Table of Contents
International Journal of Population Research
Volume 2013, Article ID 329390, 7 pages
Research Article

Intergenerational Differences in Current Contraceptive Use among Married Women in Uganda

1Makerere University, Department of Population Studies, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
2Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue, Suite B2, New York, NY 10032, USA
3Partnership for Reviving Routine Immunization in Northern Nigeria (PRRINN) and Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) Programme, Abia State House, Abuja, Nigeria

Received 29 March 2013; Revised 16 June 2013; Accepted 18 July 2013

Academic Editor: Pranitha Maharaj

Copyright © 2013 Sarah M. Wablembo and Henry V. Doctor. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Hobcraft, J. Menken, and S. Preston, “Age, period, and cohort effects in demography: a review,” Population Index, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 4–43, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. H. Hall, J. Mairesse, and L. Turner, “Identifying age, cohort, and period effects in scientific research productivity: discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on French physicists,” Economic of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 159–177, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and Macro International Inc, Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2006, UBOS and Macro International, Calverton, MD, USA and UBOS, Kampala Uganda, Bugoloobi, 2007.
  4. H. V. Doctor, “Intergenerational differences in antenatal care and supervised deliveries in Nigeria,” Health and Place, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 480–489, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. K. George and S. J. Weiler, “Sexuality in middle and late life. The effects of age, cohort, and gender,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 919–923, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Freedman, “Theories of fertility decline: a reappraisal,” Social Forces, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. E. Kaufman, “Contraceptive use in South Africa under apartheid,” Demography, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 421–434, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. B. Ryder, “The cohort as a concept in the study of social change,” American Sociological Review, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 843–861, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. K. Pillai, “The postwar rise and decline of American fertility: the pace of transition to motherhood among 1950-1969 marital cohorts of white women,” Journal of Family History, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 421–436, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Collier and R. Reinikka, “Reconstruction and liberalization: an overview,” in Uganda's Recovery: the Role of Farms, Firms and Government, R. Reinikka and P. Collier, Eds., Fountain Publishers, Kampala Uganda, Bugoloobi, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Edmonds, “Crisis management: the lessons for Africa from Obote's second term,” in Uganda Now: Between Development and Decay, H. Hansen and M. Twaddle, Eds., James Currey, London, UK, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  12. G. S. Ibingira, The Forging of an African Nation: The Political and Constitutional Evolution of Uganda from Colonial Rule to Independence, 1894-1962, Viking Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  13. World Bank, Uganda: The Challenge of Growth and Poverty Reduction, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  14. United Nations Development Programme, “Human development report 2011: sustainability and equity—a better future for all (summary),”
  15. I. C. F. International, “MEASURE DHS STATcompiler,” , 2012,,.
  16. J. Schoemaker, “Contraceptive use among the poor in Indonesia,” International Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 106–114, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. National Committee for Population and Family Planning (NCPFP) [Vietnam]. Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey 1988, NCPFP, Hanoi, Vietnam, 1990.
  18. R. Rahayu, I. Utomo, and P. McDonald, “Contraceptive use pattern among married women in Indonesia,” in International Conference on Family PlannIng: Research and Best Practices, pp. 15–18, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Fathonah, Patterns of Contraceptive Use in Indonesia, State Ministry of Population/National Family Planning Coordinating Board and Macro International, Calverton, Md, USA, 2000.
  20. D. Ojakaa, Trends and Determinants of Unmet Need for Family Planning in Kenya, The DHS Working Papers, Demographic and Health Research, Macro International, Calverton, Md, USA, 2008.
  21. M. S. Ullah and N. Chakraborty, “Factors affecting the use of contraception in Bangladesh: a multivariate analysis,” Asia-Pacific Population Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 19–30, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. E. A. Khan and T. Khan, “How a married woman's characteristics affect her contraceptive behavior?” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 19, pp. 2782–2787, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Collier, “On the economic consequences of civil war,” Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 168–183, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. P. M. Ntozi and J. B. Kabera, “Family planning in rural Uganda: knowledge and use of modern and traditional methods in Ankole,” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 116–123, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. IRIN, “Mali women's rights bill blocked,” , 2009,
  26. M. Sharan and T. W. Valente, “Spousal communication and family planning adoption: effects of a radio drama serial in Nepal,” International Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. S. Dasgupta, “Population, poverty and the local environment,” Scientific American, vol. 272, no. 2, pp. 26–31, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus