International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 910619 |

Sayan Seal, Vinay Budhraja, Liming Ji, Vasundara V. Varadan, "Enhanced Light Trapping in Thin Film Solar Cells Using a Plasmonic Fishnet Structure", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2015, Article ID 910619, 8 pages, 2015.

Enhanced Light Trapping in Thin Film Solar Cells Using a Plasmonic Fishnet Structure

Academic Editor: Ahmad Umar
Received18 Sep 2014
Revised11 Jan 2015
Accepted11 Jan 2015
Published28 Jan 2015


Incorporating plasmonic structures into the back spacer layer of thin film solar cells (TFSCs) is an efficient way to improve their performance. The fishnet structure is used to enhance light trapping. Unlike other previously suggested discrete plasmonic particles, the fishnet is an electrically connected wire mesh that does not result in light field localization, which leads to high absorption losses. The design was verified experimentally. A silver fishnet structure was fabricated using electron beam lithography (EBL) and thermal evaporation. The final fabricated structure optically resembles a TFSC. The results predicted by numerical simulations were reproduced experimentally on a fabricated sample. We show that light absorption in the a-Si absorber layer is enhanced by a factor of 10.6 at the design wavelength of 690 nm due to the presence of the fishnet structure. Furthermore, the total absorption over all wavelengths was increased by a factor of 3.2. The short-circuit current of the TFSC was increased by 30% as a result of including the fishnet.

1. Introduction

Amorphous silicon thin film solar cells (TFSCs) are an attractive alternative to crystalline silicon wafer solar cells. The material required to produce a TFSC is only a fraction of that used to make a wafer solar cell. Other advantages include low cost processing and easy deposition at comparatively lower temperatures on a variety of substrates [13], including flexible substrates. The thickness of TFSCs is typically a fraction of that of wafer solar cells, but the absorption of light in the thin film has to be comparable to a wafer cell in order to be competitive in the market today. This can be achieved by increasing the light path in the absorber layer through the scattering of the incoming light.

There are various techniques used in the processing of TFSCs to enhance absorption. The simplest technique would be to use a metallic back reflector to double the optical path length of incoming light. Extending this concept further, roughness was introduced to the geometry of the metal back reflector or the TCO layers to enhance light absorption by diffuse scattering [49]. Theoretical analysis of rough surfaces was shown theoretically by Yablonovitch in 1982 [10, 11]. Random roughness on material surfaces has been widely used in the industry, but the enhancement of light absorption using this method is limited. Hence, efforts have been made to manipulate the geometry of the back reflector geometry.

Photonic back reflectors [12, 13] and diffraction gratings [14, 15] were good propositions that utilized planar structures to aid light absorption. Shaping a solar cell itself into a geometry, such as nanodome, can also significantly improve the efficiency of a TFSC [16, 17].

Another approach to cut down the thickness of the scatterers was realized by using metal nanoparticles embedded within the front or back spacer layer. Several front surface designs were proposed which resulted in an improvement in the performance of thin film solar cells [1826]. Studies showed that for red shifting particle resonances, larger particles were required that degraded short wavelength performance of the TFSC. This exposes a major drawback of plasmonic nanoparticle based designs. For enhancement at longer wavelengths, larger particle sizes are required, which will obstruct incoming light [20] at shorter wavelengths. In a study by Pala et al. [27], periodic plasmonic particles exceeding a critical dimension of 100 nm were shown to act like reflectors. Research efforts are being made on moving plasmonic structures to the back spacer layer in thin film solar cells based on the fact that front surface plasmonics tend to suppress photocurrent generation at short wavelengths [28]. Also, using isolated nanoparticles results in high electric field localization around the particle itself, which leads to high absorption losses. This is because metals behave like dielectric materials with high attenuation coefficients at optical frequencies. Optical waves penetrate into metals and get attenuated. The reduced photon energy is converted into heat as undesired loss.

The plasmonic fishnet structure proposed by Ji and Varadan [29] is an electrically connected, plasmonic structure whose geometry can be optimized to realize absorption enhancement in the a-Si layer of a TFSC at a particular target wavelength. It is a planar structure embedded within the back spacer of a TFSC. In a-Si, the absorption is very low for wavelengths ~700 nm near the bandgap. Hence, the resonance frequency of the fishnet was designed to enhance absorption in this region. The fishnet structure has two distinct advantages compared to other particulate or discrete plasmonic structures. The field localization in the fishnet plasmonic structure is much smaller in comparison. It enhances the conductivity of the back spacer and can also serve as the back electrode. The ability of this structure to enhance the absorption and in TFSCs was shown by numerical simulation in the past [29]. Following this design very closely, a plasmonic fishnet structure was embedded within the back spacer of a TFSC structure. The incoming light is scattered into the absorber layer and also trapped by total internal reflection from the top interface. This particular fishnet provides a plasmonic resonance at the bandgap of a-Si, which corresponds to a wavelength of around 690 nm.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Fabrication of the Fishnet TFSC

The design of the fishnet TFSC is based on the previous work which was referred to earlier [29]. The only differences in the device dimensions arose as a result of changing the choice of metal for both the fishnet and the back electrode to silver instead of gold. All other materials were kept the same. The optimized design is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1(b) shows the complete structure of the fabricated sample, which optically resembles a TFSC. With this set of dimensions, the fishnet structure was expected to resonate near 700 nm, which is the bandgap of a-Si. The bandgap region of a-Si has a very low absorption coefficient; hence light absorption enhancement is most required at this wavelength. Since this is a single layer fishnet, there is no interlayer magnetic coupling that exists in multilayer fishnet structure [30]. Instead, only electrical resonance will be generated, resulting in an oscillating current in the metallic structure. This oscillating current is the result of photon-electron energy conversion and then will scatter photons back into the a-Si layer.

A 100 nm layer of silver was deposited on a glass substrate by thermal evaporation, using Cr as an adhesion layer. Silver thin films were found to disintegrate easily in the absence of the Cr layer. Al-doped zinc oxide (AZO) was then deposited on the top of the silver layer using atomic layer deposition (ALD). The fishnet structure was then fabricated using electron beam lithography, thermal evaporation and subsequent lift-off using acetone. A 7 nm thin film of Cr was required to ensure proper adhesion of the silver to the AZO during this step. This was followed by another AZO deposition step to cover the fishnet completely, thus embedding the fishnet within the AZO back spacer. a-Si was deposited over this using Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition under 900 mTorr, 50 W for 17 minutes, to give a 500 nm layer. Finally, a 50 nm AZO front spacer layer was deposited to help reduce reflection from the top of the TFSC. The pattern was fabricated within an area of 1.048 mm × 1.048 mm.

2.2. Measurement of Total Absorption

After a repeatable process was established for fabricating the solar cell, the absorption was measured. As a control experiment, a TFSC without a fishnet was used. However, the thicknesses and materials of all layers were kept unaltered. The samples were characterized optically using spectroscopic ellipsometry. The VASE ellipsometer from the J. A. Woollam Company was used to take measurements. The angle of incidence was kept fixed at 15°. Ideally measurements should have been taken at normal incidence, but 15° was the minimum achievable angle for the ellipsometer used for this measurement. Measurements were taken for three different polarization states—p-polarized (electric field vector along the plane of incidence), s-polarized (electric field perpendicular to the plane of incidence), and u-polarized (unpolarized). The plane of polarization for unpolarized light was set at 45°, but the result would be qualitatively similar for any arbitrary angle. This was important in determining whether the fishnet behaves isotropically with respect to light with different polarization states.

The ellipsometer cannot measure absorption directly. However, it can measure the coefficients of reflection () and transmission (). However, because the back reflector is negligible, this claim was verified experimentally, and the transmission is shown plotted as a function of frequency in Figure 4. Hence the coefficient of absorption () simply becomes Also, it must be noted that specular reflection and direct transmission were measured.

2.3. Calculation of the Short-Circuit Current Density ()

Equation (1) gives a measure of the total power absorbed by the whole solar cell. This is not necessarily equal to the power absorbed by the a-Si layer, because it includes losses occurring within the whole solar cell structure. It is important to estimate the power absorbed within the a-Si layer while calculating the , because this absorption gives rise to electron-hole pairs. At each wavelength, the fraction of light absorbed in the a-Si layer () was calculated from the simulation results. From this estimate, the actual absorption in a-Si in the fabricated sample was calculated using the following relation:

Once the absorption in a-Si () was calculated using (2), the was estimated using the following relation: where, is the wavelength dependent solar photon flux density and is the electronic charge.

2.4. Comparison of Experimental Results and Numerical Simulation

The model of the fishnet TFSC in Ansoft HFSS was modified based on certain observations after the fabrication process was completed. It was noted that the AZO layer covering the fishnet was not flat, it had undulations above the area covered by the fishnet, and the optical constants of the materials used for fabrication were not identical to the values used in simulation. Although the differences were within 5%, it was enough to influence the absorption profile obtained from simulations. Also the 7 nm Cr adhesion layer below the silver fishnet had to be accounted for.

The existence of bumps above the fishnet was verified using atomic force microscopy (AFM), and the model was edited accordingly. All materials used to fabricate the fishnet TFSC were characterized using spectroscopic ellipsometry. These values served as the inputs for the simulation process.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Fabrication Results for the Fishnet TFSC

Figure 2 shows the SEM image of the fabricated fishnet structure. The pattern is uniform and matches the design specifications well. The line width achieved was 100 nm on an average, with an average pitch size of 598.5 nm. The pattern was uniform throughout the patterned area, as can be seen from Figure 2(b).

Without the Cr adhesion layer, the silver fishnet could not adhere to the AZO layer. It was found to disintegrate during the lift-off process. The result from one such process is shown in Figure 3.

3.2. Measurement of Absorption of the TFSC with and without the Fishnet

Before measuring the absorption, the applicability of (1) had been verified. The direct transmission was measured to be a little over 0.35% at the most, especially at wavelengths beyond 700 nm which contribute minimally toward carrier generation (Figure 4). The average transmission over the entire wavelength range was about 0.08%.

The total absorption with and without fishnet was plotted and is shown in Figure 5(a). A 10.6x increase in total absorption was observed at a wavelength of 690 nm. Moreover, the performance at lower wavelengths was also enhanced as a result of including the fishnet. It is worth noting that the enhancement at lower wavelengths is not a plasmonic effect but is a consequence of scattering at shorter wavelengths. The fishnet is principally a light scatterer. The scattering is enhanced at the plasmonic resonance frequency. However for lower wavelengths, a significant amount of scattering always occurs because scattering is proportional to the inverse of wavelength. Even though scattering exists at lower wavelengths, it is not due to the plasmonic effect associated with the fishnet—it occurs because light at a low wavelength is incident on a corrugated surface.

This is a distinct advantage of the fishnet as compared to other discrete plasmonic structures that become electrically very large at shorter wavelengths. The average absorption enhancement due to the fishnet across the entire wavelength range was in fact 3.2x.

Figure 5(b) shows measurements taken for four different samples. This step was important to verify the repeatability of both the fabrication process, as well as the characterization technique. We find very good correlation in the absorption spectrum obtained from different samples. It can be seen from Figure 5(c) that the absorption spectrum is nearly independent of the state of polarization. Thus, the performance of the fishnet is not polarization limited; light of different polarizations will contribute equally toward the enhancement of scattering.

For plasmonic designs, it is not a valid assumption that the total light absorbed by the sample is equal to the light absorbed within the a-Si layer. Note that it is the absorption within the a-Si layer that gives rise to electron-hole pair generation. The total absorption also includes the loss in the metallic plasmonic structure and hence may be a misleading interpretation of absorption enhancement. Hence it is imperative to analyze the layer-wise absorption in the TFSC and verify that a majority of the absorption occurs within the a-Si layer. Figure 6 shows the results of this analysis, which was obtained through a full wave EM simulation of the fishnet TFSC in Ansoft HFSS. It can be observed that at plasmonic resonance only 16% of the power is dissipated in the fishnet and 1% in the spacer layers and the back electrode combined. 83% of the power is absorbed by the a-Si layer.

From Figure 6 we can also observe two absorption peaks of the fishnet around 700 nm. These correspond to the plasmonic resonance frequencies of the fishnet structure and are indicative of the absorption loss in a plasmonic structure at the plasmonic resonance frequencies. For a good plasmonic design, these losses should be minimized. Even despite this loss, there is an overall absorption enhancement as can be seen from Figure 5(a). It must be noted, however, that the resonance frequency at 730 nm does not contribute to absorption enhancement since the absorption in a-Si is practically zero beyond 700 nm.

To further investigate the absorption enhancement at the resonance frequency, the electric field pattern was computed in HFSS. Figure 7 presents the electric field plot within the a-Si layer with and without the fishnet at plasmonic resonance. It can be clearly observed that there are several localized hotspots within the a-Si layer. The relative electric field in these hotspots is enhanced by a factor of about 250 as a result of the fishnet. Moreover, even aside from the hotspots, the electric field in the less intense regions of the fishnet TFSC is also greater than that of the planar TFSC by at least two orders of magnitude.

3.3. Calculation of Short-Circuit Current Density ()

Table 1 shows the calculated using the absorption in the a-Si layer only. There was a 30% increase on an average in as a result of including the fishnet. The calculation does not take the diffusion length of the carriers since the thickness of the active region is very small in comparison. The solar irradiation spectrum is accounted for in the calculations. It is worth noting that the fishnet structure can serve as a back electrode for the solar cell as well. It is worth noting that the fishnet structure can serve as a back electrode for the solar cell as well.

S. numberTFSC (mA/cm2)

1Without fishnet11.751
2With fishnet 0115.6553
3With fishnet 0215.6775
4With fishnet 0314.9136
5With fishnet 0414.9464

3.4. Comparison between Experimental and Simulated Results

A numerical model for the fabricated fishnet TFSC was created in Ansoft’s HFSS. If a fair comparison was to be made, the model had to be upgraded to incorporate some details pertaining to the fabrication process. The schematic in Figure 8(a) shows that a 27 nm bump was modeled in the AZO layer covering the fishnet. The existence of this bump was verified using atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements (Figure 8(b)). In addition the 7 nm Cr adhesion layer below the fishnet was also included in the model. All optical constants of the materials used to fabricate the TFSC were characterized using spectroscopic ellipsometry in the wavelength range of interest. These were the values used for the numerical simulation, not reference values from literature. Optical constants differ depending on the purity of materials and the equipment used to deposit these materials. Even minor differences in the optical properties can cause considerable changes in the absorption value estimated by HFSS. Figure 8(c) shows the comparison between the numerical simulation and the absorption obtained experimentally.

The disparity in the result can be attributed to two main factors: the effect of interface roughness between the layers of the TFSC was not modeled and the simulation was carried out for normally incident light whereas the experiment was done for light incident at a 15° angle, since this was the minimum angle of incidence attainable by the ellipsometer.

4. Conclusion

The benefits of incorporating a plasmonic fishnet structure in the back spacer of TFSCs have been demonstrated theoretically in the past. This paper provides experimental proof of this claim. Numerical simulations predict the enhancement of absorption at a wavelength of about 670 nm. It was also shown from HFSS simulations that the trapped light is absorbed mostly by the a-Si layer in the TFSC. A complete process for fabricating the fishnet structure was developed as seen from SEM pictures. The total absorption of the TFSC is enhanced by a factor of 10.6 at 690 nm as a result of including the fishnet in the back spacer layer. Furthermore, the average enhancement across the considered range of wavelengths was found to increase by a factor of 3.2 resulting in a 30% increase in . This is supplemented by the fact that the fishnet structure can also serve as the back electrode. It was also shown that agreement between simulation and experimental data can be greatly improved by accurate characterization of the constituent materials and by adding appropriate structural modifications. The fishnet is just under 30 nm thick—this makes it possible to use ultra-thin layers of semiconductor material, while maintaining an electrical output comparable to wafer based cells. This also makes it a promising technology to use for flexible solar panels. Thus, if properly designed, this structure has great potential for the enhancement of absorption in TFSCs in general.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge the research support provided by the National Science Foundation under EPS-1003970. They also acknowledge the collaboration with Dr. J. Cui, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, for AZO deposition.


  1. A. Shah, P. Torres, R. Tscharner, N. Wyrsch, and H. Keppner, “Photovoltaic technology: the case for thin-film solar cells,” Science, vol. 285, no. 5428, pp. 692–698, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. V. Shah, H. Schade, M. Vanecek et al., “Thin-film silicon solar cell technology,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 113–142, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Hegedus, “Thin film solar modules: the low cost, high throughput and versatile alternative to Si wafers,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 393–411, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. O. Kluth, B. Rech, L. Houben et al., “Texture etched ZnO:Al coated glass substrates for silicon based thin film solar cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 351, no. 1-2, pp. 247–253, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Müller, B. Rech, J. Springer, and M. Vanecek, “TCO and light trapping in silicon thin film solar cells,” Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 917–930, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Zhao, A. Wang, M. A. Green, and F. Ferrazza, “19.8% efficient ‘honeycomb’ textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, no. 14, pp. 1991–1993, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Hüpkes, B. Rech, O. Kluth et al., “Surface textured MF-sputtered ZnO films for microcrystalline silicon-based thin-film solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 18-19, pp. 3054–3060, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Springer, B. Rech, W. Reetz, J. Müller, and M. Vanecek, “Light trapping and optical losses in microcrystalline silicon pin solar cells deposited on surface-textured glass/ZnO substrates,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. R. Abrams, A. Niv, and X. Zhang, “Solar energy enhancement using down-converting particles: a rigorous approach,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 109, no. 11, Article ID 114905, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Yablonovitch, “Statistical ray optics,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 899–907, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Yablonovitch and G. D. Cody, “Intensity enhancement in textured optical sheets for solar cells,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 300–305, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. Bermel, C. Luo, L. Zeng, L. C. Kimerling, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Improving thin-film crystalline silicon solar cell efficiencies with photonic crystals,” Optics Express, vol. 15, no. 25, pp. 16986–17000, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. Zhou and R. Biswas, “Photonic crystal enhanced light-trapping in thin film solar cells,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 9, Article ID 093102, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. Sheng, A. N. Bloch, and R. S. Stepleman, “Wavelength-selective absorption enhancement in thin-film solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 579–581, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. G. Mutitu, S. Shi, C. Chen et al., “Thin film silicon solar cell design based on photonic crystal and diffractive grating structures,” Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 19, pp. 15238–15248, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Zhu, C.-M. Hsu, Z. Yu, S. Fan, and Y. Cui, “Nanodome solar cells with efficient light management and self-cleaning,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1979–1984, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W. J. Nam, L. Ji, T. L. Benanti et al., “Incorporation of a light and carrier collection management nano-element array into superstrate a-Si:H solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 99, no. 7, Article ID 073113, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. R. Catchpole and A. Polman, “Plasmonic solar cells,” Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 26, pp. 21793–21800, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Derkacs, S. H. Lim, P. Matheu, W. Mar, and E. T. Yu, “Improved performance of amorphous silicon solar cells via scattering from surface plasmon polaritons in nearby metallic nanoparticles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, Article ID 093103, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Pillai, K. R. Catchpole, T. Trupke, and M. A. Green, “Surface plasmon enhanced silicon solar cells,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 093105, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. M. Schaadt, B. Feng, and E. T. Yu, “Enhanced semiconductor optical absorption via surface plasmon excitation in metal nanoparticles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, no. 6, Article ID 063106, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. V. E. Ferry, M. A. Verschuuren, H. B. T. Li et al., “Light trapping in ultrathin plasmonic solar cells,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. A237–A245, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. V. E. Ferry, L. A. Sweatlock, D. Pacifici, and H. A. Atwater, “Plasmonic nanostructure design for efficient light coupling into solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 4391–4397, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. A. Atwater and A. Polman, “Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices,” Nature Materials, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 205–213, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Nakayama, K. Tanabe, and H. A. Atwater, “Plasmonic nanoparticle enhanced light absorption in GaAs solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 12, Article ID 121904, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. A. Schuller, E. S. Barnard, W. S. Cai, Y. C. Jun, J. S. White, and M. L. Brongersma, “Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation,” Nature Materials, vol. 9, pp. 193–204, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. A. Pala, J. White, E. Barnard, J. Liu, and M. L. Brongersma, “Design of plasmonic thin-film solar cells with broadband absorption enhancements,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 34, pp. 3504–3509, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Tan, R. Santbergen, A. H. M. Smets, and M. Zeman, “Plasmonic light trapping in thin-film silicon solar cells with improved self-assembled silver nanoparticles,” Nano Letters, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 4070–4076, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. Ji and V. V. Varadan, “Fishnet metastructure for efficiency enhancement of a thin film solar cell,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 110, Article ID 043114, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Valentine, S. Zhang, T. Zentgraf et al., “Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7211, pp. 376–379, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Sayan Seal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1126 Views | 662 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.