Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Plant Genomics
Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 582837, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/582837
Review Article

Progress in Understanding and Sequencing the Genome of Brassica rapa

1Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305764, South Korea
2Brassica Genomics Team, National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (NIAB), Rural Development Administration (RDA), Suwon 441707, South Korea
3Department of Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151921, South Korea

Received 13 June 2007; Accepted 21 November 2007

Academic Editor: Yunbi Xu

Copyright © 2008 Chang Pyo Hong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Brassica rapa, which is closely related to Arabidopsis thaliana, is an important crop and a model plant for studying genome evolution via polyploidization. We report the current understanding of the genome structure of B. rapa and efforts for the whole-genome sequencing of the species. The tribe Brassicaceae, which comprises ca. 240 species, descended from a common hexaploid ancestor with a basic genome similar to that of Arabidopsis. Chromosome rearrangements, including fusions and/or fissions, resulted in the present-day “diploid” Brassica species with variation in chromosome number and phenotype. Triplicated genomic segments of B. rapa are collinear to those of A. thaliana with InDels. The genome triplication has led to an approximately 1.7-fold increase in the B. rapa gene number compared to that of A. thaliana. Repetitive DNA of B. rapa has also been extensively amplified and has diverged from that of A. thaliana. For its whole-genome sequencing, the Brassica rapa Genome Sequencing Project (BrGSP) consortium has developed suitable genomic resources and constructed genetic and physical maps. Ten chromosomes of B. rapa are being allocated to BrGSP consortium participants, and each chromosome will be sequenced by a BAC-by-BAC approach. Genome sequencing of B. rapa will offer a new perspective for plant biology and evolution in the context of polyploidization.

1. Importance of Brassica Genomics

The genus Brassica is one of the core genera in the tribe Brassicaceae and includes a number of crops with wide adaptation under a variety of agroclimatic conditions. Economically, Brassica species are important sources of vegetable oil, fresh, preserved vegetables, and condiments. B. napus, B. rapa, B. juncea, and B. carinata provide about 12% of the worldwide edible vegetable oil supply [1]. The B. rapa and B. oleracea subspecies represent many of the vegetables in our daily diet. In particular, B. rapa ssp. pekinensis (Chinese cabbage), on which this article focuses, is one of the most widely used vegetable crops in northeast Asia. Moreover, Brassica species are important sources of dietary fiber, vitamin C, and anticancer compounds [2].

The genetic relationships among the different diploid and amphidiploid Brassica species are described by the U’s triangle [3]. Of the six widely cultivated species of Brassica, B. rapa (AA, 2n = 20), B. nigra (BB, 2n = 16), and B. oleracea (CC, 2n = 18) are monogenomic diploids. The remaining three species, B. juncea (AABB, 2n = 36), B. napus (AACC, 2n = 38), and B. carinata (BBCC, 2n = 34) exhibit stable diploid genetics, but are allotetraploids, which have evolved via hybridization between differing monogenomic diploids [3]. The diploid Brassica genomes range from 1.1 pg/2C (529 Mbp/1C) for B. rapa to 1.4 pg/2C (696 Mbp/1C) for B. oleracea (see Figure 1) [4]. The genomes of the allotetraploids range from 2.2 pg/2C (1,068 Mbp/1C) for B. juncea to 2.6 pg/2C (1,284 Mbp/1C) for B. carinata (see Figure 1).

582837.fig.001
Figure 1: Genetic relationship of the different diploid and amphidiploid Brassica species. 1C, 1C nuclear DNA content (pg); GS, genome size (Mbp) [3, 4].

The genus Brassica is characterized by morphological diversity with regard to inflorescences, leaves, stems, roots, and terminal or apical buds [5]. For example, such morphological diversity can be easily observed in subspecies of B. oleracea: the enlarged inflorescences of cauliflower (B. oleracea ssp. botrytis) and broccoli (B. oleracea ssp. italica); the enlarged stems of kohlrabi (B. oleracea ssp. gongylodes) and marrowstem kale (B. oleracea ssp. medullosa); and the many axillary buds of Brussels sprout (B. oleracea ssp. gemmifera) [5]. The morphological diversity in Brassica species may be linked to genomic changes associated with polyploidization [6]. The polyploidization in Brassica species has brought about triplication of genomic segments and subsequent rearrangements such as inversions, insertions, deletions, and substitutions [716], and these genetic variations may cause novel phenotypic variations for traits among these species [5, 6]. Thus, Brassica genomics will provide us with an understanding of the rapid phenotypic evolution of polyploid plants. Additionally, it will help us to understand genomic changes and how they shape the allotetrapolyploid Brassica species. For example, a study has been done looking at rapid genomic changes and the effect of nuclear-cytoplasm interaction in synthetic allotetrapolyploid species [17].

Because of the high economic value of Brassica species throughout the world and their potential to be models for the study of polyploidization, genome sequencing projects for Brassica species, especially B. rapa and B. oleracea, have recently been initiated (http://www.brassica.info) [1820]. In particular, B. rapa ssp. pekinensis inbred line Chiffu-401-42, discussed in this article, has been selected for Brassica-A genome sequencing in the Brassicarapa Genome Sequencing Project (BrGSP) (http://www.brassica.info), a component of the consortium of the Multinational Brassica Genome Project, with the goal of completely sequencing this genome through a BAC-by-BAC approach. The BrGSP consortium has developed genomic resources for this purpose and is proceeding with whole-genome sequencing.

2. Current Understanding of the Genome Structure of B. rapa

2.1. Karyotype of B. rapa

Karyotyping is the starting point for understanding the genome structure of a species. Moreover, it provides insight into genome evolution. Most of the karyotypic analyses in B. rapa have been performed on mitotic metaphase chromosomes [2124]. However, the analyses are limited in what they can reveal about the cytological structure of the genome because of the low resolution of the technique. For example, different measurements of chromosome lengths and rDNA loci are obtained by this method. Recently, the high-resolution karyotype for the B. rapa ssp. pekinensis inbred line Chiffu was determined on pachytene chromosomes by using -6-diamino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of rDNAs and pericentromeric satellite repeats [25]. By DAPI analysis, the mean lengths of ten pachytene chromosomes ranged from 23.7  m to 51.3  m, with a total of 385.3  m, a total length which is 11.9- 17.5-fold longer than that of the mitotic metaphase chromosomes reported by Lim et al. [24] and Koo et al. [25]. In comparison, pachytene chromosome length of A. thaliana, Medicago truncatula, and tomato was estimated to be about 7.4%, 15%, and 24% of the total pachytene chromosome length, respectively (reviewed in Koo et al. [25]). In B. rapa, the pachytene karyotype consists of two metacentric (chromosomes 1 and 6), five submetacentric (chromosomes 3, 4, 5, 9, and 10), two subtelomeric (chromosomes 7 and 8), and one acrocentric chromosome (chromosome 2), with the corresponding centromeric index ranges of 38.8–41.0%, 29.5–36.7%, 17.4–20.2%, and 9.38%, respectively [25]. In the chromosomal structure at pachytene, the total length of pericentromeric heterochromatin regions was estimated to be 38.2  m, which is approximately 10% of the total chromosome length [25]. In conjunction with chromosomal structure and characteristics, 5S rDNA loci were located on pericentromeric regions of the short arms of chromosomes 2 and 7 as well as the long arm of chromosome 10, while 45S rDNA loci were located on the short arms of chromosomes 1, 2, 4, and 5 as well as the long arm of chromosome 7 [24, 25].

2.2. Collinearity between Genomic Segments of Arabidopsis and Brassica

Brassica species are closely related to A. thaliana, having diverged 17-18 million years ago (MYA) from their common ancestor [16]. A. thaliana, which has been completely sequenced, has a rather small genome (about 146 Mb) with relatively little repetitive DNA and a high gene density [26, 27]. Protein-coding regions of the genomes of Brassica species show high sequence conservation with those of A. thaliana, with nucleotide sequence similarity in exons between B. oleracea and A. thaliana ranging from 75% to 90%, compared to <70% for intronic regions [28]. This similarity allows the identification of sets of candidate genes in Brassica species and the studying of their genome structures through comparative genomics [29]. Comparative studies between Arabidopsis and Brassica have revealed the presence of collinear chromosome segments (see Figure 2). Comparative genetic mapping between diploid Brassica species and A. thaliana to identify homologous loci have revealed many conserved blocks in their genomes [7, 8, 14, 30]. Comparative physical mapping between Arabidopsis and Brassica further corroborated the findings. A set of six bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), representing a 431-kb contiguous region of Arabidopsis chromosome 2, was mapped on chromosomes and DNA fibers of B. rapa [31]. Moreover, studies on a 222-kb gene-rich region of A. thaliana chromosome 4 and its homologous counterparts in B. rapa or B. oleracea revealed the collinearity of genes in homologous segments [9, 11, 13]. This finding was supported by sequence analysis of specific homologous genomic segments [15, 16]. However, many structural rearrangements differentiate the Brassica and Arabidopsis chromosomes (see Figure 2). Comparative genetic mapping between B. nigra and A. thaliana species revealed that the average length of conserved segments between the two species was estimated at about 8 cM, which corresponds to 90 rearrangements since the divergence of the two species [7]. In addition, it was found that gene contents in their homologous genomic segments were also variable with interstitial gene losses and insertions [9, 11, 13, 15, 16].

fig2
Figure 2: An example of a comparative map of Arabidopsis and Brassica. (a) Collinearity between genomic segments of the two species and genome triplication of Brassica revealed by comparative genetic mapping. (b) Synteny of genes in a triplicated genomic region of Brassica.
2.3. Genome Triplication of Diploid Brassica Species

Most of the comparative studies mentioned above demonstrated that Brassica species contain extensively triplicated counterparts of the corresponding homologous segments of the A. thaliana genome (see Figure 2), thereby suggesting that diploid Brassica species may have been derived from a hexaploid ancestor: the genome which was similar to Arabidopsis. Consistent with the nature of genome triplication, Yang et al. [16] reported that paralogous subgenomes of diploid Brassica species triplicated  MYA, very soon after the Arabidopsis and Brassica divergence that occurred at  MYA. In addition, it was reported that after the Brassica genomes had triplicated, their subgenomes were rearranged by inversions, translocations [7, 12, 32], extensive interspersed gene loss, as well as gene insertions occurred relative to the inferred structure of the ancestral genome (see Figure 2). Additionally, such genome triplication was extensively found across the tribe Brassicaceae [12]. In comparison with the genome of A. thaliana, the genome triplication in Brassica species has clearly led to an increase in the genome size, resulting in a 3- to 5-fold inflation.

Genome triplication events in Brassica species may also have an effect on gene expression of multicopy genes, leading to such phenomena as pseudogenization, subfunctionalization, or neofunctionalization in species [3338]. For example, the MADS-box transcription factor family, whose members control key aspects of plant vegetative and reproductive development, shapes genetic systems by subfunctionalization [37]. It appears that after polyploid formation, considerable and sometimes very rapid changes in genome structure and gene expression have occurred. Researchers have hypothesized that genomic triplication in Brassica species permits mutations in loci that are normally under tight selective constraints in Arabidopsis, and may thus result in the observed greater phenotypic plasticity in Brassica [5]. Studies on expression of duplicated genes in Brassica species will provide insight into the role of polyploidization in the phenotypic divergence of the plant genus.

2.4. Survey of the B. rapa Genome Revealed by BAC-End Sequence Analysis

The B. rapa genome was surveyed via the analysis of its 12,017 HindIII BAC-end sequences (Table 1) [39]. Analyses of BAC-end sequence or genome survey sequences assist in understanding whole genome structure [3941]. It was estimated that the B. rapa genome might contain about 43000 genes (covering 16.8% of the genome), 1.6 times more than the A. thaliana genome. Recently, Yang et al. [16] also estimated the gene content of B. rapa to range from 49,000 to 63,000, based on predictions from microsynteny studies. It has been suggested that chromosomal triplication events in Brassica have led to an increase in gene number with subsequent gene loss [15, 16, 39, 42].

tab1
Table 1: Comparison of gene, TE, and SSR abundances in B. rapa and A. thaliana.

Transposable elements (TEs) with a predominance of retrotransposons were estimated to occupy approximately 14% of the genome (covering approximately 74 Mb), 8.2 times greater than that observed previously in A. thaliana [44]. Zhang and Wessler [44] reported that TEs in B. oleracea constituted 20% of the genome, slightly more than what was predicted for the B. rapa genome. Of the predicted TEs, LTR retrotransposon families were the most abundant (69.9%), followed by non-LTR retrotransposons (13.4%), DNA transposons (11.4%), and other retrotransposons (5.3%). In particular, Ty1/copia-like and Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons occupied 39.5% and 30.2% of LTR retrotransposon families, respectively. The amplification of TEs in B. rapa, especially retrotransposons, may have played a crucial role in both evolution and genomic expansion.

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) have been estimated to occur with a frequency of approximately one per 4.8 kb within the B. rapa genome, as compared to approximately one per 3.2 kb within the A. thaliana genome [39]. Of SSRs identified, trinucleotides were the most abundant repeat type, constituting about 37% of all SSRs, a percentage similar to those reported in other plant genomes [39, 45]. Comparison of SSR densities in different genomic regions demonstrated that SSR density was greatest immediately in -flanking regions of predicted genes [45]. SSRs were also preferentially associated with gene-rich regions, with pericentromeric heterochromatin SSRs mostly associated with retrotransposons [45], suggesting that the distribution of SSRs in the genome is nonrandom [39, 45].

2.5. Structure of (peri)centromeres of B. rapa

The centromere is a dynamic and rapidly evolving structure and consists largely of highly repetitive DNA sequences, especially tandem satellite repeats and retrotransposons [46, 47]. Centromeric repeats characterized in plant genomes are composed of 155 180-bp tandem repeat motifs, including the 180-bp pAL1 satellite in A. thaliana [4850], the 155 165-bp CentO satellite in rice [51, 52], the 156-bp CentC satellite in maize [53] and the 169-bp satellite in Medicago truncatula [54, 55]. Centromeric satellite repeats of Brassica species, except for those of B. nigra, are represented by the 176-bp CentBr [24, 25, 5659]. The CentBr repeats in the B. rapa genome belong to two classes which have 82% sequence similarity. The two classes are chromosome-specific, with CentBr1 found on eight chromosomes (chromosomes 1, 3, and 5–10) and CentBr2 on two chromosomes (chromosomes 2 and 4) [24, 25, 39]. Such distribution of the CentBr family may reflect the predominance of CentBr1 in the Brassica genome [39]. The CentBr repeats have also undergone rapid evolution within the B. rapa genome and have diverged among the related species of Brassicaceae [39]. Recently, Lim et al. [59] identified and characterized the major repeats in centromeric and pericentromeric heterochromatin of B. rapa. The region contains CentBr arrays, 238-bp degenerate tandem repeat (TR238) arrays, rDNAs, centromere-specific retrotransposons of Brassica (CRB), and pericentromere-specific retrotransposons (PCRBr). In particular, CRB was a major component of all centromeres in three diploid Brassica species and their allotetraploid relatives, and PCRBr and TR238 were A-genome-specific [59].

3. Progress of B. rapa Genome Sequencing

3.1. Genomic Resources

The development of genomic resources is a prerequisite to undertaking genome sequencing in any crop species. Genomic resources, including reference mapping populations, DNA libraries, and DNA sequences have been developed for B. rapa ssp. pekinensis inbred line Chiffu-401-42 (Table 2). Two reference mapping populations were derived from two B. rapa ssp. pekinensis inbred lines, Chiifu-401-42 and Kenshin-402-43 (CK), and comprise 78 double haploid (DH) lines (the CKDH population) and 201 recombinant inbred (RI) lines (the CKRI population). These mapping populations have been used for construction of reference genetic maps for genome sequencing [20]. The bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) system, commonly used for developing large-insert DNA libraries, is an invaluable resource for structural and functional genomics. Three Chiffu BAC libraries were constructed by using restriction enzymes: HindIII, BamHI, and Sau3AI, and designated as KBrH, KBrB, and KBrS. These libraries consist of 56592, 50688, and 55296 clones with an average insert size of 115 kb, 124 kb, and 100 kb, respectively. These BAC libraries cover approximately 36 genome equivalents, assuming that the genome size of Chinese cabbage is 529 Mb. Using these BAC clones, the BrGSP community has recently generated a total of 200017 BAC-end sequences. In combination with BAC fingerprinting data, the BAC-end sequences will give insight into the structure of the genome, be a resource for development of genetic markers, and aid in finding the BAC clones that correspond to the minimal tilling paths in genome sequencing [19, 60, 61]. For functional genomics of B. rapa, 22 cDNA libraries from different tissues, including leaves, roots, cotyledons, stems, seedlings, ovules, siliques, and anthers of Chiffu, have been constructed, and a total of 128582 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) have been generated from these cDNA libraries (GenBank accession number CO749247 CO750684 and EX015357 EX142500). Currently, the ESTs have been used for construction of B. rapa unigene set and gene expression microarray (http://www.brassica-rapa.org).

tab2
Table 2: Genomic resources for whole-genome sequencing of B. rapa.
3.2. Genetic and Physical Mapping

Some genetic linkage maps of B. rapa, on which genetic markers were distributed over ten linkage groups, have been constructed since 1990 [6267] (summarized in Table 3). The distances of genetic linkage maps ranged from 890 cM to 1850 cM. However, the genetic linkage maps may not provide direct and accurate genetic information for the Chiffu genome sequencing because of genetic variation between the mapping populations. For that reason, the BrGSP community has constructed the CK genetic linkage map. Using the 78 CKDH lines, a reference genetic linkage map has been constructed [67]. The map consists of a total of 556 markers, including 278 AFLPs, 235 SSRs, 25 RAPDs, and 18 ESTPs/STS/CAPS markers. Ten linkage groups were identified and designated as R1 to R10 via mapping with SSR markers derived from the reference linkage map of B. napus reported previously [68] (Table 4). The total length of the linkage map was 1182 cM with an average interval of 2.83 cM between adjacent loci. Recently, for high-resolution genetic mapping, the community has set a goal of developing more than 1,000 SSR markers derived from BAC-end sequences, ESTs, and BACs. Moreover, based on the sequence-tagged site (STS) markers, a CKRI genetic linkage map has been constructed to be complementary to the CKDH one. The linkage groups in these genetic maps may not correspond to the chromosomes assigned in the cytogenetic map. Therefore, it is important to align the linkage groups on the genetic map with chromosomes of the cytogenetic map. All ten linkage groups of a reference genetic map of B. rapa are being assigned to the corresponding chromosomes through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using locus-specific BAC clones as probes (see an example in Figure 3, unpublished data).

tab3
Table 3: Genetic linkage maps of B. rapa developed since 1990.
tab4
Table 4: The correspondence between genetic linkage groups of B. rapa ssp. pekinensis based on B. napus reference linkage maps.
582837.fig.003
Figure 3: An example of an alignment of linkage group 1 in the reference genetic map to the corresponding chromosome 5 through FISH using locus-specific BAC clones.

The fingerprinted BAC map (so-called “physical map”) makes it possible to select clones for sequencing that would ensure comprehensive coverage of the genome and reduce sequencing redundancy [69]. In addition, the clone-based map also enables the identification of large segments of the genome that are repeated, thereby simplifying the sequence assembly. To construct a deep-coverage BAC physical map of the B. rapa genome, all BAC clones from the three BAC libraries were fingerprinted using restriction enzyme digestion and SNaPshot [70] methodologies, and then BAC contigs have been assembled by FingerPrinted Contigs (FPC) software (http://www.agcol.arizona.edu/software/fpc/). This data will be open to the Brassicarapa genome sequencing consortium.

3.3. Approach to Genome Sequencing

Seed BACs for genome sequencing have been selected through in silico allocation of B. rapa BAC-end sequences onto counterpart locations of Arabidopsis chromosomes [19]. Of 91000 BAC-end sequences, a total of 45232 showed significant sequence similarity with unique Arabidopsis sequences, and 4317 BAC clones were allocated on Arabidopsis chromosomes by significant matching with both ends within 30–500 kb intervals, which span 93 Mb of Arabidopsis euchromatin regions (covering 78.2% of the Arabidopsis genome). However, approximately 9.4 Mb of euchromatin regions and 16.6 Mb pericentromeric heterochromatin regions of the Arabidopsis genome were not covered by the B. rapa BAC span (span is considered by best hit of paired ends). Based on the physical map of B. rapa and the in silico comparative map of its BAC-ends onto Arabidopsis chromosomes, 629 seed BACs have been selected spanning 86 Mb of Arabidopsis euchromatin regions and scattered throughout the B. rapa genome (http://www.brassica-rapa.org), and the BACs have been mapped on B. rapa chromosomes by STS mapping and FISH analysis. The seed BACs which are anchored and sequenced will be used as stepping stones for sequencing of the ten chromosomes.

Considering the large genome size and the possibility of international cooperation, a chromosome-based approach was suggested. Of ten chromosomes (or linkage groups), eight have been allocated to the participating countries as follow: Korea (R3 and R9), Canada (R2 and R10), UK and China (R1 and R8), USA (R6), and Australia (R7). However, R4 and R5 have remained unassigned. Progress of chromosome sequencing will be reported soon by each country.

4. Conclusions

Brassica species are economically important crops and serve as model plants for studying phenotypic evolution associated with polyploidization. The Brassica genomes have extensively triplicated and undergone subsequent genome rearrangements with sequence variations. This has significantly affected their genome structure and may underline phenotypic diversity. Genome sequencing of B. rapa can pave the way for elucidation of the relationship between genome evolution and phenotypic diversity. Moreover, it enables us to search for genes and develop molecular markers associated with agricultural traits, thereby establishing a molecular breeding system contributing to improvement of Brassica species economically.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from Rural Development Administration (BioGreen 21 Program), National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (Project no. 04-1-12-2), and Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (R21-2004-000-10010-0), South Korea.

References

  1. K. S. Labana and M. L. Gupta, “Importance and origin,” in Breeding Oilseed Brassicas, K. S. Labana, S. S. Banga, and S. K. Banga, Eds., Spinger, Berlin, Germany, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Fahey and P. Talalay, “The role of crucifers in cancer chemoprotection,” in Phytochemicals and Health, D. L. Gustine and H. E. Florens, Eds., pp. 87–93, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockvill, Md, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  3. N. U, “Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization,” Japanese Journal of Botany, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 389–452, 1935. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. S. Johnston, A. E. Pepper, A. E. Hall et al., “Evolution of genome size in Brassicaceae,” Annals of Botany, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 229–235, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. H. Paterson, T. H. Lan, R. Amasino, T. C. Osborn, and C. Quiros, “Brassica genomics: a complement to, and early beneficiary of, the Arabidopsis sequence,” GenomeBiology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1011.1–1011.4, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  6. L. N. Lukens, P. A. Quijada, J. Udall, J. C. Pires, M. E. Schranz, and T. C. Osborn, “Genome redundancy and plasticity within ancient and recent Brassica crop species,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 665–674, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. U. Lagercrantz, “Comparative mapping between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra indicates that Brassica genomes have evolved through extensive genome replication accompanied by chromosome fusions and frequent rearrangements,” Genetics, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 1217–1228, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. T. H. Lan, T. A. Delmonte, K. P. Reischmann et al., “An EST-enriched comparative map of Brassica oleracea and Arabidopsis thaliana,” Genome Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 776–788, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. M. O'Neill and I. Bancroft, “Comparative physical mapping of segments of the genome of Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra that are homoeologous to sequenced regions of chromosomes 4 and 5 of Arabidopsis thaliana,” The Plant Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 233–243, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. D. Babula, M. Kaczmarek, A. Barakat, M. Delseny, C. F. Quiros, and J. Sadowski, “Chromosomal mapping of Brassica oleracea based on ESTs from Arabidopsis thaliana: complexity of the comparative map,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 268, no. 5, pp. 656–665, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Rana, T. van den Boogaart, C. M. O'Neill et al., “Conservation of the microstructure of genome segments in Brassica napus and its diploid relatives,” The Plant Journal, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 725–733, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Lysak, M. A. Koch, A. Pecinka, and I. Schubert, “Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae,” Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 516–525, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Y. Park, D. H. Koo, C. P. Hong et al., “Physical mapping and microsynteny of Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis genome corresponding to a 222 kbp gene-rich region of Arabidopsis chromosome 4 and partially duplicated on chromosome 5,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 274, no. 6, pp. 579–588, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. I. A. P. Parkin, S. M. Gulden, A. G. Sharpe et al., “Segmental structure of the Brassica napus genome based on comparative analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana,” Genetics, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 765–781, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. C. D. Town, F. Cheung, R. Maiti et al., “Comparative genomics of Brassica oleracea and Arabidopsis thaliana reveal gene loss, fragmentation, and dispersal after polyploidy,” The Plant Cell, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1348–1359, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. T. J. Yang, J. S. Kim, S. J. Kwon et al., “Sequence-level analysis of the diploidization process in the triplicated FLOWERING LOCUS C region of Brassica rapa,” The Plant Cell, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1339–1347, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. L. N. Lukens, J. C. Pires, E. Leon, R. Vogelzang, L. Oslach, and T. Osborn, “Patterns of sequence loss and cytosine methylation within a population of newly resynthesized Brassica napus allopolyploids,” Plant Physiology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 336–348, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Ayele, B. J. Haas, N. Kumar et al., “Whole genome shotgun sequencing of Brassica oleracea and its application to gene discovery and annotation in Arabidopsis,” Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 487–495, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. T. J. Yang, J. S. Kim, K. B. Lim et al., “The Korea Brassica genome project: a glimpse of the Brassica genome based on comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis,” Comparative and Functional Genomics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 138–146, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. Y. P. Lim, P. Plaha, S. R. Choi et al., “Towards unraveling the structure of Brassica rapa genome,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 585–591, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  21. B. F. Cheng, W. K. Heneen, and B. Y. Chen, “Mitotic karyotypes of Brassica campestris and Brassica alboglabra and identification of the B.alboglabra chromosome in an addition line,” Genome, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 313–319, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. K. Fukui, S. Nakayama, N. Ohmido, H. Yoshiaki, and M. Yamabe, “Quantitative karyotyping of three diploid Brassica species by imaging methods and localization of 45s rDNA loci on the identified chromosomes,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 96, no. 3-4, pp. 325–330, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. R. J. Snowdon, T. Friedrich, W. Friedt, and W. Köhler, “Identifying the chromosomes of the A- and C-genome diploid Brassica species B. rapa (syn. campestris) and B. oleracea in their amphidiploid B. napus,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 533–538, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. K. B. Lim, H. de Jong, T. J. Yang et al., “Characterization of rDNAs and tandem repeats in the heterochromatin of Brassica rapa,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 436–444, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  25. D. H. Koo, P. Plaha, Y. P. Lim, Y. Hur, and J.-W. Bang, “A high-resolution karyotype of Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis revealed by pachytene analysis and multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1346–1352, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, “Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana,” Nature, vol. 408, no. 6814, pp. 796–815, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. M. Bevan and S. Walsh, “The Arabidopsis genome: a foundation for plant research,” Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1632–1642, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. C. F. Quiros, F. Grellet, J. Sadowski, T. Suzuki, G. Li, and T. Wroblewski, “Arabidopsis and Brassica comparative genomics: sequence, structure and gene content in the ABI1-Rps2-Ck1 chromosomal segment and related regions,” Genetics, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 1321–1330, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  29. J. A. Kim, T. J. Yang, J. S. Kim et al., “Isolation of circadian-associated genes in Brassica rapa by comparative genomics with Arabidopsis thaliana,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. P. Kowalski, T. H. Lan, K. A. Feldmann, and A. H. Paterson, “Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea chromosomes reveals islands of conserved organization,” Genetics, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 499–510, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. A. Jackson, Z. Cheng, M. L. Wang, H. M. Goodman, and J. Jiang, “Comparative fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping of a 431-kb Arabidopsis thaliana bacterial artificial chromosome contig reveals the role of chromosomal duplications in the expansion of the Brassica rapa genome,” Genetics, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 833–838, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  32. P. A. Ziolkowski, M. Kaczmarek, D. Babula, and J. Sadowski, “Genome evolution in Arabidopsis/Brassica: conservation and divergence of ancient rearranged segments and their breakpoints,” The Plant Journal, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Lynch and J. S. Conery, “The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5494, pp. 1151–1155, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Lawton-Rauh, “Evolutionary dynamics of duplicated genes in plants,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 396–409, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. Z. Gu, S. A. Rifkin, K. P. White, and W.-H. Li, “Duplicate genes increase gene expression diversity within and between species,” Nature Genetics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 577–579, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. K. L. Adams and J. F. Wendel, “Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploid plants,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 539–543, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. C. Moore and M. D. Purugganan, “The evolutionary dynamics of plant duplicate genes,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 122–128, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. W.-H. Li, J. Yang, and X. Gu, “Expression divergence between duplicate genes,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 602–607, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. C. P. Hong, P. Plaha, D.-H. Koo et al., “A survey of the Brassica rapa genome by BAC-end sequence analysis and comparison with Arabidopsis thaliana,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 300–307, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  40. C. P. Hong, S. J. Lee, J. Y. Park et al., “Construction of a BAC library of Korean ginseng and initial analysis of BAC-end sequences,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 271, no. 6, pp. 709–716, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. J. Messing, A. K. Bharti, W. M. Karlowski et al., “Sequence composition and genome organization of maize,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 40, pp. 14349–14354, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. B. J. Haas, J. R. Wortman, C. M. Ronning et al., “Complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis genome: methods, tools, protocols and the final release,” BMC Biology, vol. 3, p. 7, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. E. Bowers, B. A. Chapman, J. Rong, and A. H. Paterson, “Unraveling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events,” Nature, vol. 422, no. 6930, pp. 433–438, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. X. Zhang and S. R. Wessler, “Genome-wide comparative analysis of the transposable elements in the related species Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 15, pp. 5589–5594, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. C. P. Hong, Z. Y. Piao, T. W. Kang et al., “Genomic distribution of simple sequence repeats in Brassica rapa,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 349–356, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  46. M. Ventura, N. Archidiacono, and M. Rocchi, “Centromere emergence in evolution,” Genome Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 595–599, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. J. Jiang, J. A. Birchler, W. A. Parrott, and R. K. Dawe, “A molecular view of plant centromeres,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 570–575, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. K. Nagaki, P. B. Talbert, C. X. Zhong, R. K. Dawe, S. Henikoff, and J. Jiang, “Chromatin immunoprecipitation reveals that the 180-bp satellite repeat is the key functional DNA element of Arabidopsis thaliana centromeres,” Genetics, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 1221–1225, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  49. E. K. Round, S. K. Flowers, and E. J. Richards, “Arabidopsis thaliana centromere regions: genetic map positions and repetitive DNA structure,” Genome Research, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1045–1053, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  50. H. Thompson, R. Schmidt, A. Brandes, J. S. Heslop-Harrison, and C. Dean, “A novel repetitive sequence associated with the centromeric regions of Arabidopsis thaliana chromosomes,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 253, no. 1-2, pp. 247–252, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  51. Z. Cheng, F. Dong, T. Langdon et al., “Functional rice centromeres are marked by a satellite repeat and a centromere-specific retrotransposon,” The Plant Cell, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1691–1704, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. Y. Zhang, Y. Huang, L. Zhang et al., “Structural features of the rice chromosome 4 centromere,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2023–2030, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. E. V. Ananiev, R. L. Phillips, and H. W. Rines, “Chromosome-specific molecular organization of maize (Zea mays L.) centromeric regions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 22, pp. 13073–13078, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. O. Kulikova, G. Gualtieri, R. Geurts et al., “Integration of the FISH pachytene and genetic maps of Medicago truncatula,” The Plant Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. O. Kulikova, R. Geurts, M. Lamine et al., “Satellite repeats in the functional centromere and pericentromeric heterochromatin of Medicago truncatula,” Chromosoma, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 276–283, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. X. Xia, G. Selvaraj, and H. Bertrand, “Structure and evolution of a highly repetitive DNA sequence from Brassica napus,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 213–224, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. X. Xia, P. S. Rocha, G. Selvaraj, and H. Bertrand, “Genomic organization of the canrep repetitive DNA in Brassica juncea,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 817–832, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. G. E. Harrison and J. S. Heslop-Harrison, “Centromeric repetitive DNA sequences in the genus Brassica,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. K. B. Lim, T. J. Yang, Y. J. Hwang et al., “Characterization of the centromere and peri-centromere retrotransposons in Brassica rapa and their distribution in related Brassica species,” The Plant Journal, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 173–183, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. J. C. Venter, H. O. Smith, and L. Hood, “A new strategy for genome sequencing,” Nature, vol. 381, no. 6581, pp. 364–366, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. G. G. Mahairas, J. C. Wallace, K. Smith et al., “Sequence-tagged connectors: a sequence approach to mapping and scanning the human genome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 17, pp. 9739–9744, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. K. M. Song, J. Y. Suzuki, M. K. Slocum, P. M. Williams, and T. C. Osborn, “A linkage map of Brassica rapa (syn. campestris) based on restriction fragment length polymorphism loci,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 296–304, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. R. A. Teutonico and T. C. Osborn, “Mapping of RFLP and qualitative trait loci in Brassica rapa and comparison to the linkage maps of B.napus, B.oleracea, and Arabidopsis thaliana,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 89, no. 7-8, pp. 885–894, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. C. Kole, P. Kole, R. Vogelzang, and T. C. Osborn, “Genetic linkage map of a Brassica rapa recombinant inbred population,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 553–557, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  65. J. S. Kim, T. Y. Chung, G. J. King et al., “A sequence-tagged linkage map of Brassica rapa,” Genetics, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. K. Suwabe, H. Tsukazaki, H. Iketani et al., “Simple sequence repeat-based comparative genomics between Brassica rapa and Arabidopsis thaliana: the genetic origin of clubroot resistance,” Genetics, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 309–319, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. S. R. Choi, G. R. Teakle, P. Plaha et al., “The reference genetic linkage map for the multinational Brassica rapa genome sequencing project,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 777–792, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. I. A. Parkin, A. G. Sharpe, D. J. Keith, and D. J. Lydiate, “Identification of the A and C genomes of amphiploid Brassica napus (oilseed rape),” Genome, vol. 38, pp. 1122–1133, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  69. The International Human Genome Mapping Consortium, “A physical map of the human genome,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6822, pp. 934–941, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. M. C. Luo, C. Thomas, F. M. You et al., “High-throughput fingerprinting of bacterial artificial chromosomes using the SNaPshot labeling kit and sizing of restriction fragments by capillary electrophoresis,” Genomics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 378–389, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar