Table of Contents
International Journal of Proteomics
Volume 2010, Article ID 630134, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/630134
Research Article

Proteomic Signatures of the Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryo: Sensitivity and Specificity in Toxicity Assessment of Chemicals

Department of Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Permoser Straße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany

Received 18 February 2010; Revised 26 May 2010; Accepted 19 July 2010

Academic Editor: Uwe Völker

Copyright © 2010 Karen Hanisch et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. OECD 203, “Fish Acute Toxicity Test. OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals,” 1992, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/20/1948241.pdf.
  2. R. C. Eaton and R. D. Farley, “Spawning cycle and egg-production of zebrafish, brachi Danio rerio, in laboratory,” Copeia, vol. 1, pp. 195–204, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  3. L. E. Coverdale, D. Lean, and C. C. Martin, “Not just a fishing trip—environmental genomics using zebrafish,” Current Genomics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 395–407, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Spitsbergen and M. L. Kent, “The state of the art of the zebrafish model for toxicology and toxicologic pathology research—advantages and current limitations,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 31, pp. 62–87, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Nagel, “DarT: the embryo test with the Zebrafish Danio rerio—a general model in ecotoxicology and toxicology,” Altex, vol. 19, pp. 38–47, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Scholz, S. Fischer, U. Gündel, E. Küster, T. Luckenbach, and D. Voelker, “The zebrafish embryo model in environmental risk assessment—applications beyond acute toxicity testing,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 394–404, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. M. S. Russell and R. L. Burch, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, Methuen, London, UK, 1959.
  8. “Announcement of the amendment of the Wastewater Charges Act on January 18, 2005,” Federal Law Gazette, vol. 2005, part 1, no. 5, 2005.
  9. OECD, “Fish Embryo Toxicity (FET) Test. Draft OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals,” 2006, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/39/59/36817070.pdf.
  10. J. Bachmann, Entwicklung und Erprobung eines Teratogenitäts-Screening Testes mit Embryonen des Zebrabärblings Danio rerio, Ph.D. thesis, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 2002, http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=965592936&dok_var=d1&dok_ext=pdf&filename=965592936.pdf.
  11. W. H. Clements, “Integrating effects of contaminants across levels of biological organization: an overview,” Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 113–116, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Liedtke, J. Muncke, K. Rüfenacht, and R. I. L. Eggen, “Molecular multi-effect screening of environmental pollutants using the MolDarT,” Environmental Toxicology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Muncke, M. Junghans, and R. I. L. Eggen, “Testing estrogenicity of known and novel (xeno-)estrogens in the MolDarT using developing zebrafish (Danio rerio),” Environmental Toxicology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Voelker, C. Vess, M. Tillmann et al., “Differential gene expression as a toxicant-sensitive endpoint in zebrafish embryos and larvae,” Aquatic Toxicology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 355–364, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Muncke and R. I. L. Eggen, “Vitellogenin 1 mRNA as an early molecular biomarker for endocrine disruption in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio),” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2734–2741, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Yang, J. R. Kemadjou, C. Zinsmeister et al., “Transcriptional profiling reveals barcode-like toxicogenomic responses in the zebrafish embryo,” Genome Biology, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID R227, pp. 1–17, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Apraiz, J. Mi, and S. Cristobal, “Identification of proteomic signatures of exposure to marine pollutants in mussels (Mytilus edulis),” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1274–1285, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X. Shi, L. W. Y. Yeung, P. K. S. Lam, R. S. S. Wu, and B. Zhou, “Protein profiles in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 334–340, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. U. Gündel, D. Benndorf, M. Von Bergen, R. Altenburger, and E. Küster, “Vitellogenin cleavage products as indicators for toxic stress in zebra fish embryos: a proteomic approach,” Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 4541–4554, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. A. Shrader, T. R. Henry, M. S. Greeley Jr., and B. P. Bradley, “Proteomics in zebrafish exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals,” Ecotoxicology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 485–488, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Ziv, T. Gattegno, V. Chapovetsky et al., “Comparative proteomics of the developing fish (zebrafish and gilthead seabream) oocytes,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology D, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–35, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. V. Link, A. Shevchenko, and C.-P. Heisenberg, “Proteomics of early zebrafish embryos,” BMC Developmental Biology, vol. 6, pp. 1–9, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. L. Tay, Q. Lin, T. K. Seow, K. H. Tan, C. L. Hew, and Z. Gong, “Proteomic analysis of protein profiles during early development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio,” Proteomics, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 3176–3188, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Lin, Y. Chen, X. Yang, D. Xu, and S. Liang, “Proteome analysis of a single zebrafish embryo using three different digestion strategies coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 394, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. B. Lucitt, T. S. Price, A. Pizarro et al., “Analysis of the zebrafish proteome during embryonic development,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 981–994, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Wiegand, S. Pflugmacher, A. Oberemm, and C. Steinberg, “Activity development of selected detoxication enzymes during the ontogenesis of the zebrafish (Danio rerio),” International Review of Hydrobiology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 413–422, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  27. E. Küster, “Cholin- and carboxylesterase activities in developing zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio) and their potential use for insecticide hazard assessment,” Aquatic Toxicology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 76–85, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Riedl and R. Altenburger, “Physicochemical substance properties as indicators for unreliable exposure in microplate-based bioassays,” Chemosphere, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2210–2220, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Schreiber, R. Altenburger, A. Paschke, and E. Küster, “How to deal with lipophilic and volatile organic substances in microtiter plate assays,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1676–1682, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Görg, W. Postel, J. Weser et al., “Elimination of point streaking on silver stained two-dimensional gels by addition of iodoacetamide to the equilibration buffer,” Electrophoresis, vol. 8, pp. 122–124, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. Heukeshoven and R. Dernick, “Improved silver staining procedure for fast staining in Phast-System Development Unit. I. Staining of sodium dodecyl sulfate gels,” Electrophoresis, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. X. Yan, R. Wait, T. Berkelman et al., “A modified silver staining protocol for visualization of proteins compatible with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry,” Electrophoresis, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 3666–3672, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. Benndorf, N. Loffhagen, and W. Babel, “Chemicals and heat generate different protein patterns in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 167–174, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. Schuler and J. E. Casida, “Functional coupling of PSST and ND1 subunits in NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase established by photoaffinity labeling,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1506, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. F. Pelfrène, “Dinitro-ortho-Cresol,” World Health Organisation, 2000, https://apps.who.int/pcs/ehc/full-text/ehc220.pdf.
  36. J. R. Vane and R. M. Botting, “New insights into the mode of action of anti-inflammatory drugs,” Inflammation Research, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Monsinjon and T. Knigge, “Proteomic applications in ecotoxicology,” Proteomics, vol. 7, no. 16, pp. 2997–3009, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Terranova, T. Galeotti, and S. Baldi, “Der Einfluß von 2-deoxy-D-glucose und Rotenon auf den energetischen Stoffwechsel und auf den Energieverbrauch in Ehrlich-Ascites-Carcinomzellen,” Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 255–261, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Locker, H. Siedek, and K. H. Spitzy, “Zur Wirkung von Dinitrokresol und Thiouracil auf den Zellstoffwechsel,” Archiv für Experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, vol. 210, no. 3, pp. 281–288, 1950. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Kennedy, “The role of proteomics in toxicology: identification of biomarkers of toxicity by protein expression analysis,” Biomarkers, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 269–290, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. U. A. Boelsterli, Mechanistic Toxicology—The Molecular Basis of how Chemicals Disrupt Biological Targets, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2nd edition, 2003.
  42. J. L. Shepard and B. P. Bradley, “Protein expression signatures and lysosomal stability in Mytilus edulis exposed to graded copper concentrations,” Marine Environmental Research, vol. 50, no. 1–5, pp. 457–463, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. L. Shepard, B. Olsson, M. Tedengren, and B. P. Bradley, “Protein expression signatures identified in Mytilus edulis exposed to PCBs, copper and salinity stress,” Marine Environmental Research, vol. 50, no. 1–5, pp. 337–340, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T. Knigge, T. Monsinjon, and O.-K. Andersen, “Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry approach to biomarker discovery in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) exposed to polyaromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals under field conditions,” Proteomics, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 2722–2727, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Jin, J. Davis, D. Zhu et al., “Identification of novel proteins affected by rotenone in mitochondria of dopaminergic cells,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 8, Article ID 67, pp. 1–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Bové, D. Prou, C. Perier, and S. Przedborski, “Toxin-induced models of Parkinson's disease,” NeuroRx, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 484–494, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. W. W. Cheng and A. P. Farrell, “Acute and sublethal toxicities of rotenone in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): swimming performance and oxygen consumption,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 388–396, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. B. R. Brinkley, S. S. Barham, S. C. Barranco, and G. M. Fuller, “Rotenone inhibition of spindle microtubule assembly in mammalian cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Miura, M. Kano, K. Abe, S. Urano, S. Suzuki, and T. Toda, “Age-dependent variations of cell response to oxidative stress: proteomic approach to protein expression and phosphorylation,” Electrophoresis, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 2786–2796, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. H. Manduzio, P. Cosette, L. Gricourt et al., “Proteome modifications of blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) gills as an effect of water pollution,” Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 4958–4963, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Ravneet, M. S. Johal, and M. L. Sharma, “Three-dimensional study on the effect of organophosphate pesticide 'monocrotophos' on lens of fish and its recovery,” Veterinary Ophthalmology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 152–157, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus