Review Article
Current Status of Emerging PV Technologies: A Comparative Study of Dye-Sensitized, Organic, and Perovskite Solar Cells
Table 1
Highest recorded efficiencies and device characteristics for DSSCs, PSCs, OPVs, and tandem PSCs [
5].
| | Efficiency (%) | Active layer/absorber | Carrier transporting material | Innovative materials/techniques | Institution/company |
| DSSC | 13.0 | TiO2 dye-sensitized semiconductor | Cobalt redox couple electrolyte | Panchromatic porphyrin sensitizers | EPFL | PSC | 25.2 | FAPbI 3-based perovskite | Spiro-MeOTAD | Minimizing the deformation of photoactive layers by changing the type and ratio of ions | UNIST | Tandem PSC/Si | 29.5 | Monolithic perovskite PbI2-based top cell/Si bottom cell | Methyl-substituted carbazole monolayer/C60 | Self-assembled carbazole-based monolayer with methyl group substitution | Oxford PV | Tandem PSC/CIGS | 24.2 | Monolithic two-terminal triple-cation PSC/CIGS | Poly [bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA)/C60 | Rubidium-based self-assembled monolayer | HZB | OPV | 18.2 | PBDB-T-2F:BTP-eC9 | PEDOT:PSS | Chlorinated nonfullerene acceptor | SJTU/BUAA |
|
|