored below 4°C overnight to prevent particles from growing rapidly. The white solid would appear and became white gel after being separated from the liquid above by centrifugal machine. The precursor was acquired by purifying white solid. The precursor was calcined for 4 hrs at certain temperature to form nano-ZnO/bentonite.

2.2. Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with a JSM-740F operated at 3 kV to examine the surface topography of ZnO/bentonite. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) was carried out using JEM-2010 (JEOL, Japan), operated at 120 kV. The crystal phases of nano-ZnO/bentonite particles were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) on PaNalytical X-ray diffractometer (X’Pert Pro MPD, Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiation.

2.3. Photocatalytic Experiment

For photocatalytic activity test, a mixture of 200 mL C.I. Acid Red 35 aqueous solution with certain concentration of nano-ZnO/bentonite composite was put in a 250 mL beaker with magnetic stirring. The information of C.I. Acid Red 35 is shown in Figure 1. The position of ultraviolet light was just above the beaker at 10 cm above the beaker. The radiation source was a 10 cm long mercury UV lamp (10 W Guangdong Bright Star) and the wavelength of which radiation source was 245 nm. At a certain reaction interval of 40 min, a sample of 10 mL was taken out and centrifuged at 12000 rpm to remove catalyst. The dyestuff absorbance of C.I. Acid Red 35 in the sample after centrifuging was analyzed by a UV-2102PC UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UNICO, China). The maximum absorption of C.I. Acid Red 35 in UV-visible spectrum is 523 nm. The relationship between absorbance () and concentration of C.I. Acid Red 35 () is and the correlation coefficient () is 0.9999. The removal of C.I. Acid Red 35 is calculated by the following equation:

is the concentration of C.I. Acid Red 35 at time; is the initial concentration of C.I. Acid Red 35.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis

Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of nano-ZnO/bentonite composite at different calcination temperatures from 100 to 400°C. Bentonite characteristic peaks are shown at 2θ values of 18.9, 21.9, and 28.9° in Figure 2. The peaks of bentonite are evident in all patterns which is also consistent with other reported works [10, 14, 16]. The ZnO characteristic peaks are shown at 2θ values of 31.7, 34.4, 36.2, 47.5, 56.5, 62.8, 67.9, and 68.8° in Figure 2. All peaks can be well indexed to standard patterns (JCPDS 36-1451) without any impurity phases [5, 9, 17]. The major peaks of ZnO at 2θ values of 31.7, 34.4, 36.2, and 47.5° can be indexed to (100), (002), (101), and (102) crystal planes [18]. From Figure 2, it can be concluded that the X-ray diffraction patterns of nano-ZnO/bentonite under calcination temperature of 100 and 200°C are not integrated because the peak of (002) crystal plane is not obvious. When the calcination temperature is above 300°C, all the characteristic peaks are observed clearly with a high intensity. Nano-ZnO which is acquired under 200°C exhibits an amorphous structure and a wider half-peak width than that of 300 and 400°C. According to Scherrer equation [19], the particle sizes of ZnO calcined at 200, 300, and 400°C are 5.7, 6.8, and 12.6 nm.

3.2. SEM and TEM Analysis

Figure 3 shows the SEM and TEM of composite materials. From Figure 3(a), the SEM of nano-ZnO/bentonite (ZnO content: 60%) composite presents a feature of big particle size, which is goof for its separation and recycled from aqueous. From Figure 3(b), the TEM of pure nano-ZnO exhibits a uniform spherical particle. The particle size of nano-ZnO is about 5–7 nm which can be prepared by sol-gel technology. Figure 3(c) shows the TEM of nano-ZnO/bentonite composite. From Figure 3(c), it can be seen clearly that nano-ZnO adheres to the surface of bentonite and expresses good dispersion. It tends to decrease the dosage and improve utilization of the photocatalyst. Figure 3(d) is HRTEM of nano-ZnO/bentonite. The particle size of nano-ZnO is from 5 to 10 nm which is similar to XRD results. The lattice spacing determined from HRTEM is 0.28 nm [20, 21], which is consistent with (100) plane of ZnO.

3.3. Effect of ZnO Content on Nano-ZnO/Bentonite

Figure 4 shows photocatalytic performances of nano-ZnO/bentonite composites in which nano-ZnO contents range from 10% to 70%. With the rise of the nano-ZnO percentage in composite, C.I. Acid Red 35 removal increases rapidly. At 200 min irradiation, the removals are 14.2%, 22.4%, 30.7%, 37.9%, 79.6%, and 84.9% with the corresponding ZnO contents of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%, respectively. When the ZnO content continues to reach 70%, the dye removal presents a descending tendency to 71.5% at 200 min. According to many literatures about nanomaterial photocatalytic performance, the degradation process of organic contamination follows pseudo-first-order kinetics [22, 23]. According to the integral type of the first-order kinetics (), the apparent rate constant () is the rate of slope in the linear relationship. From Figure 4, the decomposition processes of C.I. Acid Red 35 follow pseudo-first-order kinetics because and irradiation time exhibit linear relationship at different photocatalysts. All the correlation coefficients () are above 0.98. The apparent rate constants are 0.0007 min−1, 0.0012 min−1, 0.0018 min−1, 0.0024 min−1, 0.0079 min−1, 0.0093 min−1, and 0.0065 min−1 with the ZnO contents in the composites of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70%, respectively. Therefore, the best ZnO content in nano-ZnO/bentonite composite is 60% with 0.0093 min−1 apparent rate constant and 84.9% C.I. Acid Red 35 removal.

Under UV irradiation, electronic (e) can be agitated from valence band (VB) to conduction band (CB) of ZnO to produce hole (h+). The hole can react with hydroxyl ion to generate hydroxyl radical (OH). The OH shows a strong oxidation ability to decompose the organic contamination in aqueous [7, 10, 23]. The number of OH can be increased with the rise of nano-ZnO content in nano-ZnO/bentonite. However, excessive ZnO in composite photocatalyst may aggregate together to increase nano-ZnO particle size. The big particle size of ZnO can reduce the quantum size effect and decrease the catalytic activity. On the other hand, bentonite has a good ability of adsorption of organic contaminants. The high ZnO content means the low bentonite in composite photocatalyst. The decline of adsorption ability of ZnO/bentonite also leads to the decrease of catalytic activity. So, the 60% ZnO content in ZnO/bentonite composite is the optimal value in this study.

3.4. Effect of Calcination Temperature

The precursor obtained after sol-gel procedure was treated by calcination. The nano-ZnO/bentonite composites were prepared at different calcination temperatures of 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C. The catalytic activity of nano-ZnO/bentonite composite is shown in Figure 5. From Figure 5, it is clearly seen that the precursor has a little photocatalytic activity. Under the calcination temperature of 200°C, nano-ZnO/bentonite has the best catalytic activity. When the calcination temperature is 300°C, the catalytic efficiency has a little decrease. When the calcination temperature reaches 400°C, the catalyst is in the inactivation state. After 200 min UV irradiation, the C.I. Acid Red 35 removals are 25.8%, 84.9%, 80.9%, 11.4%, and 10.5% with the calcination temperatures at 100°C, 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, respectively. From Figure 5, the degradation processes of C.I. Acid Red 35 using these five nano-ZnO/bentonite composites follow first-order kinetics and the correlation coefficients () are above 0.98.

With the rise of calcination temperature, the particle size of nano-ZnO increases according to the XRD results. The glomeration phenomenon of ZnO is very serious and ZnO dispersion in composite is poor at a high calcination temperature. Quantum size effect especially has almost disappeared when the calcination temperature is above 400°C. Therefore, the photocatalysts at 400°C and 500°C calcination temperature have a very poor activity. The best calcination temperature is 200°C.

3.5. Effect of Nano-ZnO/Bentonite Concentration

A series of experiments were carried out by varying the dosages of nano-ZnO/bentonite composite from 0.2 to 0.7 g L−1 in order to determine the effect of catalyst amounts. Color removal of C.I. Acid Red 35 is depicted at different photocatalyst addition in Figure 6. The degradation tendency of C.I. Acid Red 35 increases with the addition dosage of nano-ZnO/bentonite ranging from 0.2 to 0.6 g L−1. But color removal has a bit reduction when the dosage of composite catalyst improves to 0.7 g L−1. With 200 min UV irradiation, the removals of C.I. Acid Red 35 are 45.3%, 49.5%, 73.1%, 79.5%, 84.9%, and 67.1% as the catalyst dosages are 0.2 g L−1, 0.3 g L−1, 0.4 g L−1, 0.5 g L−1, 0.6 g L−1, and 0.7 g L−1, respectively. From Figure 6, the degradation processes of C.I. Acid Red 35 follow pseudo-first-order kinetics when catalyst dosages range from 0.2 to 0.6 g L−1, as the correlation coefficients () are above 0.98. However, catalytic performance fails to follow pseudo-first-order kinetics with only 0.96 value when catalyst addition is 0.7 g L−1. The apparent rate constants are 0.00295 min−1, 0.00332 min−1, 0.00657 min−1, 0.0076 min−1, 0.00927 min−1, and 0.00542 min−1 with the corresponding catalyst dosages of 0.2 g L−1, 0.3 g L−1, 0.4 g L−1, 0.5 g L−1, 0.6 g L−1, and 0.7 g L−1. Therefore, 0.6 g/L is the optimum catalyst dosage.

The phenomenon reveals the fact that more available active sites on the catalyst surface can absorb photons from UV-lamp to promote the valence band electron to the conduction band to oxidize C.I. Acid Red 35. On the other hand, with higher loading levels, the nano-ZnO/bentonite composite powder may reflect, screen, and scatter the radiation from UV-lamp and reduce the photonic flux within the irradiated solution. Another reason is that the catalyst surface probably becomes unavailable for photoabsorption because of agglomeration and sedimentation of photocatalyst particles.

3.6. Effect of C.I. Acid Red 35 Initial Dosage

To study the influence of initial dye concentration on color removal, the initial C.I. Acid Red 35 concentrations ranging from 0.015 to 0.03 g L−1 are investigated in Figure 7. As can be seen from Figure 7, the removal of C.I. Acid Red 35 presents a decrease tendency with increasing of the initial C.I. Acid Red 35 concentration. For instance, the C.I. Acid Red 35 removal after 200 min is about 94.9% with initial dosage of 0.015 g L−1, but it decreases to 66.5% when it is 0.03 g L−1. The apparent constants have a great decrease from 0.014 min−1 to 0.057 min−1 with the rise of C.I. Acid Red 35 concentration from 0.015 to 0.03 g L−1. The correlation coefficients () are above 0.99 when C.I. Acid Red 35 concentration varies from 0.015 to 0.03 g L−1. Although the rise of dye concentration in aqueous solution increases the number of dye molecules, the hydroxyl radical has no change. Therefore, the color removal and the decolorizing rate constant decrease as the initial concentration of C.I. Acid Red 35 increases.

4. Conclusions

Nano-ZnO supported on bentonite was prepared to form composite photocatalyst by sol-gel method. According to the XRD and TEM analysis, 5.7 nm ZnO in nano-ZnO/bentonite was acquired at 200°C calcination temperature. The removal of C.I. Acid Red 35 could reach 84.9% with optimum ZnO/bentonite dosage of 0.6 g L−1 after 200 min reaction. The 60% ZnO content in ZnO/bentonite composite exhibited a great photocatalytic activity to treat C.I. Acid Red 35. The photocatalytic process followed pseudo-first-order kinetics and the best apparent rate constant was 0.00927 min−1 with correlation coefficient () of above 0.98.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21006057) and Henan Provincial Science and Technology Foundation (nos. 142102210427 and 142300410202).