International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Nanostructured Solar Cells

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 7594869 |

Ciaran Lyons, Neelima Rathi, Pratibha Dev, Owen Byrne, Praveen K. Surolia, Pathik Maji, J. M. D. MacElroy, Aswani Yella, Michael Grätzel, Edmond Magner, Niall J. English, K. Ravindranathan Thampi, "Organic Dyes Containing Coplanar Dihexyl-Substituted Dithienosilole Groups for Efficient Dye-Sensitised Solar Cells", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2017, Article ID 7594869, 14 pages, 2017.

Organic Dyes Containing Coplanar Dihexyl-Substituted Dithienosilole Groups for Efficient Dye-Sensitised Solar Cells

Academic Editor: Bill Pandit
Received20 Oct 2016
Accepted20 Feb 2017
Published04 May 2017


A chromophore containing a coplanar dihexyl-substituted dithienosilole (CL1) synthesised for use in dye-sensitised solar cells displayed an energy conversion efficiency of 6.90% under AM 1.5 sunlight irradiation. The new sensitiser showed a similar fill factor and open-circuit voltage when compared with N719. Impedance measurements showed that, in the dark, the charge-transfer resistance of a cell using CL1 in the intermediate-frequency region was higher compared to N719 (69.8 versus 41.3 Ω). Under illumination at AM 1.5G-simulated conditions, the charge-transfer resistances were comparable, indicative of similar recombination rates by the oxidised form of the redox couple. The dye showed instability in ethanol solution, but excellent stability when attached to TiO2. Classical molecular dynamics indicated that interactions between ethanol and the dye are likely to reduce the stability of CL1 in solution form. Time-dependent density functional theory studies were performed to ascertain the absorption spectrum of the dye and assess the contribution of various transitions to optical excitation, which showed good agreement with experimental results.

1. Introduction

Dye-sensitised solar cells (DSSCs) [1] have the distinct advantage of being responsive to low and diffuse light levels, as well as to the light incident under acute irradiation angles. This renders the technology particularly suitable for indoor situations and other similar applications where the incident light is confined to a select band in the visible spectrum, which may be the characteristic output of a certain light source. There, it is possible to tune the spectral sensitivity of DSSC as the light-harvesting function of the cell is separated from the semiconductor, unlike in inorganic solar cells, and is taken up by a sensitiser. The standard and most studied sensitisers for making DSSC are ruthenium dyes with a reported maximum efficiency of 11.9% [2]. Although the DSSC is optimal for room interiors and vertical façade positions, its certified solar-to-electric power conversion efficiency (PCE) under standard air mass 1.5 (AM 1.5) reporting conditions (1000 W/m2 solar light intensity and 298 K) is still a factor of 2 below that of Si solar cells. Much effort has been expended in developing more efficient dyes [3, 4]. However, Ru is expensive, has limited availability, and has an undesirable environmental impact when used in large amounts. A newer and increasingly emerging area of solar research lies in perovskite solar cells. One key challenge for perovskite commercialisation is stability. The light-sensitive material in these devices dissolves in the presence of water and decomposes at high temperature. Scientists must also address the possibility of lead contamination before these cells can be commercialised at large scale [3].

The development of new organic dyes has been the subject of much interest lately, especially metal-free dyes [57]. Organic dyes can be more versatile in their light absorption properties, owing to a larger number of molecular structure variations possible and in principle cheaper for mass scale production. They also possess higher molar extinction coefficients allowing efficient light harvesting using thinner layers when compared to Ru dyes. Porphyrins and phthalocyanines containing inexpensive metal atoms also have attracted considerable attention in the recent years [8, 9]. Recent reports have described a porphyrin-based dye in combination with a Co-complex containing electrolyte, a redox mediator exhibiting higher reduction potentials than that of I3, which has displayed the highest efficiency to date of 13%, as well as over 14% from a DSSC cophotosensitised with an alkoxysilyl-anchor dye and a carboxy-anchor organic dye [57]. Another reason for developing organic dyes is the industrial and architectural preferences for specific dye colours such as green, bright red, golden, and blue, when conceiving new buildings with integrated photovoltaics and designing newer interior designs. Indeed, industry is even willing to compromise slightly on solar cell efficiency for desired colour characteristics. This confers to organic dye research a rather compelling new impetus and scope.

In general, organic dyes consist of three segments: a donor, a linker, and an acceptor group. Much research has been performed on altering the nature of each of these groups with the aim of tuning the dyes’ absorption spectrum in the visible spectral region. Synthetic chemists increasingly turn to molecular structures based on the current understanding of dyes’ structure-property relationships. The introduction of long-chain alkyloxy groups in the dye structure is suggested to generally retard the charge recombination process [10]. Donor-π-bridge-acceptor (D-π-A) sensitisers, endowed with such groups, recently reached open-circuit voltage (Voc) values exceeding 0.8 V when used with Co(II/III)tris(bipyridyl) redox electrolytes. However, the energy conversion efficiencies of these dyes remained in the 6.7 to 9.6% range because of their insufficient solar light harvesting, resulting in low photocurrents [10, 11]. The quest for newer dyes is therefore very challenging. In fact, dyes with narrower spectral bands still may find use in DSSC devices destined for indoor applications, where the available spectrum is usually influenced by indoor lighting systems.

Five-membered heterocycles containing silicon have also attracted attention recently, in particular, silole derivatives with a 2,2′-bithiophene group connected through a silicon atom. Si, an abundant tetravalent element like C and widely used in organic synthesis, is thus a natural choice for organic sensitisers. Dithienosilole derivatives have been used in many optoelectronic devices, such as light emitting diodes [12], whilst dithienosilole-based polymers have been used in polymer solar cells [13]. There have been a few reports on the use of these materials in DSSCs, too. Ko et al. described the synthesis of silole-spaced triarylamine derivatives containing combinations of phenyl and methyl groups attached to silicon, with a PCE of 7.50% [14, 15]. Lin et al. reported a coplanar diphenyl-substituted dithienosilole dye with an efficiency of 7.60%. The additional O-hexyl donor groups were added to the triphenylamine donor group to provide increased electron donor capabilities [14, 15]. However, these compounds possessed increased conjugation and lowered LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) levels. Coplanarity of the π-spacer was obtained by bridging the two thiophene units with a silicon atom, leading to more effective rates of electron transfer. To our knowledge, there have been no reports to date on the effects of adding large alkyl chains to the silicon group.

Here, we report a dithienosilole dye (Scheme 1) containing alkyl chains to help prevent aggregation of the dye sensitiser. The brightly red-coloured dye showed a good power conversion efficiency of 6.90% under 1 sun, in the absence of any additional electron donor groups. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to study the charge-transfer properties of the dye-sensitised solar cell [1620]. Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) was used to calculate the absorption spectra and compare it with experimental spectra. On exposure to ethanol for a week in a dye bath, the dye showed a decrease in efficiency to 5.83% and the colour of the dye bath went from the bright fluorescent red to a dull brown. Cell performance and UV-Vis absorption tested over time are shown in Supporting Information available online at However, DSSCs made using this dye and a standard iodide-tri-iodide electrolyte still showed a stable incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) value even after a month. Computational studies using classical molecular dynamics (MD) were performed to provide an insight into solvent effects and investigate hydrogen bonding between the dye and the ethanol medium.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The following materials were used as received: 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium iodide (BMII, Merck 4.90187.0100) and guanidinium thiocyanate (GuSCN, Merck 8.20613.0250). Ethanol was purchased from Lennox, Dublin. All other chemicals were purchased and used as received from Sigma-Aldrich. Toluene was distilled under sodium benzophenone and stored under nitrogen. Dimethylformamide was dried using barium oxide. Titanium dioxide paste (Ti-Nanooxide D20), electrolyte (Iodolyte AN-50), Surlyn film (Meltonix 1170-60), and fluorine-doped tin oxide glass slides (TCO30-8, ~8 ohm/square) were purchased from Solaronix SA (Aubonne, Switzerland). A second “light scattering” paste of particle size 150–250 nm was purchased from DyeSol Ltd. (WER 2-0).

Three types of TiO2 pastes were used to make cells, including the commercially purchased samples. The first was a “transparent” type containing 20 nm particles of TiO2 prepared from Evonik P25 powder using a standard fabrication procedure [21]. Ethyl cellulose (Fluka, #46080) and anhydrous terpineol (Fluka, #46070) were used as received to make a paste. A second paste of particle size 150–250 nm and purchased from DyeSol Ltd. (WER 2-0) was used to form a light scattering layer. Both pastes were screen printed with a 90T mesh to yield electrodes of approximately 15 μm thickness (10 μm transparent layer and a 5 μm scattering layer). The standard liquid electrolyte used was labelled E1 [22] and was comprised of 0.03 M iodine, 0.1 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine, and 0.6 M BMII in an acetonitrile : valeronitrile solvent mixture (85  :  15 by volume). The Solaronix paste was used without light scattering layers in certain experiments, where cell efficiencies were not considered the primary objective.

2.2. Dye Characterisation

Absorption and emission spectra of the dye were obtained, both in the dissolved form as well as in the chemisorbed state on TiO2 surface. For experiments with TiO2, a mixture was prepared using 100 μl Ti-Nanooxide D20, 35 μl polyethylene glycol (PEG), and 100 μl of 1% Tween-80 in water, which were mixed together to obtain a gel. The gel was spread onto an FTO glass slide and left to dry for 30 min after which the electrode was calcined at 450°C for 30 minutes. The adsorption of CL1 dye was performed by immersing the TiO2 electrodes in CL1 (0.57 mM) solution in ethanol overnight (18 h). The electrodes were then rinsed with ethanol and dried in air. Solution-based absorption and emission spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 300 UV-Visible and a Cary eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer, respectively, using quartz cuvettes. The absorption spectrum of the anchored dye was obtained on a UV-1800 Shimadzu spectrophotometer.

A Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrometer was used to record ATR-FTIR spectra at a resolution of 2 cm−1. The spectra reported represent averages of 100 scans. A CHI800 potentiostat was used for cyclic-voltammetry measurements. Dye-immobilised TiO2, Pt wire, and Ag/AgCl/KCl were used as the working, counter, and reference electrodes, respectively. Solutions were bubbled with N2 gas and kept under an N2 atmosphere during experiments. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was performed using an impedance analyser (Solartron analytical, 1260) connected to a potentiostat (Solartron Analytical, 1287). EIS spectra were measured under illumination and at applied bias voltage equivalent to the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of the device in the dark over the frequency range of 0.1 to 105 Hz using a 10 mV amplitude AC signal. Impedance spectra were fitted to an equivalent circuit model using ZView software (Scribner Associates Inc.).

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded using Bruker 300 and 400 MHz instruments using the residual signals δ = 7.26 ppm and 77.0 ppm for CDCl3 and δ = 2.50 ppm and 39.4 ppm for [D6]-DMSO.

2.3. General Synthetic Procedure

The synthetic procedure for the preparation of compound A has been described previously [23]. The synthesis of B was achieved through Suzuki coupling between the bromo-silole derivative and triphenylamine-boronic acid. Aldehyde addition was performed using Vilsmeier formylation using phosphorus oxychloride to yield C. Claisen condensation between cyano-2-acetic and the aldehyde in the presence of piperidine yielded CL-1 as a purple solid with a yield of 41%.

2.4. 5-[N,N-Bis(phenylamino)phenyl]-3,3′-dihexyllsilylene-2,2′-bithiophene (B)

Compound A (0.59 g, 1.34 mmol), 4-(diphenylamino) phenylboronic acid (0.469 g, 1.61 mmol), palladium(II) acetate (0.030 g, 0.134 mmol), and cesium carbonate (2.638 g, 8.09 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (75 ml). The reaction mixture was refluxed overnight. The organic layer was extracted using CH2Cl2 and washed with H2O and then dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The crude product obtained was then purified using column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 = 6/1) to yield compound B as a yellow wax with 61% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ ppm 7.46 (2H, J = 12 Hz, d), 7.29–6.97 (15H, m), 1.45–1.16 (16H, m), 0.95–0.87 (m, 4H), and 0.87–0.79 (6H, m); 13C NMR ([D6]-DMSO, 100 MHz): δ ppm 149.42, 147.61, 147.51, 146.89, 144.78, 143.12, 141.05, 129.63, 129.27, 129.17, 128.90, 126.38, 124.95, 124.85, 124.39, 124.14, 123.90, 122.98, 122.64, 32.85, 31.42, 24.16, 22.55, 14.07, and 11.91.

2.5. 5-[N,N-Bis(phenylamino)phenyl]-5′-formyl-3,3′-hexylsilylene-2,2′-bithiophene (C)

Compound B (0.50 g, 0.825 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (50.00 ml). At 0°C, POCl3 (0.184 ml, 1.956 mmol) was added to this solution and the mixture was stirred at 90°C overnight. The organic layer was extracted using CH2Cl2 and washed with H2O and before drying over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The crude product was then purified using column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 = 4/1) to yield compound C as an orange wax in 74% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ ppm 9.85 (1H, s), 7.69 (1H, s), 7.47 (2H, J = 8 Hz, d), 7.30–7.21 (5H, m), 7.14–7.03 (8H, m), 1.44–1.19 (16H, m), 0.99–0.91 (4H, m), and 0.88–0.79 (6H, m); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ ppm 181.41, 158.06, 148.15, 147.04, 146.77, 146.29, 145.03, 143.20, 140.68, 138.49, 132.94, 128.34, 126.75, 125.72, 124.00, 123.70, 122.34, 122.31, 119.94, 31.77, 30.34, 23.06, 21.49, 13.02, and 10.70.

2.6. 3-[5-[N,N-Bis(phenylamino)phenyl]-3,3′-dihexylsilylene-2,2′-bithiophene-5′-yl]-2-cyanoacrylic Acid (CL-1)

At first, compound C (0.05 g, 0.883 mmol), 2-cyanoacetic acid (0.02 g, 0.258 mmol), and a drop of piperidine were dissolved in acetonitrile (10 ml). This mixture was then refluxed for 2.5 h. After removal of the solvent, the crude product was purified using column chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH = 30/1) to yield Cl-1 as a purple solid with 41% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ ppm 8.05 (1H, s), 7.67 (1H, s), 7.59 (2H, J = 12 Hz, d), 7.52 (1H, s), 7.38–7.28 (4H, m), 7.12–6.94 (8H, m). 1.39–1.10 (16H, m), 0.99–0.89 (4H, m), and 0.84–0.73 (6H, m); HRMS (TOF-MS-ESI) m/z: 699.2535 [M+]; calculated for C42H43N2O2S2Si [M+]: 699.2535.

2.7. Cell Fabrication and Characterisation

DSSCs were manufactured as described previously [24]. Screen printing was used to deposit layers of TiO2 on a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conducting transparent glass substrate. In all cases, a nonporous, dense blocking underlayer of TiO2 was deposited first on the FTO substrate via TiCl4 treatment [21] in order to reduce charge recombination, prior to screen printing. The TiO2 paste was then printed on the TiCl4 treated glass using a Tiflex Ltd., France, screen printer and involved several cycles. After deposition of each layer, the films were kept in an ethanol saturated chamber for 6 min followed by drying at 125°C for 6 min, whilst the final sintering involved gradual heating in an oven at 325°C (5 min), 375°C (5 min), 450°C (15 min), and 500°C (30 min). After sintering, a layer of TiCl4 was deposited followed by sintering at 500°C for 30 min. The TiO2 active area was 0.283 cm2 (6 mm diameter circular spot). The sintered electrodes were placed in a dye bath of N719 (benchmark dye as supplied by Dyesol Ltd., without further purification) dissolved in an acetonitrile : tert-butyl alcohol: THF mixture (vol 4.5  :  4.5  :  1) or Si dye (CL-1) in ethanol at a concentration of 200 μM for 16–20 hours. The counter electrode was prepared with a thin film of Pt catalyst deposited via a drop of H2PtCl6 solution (2 mg Pt content in 1 ml ethanol) and heat treated at 400°C for 15 minutes. The dye-coated TiO2 electrode and Pt-coated counter electrode were sandwiched together and sealed using a Bynel polymer gasket (50 μm thick). Electrolyte was filled into the space between the two electrodes through a hole in the counter electrode via the vacuum back-filling method. The back hole was then heat sealed with a thin piece (0.1 mm thick) of glass, again with Bynel.

2.8. Electrooptical Characterisation

Current/voltage () curves, open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current density (), and the fill factor (FF) were measured using a Newport 91195A-1000 solar simulator and Newport 69920 Arc Lamp Power Supply. A Newport 81088A air mass filter was placed before the output of the solar simulator to simulate the AM 1.5 spectrum. measurements were recorded with a GAMRY Instruments potentiostat. Spectral response and incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) measurements were made with using a solar cell spectral response/QE/IPCE measurement system (Solar Cell Scan 100 (SCS100)—Gilden Photonics Ltd.).

2.9. Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

The Cl-1 dye was modelled using Discovery Studio Visualizer package (Accelrys, San Diego, CA). Ground-state structural optimisation and excited-state calculations for the isolated dye and the dye in complex with a titania nanoparticle were then performed using Gaussian’09 using the linear response approach [25]. The two hexyl groups in the side chains were replaced by the methyl groups to reduce computational time. This should not affect the results, as these side chains do not participate in the photoexcitation of the dye. The transitions of interest are predominantly charge-transfer in character. Such excitations are better described by conventional hybrid and range-separated xc-functionals [26, 27]. For the CL1 dye, two approximations were used: (a) Becke-3 Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) hybrid functional [2830] and (b) Coulomb-attenuated functional, CAM-B3LYP [31]. The standard basis set, which provides a very good compromise between the accuracy and computational time, was also used. The calculations were performed in two stages: (1)Structural optimisation was carried out for the isolated dye using both functionals. After geometry optimisation, TD-DFT was used to obtain the UV/Vis absorption spectra of the dye within the two functionals. The theoretical results were then compared with experimental data to choose the most appropriate functional.(2)The ground- and excited-state properties of the dye-titania complex were characterised using the optimal functional. To compare theoretical results with their experimental counterparts, solvent (ethanol) effects were added using the polarisable continuum solvation model (C-PCM) [32] in all calculations. The complex was created by attaching the dye to a 114 atom-containing nanoparticle TiO2 cut from an anatase (101) surface. This cluster geometry has been employed in earlier studies and demonstrated that the lowest excitation energy was in agreement with the experimental semiconductor bandgap [3337]. Geometrical optimisation of the isolated titania cluster was performed under CAM-B3LYP. The ground-state structure of the nanoparticle was then used to create the CL1 dye-titania complex. Once the complexed structure was also optimised, TD-DFT calculations were performed to obtain the UV/Vis absorption spectra for the dye-titania complex.

2.10. Molecular Dynamics

Classical MD simulations were used to investigate and quantify hydrogen-bond lifetimes with ethanol as a solvent. Given the small-molecule nature of the dye, the MMFF94 force field was utilized [38]. All MD calculations were performed using the MOE software package [39]. Nonbonded interactions were treated using a twin-range method [40], with short and long cut-off radii of 10 and 12 Å, respectively, with reaction field electrostatics [41] with a cut-off radius of 15 Å. The dielectric constant was set at the experimental value of 24.3 [42]. Following gas-phase geometry optimisation, the dye was placed in the centre of a rectangular periodic box surrounded by 845 ethanol molecules under periodic boundary conditions (PBC) [43], relaxed via MD in the liquid state at 298 K and 1 atm. Prior to MD under PBC, the heavy atoms in the simulation box were fixed and the system was relaxed by energy minimization. This was followed by “heating” of the system to 300 K in 25 K increments by MD in stages of 10 ps duration in the NVT ensemble, using velocity assignments from the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at the start of each step. A production simulation was then carried out in the NPT ensemble for 100 ps, and bond lengths were constrained with a relative tolerance of 10−8 [43]. A time step of 1 fs was used. The period of the thermal and barostat reservoirs [43] was set to 1 and 5 ps, to allow for relatively weak coupling.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Absorption and Emission Spectra

The absorption spectrum of the CL1 dye in ethanol (Figure 1) showed a broad absorption band at 468 nm with a molar extinction coefficient (ε) of 30 × 103 M−1 cm−1, which arises from charge-transfer transition [15, 44, 45]. The absorption spectra of adsorbed dyes on TiO2 displayed a slight red shift in the absorption bands, indicative of interactions between the dye molecule and the semiconductor. The dye in solution exhibits considerable emission characteristics, when excited with light of suitable wavelengths. The fluorescence spectrum of the CL1 dye in ethanol shows an emission peak centred at 618 nm upon excitation at 468 nm. The absorption spectrum of CL1 dye in ethanol, shown in Figure 1(a), is presented together with its fluorescence spectrum in Figure 2, which shows a stoke shift of 150 nm.

3.2. Cyclic Voltammetry

Cyclic voltammetry was used to measure the ground-state oxidation potential () of the dye. The cyclic voltammogram (Figure 3) of the dye showed quasi-reversible behaviour; the oxidation and reduction peaks can be attributed to the triphenylamine moieties and cyanoacrylic acid, respectively [15]. The value of of the dye, 1.28 V (versus NHE), is more positive (Table 1) than the redox potential (0.4 V versus NHE) [46] of the iodide/triiodide couple. Thus, the oxidised dye can be regenerated by I in the electrolyte enabling efficient charge separation. The LUMO energy level of the dye, −1.01 V (versus NHE), is more negative than the conduction band edge (−0.5 V versus NHE) [46] of TiO2 (Table 1), thus providing sufficient driving force to inject an electron from the excited dye to the conduction band of TiO2.

λabs,max (nm)ε (M−1 cm−1)λem,max (nm)Eox (V) (versus NHE)aE0–0 (eV)ELUMO (V) (versus NHE)


aThe LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) level of the dye was calculated using equation [47, 48], where E0–0 is the zeroth–zeroth transition energy of the dye estimated from the intersection between the absorption and emission spectra of the dye (Figure 2).
3.3. ATR-FTIR Spectra

ATR-FTIR spectra of the dye (Figure 4(a)) showed sharp phenyl and thiophene ring modes [42, 49, 50] at 1517, 1491, 1375, and 1256 cm−1, whilst the C–N stretching mode of triarylamine appeared at 1348 cm−1. Stretching modes assigned to υ (C=O), υ (Si–C), and υ (C–H) stretch were observed at 1588, 886, and 2957 cm−1, respectively. The ATR-FTIR spectrum (Figure 4(b)) of adsorbed CL1 dye shows the υasym(COO) and υsym(COO) stretching modes of carboxylate linker groups at 1590 and 1382 cm−1, respectively [42, 49, 51]. The C≡N stretch frequency was unchanged at 2209 cm−1. Possible binding modes between the carboxylate group and TiO2 can be either bidentate bridging or chelation [52]. As the chelation mode is known to be unstable [53], the bridging bidentate mode is more likely to occur.

3.4. Impedance Analysis

The electrochemical impedance spectra (Figure 5) were fitted to an equivalent circuit model [5456], containing a constant phase element (CPE) and resistance () (Figure 6). Rs is the resistance at the FTO/TiO2 interface and R1 and C1 are the charge-transfer resistance and capacitance at the electrolyte/Pt-FTO interface. Variations in Rs arise from the electrical contacts and wiring of the device [57, 58]. R2 and C2 are the charge recombination resistance and capacitance at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface. The parameters obtained upon fitting the spectra to the equivalent circuit (Figure 6) are shown in Table 2.

DSCRs (Ω)R1 (Ω)R2 (Ω)ωmax (Hz)

AM 1.5 sunlight at an
intensity of 1 sun
(1000 W/m2)
In dark

The impedance spectra of N719 and the CL1-DSSC measured at Voc under illumination and in the dark at an applied bias voltage equivalent to Voc of the cell are shown in Figure 6. Three semi-circles were observed in the Nyquist plots over the frequency range of 0.1–105 Hz. The smaller semicircle in the high-frequency region is associated with charge transfer at the electrolyte/Pt-FTO interface; the larger semicircle in the middle-frequency region, to the electron transport and recombination mechanism at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface, whilst the low-frequency region semi-circle may be attributed to diffusion of I3 in the electrolyte. The impedance values of the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface, represented by the semicircles at the intermediate-frequency region in the Nyquist plots, are much smaller under illumination than in the dark. Under illumination, and subject to solubility conditions [59], I3 is formed at the TiO2/electrolyte interface by dye regeneration, whilst in the dark, I3 is produced at the counter electrode. This indicates that recombination of CB electrons is accelerated under illumination hence decreasing the electron lifetime in the TiO2 film. In the dark, the charge-transfer resistance of CL1 DSC (69.8 Ω), in the intermediate frequency region, was higher compared to N719 (41.3 Ω); under illumination, the charge-transfer resistances were similar (6.8 and 10.7 Ω, for CL1 and N719, respectively), indicative of similar recombination rates for both dyes.

EIS Bode phase plots also exhibited two characteristic peaks under 1 sun and in the dark; the peak at higher frequency can be attributed to charge transfer at the counter electrode, whilst the peak in the middle-frequency region is associated with electron transfer at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface. The characteristic middle-frequency peak of the Bode plot can be used to provide a measure of the charge recombination rate [60]. For simple circuits, the reciprocal of this frequency peak is a direct measure of the electron lifetime in TiO2; however, the relationship is more complex for the Randles circuit described in Figure 6. Under illumination, the midfrequency peak of the CL1-based DSC (Figure 5(d)) is slightly shifted to higher frequency compared to that of the N719 DSC, indicative of a shorter electron lifetime. This suggests a slightly lower rate of electron injection and lower charge collection efficiency for the CL1-based cell compared to the N719 cell, hence leading to a lower overall value of Jsc.

3.5. Cell Efficiency Analysis

A PCE of 6.90% was achieved for the CL1-containing DSSC. The fill factor and open-circuit voltages (Voc) were similar to those of the N719 dye (cf. Table 3). The N719 dye achieved an efficiency of 8.05%, which is due to a higher cell current of 17.4 mA/cm2 compared to the CL1 value of 14.4 mA/cm2. The difference in cell current can be rationalised in terms of the spectral response of each dye, as exhibited in the IPCE spectra in Figure 7. The N719 dye displayed an increased absorbance over the spectral region (500–750 nm), resulting in an increase in the overall photocurrent yield. Note that the Si dye has a higher absorbance than N719 in the 400–470 nm region, which may be advantageous depending on the desired DSSC application and lighting conditions, for example, under indoor lighting conditions. It is equally useful for tandem cell configurations, where the light management between the top and bottom cell need to be optimised for obtaining devices with maximum open-circuit voltage and photo-current density.

DyeVoc (V)Jsc (mA/cm2)FFη (%)

Si dye0.74214.4656.90

The possibility of CL1 showing considerable molecular aggregation on the surface of TiO2 cannot be discounted. In fact, the dye-sensitised TiO2 electrode surface shows a strong and attractive red colour, suggesting the possibility of molecular aggregation in a qualitative manner. However, with the limited architectural details available on the packing of the new dye in an adsorbed state over TiO2 at this stage, no conclusive evidence is available to determine the magnitude of molecular aggregation and its dependence on the TiO2-dyeing process itself. Whether a neat monolayer could be obtained on TiO2 surface without any molecular aggregation is also not clear as of now.

3.6. Comparison of CL-1 with Other Silicon-Based Dyes

Lin et al. synthesised a series of dithienosilole dyes (TPCADTS and TP6CADTS), which are structurally similar to CL-1 with comparable PCE values [15]. The structures are shown in Figure 8. TPCADTS contained diphenyl-substituted dithienosilole and showed a very similar efficiency of 6.65%. When extra electron donors were added by addition of O-hexyl groups, the efficiency increased to 7.60%. When comparing the more similar TPCADTS with CL-1, it is evident where the improvements lie. The largest improvement lay in the value of Jsc for CL-1 which increased from 12.7 to 14.4 mA/cm2 on addition of the dihexyl-substituted dithienosilole core. The values obtained for Voc remained very similar. It has been reported that on addition of alkyl chains, Voc can increase; but, both the diphenyl and dihexyl cores had similar effects on the cell performance.

Ko et al. synthesised a series of silole-spaced triarylamine derivatives with an efficiency ranging from 6.73% to 7.50% [14]. These dyes also had similar structural features to CL-1. The one major difference which leads to the increase in efficiency in comparison to the CL-1 was that the added bulky electron donation was present in the form of a 3-5′-N,N-bis (9,9 dimethylfluorene-2-yl)-phenyl unit (DTS). This dye was named 7b. Diphenyl- rather than dihexyl-substituted dithienosilole was used, and, when combined with the DTS electron-donating group, it had a significantly greater efficiency of 7.50%. Surprisingly enough, the Jsc value decreased to 13.9 mA/cm2 compared to 14.4 mA/cm2 for CL-1. No significant difference was observed in the Voc. The increased efficiency of 7b likely arises from the superior FF which increased by 9% compared with CL-1. When a dimethyl group (7a) was used instead of a diphenyl (7b), the efficiency value decreased to 6.73% which is lower than that of CL1. This suggests that lower aggregation levels were found with CL-1.

3.7. Molecular Modelling
3.7.1. Hydrogen-Bonding Dynamics with Ethanol

From the NPT production simulations of classical MD, the persistence times of hydrogen bonding events from hydrogen atoms in ethanol to the carboxylic acid’s oxygen atom in the dye were measured. It was found that the hydrogen bonds were short lived and transient, occurring some 4-5% of the time overall on subpicosecond timescales; the average persistence time, between breakage and possible reformation, was 0.072 ± 0.023 ps. As ethanol molecules underwent self-diffusion in the solvation layer of the dye, and rotational motion therein, the identities of the donors to the carboxylic group oxygen atom change. This underlines the key role of the interactions of the dye with ethanol and also on dye-solvent hydrogen bonding. These frequent dye-solvent hydrogen-bond rearrangements serve to rationalise the potential chemical transformation observed experimentally when placed in ethanol for several days or more.

3.7.2. Spectra of Isolated Systems

Turning to the use of TD-DFT to determine absorption spectra and the underlying transitions, the UV/Vis absorption spectra are provided in Figure 9 for the isolated dye (using the continuum solvation model for ethanol, as discussed earlier).

The experimental UV/Vis absorption spectrum has a maximum absorbance (λmax) at 468.0 nm. Figure 9 shows the theoretical UV/Vis absorption spectra of the isolated dye as calculated within the B3LYP and the CAM-B3LYP approximations. Using B3LYP, a charge-transfer excitation energy of 618.4 nm was obtained. On the other hand, the CAM-B3LYP calculation yielded a more accurate result of 453.6 nm. Table 4 summarises these results, providing the values of λmaxTh, the positions of HOMO (H), LUMO (L), and the HL gaps, ΔHL = ELUMO − EHOMO for the dye. It also provides the values of valence band maximum (VBM), conduction band minimum (CBM), and the orbital energy bandgap (Eg) for the nanoparticle.

eV (nm)
H (eV)L (eV)ΔHL (eV)

CL1B3LYP2.0 (618.4)−5.0−2.82.3
CAM-B3LYP2.7 (453.6)−6.2−1.74.6

SystemApprox.1st trans.
eV (nm)
Eg (eV)

TiO2B3LYP3.8 (326.3)−7.5−3.04.5
CAM-B3LYP4.4 (279.9)−9.2−1.77.6

Table 5 provides further details for the transition corresponding to λmaxTh. The B3LYP results displayed a large error in the excitation energy; therefore, we will focus mainly on CAM-B3LYP results. For CAM-B3LYP, the transition upon photoexcitation involves several promotions between the occupied and empty orbital pairs. However, the most prominent promotion (indicated by the magnitude of the configuration interaction singles coefficients) corresponds to the one from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO).

Approx.T.E. (O.S.) (eV)Involved orbitals (Coeff.)

(1) B3LYP2.0 (1.17)H → L (0.71)
(2) CAM-B3LYP2.7 (1.65)H → L (0.57), H-1 → L (0.37)
H → L + 1 (0.14)

Figure 10 shows the isosurface plots (isovalue = 0.2e/a.u.3) of the various MOs involved in the photoexcitation. The results show that the HOMO of the dye is delocalised over the entire molecule, with somewhat more localisation on the donor group compared to the acceptor group. In contrast, the LUMO of the dye is predominantly localised on the acceptor and the linker/spacer groups. In turn, this implies that there will be sufficient charge separation upon excitation, thereby, reducing the rate of charge recombination.

3.7.3. Absorption Spectra of the CL1-TiO2 Complex

The excited-state properties of the dye-titania complex were modelled using the CAM-B3LYP approximation. CAM-B3LYP was utilised as it outperforms B3LYP in its description of the excited-state properties of the dye molecule, which is the photoactive subsystem in the complex; this superior performance of CAM-B3LYP was shown in the previous discussion of the isolated dye (cf. Tables 4 and 5 and Figures 10 and 11). To create a computer model of the dye-titania complex, the dye molecule was chemisorbed in silico onto the nanoparticle. This was accomplished by the removal of the hydrogen atom from the carboxylic acid anchor and binding the two carboxylate oxygen atoms with two fivefold coordinated titanium atoms on the surface of the titania nanoparticle. The hydrogen atom removed was transferred to an undercoordinated oxygen atom on the titania surface to maintain the neutrality of the system, which was essential for the TD-DFT calculations. The resulting structure was relaxed within CAM-B3LYP. This optimised structure was then used to study the excited-state properties of the complex using TD-DFT.

Figure 11 shows the UV/Vis spectra for the complex as calculated using TD-DFT. The experimental and calculated values of the energy for maximum absorbance are in very good agreement at about 436.0 nm (2.8 eV) and 467.4 nm (2.7 eV), respectively.

Details of the most important transition corresponding to λmaxTh and the involved orbital pairs are provided in Table 6. Figure 12 shows the molecular orbitals of the complex involved in the transition (HOMO-1 orbital is not shown here; it is mostly derived from the dye’s HOMO-1). From the isosurface plots, both HOMO and LUMO are predominantly localised on the dye molecule itself. However, the LUMO does show some hybridisation between the dyes LUMO and the d-orbitals of the titanium atoms at the surface. Such a result, where the only empty state involved is the LUMO of the complex, may indicate that only a direct transition is possible for the complex. However, it is difficult to pinpoint the precise mechanism in this case. This is due to the fact that although CAM-B3LYP improves the description of the photophysics of the isolated dye, it overestimates the bandgap of the titania nanoparticle. In turn, this results in a misalignment of dye states with regard to the valence and conduction bands of the titania nanoparticle; hence, there is an absence of a titania-derived conduction band manifold below the dye’s LUMO. Clearly, it is difficult to obtain an accurate value for the charge-transfer excitation energy of the isolated dye and the dye-titania complex, whilst also getting a reasonable level alignment (at least within the xc-functionals explored here). The latter is important for the accurate description of the charge-transfer mechanism(s), and this is discussed further in [61].

SystemT.E. (eV) (O.S.)Involved orbitals (Coeff.)

CL1-TiO22.7H-1 → L (0.38)
(1.77)H → L (0.55)

4. Conclusions

The CL1 dye containing a silicon bridge showed a good light to electricity efficiency of 6.90%. The Si dye exhibited better performance than N719 in the 400–470 nm region, which may be advantageous depending on the desired DSSC application and lighting conditions. CL-1 compares well with other Si-based dyes [9, 10], which achieve efficiencies of around 7.5%. Also, this is generally superior in performance than rival nanorod-based solar technologies [62] or DSSC approaches exploiting dye coverage with cobalt-based electrolytes [63]. From the view point of TD-DFT, the (conjectured) possibility that only a direct transition may take place due to some hybridisation between the LUMO of the dye and surface Ti atoms in the complexed state may limit the extent of photo-excited transition in the present dye—this may serve to rationalise why the observed overall energy conversion efficiency is not perhaps as high as the previously reported Si-based dyes. However, this conclusion is somewhat tentative, given that partial LUMO hybridisation does not necessarily preclude additional indirect transitions. These dyes are eventually useful for certain indoor applications where the spectral availability matches with the dye’s absorption spectrum as well as for building tandem DSSC devices with optimal light management in order to obtain maximum short-circuit current densities. From classical MD simulations, it was evident that ethanol-formed hydrogen bonds and other dispersive and Coulombic interactions with the dye in dissolved state compromise its stability in solution form, whilst TD-DFT has provided a good agreement with the experimental data for prediction of optical absorption and identification of the underlying transitions responsible. Further work has been done on the addition of donor groups and will be presented in a later paper.


Pratibha Dev’s current address is at Department of Physics and Astronomy, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA, and Praveen K. Surolia’s current address is at Department of Chemistry, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This material is based upon work supported by the Science Foundation Ireland under Grant no. [07/SRC/B1160]. K. Ravindranathan Thampi acknowledges the support received under SFI-Airtricity-Funded SFI-Stokes professorship grant and the SMARTOP project (Grant no. 265769) financed by the EC-FP7 programme. The authors acknowledge the computational support provided by the Irish Centre for High-End Computing (ICHEC). Neelima Rathi and Edmond Magner acknowledge support from the HEA-funded PRTLI4 programme, INSPIRE. Pratibha Dev and Praveen K. Surolia acknowledge the financial support for this work through EMPOWER fellowships granted by the Irish Research Council for Science and Engineering (IRCSET).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials: Performance metrics for Organic Dyes Containing Coplanar Dihexyl-Substituted Dithienosilole Groups for Efficient Dye-Sensitised Solar Cells.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. B. O'Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Komiya, A. Fukui, N. Murofushi, N. Koide, R. Yamanaka, and H. Katayama, in Technical Digest, 21st International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference, Fukuoka, November 2011, 2 C-5O-08.
  3. M. A. Green, K. Emery, Y. Hishikawa, W. Warta, and E. D. Dunlop, “Solar cell efficiency tables (version 45),” Progress in Photovoltaics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Imahori, T. Umeyama, and S. Ito, “Large π-aromatic molecules as potential sensitizers for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1809–1818, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Yella, H. W. Lee, H. N. Tsao et al., “Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)–based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6056, pp. 629–634, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Mathew, A. Yella, P. Gao et al., “Dye-sensitized solar cells with 13% efficiency achieved through the molecular engineering of porphyrin sensitizers,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 242–247, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Kakiage, Y. Aoyama, T. Yano, K. Oya, J. Fujisawa, and M. Hanaya, “Highly-efficient dye-sensitized solar cells with collaborative sensitization by silyl-anchor and carboxy-anchor dyes,” Chemical Communications, vol. 51, no. 88, pp. 15894–15897, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. N. Clifford, G. Yahioglu, L. R. Milgrom, and J. R. Durrant, “Molecular control of recombination dynamics in dye sensitised nanocrystalline TiO 2 films,” Chemical Communications, no. 12, pp. 1260–1261, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Bessho, S. M. Zakeeruddin, C. Y. Yeh, E. W. G. Diau, and M. Grätzel, “Highly efficient mesoscopic dye-sensitized solar cells based on donor-acceptor-substituted porphyrins,” Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, vol. 49, no. 37, pp. 6646–6649, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. M. Feldt, E. A. Gibson, E. Gabrielsson, L. Sun, G. Boschloo, and A. Hagfeldt, “Design of organic dyes and cobalt polypyridine redox mediators for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 46, pp. 16714–16724, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. N. Tsao, C. Yi, T. Moehl et al., “Cyclopentadithiophene bridged donor-acceptor dyes achieve high power conversion efficiencies in dye-sensitized solar cells based on the tris-cobalt bipyridine redox couple,” ChemSusChem, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 591–594, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Liao, A. Cirpan, Q. Chu, F. E. Karasz, and Y. Pang, “Synthesis and optical properties of light‐emitting π‐conjugated polymers containing biphenyl and dithienosilole,” Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2048–2058, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  13. T.-Y. Chu, J. Lu, S. Beaupré et al., “Effects of the molecular weight and the side‐chain length on the photovoltaic performance of dithienosilole/thienopyrrolodione copolymers,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2345–2351, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Ko, H. Choi, M.-S. Kang et al., “Silole-spaced triarylamine derivatives as highly efficient organic sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs),” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2391–2399, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L.-Y. Lin, C.-H. Tsai, K.-T. Wong et al., “Organic dyes containing coplanar diphenyl-substituted dithienosilole core for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 75, no. 14, pp. 4778–4785, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. J. Ross and K. R. William, Impedance spectroscopy, Wiley, New York, 1987.
  17. J. Bisquert, “Theory of the impedance of charge transfer via surface states in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 646, no. 1-2, pp. 43–51, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Andrade, R. Cruz, H. Ribeiro, and A. Mendes, “Impedance characterization of dye-sensitized solar cells in a tandem arrangement for hydrogen production by water splitting,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 8876–8883, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. Fabregat-Santiago, J. Bisquert, E. Palomares et al., “Correlation between photovoltaic performance and impedance spectroscopy of dye-sensitized solar cells based on ionic liquids,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 17, pp. 6550–6560, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  20. R. Kern, R. Sastrawan, J. Ferber, R. Stangl, and J. Luther, “Modeling and interpretation of electrical impedance spectra of dye solar cells operated under open-circuit conditions,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 47, no. 26, pp. 4213–4225, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Ito, T. N. Murakami, P. Comte et al., “Fabrication of thin film dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric power conversion efficiency over 10%,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 14, pp. 4613–4619, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Ito, P. Chen, P. Comte et al., “Fabrication of screen‐printing pastes from TiO2 powders for dye‐sensitised solar cells,” Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 603–612, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. Lu, H. Usta, C. Risko et al., “Synthesis, characterization, and transistor response of semiconducting silole polymers with substantial hole mobility and air stability. Experiment and theory,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 24, pp. 7670–7685, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. M. Kroon, N. J. Bakker, H. J. P. Smit et al., “Nanocrystalline dye‐sensitized solar cells having maximum performance,” Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Frisch, G. Trucks, H. Schlegel et al., “Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 1787–1799, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. J. G. Peach, P. Benfield, T. Helgaker, and D. J. Tozer, “Excitation energies in density functional theory: an evaluation and a diagnostic test,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 128, no. 4, p. 044118, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Dev, S. Agrawal, and N. J. English, “Determining the appropriate exchange-correlation functional for time-dependent density functional theory studies of charge-transfer excitations in organic dyes,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 136, no. 22, p. 224301, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. D. Becke, “Density‐functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 5648–5652, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. Kavathekar, P. Dev, N. J. English, and J. M. D. MacElroy, “Molecular dynamics study of water in contact with TiO2 rutile-110, 100, 101, 001 and anatase-101, 001 surfaces,” Molecular Physics, vol. 109, no. 13, pp. 1649–1656, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. S. Ashvar, C. F. Chabalowski, and M. J. Frisch, “Theoretical calculation of vibrational circular dichroism spectra,” Faraday Discussions, vol. 99, pp. 103–119, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  31. T. Yanai, D. P. Tew, and N. C. Handy, “A new hybrid exchange–correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP),” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 393, no. 1–3, pp. 51–57, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Cossi, N. Rega, G. Scalmani, and V. Barone, “Energies, structures, and electronic properties of molecules in solution with the C‐PCM solvation model,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 669–681, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. Persson, R. Bergström, and S. Lunell, “Quantum chemical study of photoinjection processes in dye-sensitized TiO2 nanoparticles,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, vol. 104, no. 44, pp. 10348–10351, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. De Angelis, A. Tilocca, and A. Selloni, “Time-dependent DFT study of [Fe (CN) 6] 4-sensitization of TiO2 nanoparticles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 46, pp. 15024–15025, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. De Angelis, “Direct vs. indirect injection mechanisms in perylene dye-sensitized solar cells: a DFT/TDDFT investigation,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 493, no. 4–6, pp. 323–327, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  36. S. Agrawal, P. Dev, N. J. English, K. R. Thampi, and J. MacElroy, “First-principles study of the excited-state properties of coumarin-derived dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 30, pp. 11101–11108, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. Agrawal, P. Dev, N. J. English, K. R. Thampi, and J. MacElroy, “A TD-DFT study of the effects of structural variations on the photochemistry of polyene dyes,” Chemical Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 416–424, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. T. A. Halgren, “Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 5-6, pp. 490–519, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. MOE, The Molecular Operating Environment from Chemical Computing Group Inc., 1010 Sherbrooke St. W., Suite 910, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2R7.
  40. N. J. English and J. M. D. MacElroy, “Atomistic simulations of liquid water using Lekner electrostatics,” Molecular Physics, vol. 100, no. 23, pp. 3753–3769, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. N. J. English, “Effect of electrostatics techniques on the estimation of thermal conductivity via equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation: application to methane hydrate,” Molecular Physics, vol. 106, no. 15, pp. 1887–1898, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Xu, S. Wenger, H. Bala et al., “Tuning the energy level of organic sensitizers for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 2966–2973, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  43. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Molecular Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon, Oxford, 1987.
  44. S. Roquet, A. Cravino, P. Leriche, O. Alévêque, P. Frère, and J. Roncali, “Triphenylamine−thienylenevinylene hybrid systems with internal charge transfer as donor materials for heterojunction solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 10, pp. 3459–3466, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. H. Yum, D. P. Hagberg, S. J. Moon et al., “A light‐resistant organic sensitizer for solar‐cell applications,” Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English), vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1576–1580, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Hagfeldt and M. Gratzel, “Light-induced redox reactions in nanocrystalline systems,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 49–68, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Klein, M. K. Nazeeruddin, P. Liska et al., “Engineering of a novel ruthenium sensitizer and its application in dye-sensitized solar cells for conversion of sunlight into electricity,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 178–180, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C. Teng, X. Yang, C. Yang et al., “Influence of triple bonds as π-spacer units in metal-free organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 25, pp. 11305–11313. View at: Google Scholar
  49. D. Shi, Y. Cao, N. Pootrakulchote et al., “New organic sensitizer for stable dye-sensitized solar cells with solvent-free ionic liquid electrolytes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 44, pp. 17478–17485, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. R. M. Silverstein, G. C. Bassler, and T. C. Morrill, Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, 1974. View at: Publisher Site
  51. M. K. Nazeeruddin, R. Humphry-Baker, D. L. Officer, W. M. Campbell, A. K. Burrell, and M. Gratzel, “Application of metalloporphyrins in nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells for conversion of sunlight into electricity,” Langmuir, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 6514–6517, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. B. Deacon and R. J. Phillips, “Relationships between the carbon-oxygen stretching frequencies of carboxylato complexes and the type of carboxylate coordination,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 227–250, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Vittadini, A. Selloni, F. P. Rotzinger, and M. Gratzel, “Formic acid adsorption on dry and hydrated TiO2 anatase (101) surfaces by DFT calculations,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 1300–1306, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. Bisquert, F. Fabregat-Santiago, I. Mora-Sero, G. Garcia-Belmonte, and S. Giménez, “Electron lifetime in dye-sensitized solar cells: theory and interpretation of measurements,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 40, pp. 17278–17290, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  55. Q. Wang, J.-E. Moser, and M. Grätzel, “Electrochemical impedance spectroscopic analysis of dye-sensitized solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 31, pp. 14945–14953, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. L. Han, N. Koide, Y. Chiba, and T. Mitate, “Modeling of an equivalent circuit for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, no. 13, pp. 2433–2435, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. Halme, P. Vahermaa, K. Miettunen, and P. Lund, “Device physics of dye solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 35, pp. 22–E234, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. L.-L. Li, Y.-C. Chang, H.-P. Wu, and E. W.-G. Diau, “Characterisation of electron transport and charge recombination using temporally resolved and frequency-domain techniques for dye-sensitised solar cells,” International Reviews in Physical Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 420–467, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. N. J. English and D. G. Carroll, “Prediction of Henry’s Law constants by a Quantitative Structure Property Relationship and neural networks,” Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1150–1161, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  60. M. Adachi, M. Sakamoto, J. Jiu, Y. Ogata, and S. Isoda, “Determination of parameters of electron transport in dye-sensitized solar cells using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, vol. 110, no. 28, pp. 13872–13880, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. P. Dev, S. Agrawal, and N. J. English, “Functional assessment for predicting charge-transfer excitations of dyes in complexed state: a study of triphenylamine-donor dyes on titania for dye-sensitized solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A, vol. 117, no. 10, pp. 2114–2124, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. Singh, N. J. English, and K. M. Ryan, “Highly ordered nanorod assemblies extending over device scale areas and in controlled multilayers by electrophoretic deposition,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 1608–1615, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. Pazoki, P. W. Lohse, N. Taghavinia, A. Hagfeldt, and G. Boschloo, “The effect of dye coverage on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells with a cobalt-based electrolyte,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 8503–8508, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Ciaran Lyons et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2194 Views | 551 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.