In Situ Carbon Coated LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Cathode Material Prepared by Prepolymer of Melamine Formaldehyde Resin Assisted Method

Yang, Wei; Dang, Haifeng; Chen, Shengzhou; Zou, Hanbo; Liu, Zili; Lin, Jing; Lin, Weiming

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4279457

International Journal of Polymer Science

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 4279457 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4279457

In Situ Carbon Coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ Cathode Material Prepared by Prepolymer of Melamine Formaldehyde Resin Assisted Method

Wei Yang,¹Haifeng Dang,²Shengzhou Chen,¹Hanbo Zou,¹Zili Liu,¹Jing Lin,¹and Weiming Lin^1,3

Academic Editor: Subramaniam Ramesh

Received31 Aug 2016

Accepted07 Nov 2016

Published19 Dec 2016

Abstract

Carbon coated spinel LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ were prepared by spray-drying using prepolymer of melamine formaldehyde resin (PMF) as carbon source of carbon coating layer. The PMF carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was characterized by XRD, SEM, and other electrochemical measurements. The as-prepared lithium nickel manganese oxide has the cubic face-centered spinel structure with a space group of Fd3m. It showed good electrochemical performance as a cathode material for lithium ion battery. After 100 discharge and charge cycles at 0.5 C rate, the specific discharge capacity of carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was 130 mAh·g⁻¹, and the corresponding capacity retention was 98.8%. The 100th cycle specific discharge capacity at 10 C rate of carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was 105.4 mAh·g⁻¹, and even the corresponding capacity retention was 95.2%.

1. Introduction

Spinel LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ is a promising and attractive cathode material because of its good electrochemical properties and high working potential (~5.0 V) [1–3]. But the high rate discharge capacity is far less than the theoretical capacity due to low electronic conductivity and Li⁺ ion diffusion coefficient of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ [4]. Therefore, many efforts have been devoted to enhance the electronic conductivity and Li⁺ ion diffusion coefficient by different synthesis routes [5–7], doping [8–12], and coating [13–16].

Carbon coating is easy and popular method at present [17]. In our prophase research, we found that the prepolymer of melamine formaldehyde resin would evenly coat on the surface of metal oxide and obtained the carbon coated metal catalysts with abundant pore structure after high temperature sintering [18]. In this study, in order to prepare the LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ as well as to improve the high rate discharge performance, polymer-complex-assisted method was applied. Prepolymer of melamine formaldehyde resin (PMF) is used as carbon source to accomplish the carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄.

2. Experimental Sections

2.1. Material Synthesis

The synthesis route was as follows: LiOH, Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O and MnSO₄·H₂O were used as starting precursors with molar ratio of Li : Ni : Mn = 1.0 : 0.5 : 1.5. Ni(NO₃)₂·6H₂O and MnSO₄·H₂O were dispersed in deionized water under continuous stirring and then slowly dripped the (NH₄)₂C₂O₄ aqueous solution. After reaction at 50°C for 12 h, then centrifugal washing to obtain the Ni_0.5Mn_1.5(C₂O₄)₂ precipitates. Ni_0.5Mn_1.5(C₂O₄)₂, LiOH, and PMF (10 wt.%) were dispersed in deionized water by ultrasonic dispersion 30 min into suspension. The suspension was dried by spray-drying method (inlet temperature 220°C and feed rate 6 mL·min). The dried products were presintered at 500°C in N₂ atmosphere for 5 h and then sintered at 800°C in N₂ atmosphere for 20 h to obtain the carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄. For comparison, LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was also synthesized without PMF.

2.2. Characterization

The structure of the LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ materials was characterized using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, XD-3, Beijing Purkinje General, China) with Cu Kα radiation at 36 kV and 20 mA. The morphology of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was identified by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-5600, JEOL, Japan).

For electrochemical characterizations, 2032 type coin cells were used. The coin-type cells (2032) were assembled with Li plate as anode and LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode as cathode. The LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrodes were prepared by coating the slurry of a mixture composed of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ (80 wt.%), conducting agent (Super-p, 10 wt.%), and binder (polyvinylidene difluoride, 10 wt.%) onto an aluminum foil, and then dried at 120°C for 24 h in a vacuum drier. The weight of active material in the LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode was 3.0 mg·cm⁻². The electrolyte was 1 mol·L⁻¹ LiPF₆ in the mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) with a volume ratio of 1 : 1. A polypropylene (PP) film (Celgard 2300) was used as the separator. Afterwards, the coin-type cells were assembled in argon-filled glove box. NEWARE multichannel battery-testing unit (CT-3008W, China) was employed to test the cycling and rate performances of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ over a voltage range between 3.5 and 5.0 V versus Li/Li⁺ electrode at room temperature. Firstly, the cell should discharge and charge two cycles at 0.5 C and then discharge and charge 100 cycles at different rates. The cyclic voltammetric (CV) tests were carried out on an electrochemical workstation (CHI660A) at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s⁻¹ in the range of 3.5–5.0 V versus Li/Li⁺. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of the electrodes were acquired at room temperature by a electrochemical workstation (CHI660A) before cycling in the frequency range 10 mHz–100 kHz by imposing an alternate current with an amplitude of 10 mV on the electrode.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of the as-prepared LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄. Compared with the PDF powder diffraction data file (JCPDS Card No. 80-2162), the diffraction peaks of as-prepared LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ are in agreement with the standard diffraction peaks. This illustrates that the as-prepared LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ has the cubic face-centered spinel structure with a space group of Fd3m [19]. There is no change of the station of diffraction peak after carbon coating and no coating. The diffraction peak intensity would be enhanced after PMF carbon coating. The carbon coating would be helpful to improve LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ crystallinity. Figure 2 shows FE-SEM images of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ with no coating and after 10 wt.% PMF carbon coating. The LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ maintains the micronanostructure after carbon coating, but the surface of samples becomes roughed, and the roughness of samples increases after the PMF carbon coating. The degree of sphericity drops gradually.

Figure 3 shows the 2nd, 50th, and 100th charge and discharge curves of carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ at the rate of 0.5 C. The specific discharge capacity of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ increased after PMF carbon coating at around 4.7 V voltage plateau. The 2nd cycle specific discharge capacity raised from 125.1 mAh·g⁻¹ (no coating) to 131.7 mAh·g⁻¹ (after coating). After 100 discharge and charge cycles, the specific discharge capacity of carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was 130 mAh·g⁻¹, and even the corresponding capacity retention was 98.8%. And yet the specific discharge capacity of no coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was 88.9 mAh·g⁻¹, and the corresponding capacity retention was 71.1%. The discharge and charge curves indicate that the PMF carbon coating reduces the electrode polarization after repeatedly charging and discharging cycle which suggests that PMF coating was in favour of improving the discharge and charge performance of lithium nickel manganese oxide materials. Another reason might be that the PMF carbon coating prevents the Mn³⁺ dissolving in the process of charging and discharging, thereby reducing the fading rate of discharge capacity [20, 21].

(a) No-PMF

(b) PMF-10%

Figure 4 shows the 2nd, 50th, and 100th charge and discharge curves of carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ at the rate of 10 C. The specific discharge capacity of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ declines sharply after PMF carbon coating at high rate discharge. The 2nd cycle specific discharge capacity decreased from 117.9 mAh·g⁻¹ (before coating) to 110.6 mAh·g⁻¹ (after coating). The PMF carbon coating hinders the Li⁺ ionic conduction at high rate discharge and charge. But the corresponding capacity retention was greatly improved after PMF carbon coating. The 100th cycle specific discharge capacity of carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was 105.4 mAh·g⁻¹, and even the corresponding capacity retention was 95.2%. And yet the specific discharge capacity of no coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was 85.4 mAh·g⁻¹, the corresponding capacity retention was 69.1%.

(a) No-PMF

(b) PMF-10%

Figure 5 shows the CV curves of the PMF carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode. In the full range view of CV curves, one pair of redox peaks around 4 V (Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺) and two pairs of well separated strong redox peaks at 4.6–4.8 V can be observed in CV curve of no carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode. The two strong redox peaks indicate a two-stage (Ni²⁺/Ni³⁺ and Ni³⁺/Ni⁴⁺) Li⁺ extraction from or insertion into the spinel framework [22]. For PMF carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode, the peaks around 4 V should weaken obviously. This indicates that the Mn³⁺ ions dissolution amount of the PMF carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ is smaller than no carbon coating [23]. The presence of Mn³⁺ in the LMNO material plays an important role in the capacity retention [9]. And the two redox peaks of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ with 10 wt.% PMF carbon coating are overlapped to a broad peak. The cyclic voltammetry curves of the PMF carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ material exhibit smaller potential intervals that indicated higher electrode reaction reversibility and lower polarization. The PMF carbon coating would effectively restrain the Mn³⁺ stripping and the side reaction between positive electrode active material and electrolyte at high voltage.

Figure 6 depicts the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of the electrode obtained after the first cycle of charge. The semicircle at high frequency (>100 Hz) in EIS spectra reflects the contact resistances between the active materials and electrolyte or current collector [24]. The significant improvements in electric conductivity for LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode could therefore be attributed to the PMF carbon coating [25].

4. Conclusions

PMF carbon coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was prepared as the 5 V cathode materials of lithium ion batteries for the first time. PMF carbon coating increases the crystallinity of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄. The as-prepared LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ has the cubic face-centered spinel structure with a space group of Fd3m. The PMF carbon coating greatly promotes electrochemical performance and reduces the LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode polarization in the process of charging and discharging. The cycle life of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ was significantly improved by PMF carbon coating, especially at high rate discharging and charging.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21376056 and no. 21463030), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M590781), and Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou (no. 201509030005 and no. 201510010131).

References

R. Santhanam and B. Rambabu, “Research progress in high voltage spinel LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ material,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 195, no. 17, pp. 5442–5451, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-S. Fang, Z.-X. Wang, X.-H. Li, H.-J. Guo, and W.-J. Peng, “Exploration of high capacity LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ synthesized by solid-state reaction,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 174–176, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qian, Y. Deng, Z. Shi, Y. Zhou, Q. Zhuang, and G. Chen, “Sub-micrometer-sized LiMn_1.5Ni_0.5O₄ spheres as high rate cathode materials for long-life lithium ion batteries,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 27, pp. 92–95, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-H. Kim, N. P. W. Pieczonka, Z. Li, Y. Wu, S. Harris, and B. R. Powell, “Understanding the capacity fading mechanism in LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄/graphite Li-ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 90, pp. 556–562, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Liu, J. Han, and J. B. Goodenough, “Structure, morphology, and cathode performance of ${Li}_{1-x}$ [Ni_0.5Mn_1.5]O₄ prepared by coprecipitation with oxalic acid,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 195, no. 9, pp. 2918–2923, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-C. Jin and J.-G. Duh, “Nanostructured LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ cathode material synthesized by polymer-assisted co-precipitation method with improved rate capability,” Materials Letters, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 77–80, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, D. Chen, J. Wang, G. Liu, W. Wu, and G. Liang, “Synthesis of LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ cathode material with improved electrochemical performances through a modified solid-state method,” Powder Technology, vol. 292, pp. 203–209, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hassoun, K.-S. Lee, Y.-K. Sun, and B. Scrosati, “An advanced lithium ion battery based on high performance electrode materials,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 3139–3143, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Xiao, X. Chen, P. V. Sushko et al., “High-performance LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ Spinel controlled by Mn³⁺ concentration and site disorder,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 2109–2116, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Deng, Y. Xu, L. Xiong, L. Li, X. Sun, and Y. Zhang, “Improving the fast discharge performance of high-voltage LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ spinel by Cu²⁺, Al³⁺, Ti⁴⁺ tri-doping,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 677, no. 8, pp. 18–26, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Liu, Y. Du, W. Liu, and L. Wen, “Study on the action mechanism of doping transitional elements in spinel LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 209, pp. 308–314, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, P. Li, L. Shao et al., “Preparation of spinel LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ and Cr-doped LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ cathode materials by tartaric acid assisted sol-gel method,” Ceramics International, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1347–1353, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Lee, Y. K. Sun, S. Ota, T. Miyashita, and M. Yoshio, “Preparation and characterization of nano-crystalline LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ for 5 V cathode material by composite carbonate process,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 989–994, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. B. Yao, Y. Xie, G. J. Han, and D. M. Jia, “Enhanced electrochemical performance of the cathode material LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ embedded by CNTs,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1780–1783, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, W. Guo, Y. Liu, W. He, and Z. Xiao, “Spinel LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ as superior electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries: ionic liquid assisted synthesis and the effect of CuO coating,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 278–283, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hwang, J. K. Lee, J. Mun, and W. Choi, “Surface-modified carbon nanotube coating on high-voltage LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ cathodes for lithium ion batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 322, no. 8, pp. 40–48, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Vijn, F. Hoffmann, and M. Fröba, “Thermal conversion to form LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O_4−δ: Influence of precursors and supporting carbon template materials,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 638, pp. 138–150, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wei, C. Shengzhou, and L. Weiming, “Oxygen reduction on non-noble metal electrocatalysts supported on N-doped carbon aerogel composites,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 942–945, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-J. Gu, Y. Li, Y.-B. Chen, and H.-Q. Liu, “Comparison of Li/Ni antisite defects in Fd-3 m and P4₃32 nanostructured LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ electrode for Li-ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 213, no. 9, pp. 368–374, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, Z. Shi, J. Li et al., “Direct carbon coating at high temperature on LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ cathode: unexpected influence on crystal structure and electrochemical performances,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 288, no. 8, pp. 206–213, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Jia, C. Jiao, W. Xue et al., “Improvement in electrochemical performance of calcined LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄/GO,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 292, no. 9, pp. 15–21, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhou, D. Y. Zhao, and X. W. Lou, “LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ hollow structures as high-performance cathodes for lithium-ion batteries,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 243–245, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Liu and A. Manthiram, “Understanding the improved electrochemical performances of Fe-substituted 5 V spinel cathode LiMn_1.5Ni_0.5O₄,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 33, pp. 15073–15079, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q.-C. Zhuang, T. Wei, L.-L. Du, Y.-L. Cui, L. Fang, and S.-G. Sun, “An electrochemical impedance spectroscopic study of the electronic and ionic transport properties of spinel LiMn₂O₄,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 18, pp. 8614–8621, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yang, N. Zhang, Y. Lang, and K. Sun, “Enhanced rate performance of carbon-coated LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄ cathode material for lithium ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 4058–4064, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Wei Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1204

Downloads

952

Citations