Research Article  Open Access
Radi A. Jishi, Marcus A. Lucas, "ZnSnS_{3}: Structure Prediction, Ferroelectricity, and Solar Cell Applications", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2016, Article ID 6193502, 9 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6193502
ZnSnS_{3}: Structure Prediction, Ferroelectricity, and Solar Cell Applications
Abstract
The rapid growth of the solar energy industry is driving a strong demand for high performance, efficient photoelectric materials. In particular, ferroelectrics composed of earthabundant elements may be useful in solar cell applications due to their large internal polarization. Unfortunately, wide band gaps prevent many such materials from absorbing light in the visible to midinfrared range. Here, we address the band gap issue by investigating the effects of substituting sulfur for oxygen in the perovskite structure ZnSnO_{3}. Using evolutionary methods, we identify the stable and metastable structures of ZnSnS_{3} and compare them to those previously characterized for ZnSnO_{3}. Our results suggest that the most stable structure of ZnSnS_{3} is the monoclinic structure, followed by the metastable ilmenite and lithium niobate structures. The latter structure is highly polarized, possessing a significantly reduced band gap of 1.28 eV. These desirable characteristics make it a prime candidate for solar cell applications.
1. Introduction
Ferroelectrics are materials that possess spontaneous electric polarization. This results from a lack of inversion symmetry; all ferroelectric crystals are noncentrosymmetric. Due to intrinsic polarization, ferroelectrics may serve as light harvesters in photovoltaic devices [1–6]. In a semiconductor pn junction acting as a photovoltaic device, the builtin potential across the depletion layer is used to separate the photoexcited electronhole pairs; the maximum opencircuit voltage is thus almost equal to the semiconductor band gap. In a ferroelectric, on the other hand, the separation of the photoexcited pairs is due to the builtin potential induced by the intrinsic polarization; this makes possible the realization of opencircuit voltages that far exceed the band gap [7–17].
Among the most important ferroelectrics are metal oxide perovskites with the general formula ABO_{3}, where A and B are metal cations (B is usually a transition metal). Wellknown examples of such ferroelectrics are BaTiO_{3} and LiNbO_{3}. These oxides have relatively large internal electric fields that could be exploited in photovoltaic applications. However, progress in this area has been hampered by the fact that these ferroelectrics have a large band gap (34 eV), which makes them unsuitable for efficient light harvesting. The large band gap is due to the strong ionic bonding between the transition metal B and oxygen, which, in turn, is due to the large difference in electronegativity between these atoms. In ABO_{3}, the highest valence band is derived from oxygen 2p orbitals, while the low conduction bands are derived from the transition metal 3d states.
To reduce the band gap in ferroelectrics, different strategies have been implemented. Choi et al. [18] alloyed the ferroelectric Bi_{4}Ti_{3}O_{12}, which has an optical band gap between 3.1 and 3.6 eV [19–21], with LaCoO_{3}, which is a Mott insulator with a small band gap of 0.1 eV [22]. From Xray diffraction and scanning transmission electron microscopy, they concluded that some La atoms substitute for some Bi atoms at specific sites, and some Co atoms occupy some Ti sites. Since Co is more electronegative than Ti (1.88 versus 1.54), CoO bond is less ionic than TiO bond, and a reduction in the band gap is expected. Indeed, a reduction of up to 1 eV was observed.
In another approach, Grinberg et al. [23] placed two different transition metal cations on the perovskite Bsite, with one atom driving ferroelectricity and the other producing a band gap in the visible range. They mixed the ferroelectric oxide potassium niobate (KNbO_{3}) with barium nickel niobate (BaNi_{1/2}Nb_{1/2}O_{3−δ}) so as to introduce Ni^{2+} on the Bsite along with an oxygen vacancy which can give rise to gap states in the host KNbO_{3} crystal. The solid solutions thus formed, with to , were ferroelectric, with a direct band gap ranging from 1.1 to 3.38 eV.
In some multiferroics, which exhibit a magnetic order alongside the ferroelectric one, a somewhat smaller band gap exists. In BiFeO_{3} the band gap is 2.7 eV [24, 25]. It is thus expected that multiferroics, such as BiFeO_{3} and Bi_{2}FeCrO_{6} [26, 27], would be more promising candidates for solar cell applications. In Bi_{2}FeCrO_{6} epitaxial thin films, the optical band gap depends on the degree of FeCr ordering. This dependence results from the hybridization of the 3d orbitals in Fe and Cr with the 2p orbitals in oxygen. Nechache et al. [28] investigated the effect of Fe/Cr ordering on the band gap and found that, under the right film growth conditions, the gap can be tuned all the way from 2.7 eV down to 1.5 eV.
An important class of ferroelectric oxides is those that crystallize in the LiNbO_{3} structure (LNstructure) with space group R3c. These crystals are noncentrosymmetric, with a large polarization. LNZnSnO_{3}, synthesized under a pressure of 7 GPa [29], has a polarization given by 59 μC/cm^{2}. Other LNtype polar oxides synthesized under high pressure include CdPbO_{3} [30], PbNiO_{3} [30, 31], GaFeO_{3} [32], and LiOsO_{3} [33]. Ilmenite ZnGeO_{3} transforms to an orthorhombic perovskite phase at 30 GPa, and upon releasing the pressure, to the LNstructure [34, 35], with a polarization of about 60 μC/cm^{2} [36, 37]. Several other LNtype oxides, such as MnTiO_{3} [38–41], MnSnO_{3} [42, 43], FeTiO_{3} [39, 43–45], FeGeO_{3} [46], MgGeO_{3} [35, 39, 47], and CuTaO_{3} [48], were similarly obtained during decompression from the perovskitetype phase, which is stable at high pressure. More recently, LNtype ZnTiO_{3}, with a large polarization of 88 μC/cm^{2}, has been synthesized in this fashion [49].
Polar oxide semiconductors of the LNtype have wide band gaps. For example, ZnSnO_{3} has a band gap of 3.3–3.7 eV [50, 51]; such values are typical for this class of materials. However, it has been noted that the band gap in ZnSnO_{3} is very sensitive to variations in the lattice constants, and suggestions have been made to tune the band gap by growing ZnSnO_{3} films on a substrate with some degree of lattice mismatch [52], by substituting sulfur for oxygen [53], or by substitutional doping with calcium or barium [54].
In this work, we carry out firstprinciples calculations, using density functional theory (DFT), on three LNtype crystals with large remnant polarization, namely, ZnSnO_{3}, ZnGeO_{3}, and ZnTiO_{3}. We show that, upon using the modified BeckeJohnson (mBJ) exchange potential [55], the correct sizes of the band gaps are calculated for these crystals. Having established the validity of this computational method in producing the correct band gaps for this family of compounds, we then focus on ZnSnO_{3} and study the effect of substituting sulfur for oxygen. Previous work has already validated the substitution of sulfur for oxygen and vice versa as a way of tailoring band gaps in other materials [56–58]. Since the structure of the resulting compound, ZnSnS_{3}, is unknown, we carry out extensive calculations using evolutionary algorithms in order to determine its structure. We find that the most stable form of ZnSnS_{3} has a monoclinic structure, followed closely by the ilmenite and lithium niobate (LN) forms. The monoclinic and ilmenite phases are not polar, but the LNphase is ferroelectric, with significant polarization and a small band gap of 1.28 eV.
2. Methods
To predict the stable and metastable structures of ZnSnS_{3}, two different evolutionary methods, implemented in the codes USPEX and CALYPSO, were employed. The USPEX (Universal Structure Predictor: Evolutionary Xtallography) software [59–61], developed by Oganov, Glass, Lyakhov, and Zhu, features local optimization, realspace representation, and variation operators that mimic natural evolution. The CALYPSO (Crystal Structure Analysis by Particle Swarm Optimization) software [62], developed by Wang et al., uses local structural optimization and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) method to update structures.
The first step, in both methods, is to generate a population of random crystal structures, each with a symmetry described by a randomly chosen space group. Once a space group is selected, appropriate lattice vectors and atomic positions are generated. Each generated structure is optimized using density functional theory, and its free energy (known as the fitness function) is calculated. The structure optimization is carried out using the VASP [63–65] software, which uses a plane wave basis for expanding the electronic wave function. Each structure is optimized in four steps, beginning with a coarse optimization, followed by increasingly accurate iterations. In the last optimization step, the kinetic energy cutoff for plane wave expansion of the wave function is 600 eV. The optimized structures of the initially generated population constitute the first generation, with each member being called an individual. A new generation is then produced, with some of its members being generated randomly while others are obtained from the best structures (those with lowest energy) of the previous generation. In USPEX, new individuals (offspring) are produced from parent structures by applying variation operators such as heredity, mutation, or permutation. In the PSO method, a new structure is generated from a previous one by updating the atomic positions using an evolutionary algorithm. The structures in the new generation are optimized, and the best among them serve as precursors for structures in the next generation. The process continues until convergence to the best structures is achieved.
Band gaps, band structures, and densities of states were calculated using the allelectron, fullpotential, linearized, and augmented plane wave method as implemented in the WIEN2K [66] software suite. Here, space is divided into two regions. One region comprises the interior of nonoverlapping muffintin spheres centered on the atomic sites, while the rest of the space (the interstitial) forms the other region. The electronic wave function is expanded in terms of a set of basis functions which take different forms in each distinct region. Inside the spheres, the basis functions are atomiclike functions written as an expansion in spherical harmonics up to . In the interstitial, they are plane waves with a maximum wave vector of magnitude . Each plane wave is augmented by one atomiclike function in each muffintin sphere. was chosen so that , where is the radius of the smallest muffintin sphere in the unit cell. Charge density was Fourierexpanded up to a maximum wave vector of 14 , where is the Bohr radius. Modified BeckeJohnson exchange potential [55], which is known to yield reasonably accurate band gap values in semiconductors, was adopted in our band structure calculations. In the selfconsistent field calculations, the total energy and charge were converged to within 0.1 mRy and 0.001 e, respectively. For total energy calculations, a MonkhorstPack [67] 8 × 8 × 8 grid of kpoints in the Brillouin zone is used.
The phase transition mechanism between stable and metastable structures of ZnSnS_{3} is characterized using a combination of the variablecell nudged elastic band method (VCNEB) [68] and the Gibbs construction [69]. VCNEB is an extension of the nudged elastic band (NEB) technique, a widely used method for determining possible reaction paths and saddle points along the minimum energy path (MEP) between endpoints on a potential surface. NEB determines this pathway by using a user defined initial and final structures to generate a set of intermediate structures or “images.” These images are then iteratively adjusted in order to minimize the increase in energy along the transition pathway. The traditional NEB algorithm is constrained to maintain a constant unit cell throughout its optimization. VCNEB expands this technique by incorporating lattice parameters into the configuration space, thereby making it suitable for the analysis of phase transition pathways. In particular, it is appropriate for estimating the energy barrier between phases at constant pressure.
Likewise, the Gibbs construction is useful for estimating the pressure at which a specific phase transition will occur. The construction is determined by first plotting the unit cell energy versus volume of a material’s stable structures. A tangent line is drawn between the resulting curves. The slope of this line corresponds to the transition pressure between phases of the given material.
We use the VCNEB implementation included with USPEX in combination with VASP to estimate the energy barrier between the stable and metastable phases of ZnSnS_{3}. For the Gibbs construction, we use a combination of VASP and various Python software packages to plot the energies of the scaled ZnSnS_{3} structures.
3. Results and Discussion
As a rough guide to predicting the stable structure of a compound of the form ABX_{3}, one usually calculates the Goldschmidt tolerance factor given bywhere , , and are the radii of the A, B, and X ions, respectively. For Zn, Sn, O, and S, the ionic radii are given, respectively, by 0.74 Å, 0.69 Å, 1.4 Å, and 1.84 Å. Using these values, we find that for ZnSnO_{3}, , while for ZnSnS_{3}, . One is thus tempted to conclude that the replacement of oxygen with sulfur should not cause a change in structure. However, the large polarizability of sulfur indicates that the Goldschmidt tolerance factor may not be appropriate for predicting the structure of sulfurcontaining compounds [70].
To resolve this issue, we carried out extensive calculations using the evolutionary algorithm implemented in USPEX and the PSO method used by CALYPSO. For the USPEX calculation, 20 generations were produced, with each generation containing 40 individuals. With the PSO method, we produced 20 generations, each consisting of 50 individuals. In all cases, the unit cell was assumed to contain two formula units. The most stable structures were identified. To further refine our results, sets of 80 random structures were subsequently generated for each of the most stable space groups. Out of each set, the single structure with the lowest energy was selected, thereby determining the optimal structures and symmetries of ZnSnS_{3}.
In Table 1 we list these ZnSnS_{3} structures by order of stability. To more easily compare the relative stability of various structures, the free energy per atom in the most stable structure is set equal to zero. That structure has a monoclinic unit cell with space group P2_{1} (number 4). The metastable structure with lowest energy is the ilmenite, followed by the LNtype structure. By contrast, in ZnSnO_{3}, the LNphase is the most stable structure.

To evaluate the usefulness of ZnSnS_{3} for solar cell applications, we have calculated the band structures of the three most stable phases of this compound. Since low band gap values for light absorbers are essential in photovoltaic applications, it is important that the computational method yield accurate values for these gaps. Density functional theory, when using the local density approximation (LDA) or generalized gradient approximation (GGA) to approximate the exchangecorrelation term, severely underestimates band gaps in semiconductors. The use of the modified BeckeJohnson (mBJ) exchange potential results in a significant improvement in calculated band gap values, comparable to that produced by the much more expensive GW approximation. For example, consider the case of ZnSnO_{3}. It has a measured band gap in the range 3.3–3.7 eV [50, 51]. Our calculations, using GGA, give a band gap of 1.5 eV. On the other hand, using the mBJ exchange potential, we calculate a band gap of 3.4 eV, which is in excellent agreement with experiment. We have also calculated the band gaps in ZnGeO_{3} and ZnTiO_{3} using the mBJ potential and found them to be 3.57 eV and 3.51 eV, respectively. Though experimental values are not available for the band gaps of these two compounds, the calculated values are typical of those encountered in ferroelectric oxides.
In Figure 1 we present the calculated energy bands and density of states of the monoclinic phase of ZnSnS_{3} with space group P2_{1}, using the mBJ exchange potential. The band gap is 1.90 eV. Similar calculations on the ilmenite phase of ZnSnS_{3}, with the space group R3, feature a band gap of 2.30 eV. These two phases of ZnSnS_{3} are not very useful as light harvesters in solar cells for two reasons: () they do not have small band gaps and (2) they are not polar.
The situation is markedly different for the LNphase of ZnSnS_{3} with space group R3c (number 161). This phase has a low band gap and a large polarization. In Figure 2 we show the calculated band structure, using the mBJ potential, along with the density of states. Here the band gap is 1.28 eV, in agreement with a previous calculation [53] that used the GW approximation. The upper valence bands are derived mainly from S porbitals, while the lower conduction bands result mainly from Sn sorbitals and S porbitals. The polarization, calculated using the Berry phase formalism of the modern theory of crystal polarization [71, 72], is found to be 57 μC/cm^{2}, which is essentially the same as in the ferroelectric ZnSnO_{3}. About onethird of the polarization is electronic; the rest is ionic. The large ionic polarization derives from the particular crystal structure of this phase of ZnSnS_{3}. Though the Sn ion is octahedrally bonded to six S ions, it does not sit at the center of the octahedron; rather, three of the six SnS bonds have a length of 2.42 Å while the other three have a length of 2.57 Å. Hybridization between the Sn sorbitals and S porbitals causes a displacement of the Sn ion from the center of the octahedron, thereby lowering the energy of the system.
As indicated earlier, the monoclinic structure is the most stable phase of ZnSnS_{3}, while the LNphase is metastable. We now consider the possible transition between these two phases. A variablecell nudged elastic band (VCNEB) calculation is carried out in order to map out the transition path connecting the two phases. The minimum energy path between the monoclinic and LNtype structures is shown in Figure 3. From the figure we see that an energy barrier of 4.52 eV (0.452 eV/atom) separates the phases. The lattice parameters of the path’s terminal structures and two intermediate metastable structures are presented in Table 2. The high energy barrier present at zero temperature and pressure suggests that, while not the lowest energy configuration of ZnSnS_{3}, it is highly unlikely that the LNphase, once established, would revert to the monoclinic phase at room temperature.

By using the Gibbs construction, discussed earlier in Section 2, we can make a rough estimate of the pressure which, at zero temperature, will induce a structural phase transition in ZnSnS_{3} from the monoclinic phase to the LNphase. This is illustrated in Figure 4, which indicates that the phase transition takes place at a pressure of 16 GPa.
Finally, we examine the formation and stability of ZnSnS_{3} by comparing its free energy to that of some potential precursors at zero temperature. We note that ZnSnO_{3} is formed by a solidstate reaction of ZnO and SnO_{2} at high temperature and pressure. At zero temperature and zero pressure, our calculations indicate that the free energies of ZnO, SnO_{2}, and ZnSnO_{3} are, respectively, −5.29 eV/atom, −7.09 eV/atom, and −6.35 eV/atom. The average free energy per atom of ZnSnO_{3} is thus higher than that of a mixture of ZnO and SnO_{2} by 0.02 eV. However, at zero temperature and a pressure of 7 GPa, the peratom energy of ZnSnO_{3} drops below that of its precursor mixture by 0.005 eV. This helps explain how it is possible to form stable ZnSnO_{3} from compounds with apparently higher stability. Furthermore, when ZnSnO_{3} is returned to ambient conditions, it remains stable, rather than decomposing into smaller, lowerenergy compounds.
We apply the same reasoning to ZnSnS_{3}, assuming that it may be formed at high temperature by applying pressure to a mixture of ZnS and SnS_{2}. At zero temperature and pressure, the free energies of ZnS and SnS_{2} are −4.10 eV/atom and −5.00 eV/atom, respectively, yielding a combined peratom energy of −4.64 eV. For ZnSnS_{3}, on the other hand, the calculated energy is −4.60 eV/atom, which is higher than that of its precursors by 0.04 eV/atom. However, at zero temperature and a pressure of 18 GPa, our calculations indicate that the free energy per atom of ZnSnS_{3} is lower than the combined peratom free energy of ZnS and SnS_{2} by 0.004 eV. This indicates that it is possible for ZnSnS_{3} to form, albeit at relatively high pressure. Importantly, these energies were calculated at zero temperature and, in practice, the addition of heat energy may further lower the pressure at which ZnSnS_{3} forms. The analogous example of ZnSnO_{3}, along with the high energy barriers between phases of ZnSnS_{3}, leads us to believe that, once formed, ZnSnS_{3} would be stable at ambient conditions.
4. Conclusions
As anticipated, our calculations indicate that the substitution of sulfur for oxygen in ZnSnO_{3} reduces its band gap, particularly for the LNphase. This reduction is sufficient to bring the absorption band of ZnSnS_{3} into the visible to midinfrared spectrum, thereby making it suitable for solar cell applications. An unexpected result of the substitution is that a monoclinic phase becomes the most stable structure of ZnSnS_{3}. It is likely that a suitable application of temperature and pressure may transition ZnSnS_{3} to its LNphase. VCNEB calculations for ZnSnS_{3} suggest that it will not revert from its LNphase (once attained) to its monoclinic phase at room temperature. Furthermore, the Gibbs construction specifies the transition pressure between phases to be roughly 16 GPa, a pressure that is not difficult to attain in the lab but is sufficiently high to allow for a persistent metastable structure under typical atmospheric conditions.
Further work is needed to characterize the precise conditions under which transition to the polar LNphase occurs. The application of transition path sampling (TPS) to further evaluate the transition path produced by VCNEB may help to better identify the most likely pathway between stable and metastable states in ZnSnS_{3}. Finally, the effect of oxygen to sulfur substitution in other oxides such as ZnGeO_{3} and ZnTiO_{3} should be evaluated.
Competing Interests
The authors report no conflict of interests in this research.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge support by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. HRD1547723 and the NSF PREM Program: Cal State LA & Penn State Partnership for Materials Research and Education, Award DMR1523588. The authors also acknowledge partial support by the Materials Simulation Center and the Material Research Institute at PennState University.
References
 D. Cao, C. Wang, F. Zheng, W. Dong, L. Fang, and M. Shen, “Highefficiency ferroelectricfilm solar cells with an ntype Cu_{2}O cathode buffer layer,” Nano Letters, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2803–2809, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Alexe and D. Hesse, “Tipenhanced photovoltaic effects in bismuth ferrite,” Nature Communications, vol. 2, no. 1, article 256, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Qin, K. Yao, and Y. C. Liang, “High efficient photovoltaics in nanoscaled ferroelectric thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 12, Article ID 122904, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Choi, S. Lee, Y. J. Choi, V. Kiryukhin, and S.W. Cheong, “Switchable ferroelectric diode and photovoltaic effect in BiFeO_{3},” Science, vol. 324, no. 5923, pp. 63–66, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. T. Butler, J. M. Frost, and A. Walsh, “Ferroelectric materials for solar energy conversion: photoferroics revisited,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 838–848, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Yuan, Z. Xiao, B. Yang, and J. Huang, “Arising applications of ferroelectric materials in photovoltaic devices,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 2, no. 17, pp. 6027–6041, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Y. Yang, J. Seidel, S. J. Byrnes et al., “Abovebandgap voltages from ferroelectric photovoltaic devices,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 143–147, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Inoue, K. Sato, K. Sato, and H. Miyama, “Photoassisted water decomposition by ferroelectric lead zirconate titanate ceramics with anomalous photovoltaic effects,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 13, pp. 2809–2810, 1986. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. M. Young and A. M. Rappe, “Firstprinciples calculation of the shift current photovoltaic effect in ferroelectrics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 11, Article ID 116601, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Huang, “Solar energy: ferroelectric photovoltaics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 134–135, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Yuan, T. J. Reece, P. Sharma et al., “Efficiency enhancement in organic solar cells with ferroelectric polymers,” Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 296–302, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. W. Bennett, L. Grinberg, and A. M. Rappe, “New highly polar semiconductor ferroelectrics through d^{8} cationO vacancy substitution into PbTi0_{3}: a theoretical study,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 51, pp. 17409–17412, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. M. Fridkin and B. Popov, “Anomalous photovoltaic effect in ferroelectrics,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 981–991, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
 V. M. Fridkin, Photoferroelectrics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1979.
 A. M. Glass, D. Von Der Linde, and T. J. Negran, “High‐voltage bulk photovoltaic effect and the photorefractive process in LiNbO_{3},” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 233–235, 1974. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. G. Chynoweth, “Surface spacecharge layers in barium titanate,” Physical Review, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 705–714, 1956. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. F. Neumark, “Theory of the anomalous photovoltaic effect of ZnS,” Physical Review, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 838–845, 1962. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. S. Choi, M. F. Chisholm, D. J. Singh, T. Choi, G. E. Jellison Jr., and H. N. Lee, “Wide band gap tunability in complex transition metal oxides by sitespecific substitution,” Nature Communications, vol. 3, article 689, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Ehara, K. Muramatsu, M. Shimazu et al., “Dielectric properties of Bi_{4}Ti_{3}O_{12} below the curie temperature,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 877–881, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. J. Singh, S. S. A. Seo, and H. N. Lee, “Optical properties of ferroelectric Bi_{4} Ti_{3} O_{12},” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 82, no. 18, Article ID 180103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Jia, Y. Chen, and W. F. Zhang, “Optical properties of aluminum, gallium, and indiumdoped Bi_{4}Ti_{3}O_{12} thin films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, no. 11, Article ID 113108, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Arima, Y. Tokura, and J. B. Torrance, “Variation of optical gaps in perovskitetype 3d transitionmetal oxides,” Physical Review B, vol. 48, no. 23, pp. 17006–17009, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Grinberg, D. V. West, M. Torres et al., “Perovskite oxides for visiblelightabsorbing ferroelectric and photovoltaic materials,” Nature, vol. 503, no. 7477, pp. 509–512, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. R. Basu, “Photoconductivity in BiFeO_{3} thin films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 9, Article ID 091905, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 A. J. Hauser, J. Zhang, L. Mier et al., “Characterization of electronic structure and defect states of thin epitaxial BiFeO_{3} films by UVvisible absorption and cathodoluminescence spectroscopies,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 22, Article ID 222901, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Nechache, C. Harnagea, A. Pignolet et al., “Growth, structure, and properties of epitaxial thin films of firstprinciples predicted multiferroic Bi_{2}FeCrO_{6},” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, no. 10, Article ID 102902, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Nechache, C. Harnagea, L.P. Carignan, D. Ménard, and A. Pignolet, “Epitaxial Bi_{2}FeCrO_{6} multiferroic thin films,” Philosophical Magazine Letters, vol. 87, no. 34, pp. 231–240, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Nechache, C. Harnagea, S. Li et al., “Bandgap tuning of multiferroic oxide solar cells,” Nature Photonics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Inaguma, M. Yoshida, and T. Katsumata, “A polar oxide ZnSnO_{3} with a LiNbO_{3}type structure,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 21, pp. 6704–6705, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Inaguma, M. Yoshida, T. Tsuchiya et al., “Highpressure synthesis of novel lithium niobatetype oxides,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 215, no. 1, Article ID 012131, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Inaguma, K. Tanaka, T. Tsuchiya et al., “Synthesis, structural transformation, thermal stability, valence state, and magnetic and electronic properties of PbNiO_{3} with perovskite and LiNbO_{3}type structures,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 42, pp. 16920–16929, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Arielly, W. M. Xu, E. Greenberg et al., “Intriguing sequence of GaFeO_{3} structures and electronic states to 70 GPa,” Physical Review B, vol. 84, no. 9, Article ID 094109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Shi, Y. Guo, X. Wang et al., “A ferroelectriclike structural transition in a metal,” Nature Materials, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1024–1027, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Yusa, M. Akaogi, N. Sata, H. Kojitani, R. Yamamoto, and Y. Ohishi, “Highpressure transformations of ilmenite to perovskite, and lithium niobate to perovskite in zinc germanate,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 217–226, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Akaogi, H. Kojitani, H. Yusa, R. Yamamoto, M. Kido, and K. Koyama, “Highpressure transitions and thermochemistry of MGeO_{3} (M=Mg, Zn and Sr) and Srsilicates: systematics in enthalpies of formation of A^{2+}B^{4+}O_{3} perovskites,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 32, no. 89, pp. 603–613, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhang, B. Xu, Z. Qin, X. F. Li, and K. L. Yao, “Ferroelectric and nonlinear optical properties of the LiNbO_{3}type ZnGeO_{3} from firstprinciples study,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 514, pp. 113–119, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Inaguma, A. Aimi, Y. Shirako et al., “Highpressure synthesis, crystal structure, and phase stability relations of a LiNbO_{3}type polar titanate ZnTiO_{3} and its reinforced polarity by the secondorder JahnTeller effect,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 7, pp. 2748–2756, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Syono, S.I. Akimoto, Y. Ishikawa, and Y. Endoh, “A new high pressure phase of MnTiO_{3} and its magnetic property,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1665–1672, 1969. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Ito and Y. Matsui, “Highpressure transformations in silicates, germanates, and titanates with ABO_{3} stoichiometry,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 265–273, 1979. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ko and C. T. Prewitt, “Highpressure phase transition in MnTiO_{3} from the ilmenite to the LiNbO_{3} structure,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 355–362, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. L. Ross, J. Ko, and C. T. Prewitt, “A new phase transition in MnTiO_{3}: LiNbO_{3}perovskite structure,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 621–629, 1989. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Syono, H. Sawamoto, and S. Akimoto, “Disordered ilmenite MnSnO_{3} and its magnetic property,” Solid State Communications, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 713–716, 1969. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Leinenweber, W. Utsumi, Y. Tsuchida, T. Yagi, and K. Kurita, “Unquenchable highpressure perovskite polymorphs of MnSnO_{3} and FeTiO_{3},” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 244–250, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Mehta, K. Leinenweber, A. Navrotsky, and M. Akaogi, “Calorimetric study of high pressure polymorphism in FeTiO_{3}: stability of the perovskite phase,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 207–212, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Leinenweber, J. Linton, A. Navrotsky, Y. Fei, and J. B. Parise, “Highpressure perovskites on the join CaTiO_{3}FeTiO_{3},” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 251–258, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Hattori, T. Matsuda, T. Tsuchiya, T. Nagai, and T. Yamanaka, “Clinopyroxeneperovskite phase transition of FeGeO_{3} under high pressure and room temperature,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 212–216, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Leinenweber, Y. Wang, T. Yagi, and H. Yusa, “An unquenchable perovskite phase of MgGeO_{3} and comparison with MgSiO_{3} perovskite,” American Mineralogist, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 197–199, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 A. W. Sleight and C. T. Prewitt, “Preparation of CuNbO_{3} and CuTaO_{3} at high pressure,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 207–211, 1970. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Akaogi, K. Abe, H. Yusa, H. Kojitani, D. Mori, and Y. Inaguma, “Highpressure phase behaviors of ZnTiO_{3}: ilmeniteperovskite transition, decomposition of perovskite into constituent oxides, and perovskitelithium niobate transition,” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 421–429, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. V. Borhade and Y. R. Baste, “Study of photocatalytic asset of the ZnSnO_{3} synthesized by green chemistry,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Mizoguchi and P. M. Woodward, “Electronic structure studies of main group oxides possessing edgesharing octahedra: implications for the design of transparent conducting oxides,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 25, pp. 5233–5248, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Kolb and A. Kolpak, “Zinc stannate as a solar cell material,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, vol. 59, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Kolb and A. M. Kolpak, “Firstprinciples design and analysis of an efficient, Pbfree ferroelectric photovoltaic absorber derived from ZnSnO_{3},” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 27, no. 17, pp. 5899–5906, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Kons, A. Datta, and P. Mukherjee, “Bandgap tuning in perovskitetype ferroelectric ZnSnO_{3} by doping and core shell approach for solar cell applications,” Bulletin of the American Physical Society, vol. 60, no. 1, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Tran and P. Blaha, “Accurate band gaps of semiconductors and insulators with a semilocal exchangecorrelation potential,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 22, Article ID 226401, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Kosugi, K. Murakami, and S. Kaneko, ThinFilm Structures for Photovoltaics, Materials Research Society, Symposium, 1997.
 N. Barreau, J. C. Bernède, S. Marsillac, and A. Mokrani, “Study of low temperature elaborated tailored optical band gap βIn_{2}S_{3−3x}O_{3x} thin films,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 235, no. 1–4, pp. 439–449, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Ogisu, A. Ishikawa, Y. Shimodaira, T. Takata, H. Kobayashi, and K. Domen, “Electronic band structures and photochemical properties of LaGabased oxysulfideslfides,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 31, pp. 11978–11984, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. R. Oganov and C. W. Glass, “Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 124, no. 24, Article ID 244704, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. O. Lyakhov, A. R. Oganov, H. T. Stokes, and Q. Zhu, “New developments in evolutionary structure prediction algorithm USPEX,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 4, pp. 1172–1182, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. R. Oganov, A. O. Lyakhov, and M. Valle, “How evolutionary crystal structure prediction worksand why,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 227–237, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, J. Lv, L. Zhu, and Y. Ma, “CALYPSO: a method for crystal structure prediction,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 10, pp. 2063–2070, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Physical Review B, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 558–561, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, “Efficiency of abinitio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a planewave basis set,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–50, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmentedwave method,” Physical Review B, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1758–1775, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, and J. Luitz, “User's Guide: WIEN2K: an augmented plane wave + local orbitals program for calculating crystal properties,” 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, “Special points for Brillouinzone integrations,” Physical Review. B. Solid State, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 5188–5192, 1976. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 G.R. Qian, X. Dong, X.F. Zhou, Y. Tian, A. R. Oganov, and H.T. Wang, “Variable cell nudged elastic band method for studying solidsolid structural phase transitions,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 9, pp. 2111–2118, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. T. Yin and M. L. Cohen, “Theory of static structural properties, crystal stability, and phase transformations: application to Si and Ge,” Physical Review B, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 5668–5687, 1982. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. A. Brehm, J. W. Bennett, M. R. Schoenberg, I. Grinberg, and A. M. Rappe, “The structural diversity of ABS_{3} compounds with d^{0} electronic configuration for the Bcation,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 140, no. 22, Article ID 224703, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Resta, “Macroscopic electric polarization as a geometric quantum phase,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. D. KingSmith and D. Vanderbilt, “Theory of polarization of crystalline solids,” Physical Review B, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1651–1654, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Radi A. Jishi and Marcus A. Lucas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.