Multiple DGs for Reducing Total Power Losses in Radial Distribution Systems Using Hybrid WOA-SSA Algorithm

Table 1

Taxonomy of the reviewed optimal DG unit placement models.

Ref.	Proposed approach	Test system	Aim of the study
[3]	BSA	33 and 94 buses	Reduce the real losses and enhance the voltage profile
[4]	CSA	33, 69, and 119 nodes	Minimize active power losses and maximize voltage magnitude
[5]	Analytical and PSO	33 and 69 buses	Minimize the power distribution loss
[6]	Analytical	33 and 69 buses	Minimize power losses
[7]	LSF and IWO	33 and 69 buses	Minimize losses and operational cost and improve the voltage stability
[8]	PSO	33 and 69 buses	Minimize power losses
[9]	AGPSO	69 buses	Minimize power losses
[10]	GWO	33 and 69 buses	Minimize power losses
[11]	GA-PSO	33 and 69 buses	Minimize losses and maintain acceptable voltage profiles
[12]	GA-ABC	33 and 69 buses	Reduce the cost of the system and decrease RPLs
[13]	GA and Fuzzy	34 buses	Minimize cost, emission, power losses, and voltage deviation
[14]	PBIL and PSO	33 and 69 buses	Reduce active power losses and improve the nodal voltage profiles
[15]	PSO	30 buses	Minimize the transmission losses
[16]	CSO	69 buses	Maximize the reliability in the system
[17]	BSA	69 and 136 buses	Reduce power losses and improve network voltage profile
[18]	BSA and Fuzzy expert rules	33 and 94 nodes	Minimize the network power losses, consolidate the static voltage stability indices, and ameliorate the bus’s voltage profile.