Research Article

Social Capital and International Migration from Latin America

Table 3

Effects of different forms of capital on the probability that a male household head from five Latin American societies took a first trip to the United States 1965-survey date.

Independent variablesMexicoDominican RepublicNicaraguaCosta RicaPeru

Forms of capital

Individual social capital
 Parent a U.S. migrant0.580***1.221**1.900***1.233**
 U.S. migrant siblings0.875***1.158***1.538***0.563*1.015
 Wife a U.S. migrant0.697***2.182***1.961***1.535**
 U.S. migrant children0.399**−0.4200.381
Community social capital
 Percent U.S. migrants0.031***0.0120.055**0.145***0.290
Individual human capital
 Education−0.035***0.0440.105***0.034−0.082
 Years of LF experience0.019***0.0120.0120.062*−0.011
 Skilled occupation−0.647***0.309−0.780*−0.4700.620
Physical capital
 Land−0.0300.668−0.312−0.172
 Home−0.143**−0.3280.108−0.191−1.028
 Business−0.446***−0.2420.2690.145

Control variables

Community size
 Metro area−0.540***−0.010−0.638+−2.307***
Demographic background
 Age−0.045***0.1600.101−0.165*0.158
 Age squared−0.0007***−0.003+−0.0015+0.001−0.001
 Married or in union−0.066−0.0050.4510.685**−0.058
 No. children <180.0332**−0.029−0.146+−0.007−0.668
Period
 <1980
 1980–19890.0120.4250.882**0.452+−0.554
 1990–1995-0.029−0.242−0.403−0.330.113
 1996+0.409***−0.967−0.699−1.343**−0.930

Intercept−2.866***−8.635***−9.323***−2.989**−10.65**
Likelihood ratio4,939.86***68.27***175.86***271.32***9.31
Somer’s D0.5960.5930.5680.6770.139
Person years observed284,75115,75432,54428,99415,009