Comparison of Cement-Based and Polymer-Based Concrete Pipes for Analysis of Cost Assessment

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Sand (kg)</td><td align="center">Rock (kg)</td><td align="center">Fly Ash (kg)</td><td align="center">Cement (kg)</td><td align="center">Water (kg)</td><td align="center">WRA (L)</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">1510</td><td align="center">448</td><td align="center">73.5</td><td align="center">294</td><td align="center">98.9</td><td align="center">7.06</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="6"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td>WRA: Water reducing admixture.<br/></td></tr></table>

Concrete industries mix design (per m<sup>3</sup>).

International Journal of Polymer Science

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: Comparison of Cement-Based and Polymer-Based Concrete Pipes for Analysis of Cost Assessment 