Addressing Inequities in Access to Health Products through the Use of Social Marketing, Community Mobilization, and Local Entrepreneurs in Rural Western Kenya
Table 2
Proportion of NICHE households ever receiving a visit from a SWAP vendor and frequency of purchases from vendors, NICHE study, Nyando District, Kenya, 2007–2009.
BL
FU1
FU2
I ()
C ()
P
Total ()
I ()
C ()
P
Total ()
I ()
C ()
P
Total ()
Ever visited by a SWAP vendor
17/573 (3%)
10/527 (2%)
0.43
27/1100* (2%)
195/496 (39%)
42/466 (9%)
<0.0001
237/962* (25%)
153/326 (47%)
130/321 (41%)
0.16
283/647* (44%)
Ever purchased anything from SWAP vendor†
12 (75%)
6 (60%)
0.35
18/26* 69%)
185 (95%)
37 (88%)
0.01
232/247 (94%)
141 (92%)
117 (90%)
0.53
258/283 (91%)
Ever purchased WaterGuard from SWAP vendor†
10 (2%)
5 (1%)
0.28
15 (1%)
66 (14%)
8 (2%)
<0.0001
74 (8%)
87 (27%)
66 (21%)
0.12
153 (24%)
Ever purchased ITN from SWAP vendor †
2 (<1%)
0 (0%)
0.50
2 (<1%)
14 (3%)
3 (1%)
0.04
17 (2%)
16 (5%)
15 (5%)
0.91
31 (5%)
Ever purchased Sprinkles from SWAP vendor †
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
N/A
0 (0%)
177 (36%)
30 (6%)
<0.0001
207 (22%)
126 (39%)
105 (33%)
0.20
231 (36%)
I: NICHE intervention villages; C: NICHE comparison villages. values refer to differences between the intervention and comparison villages during the specified survey. Note that the intervention was provided differentially during Year 1 but not Year 2 of the study. †Among households visited by a SWAP vendor.
*Missing data.
