Review Article

Soybean Genomics: Developments through the Use of Cultivar “Forrest”

Table 2

Ranges and means of selected mean traits measured across multiple locations and years using the RIL population and the “Essex” and “Forrest” parents. For traits 1–35 see [24]; traits 36–79 were from [39, 42] and or unpublished.

No. of trait and symbolUnitRIL population
AverageRange

1. SDS disease incidence Score 48.5 4.4–94
2. SDS disease severity Score 1.5 1.1–2.3
3. SDS disease index Score 9.3 1.1–23.9
4. Soybean cyst nematode IP (%) 530–100
5. Yield during SDS Kg·ha-13.32.9–3.76
6. Seed daidzein content g·g-11314874.5–2181
7. Seed genistein content g·g-1996.8695.5–1329
8. Seed glycitein content g·g-1206.1116–309
15. Total seed isoflavone content g·g-12516.81774.2–3759
21. Resistance to manganese toxicity Scale 0–5 2.021.1–4.5
32. Seed yield Kg ha-13.442.64–4.13
33. Leaf trigonelline content (irrigated) g g-198.85 59.87–126.96
34. Leaf trigonelline content (rain-fed) g·g-1417.94245.95–618.18
35. Flower color (white: purple) color 43:47na
38. Mean SDS DX in Argentina Scale 1–10 1.60.1–3.1
43. Tolerance to aluminum toxicity(%)14−20–37
47. Seed protein content (%)39.537.5–41.5
51. Seed oil content(%) 18.918.0–20.1
55. Resistance to insect herbivory (IP)(%) 22.313.0–32.5
60. Seedling root growthmm 8.36–11