International Journal of Polymer Science

International Journal of Polymer Science / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Preparation and Application of Conducting Polymer-Based Nanocomposites

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 3160732 |

Ke Wang, Yuting Hao, Yingna Wang, Jinyuan Chen, Lianzhi Mao, Yudi Deng, Junlin Chen, Sijie Yuan, Tiantian Zhang, Jiaoyan Ren, Wenzhen Liao, "Functional Hydrogels and Their Application in Drug Delivery, Biosensors, and Tissue Engineering", International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2019, Article ID 3160732, 14 pages, 2019.

Functional Hydrogels and Their Application in Drug Delivery, Biosensors, and Tissue Engineering

Guest Editor: Lin Zhang
Received23 May 2019
Accepted06 Jul 2019
Published07 Oct 2019


Hydrogel is a new class of functional polymer materials with a promising potential in the biomedical field. The purpose of this article is to review recent advancements in several types of biomedical hydrogels, including conductive hydrogels, injectable hydrogels, double network hydrogels, responsive hydrogels, nanocomposite hydrogels, and sliding hydrogels. In comparison with traditional hydrogels, these advanced hydrogels exhibit significant advantages in structure, mechanical properties, and applications. The article focuses on different methods used to prepare advanced biomedical hydrogels and their diversified applications as drug delivery systems, wound dressings, biosensors, contact lenses, and tissue replacement. These advances are rapidly overcoming current limitations of hydrogels, and we anticipate that further research will lead to the development of advanced hydrogels with ubiquitous roles in biomedicine and tissue replacement and regeneration.

1. Introduction

Hydrogels are a class of polymers having a three-dimensional network structure formed through physical and chemical cross-linking of monomers with a hydrophilic group [1]. Hydrogels swell when they absorb large volumes of water yet maintain their original structures without being dissolved [2, 3] (Figure 1). In the biomedical field, hydrogels are a new class of functional polymer materials with enormous potential in biotechnology. When the polymer network is encased in water, the material absorbs the water and adopts fluidic properties, which is very similar to what occurs with tissues in the human body [4, 5]. In the presence of water, the surfaces of the hydrogels become wet and malleable. And because of these properties, couple with the stable organization of the material significantly reduces irritation to the surrounding tissues and improves biocompatibility [6]. Additionally, hydrogels will not affect the metabolic processes of living organisms and metabolites can pass freely through the hydrogels. Hydrogels are also sensitive to small changes in external stimuli, such as temperature, pH, ionic strength, electric fields, and magnetic fields, and can respond to these stimuli through volume swelling or shrinking [711]. Therefore, hydrogels are more similar to living tissues, specifically the outer membrane of the cell matrix, than any other currently known synthetic biomaterials and these properties result in reducing friction and mechanical effects on the surrounding tissues, which significantly improves the biological properties of the material [12].

Hydrogels have been one of the greatest interests to biomaterial scientists since the pioneering work of Wichterle and Lim in 1960 on cross-linked HEMA (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels, which has led to the development of materials with excellent water absorption, high water retention, good biocompatibility, biodegradability, limited or minimal toxicity, and simplified synthesis methods. These materials are now widely used in biomedicine, functioning as tissue fillers, drug delivery agents, contact lenses, and tissue engineering scaffold materials [1214]. Because hydrogels produce huge economic and social benefits, the research, the development, the application, and the production of hydrogels represent an important area of the biomaterial field.

Traditional hydrogels are typically formed by chemical cross-linking. Nonuniform dispersion of a chemical cross-linking agent results in a nonuniform gel network, and the resulting gel is very weak and fragile, greatly limits its application [15]. To overcome mechanical limitations in traditional gels, four major types of novel network structures have been investigated, as follows: (i) the replacement of covalent cross-linking points by active cross-linking sites, which can reduce the stress concentration and the network structural damage caused by the uneven distribution of covalent bonds. Representative studies include “Slide-Ring” hydrogels, in which “8”-shaped polyrotaxane as a crosslinking point, polymer chains pass through the cross-linking agent from its upper and lower cavities [16]. The molecular chains distribute stress more uniformly across the gel network through positional adjustment in the external force. (ii) The introduction of a “sacrifice key” within the structure of certain hydrogels (e.g., double network hydrogels), which is a region designed to break and absorb energy that can improve the strength and resilience of the materials [17]. These hydrogels are mainly composed of two interpenetrating or semi-interpenetrating networks with different properties. Under stress, the first network absorbs energy to burst, endowing hydrogels with high strength and toughness, while the second network is loosely cross-linked and is more difficult to destroy, which maintains the integrity of hydrogels [3]. (iii) Nanoparticles as giant multifunctional cross-linking points, where polymer chains are cross-linked into a three-dimensional network by physical adsorption or chemical bonding [18]. The physical adsorption between the molecular chains and nanoparticles can dissipate energy to improve the mechanical properties of hydrogels, while conversely, the high specific surface area and high modulus of nanoparticles themselves strengthen the hydrogels [19]. (iv) Polymers constructed via noncovalent interactions and supramolecular self-assembling structures, producing hydrogels that are strong, resilient, and responsive to changing stimuli [20]. Consequently, the objective of this review is to evaluate recent research and progress aimed at developing novel high-performance, intelligent hydrogel materials for biomedical applications.

2. Main Types of Hydrogels

2.1. Conductive Hydrogels

Conductive hydrogel (CH) is a new effective material which has the similar unique properties to traditional hydrogels and an additional benefit in electrical conductivity [2123]. It was first proposed by Gilmore et al. [24], and in recent years, more attention has been given in the exploitation and application of CHs. Depending on the different additives, the CHs are divided into two categories: (i) the CHs-based conducting polymers (CPs) and (ii) the CHs-based metallic nanoparticles. Mostly, the CH is defined as a hybrid network made by cross-linked soft hydrogels and CPs [25]. Although CP is not metallic, it has extraordinary electrical conductivity that can change the final hydrogels in structural and electrical properties to a considerable extent [2631]. The use of CPs enables hydrogels to stimulate electricity locally and enhance the physical properties of hydrogels to accurately control the extent and duration of external stimulation [32, 33]. The microscopy allows the microstructure magnified, and it always be used to observe the microstructure of the hydrogel, such as atomic force microscopy, which can not only observe the microstructure of objects [34, 35] but also the conductivity of the conductive hydrogel that can be detected by conducting probe atomic force microscopy [36]. Nowadays, the most familiar CPs like polypyrrole (PPY), polythiophene (PT), poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) (PEDOT), and polyaniline (PAni) are widely used in biomedical science to promote cell growth and proliferation [37, 38]. Besides, the natural polymers such as alginate, starch, chitosan, and their derivatives also have been considered as CPs in different conditions and because of the characteristics of these natural polymers, the final hydrogels are extremely beneficial to biodegradable and biocompatible. Till now, the CPs has gained lots of scientific responsiveness and they have extensively applied in batteries, sensors, semiconductor devices, electronic and optoelectronic devices, and so on [3943]. Similar to the CPs mentioned before, the metallic nanoparticles give the CH synergistic properties combined with the metal and hydrogel matrix [44, 45]. And since the performance of the hydrogels has improved the homogeneous distribution and long-term cytotoxicity of metallic nanoparticles, more applications of final hydrogels are being developed in the field of biomaterials.

A number of routes have explored to the preparation of CHs, but all of them can be summarized as two types: preparation of single component CHs and preparation of multicomponent CHs. Single-component CHs are defined as a stable conjugate-combined conductive polymer with small hydrophilic molecule through electrostatic interaction or cross-linked by substitutes of small molecular. According to the electrostatic interaction between the positive charges on PAni with the phosphate on phytic acid, the final hydrogel has better characteristics in capacitance (∼480 F·g−1), higher sensitivity (~16.7 μA·mM-1), and faster response time (~0.3 s) in the glucose sensing test [46]. The common methods to prepare multicomponent CHs are electrochemical polymerization and chemical oxidation polymerization; the latter usually includes one-step facile strategy and two-step sequential preparation method. The one-step facile strategy refers to the cross-linked hydrogels obtained by the chemical reaction of CPs and hydrophilic polymer mixture. PPY has poor water solubility, but the PPY/agarose CH can get by this route when PPY is added to aqueous solution of agarose and cupric chloride is added to the solution to oxidize PPY [47, 48]. The two-step sequential preparation method is more complex; the extra step is the monomers of CPs which permeate into hydrophilic polymer hydrogels. The preparation of PPY conductive hydrogel can also use the two-step method, incorporation of pyrrole monomer and silver nanoparticles first, and then oxidation of pyrrole with ferric ion, and it is surprising to find that the final CHs are beneficial to thermostability, uniform mesh structure, and mechanical property (storage modulus 10 kPa) [49]. Generally, because a one-step facile strategy has the advantages of simple operation, energy saving, and environmental protection while the two-step sequential preparation method needs the step of incorporation because the final hydrogels are not uniform, the former will be the main research direction of the CH preparation in the future.

2.2. Injectable Hydrogels

Injectable hydrogels are characterized by an intrinsic fluidity and can be applied by an injection method. In response to external stimuli (e.g., temperature or pH changes), injectable hydrogels exhibit sol-gel phase transitions [50]. Moreover, compared with conventional hydrogels, injectable hydrogels are more effective for minimally invasive applications. This not only expands the scope of its application in the biomedical field but also improves the comfort satisfaction of patients and reduces the cost of application to a certain extent [51, 52]. Based on the methods used for development, injectable hydrogels can be divided into two categories: light irradiation hydrogels and self-assembling hydrogels [53, 54]. Light irradiation hydrogels involve the formation of irreversible covalent bonds through the application of visible or ultraviolet light radiation, while self-assembling hydrogels are formed spontaneously or after directional initiation [52, 55].

Many injectable hydrogels with different properties have been prepared using the above two gelation methods. Injectable hydrogels made of dextran methacrylate (DEX-MA) and scleroglucan (Scl) can be formed by UV irradiation using a photoinitiator, and the resulting gels reportedly exhibited adequate mechanical properties, suitable for biomedical applications [56]. Novel injectable photochemical hydrogels are composed of gellan gum methacrylate (GG-MA) and polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate (PEG-DMA) and have also been synthesized by irradiation with a UV lamp for 30 min [57], and the resulting hydrogels exhibited better mechanical properties than those composed of GG-MA alone. Interestingly, the strength is significantly enhanced by the concentration and the molecular weight of PEG-DMA used to construct the new network [57]. The methods of self-assembling hydrogels include enzyme-induced gelation, chemical cross-linking with complementary groups, and ionic interactions. The injectable porous hydrogels have been widely used in biomedical applications due to their excellent permeability and ease of integration into sites of surgical intervention. For example, Yom-Tov et al. developed a method that enables the in situ formation of pores with tailored porosity and pore size, by encapsulating oil droplets in the hydrogel using an emulsion templating technique and then leaching the droplets out of the gel to create the porous structures [58]. The oil-to-water ratios and the surfactant concentrations were adjusted to vary pore size and porosity, and this method produced bioactive hydrogels exhibiting good mechanical strength, water absorbency, and diffusive properties, useful for biomedical applications [58].

2.3. Double Network Hydrogels

Double network (DN) hydrogels comprise two interpenetrating polymer networks; one of which is a highly cross-linked rigid polymer network, while the other is a lightly cross-linked flexible polymer network [59]. While this structure is connected through physical entanglement, no chemical cross-linking occurs between these two mutually independent cross-linked networks [60]. Hydrogels exhibit a certain viscous flow due to the loose cross-linking of the second network, which can effectively absorb the fracture energy through the network deformation and/or the slippage of physical entanglements along the polymer chain. This prevents cracks from propagating across the structure, so DN hydrogels have good mechanical strength [61]. In addition to greater mechanical strength, DN hydrogels have several other advantages over hydrogels with a single network structure, such as the degree of cross-linking is easier to control and increased drug loading capacity [62].

Early DN hydrogels were mainly composed of covalent bonds, but when covalent networks are destroyed by stress, hydrogels become increasingly elastic and will permanently lose their energy dissipation mechanisms [63]. In recent years, a series of DN hydrogels have been developed that introduce noncovalent (e.g., ions or hydrogen bonds) “sacrifice units” [64, 65] that exhibit high strength and durability [66, 67]. The noncovalent interactions are often dynamic and reversible. When they are introduced into the hydrogels, the noncovalent “sacrifice units” may be destroyed from energy dissipation due to stress [68], then reunited to rebuild the network structure once the stressor has been removed, thus restoring the original strength and toughness of the gel [65]. For example, a novel double network hydrogel (IPN hydrogels) was fabricated by combining cellulose and poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide), in which cellulose hydrogels were employed as the first network (Figure 2(a)), while the second network was comprised of monomeric N-isopropylacrylamide, N,N-methylene bis-acrylamide as a cross-linker, and ammonium persulfate as an initiator (Figure 2(b)) [69]. The two networks were subsequently integrated through a polymerization reaction at 35°C (Figure 2(c)), and the resulting DN hydrogel exhibited uniform porous structure, while its mechanical and swelling properties were strongly dependent on the weight ratio of two networks [69]. In a different study, an extremely stretchable and tough hydrogel was synthesized by mixing ionically cross-linked alginate and covalently cross-linked polyacrylamide [70]. The alginate chain was comprised of mannuronic acid (M unit) and guluronic acid (G unit) connected by glycosidic linkages. In an aqueous solution, the G blocks were able to chelate divalent cations (e.g., Ca2+) to form ionic cross-links. These initial Ca2+-cross-linked alginate hydrogels exhibited limited stretching capabilities and could rupture when stretched beyond 1.2 times its original length. However, subsequent research reported that in situ polymerization combining the Ca2+-cross-linked alginate hydrogel skeleton with an acrylamide monomer to form an interpenetrating network structure greatly improved the tensile toughness and strength of hydrogels, thus increasing its tensile breaking length up to 23 times the original length [70].

2.4. Responsive Hydrogels

Hydrogels with responsive performance have a broad range of potential applications in biological tissue engineering, including drug delivery and controlled release, artificial muscles, sensors, and enzyme catalysis [7173]. When environmental changes (e.g., external temperature, pH, light, electric field, and salinity) occur, hydrogels can shrink or swell as needed due to the introduction of hydrogen bonds, ions, complexation, electrostatic interactions, and other noncovalent interactions [74]. These responsive “smart” or intelligent hydrogels were first developed by Katchalsky in 1949, by copolymerizing methacrylic acid with a low percentage of divinyl benzene, producing a gel capable of absorbing hundreds of times its own weight of water at higher pH values, then gradually shrinking with decreasing pH [75]. Significant progress has been made since then, and currently, responsive hydrogels can be classified (Table 1) based on responses to different stimuli as being temperature-sensitive, pH-sensitive, light-sensitive, or electricity-sensitive [76, 77].

TypeStimulating factorsResponsive group or substance

pH-sensitivepH-COOH, -HSO3, -NH2
Light-sensitiveLightCinnamoyl-, azobenzene, O-nitrobenzyl alcohol
Electricity-sensitiveElectricityCarbonyl-, nitro-, alkyl group

The most common intelligent hydrogels are temperature-sensitive, particularly those comprised of N-isopropyl acrylamide [78], where interactions between hydrophilic amide groups and hydrophobic isopropyl groups can produce structural changes in the hydrogel [79]. A novel polymer network was obtained by the introduction of the extracellular glucan salecan into a poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAm) network, resulting in a thermosensitive hydrogel possessing good mechanical properties and high water absorption at room temperature [80]. Moreover, the salecan/PNIPAm hydrogels were nontoxic and exhibited good biocompatibility, making them suitable for biomedical applications [80]. N,N-Diethylacrylamide has also been found to exhibit temperature sensitivity [81]. Hoffman has synthesized a series of thermo- and pH-sensitive poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide-co-itaconic acid) (PVA/P(DEA-co-IA)) semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN) hydrogels by radical polymerization and semi-IPN technology [1]. The obtained semi-IPN hydrogels possessed unconventional thermosensitive properties, such as faster deswelling rates and slower swelling rates in response to an alternation of temperature, and outstanding mutative values in response to pH value change [1].

Smart hydrogels capable of responding to pH changes have also been developed by incorporating ionizable acidic or basic groups (e.g., carboxyl, sulfonic acid, or amino groups) in the preparation process [8284]. Dissociation or association of these groups is affected by the pH value, which can alter either the internal network structure of the hydrogels or the affinity/hydrophobicity of the molecular chains, thereby altering the water absorption capacity of the gel [85]. A novel pH-sensitive hydrogel with excellent mechanical strength was prepared using oligomonomers of poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMA) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) [86]. When immersed in solutions with a pH below ∼4, the hydrogels exhibited a low swelling ratio with a compression strength of ∼8 MPa, while in solutions with a , the hydrogels were transparent and exhibited a high swelling ratio with a compression strength of ∼1 MPa. The robust nature of these hydrogels over a wide pH range may be useful for applications such as artificial muscles and controlled release devices.

Moreover, dual or multiple smart hydrogels may be prepared by combining two or more responsive hydrogel types using interpenetrating network connection or a graft copolymerization method, among other approaches. For example, a new kind of multiple stimulus-responsive organic/inorganic hybrid hydrogel was successfully fabricated by combining a dual stimuli-responsive poly(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl methacrylate-co-oligo(ethylene glycol)methacrylate-co-acrylic acid) (PMOA) hydrogel with magnetic attapulgite/Fe3O4 (AT-Fe3O4) nanoparticles [87]. The resulting AT-Fe3O4/PMOA hydrogels presented temperature/pH sensitivity, good mechanical properties, and magnetic functionality, allowing them to continue to swell under an alternating magnetic field following equilibrium swelling in deionized water [87].

2.5. Nanocomposite Hydrogels

The nanoscale dispersion of different materials in the polymeric matrix form nanocomposite hydrogels, with particle sizes ranging from 1 to 1000 nm, and the molecular chain structure consists of branched polymers and cross-linked network polymers [21]. This uniform dispersion of inorganic components can greatly improve the strength of hydrogels [19]. Nanocomposite hydrogels are also known as hybrid hydrogels, which are formed by physical or chemical covalent cross-linking of the polymer network with raw material particles, including carbon-based nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, inorganic/ceramic nanoparticles, or metal/metal oxides [19, 21, 8890].

Yadollahi et al. reported the synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose/ZnO nanocomposite hydrogels by in situ formation of ZnO nanoparticles within swollen carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels [91]. The resulting nanocomposite hydrogels exhibited both pH- and salt-sensitive swelling behaviors. In addition, they exhibited increased swelling in different aqueous solutions compared with neat hydrogels. The presence of the inorganic salt can weaken hydrogen bonding between the polymer chains and water, resulting in a localized dehydration of the polyphosphate ester and thus increasing aggregation. Based on this approach, a novel biodegradable nanoscopic hydrogel was synthesized by photocross-linking salt-induced polymer assemblies [92]. This method was based on the integration of block copolymers containing polyphosphoester (poly(ethyl ethylene phosphate) (PEEP)), which could undergo a salt-induced hydrophobic-to-hydrophilic transition. A triblock copolymer of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) combined with PEEP was synthesized, and its end groups were then functionalized with acryloyl chloride to produce an acrylate block copolymer (Acr-PEEP-PEG-PEEP-Acr). Subsequently, a diblock copolymer of PEG and PEEP (Acr-PEEP-PEG-Lac) containing heteroacrylate and lactosyl end functional groups was also synthesized to incorporate targeting moieties into the nanogel. These block copolymers were found to be soluble in water but self-assembled into core-shell structural nanoparticles following the addition of salt. The resulting nanoparticles could become totally hydrophilic after UV cross-linking to anchor the structure and dialysis to remove salt, generating nanogel particles with an inner reservoir for water-soluble drugs. This synthesis method is both facile and biocompatible, which could waive the inconvenient purification requirements typically required following nanogel generation [92].

2.6. Sliding Hydrogels

Sliding hydrogels contain topologically interlocked noncovalent cross-links that can slide along a threaded polymer backbone [93]. A novel sliding hydrogel, pseudopolyrotaxanes of monothiolated beta-cyclodextrin threaded on poly(allyl glycidyl ether)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(allyl glycidyl ether), was previously prepared in water by sonication and subsequently photocross-linked by UV irradiation, resulting in a sliding hydrogel with elasticity comparable to other hydrogels, increased stretchability, and tunable degradability under acidic conditions [16]. The benefit of these hydrogels lies in their more stable mechanical properties, as common hydrogels exhibit greater volatility under a smaller strain range. Research suggests that the mechanical strength of sliding hydrogels can adapt to the strength of mammal skin, blood vessels, and tissues; therefore, the sliding hydrogels could be used as a substitute for a variety of biological materials. Additionally, the stimulation sensitivity of sliding hydrogels may be improved by modifying cyclodextrin rings with the addition of sensitive groups [94, 95]. For example, a novel photosensitive sliding hydrogel was prepared by adding azobenzene units to the mobile α-cyclodextrin units of a poly(ethylene oxide)-based polyrotaxane and its photoresponsive behavior was attributed to the dynamic nature of the cross-linkers [96].

In summary, there are three primary factors that determine the performance of sliding hydrogels: the number of rings on each polymer chain, cross-linking density, and swelling properties of the hydrogels in solvents [97]. In conventional gels, the chain length between cross-linking points is uneven and the shorter chains may break more readily due to unequal chain tension under external force (Figure 3(a)). Conversely, in sliding gels, the chain length between cross-linking points is relatively uniform due to free slide of cross-linked rings under external force, so these hydrogels exhibit higher mechanical strength than conventional gels (Figure 3(b)).

2.7. Other Novel Hydrogels

In addition to the five biomedical hydrogels cited above, research has led to the development of a number of other novel hydrogels, including DNA-enabled hydrogels, and magnetic hyaluronate hydrogels [98, 99]. DNA-enabled hydrogels have been synthesized through the reaction of dibenzocyclooctyne-functionalized multiarm poly(ethylene glycol) with azide-functionalized single-stranded DNA in aqueous solutions by copper-free click chemistry (Figure 4) [98]. Besides, the hydrogel contained with the adipose-derived stem cells has been reported that can augment diabetic wound healing [100]. These gels can be degraded by nucleases and may be modified for use in a variety of applications, such as drug delivery and wound healing systems. These research efforts will continue to drive the development of novel hydrogels with increased sensitivity to the area of changing environmental conditions, improving strength, elasticity, and capability of novel hydrogels; all of which can further enhance their critical roles in biomedicine.

3. Applications of Hydrogels

3.1. Applications in Drug Delivery Systems

In recent years, drug delivery systems capable of controlled dosage delivery for extended periods in the affected area have been vigorously developed all over the world [101]. An effective drug delivery system has three critical requirements of the structure: a region for drug storage, a controlled release rate, and a release drive [102]. Hydrogels exhibit these three functions. Moreover, hydrogels can mask the bitter taste and odor of pharmaceuticals. Thus, hydrogels have a great potential for application via oral, nasal, buccal, rectal, vaginal, eye, injection, and other administration routes. When the hydrogel is injected or transplanted into an organism, it can maintain the effective and controlled release of an embedded drug into body fluids [103]. The therapeutic effects of many lipophilic drugs are limited due to a variety of problems including poor solubility, poor dispersion, lack of uniformity, poor dissolution, low bioavailability, and lack of in vivo stability. However, when these drugs are uploaded to a hydrogel system, the above defects can be improved to some extent, resulting in solubilization, sustained release or controlled release effects, and enhanced stability and bioactivity. Conversely, small molecule drugs that are highly soluble exhibit more advantages, including improved absorption and high bioavailability, but these properties are incompatible with sustained drug delivery effects. To exploit these more desirable properties, a novel interpenetrating polymer network was synthesized through the modification of silicone elastomers with a poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA)-based hydrogel characterized by a surface-connected hydrophilic carrier network inside the silicone [104]. These structures were then loaded with the antibiotic ciprofloxacin, and the resulting drug release inhibited bacterial growth when placed on agar, suggesting that these hydrogels have potential for future applications in drug-releasing medical devices [104]. Additionally, floating hydrogels synthesized from kappa carrageenan containing either CaCO3 or NaHCO3 as pore forming agents have been evaluated with amoxicillin trihydrate as a model drug [105]. The hydrogels incorporating CaCO3 exhibited higher drug entrapment efficiency and longer sustained drug release than NaHCO3, indicating that CaCO3 is a viable pore-forming agent for the development of an effective floating drug delivery system [105]. Interestingly, because of the distinctive conductivity of the conducting hydrogel, they are also electrostimulated drug release devices and these devices have great advantages in low-voltage drive and high load capacity [106]. Based on the conductive polymer poly(3-methoxydiphenylamine) and pectin hydrogels, Mongkolkitikul et al. synthesize a drug delivery system to transport ibuprofen. And the study showed that under applied electric potential, the diffusion coefficient of a drug is much higher than those without electric potential due to the mesh size expansion [107].

Hydrogels can also be used as a carrier for biological macromolecular drugs, mainly due to the controlled release behavior of protein drugs in polymer systems. For example, hydrophilic and hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels were prepared via Michael-type addition, which were employed for sustained delivery of a monoclonal antibody against the protective antigen of anthrax. Burst release of the antibody from the matrix was avoided due to the PEG-induced precipitation. These hydrogels were able to release active antibodies in a controlled manner, for up to 56 days in vitro, by varying the polymer architectures and molecular weights of the precursors. Analyses of the secondary and tertiary protein structures and the in vitro activity of the released antibody indicated that the encapsulation and release of the drug did not affect the protein conformation or functionality, which suggested that this is a promising approach for developing PEG-based carriers capable of sustained release of therapeutic antibodies against toxins in various applications [108]. Similarly, novel disc-shaped hydrogel nanoparticles have been prepared by fragmentation of stearoyl macrogol-32 glycerides (Gelucire 50/13) hydrogels, and the resulting nanoparticles exhibited good physical stability due to their outer coating of PEG [109]. Moreover, these nanoparticles exhibited good loading capacity for hydrophilic macromolecules (such as lysozyme) mainly via surface adsorption, indicating their potential as effective nanocarriers for drug delivery (Figure 5).

In addition, several studies have reported the use of hydrogels as carriers for polysaccharide substances and genes. A novel high-strength photosensitive hydrogel was formed by the photoinitiated copolymerization of hydrophilic hydrogen bonding monomer (acrylamide (AAm)), hydrophobic hydrogen bonding monomer (2-vinyl-4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine (VDT)), and a spiropyran-containing monomer, in the presence of the cross-linker poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. Reverse gene transfection was then successfully accomplished by anchoring the PVDT/pDNA complex nanoparticles on the gel surface through hydrogen bonding between diaminotriazine motifs prior to cell seeding [110]. Interestingly, the gene transfection level could be further increased by fibronectin modification combined with the supplementation of PVDT/pDNA complex nanoparticles after the first cycle of reverse gene transfection (i.e., sandwich gene transfection) [110].

3.2. Applications in Wound Dressings

Hydrogel materials have been used directly in contact with human tissues, absorbing exudate to form a gel, which effectively prevents the loss of body fluids and is not subject to adhesion on the wound after absorption of exudate [111]. Hydrogels can also deliver oxygen to the wound to accelerate the growth of epithelial cells and proliferation of new capillaries [112, 113] and can protect the wound from bacterial violations, inhibiting bacterial growth and thus promoting wound healing in general [114]. There is an unmet clinical need for wound dressings, and currently, hydrogel materials for wound dressings have entered the commercial market. These hydrogel materials can be made of spray, emulsion, or paste, with embedded anti-inflammatory drugs that can be slowly released through the gel to the injured area, which can accelerate wound healing. A class of “smart” peptide hydrogels was prepared by self-assembling of ultrashort aliphatic peptides into helical fibers, and these nanofibrous hydrogels reportedly accelerated wound closure in a rat model for partial thickness burns [115]. The regenerative properties could be further enhanced by incorporation of bioactive moieties such as growth factors and cytokines. Singh et al. reported the development of a novel hydrogel combining silver nanoparticles and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) blended with carrageenan via gamma irradiation, which could be used as wound dressings to control infection and facilitate the healing process for burns and other skin injuries [116].

3.3. Applications in Biosensors

The biosensor is a fast, accurate, and real-time detection means. Biomolecules generally are fixed either on the surface or the interior of hydrogels, connecting to the physical elements of the biosensors. The hydrogel film is the hub connecting the biomolecules and physical components. Hydrogels prepared for sensors are typically comprised of alginate, alginic acid in complex with chitosan, acrylamide, or N-isopropyl acrylamide [117121]. A nonenzymatic electrochemical H2O2 sensor was prepared by in situ fabrication of biocompatible chitosan hydrogels containing a specific recognition molecule for H2O2, and this sensor exhibited a fast amperometric response to H2O2 within 7 s. The remarkable analytical performance of the nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor represents a promising model for durable monitoring of H2O2 in rat brain microdialysates, which will improve our ability to understand the biological effects of H2O2 on pathological and physiological processes [122]. Similarly, Devadhasan and Kim introduced a new method to quantify various pH solutions with a complementary metal oxide semiconductor image sensor, which produced high-accuracy analyses based on pH measurement [123]. In this approach, a thin film was fabricated by merging a pH indicator with the hydrogel matrix and the modified gel exhibited color change development across the full spectrum of pH (pH 1–14).The complementary metal oxide semiconductor image sensor then absorbed the color intensity of the hydrogel film, and the hue value was converted into digital data with the help of an analog-to-digital converter to determine the pH ranges of solutions [123]. This gel may be useful for in situ pH sensing in the presence of toxic chemicals and chemical vapors.

3.4. Applications in Contact Lenses

Contact lenses are delicate ophthalmic medical tools for correcting vision or changing eye color for aesthetic effects, and their permeability and biocompatibility are key properties to be considered during design. Hydrogel contact lenses must be comfortable to wear, have good oxygen permeability, and potentially have the capacity to assist in the treatment of eye diseases, which is the reason why hydrogels represent important manufacturing materials for contact lenses [124]. The majority of soft contact lenses are comprised of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels cross-linked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate or silicone [125]. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels have several advantages: relatively high water content, thermal and chemical stability, tunable mechanical properties, and oxygen permeability, which are very important for safe daily wear [126]. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (p(HEMA)) soft contact lenses have been prepared by thermal or photopolymerization of HEMA solutions containing ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as the cross-linker and different proportions of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone or methacrylic acid as comonomers [127]. The drug loading capacity and release properties of p(HEMA)-based soft contact lenses were improved based on the optimization of the hydrogel composition and microstructural modifications using water during the polymerization process [127].

3.5. Applications in Tissue Engineering

The objective of tissue engineering research and development is to produce biological alternatives to restore, maintain, or improve the morphology and function of damaged tissues and organs, thereby achieving reconstruction by applying principles and methods from both cell biology and engineering [128]. Tissue engineering has also been defined as “regenerative medicine.” Specifically, donor cells, after amplification in vitro, are seeded for growth onto a biodegradable three-dimensional scaffold. The resulting complex can then be implanted into the body or at targeted sites, where the implanted cells continue to proliferate and secrete an extracellular matrix [129]. As the scaffold degrades, new tissues or organs will form bearing the same shape and function as the damaged tissues or organs. Tissue engineering represents an extraordinarily important, emerging area of research with enormous scientific value and broad application prospects and will be a major focus of life science researches in the 21st century. Organ transplantation will be replaced by the development and manufacturing of synthetic tissues and organs. One of the key technologies of tissue engineering is the preparation of a biocompatible and biodegradable cell scaffold, and hydrogels represent a large class of materials that can function as tissue engineering scaffolds [130]. Hydrogels are a type of three-dimensional scaffolds with chemical or physical cross-linking structures, which can absorb and retain large amounts of water, yet remain insoluble in water. Hydrogels have been widely used as scaffold materials in tissue engineering for several reasons. First, hydrogels are soft and flexible, similar to soft tissues in vivo. Second, hydrogels in the liquid state can be implanted in the body by injection, where they can quickly fill tissue defects by forming irregular nonflowing semisolids [52]. This method is simple and also circumvents risks associated with trauma, infection, and scar formation by surgical implantation. Third, the three-dimensional network structure of a hydrogel is similar to a natural extracellular matrix, which will eventually promote cell engraftment, adhesion, and growth by adjusting the porosity and pore size and increasing the internal surface area [131]. Fourth, hydrogels are rich in water (up to 99%), which is beneficial for the transportation of oxygen, nutrients, and cellular metabolites, in addition to reducing friction and mechanical stimulation of the surrounding tissues. Additionally, the inclusion of cells prior to gelation results in a more uniform distribution of cells throughout the scaffold, thus increasing plating efficiency [132].

A variety of potential medical hydrogels have been investigated in recent years, such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds and polylactic acid scaffolds combined with osteoblasts in bone tissue engineering, filamentous collagen materials in neural tissue engineering, and cellulose acetate scaffolds combined with chondrocytes in cartilage tissue engineering [133135]. Vo et al. reported the osteogenic potential of injectable, dual thermally and chemically gelable composite hydrogels for mesenchymal stem cell delivery in vitro and in vivo [136]. A novel composite hydrogel containing copolymer macromers of N-isopropylacrylamide was prepared by the incorporation of gelatin microparticles as enzymatically digestible porogens and sites for cellular attachment. Results indicated that these injectable, dual-gelling cell-laden composite hydrogels could facilitate bone ingrowth and integration, ensuring further research for bone tissue engineering [136]. Also, a novel injectable hydrogel based on a glycopolypeptide was prepared by an enzymatic cross-linking reaction in the presence of horseradish peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide, in which the glycopolypeptide was synthesized through conjugation of poly(γ-propargyl-L-glutamate) with azido-modified mannose and 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propanamide via click chemistry [137]. The resulting hydrogels displayed good cytocompatibility in vitro and were rapidly formed in situ after subcutaneous injection into rats, exhibiting acceptable biocompatibility desirable biodegradation in vivo. Interestingly, the glycopolypeptide hydrogels containing chondrocytes in the subcutaneous model of nude mice were observed to maintain the chondrocyte phenotype and produce the cartilaginous specific matrix, indicating that the biomimetic glycopolypeptide-based hydrogels represent potential three-dimensional scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering [137]. Due to additional benefit in electrical conductivity, conductive hydrogels play the tremendous role in tissue engineering. Homogenously electrical double network based on conducting polymer poly(3-thiophene acetic acid) (PTAA) has been reported to be used in myocardial tissue engineering. It can support BADSC adhesion, and reduce inflammation in vivo, and the PTAA in this hydrogel can significantly enhance the differentiation potency of BADSCs to cardiomyocytes, increase the expression of myocardial specific proteins cTnT and α-actinin, promote intercellular communication ability, and increase the expression of connexin 43. More importantly, electrical stimulation can enhance the effect of PTAA [138].

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Hydrogels are new functional polymer materials experiencing rapid development. New biomedical hydrogels have been observed to exhibit improved degradation and mechanical properties, thereby overcoming deficiencies found in traditional hydrogels and expanding the potential roles of hydrogels in the field of biomedical applications. However, for applications based on particular tissues or organs, much research remains to develop hydrogels capable of functioning as replacements for real tissues. Future studies into biomedical hydrogels will be needed to address the following: (i) the swelling rate of hydrogels should be controlled while improving their mechanical properties, meeting the size requirements of tissues and organs; (ii) their biocompatibility should be enhanced to achieve simulation of the extracellular matrix structure and functions; (iii) the degradation rate of hydrogels should be controllable, conforming to tissue-specific mechanical properties and regeneration needs; and (iv) hydrogels should be combined with other materials to achieve the complex structural and functional components necessary to act as replacements for specific organs. In summary, while technical problems associated with the synthesis and application of hydrogel materials remain to be resolved, it is clear that continuing research will eventually overcome these problems, leading to a revolutionary new model for bioengineering and advances in tissue replacement and regeneration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Ke Wang and Yuting Hao contributed equally to this work.


  1. A. S. Hoffman, “Hydrogels for biomedical applications,” Advanced drug delivery reviews., vol. 64, pp. 18–23, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. M. Ahmed, “Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 105–121, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Hosseini, H. Tenhu, and S. Hietala, “Rheological properties of thermoresponsive nanocomposite hydrogels,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 133, no. 11, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Chang and L. Zhang, “Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects,” Carbohydrate polymers., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 40–53, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Nielsen, H. Vorum, N. Ehlers, N. Aagaard, J. Hjortdal, and B. Honoré, “Tear film proteins deposited on high water content contact lenses identified with two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry,” Acta ophthalmologica., vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 658–662, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. A. Kamoun, X. Chen, M. S. Mohy Eldin, and E.-R. S. Kenawy, “Crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels for wound dressing applications: a review of remarkably blended polymers,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Yao, Z. Liu, C. Yang et al., “Smart Hydrogels: Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-Clay Nanocomposite Hydrogels with Responsive Bending Property as Temperature-Controlled Manipulators (Adv. Funct. Mater. 20/2015),” Advanced Functional Materials., vol. 25, no. 20, p. 3104, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Rodkate, B. Rutnakornpituk, U. Wichai, G. Ross, and M. Rutnakornpituk, “Smart carboxymethylchitosan hydrogels that have thermo-and pH-responsive properties,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 132, no. 8, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Tudor, L. Florea, S. Gallagher, J. Burns, and D. Diamond, “Poly (ionic liquid) semi-interpenetrating network multi-responsive hydrogels,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 219, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Karimi, P. S. Zangabad, A. Ghasemi, and M. R. Hamblin, “Electrical and mechanical-responsive nanocarriers,” in Smart External Stimulus-Responsive Nanocarriers for Drug and Gene Delivery, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. K. Lima-Tenório, E. T. Tenório-Neto, F. P. Garcia et al., “Hydrogel nanocomposite based on starch and Co-doped zinc ferrite nanoparticles that shows magnetic field-responsive drug release changes,” Journal of Molecular Liquids., vol. 210, pp. 100–105, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. V. Sridhar, J. L. Brock, J. S. Silver, J. L. Leight, M. A. Randolph, and K. S. Anseth, “Tissue engineering: development of a cellularly degradable PEG hydrogel to promote articular cartilage extracellular matrix deposition (Adv. Healthcare Mater. 5/2015),” Advanced healthcare materials, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 635, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Gritsch, F. L. Motta, and S. Fare, “History and applications of hydrogels,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 04, no. 02, p. 13, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Alhede, L. H. Christensen, and T. Bjarnsholt, “Microbial biofilms and adverse reactions to gel fillers used in cosmetic surgery,” in Biofilm-based Healthcare-associated Infections, pp. 45–52, Springer, Cham, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Blumlein and J. J. McManus, “Bigels formed via spinodal decomposition of unfolded protein,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B., vol. 3, no. 17, pp. 3429–3435, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Murakami, B. V. K. J. Schmidt, H. R. Brown, and C. J. Hawker, “One-pot “click” fabrication of slide-ring gels,” Macromolecules, vol. 48, no. 21, pp. 7774–7781, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Cai, R. E. Dewi, and S. C. Heilshorn, “Injectable hydrogels with in situ double network formation enhance retention of transplanted stem cells,” Advanced Functional Materials., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1344–1351, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Noori, M. Kokabi, and Z. M. Hassan, “Nanoclay enhanced the mechanical properties of poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel as wound dressing,” Procedia Materials Science, vol. 11, pp. 152–156, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Merino, C. Martín, K. Kostarelos, M. Prato, and E. Vázquez, “Nanocomposite hydrogels: 3D polymer–nanoparticle synergies for on-demand drug delivery,” ACS Nano, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 4686–4697, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Q. Li, D. G. Barrett, P. B. Messersmith, and N. Holten-Andersen, “Controlling Hydrogel MechanicsviaBio-Inspired Polymer–Nanoparticle Bond Dynamics,” ACS nano, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1317–1324, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. K. Gaharwar, N. A. Peppas, and A. Khademhosseini, “Nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 441–453, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Balint, N. J. Cassidy, and S. H. Cartmell, “Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2341–2353, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. M. Kloxin, C. J. Kloxin, C. N. Bowman, and K. S. Anseth, “Mechanical properties of cellularly responsive hydrogels and their experimental determination,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 31, pp. 3484–3494, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Gilmore, A. J. Hodgson, B. Luan, C. J. Small, and G. G. Wallace, “Preparation of hydrogel/conducting polymer composites,” Polymer Gels and Networks, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Sharma, V. Kumar, B. S. Kaith, S. Kalia, and H. C. Swart, “Conducting polymer hydrogels and their applications,” in Conducting Polymer Hybrids, pp. 193–221, Springer, Cham, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Q. Tang, J. Lin, J. Wu, C. Zhang, and S. Hao, “Two-steps synthesis of a poly(acrylate–aniline) conducting hydrogel with an interpenetrated networks structure,” Carbohydrate Polymers., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 332–336, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Q. Tang, J. Wu, and J. Lin, “A multifunctional hydrogel with high conductivity, pH-responsive, thermo-responsive and release properties from polyacrylate/polyaniline hybrid,” Carbohydrate Polymers., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 315–321, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Lin, Q. Tang, D. Hu, X. Sun, Q. Li, and J. Wu, “Electric field sensitivity of conducting hydrogels with interpenetrating polymer network structure,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 346, no. 1-3, pp. 177–183, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Q. Tang, J. Wu, H. Sun, S. Fan, D. Hu, and J. Lin, “Superabsorbent conducting hydrogel from poly(acrylamide-aniline) with thermo-sensitivity and release properties,” Carbohydrate Polymers., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 473–481, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Zhang, W. Du, A. Nautiyal, Z. Liu, and X. Zhang, “Recent progress on nanostructured conducting polymers and composites: synthesis, application and future aspects,” Science China Materials, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 303–352, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Z. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Zhang et al., “Controlled synthesis of transition metal/conducting polymer nanocomposites,” Nanotechnology, vol. 23, no. 33, p. 335603, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, M. P. Prabhakaran, M. Morshed et al., “Application of conductive polymers, scaffolds and electrical stimulation for nerve tissue engineering,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. e17–e35, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. M. Sajesh, R. Jayakumar, S. V. Nair, and K. P. Chennazhi, “Biocompatible conducting chitosan/polypyrrole–alginate composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering,” International journal of biological macromolecules., vol. 62, pp. 465–471, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. Shi, Y. He, M. Ding, Y. Wang, and J. Zhong, “Nanoimaging of food proteins by atomic force microscopy. Part I: components, imaging modes, observation ways, and research types,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 87, pp. 3–13, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. Shi, Y. He, M. Ding, Y. Wang, and J. Zhong, “Nanoimaging of food proteins by atomic force microscopy. Part II: application for food proteins from different sources,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 87, pp. 14–25, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. García, J. Buendía, S. Ghosh, A. Ajayaghosh, and L. Sánchez, “Luminescent and conductive supramolecular polymers obtained from an N-annulated perylenedicarboxamide,” Chemical Communications, vol. 49, no. 81, pp. 9278–9280, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Mawad, E. Stewart, D. L. Officer et al., “Conducting polymer hydrogels: a single component conducting polymer hydrogel as a scaffold for tissue engineering (Adv. Funct. Mater. 13/2012),” Advanced Functional Materials., vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 2691–2691, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. G. Kaur, R. Adhikari, P. Cass, M. Bown, and P. Gunatillake, “Electrically conductive polymers and composites for biomedical applications,” Rsc Advances., vol. 5, no. 47, pp. 37553–37567, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. Shi, J. Zhang, A. M. Bruck et al., “A tunable 3D nanostructured conductive gel framework electrode for high-performance lithium ion batteries,” Advanced Materials, vol. 29, no. 22, p. 1603922, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. Cai, J. Wang, K. Qian, J. Chen, S. Li, and P. S. Lee, “Extremely Stretchable Strain Sensors Based on Conductive Self-Healing Dynamic Cross-Links Hydrogels for Human-Motion Detection,” Advanced Science, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 1600190, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Q. Rong, W. Lei, and M. Liu, “Conductive hydrogels as smart materials for flexible electronic devices,” Chemistry–A European Journal., vol. 24, no. 64, pp. 16930–16943, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. Xu, Y. Ding, Y. Yu, S. Jiang, L. Chen, and H. Hou, “Highly foldable PANi@CNTs/PU dielectric composites toward thin-film capacitor application,” Materials Letters., vol. 192, pp. 25–28, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Han, K. Lu, Y. Yue et al., “Nanocellulose-templated assembly of polyaniline in natural rubber-based hybrid elastomers toward flexible electronic conductors,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 128, pp. 94–107, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. J. Devaki, R. K. Narayanan, and S. Sarojam, “Electrically conducting silver nanoparticle–polyacrylic acid hydrogel by in situ reduction and polymerization approach,” Materials Letters., vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Y. Xiang and D. Chen, “Preparation of a novel pH-responsive silver nanoparticle/poly (HEMA–PEGMA–MAA) composite hydrogel,” European Polymer Journal., vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 4178–4187, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. Pan, G. Yu, D. Zhai et al., “Hierarchical nanostructured conducting polymer hydrogel with high electrochemical activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America., vol. 109, no. 24, pp. 9287–9292, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. N. Park, S. C. Chae, I. T. Kim, and J. Hur, “Fabrication of self-healable and patternable polypyrrole/agarose hybrid hydrogels for smart bioelectrodes,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1400–1404, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Hur, K. Im, S. W. Kim et al., “Polypyrrole/agarose-based electronically conductive and reversibly restorable hydrogel,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 10066–10076, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Zhou, M. Wang, X. Chen, and F. Xu, “Facile template synthesis of microfibrillated cellulose/polypyrrole/silver nanoparticles hybrid aerogels with electrical conductive and pressure responsive properties,” Acs Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 3346–3354, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. S. Sivan, S. Roberts, J. P. G. Urban et al., “Injectable hydrogels with high fixed charge density and swelling pressure for nucleus pulposus repair: Biomimetic glycosaminoglycan analogues,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1124–1133, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J.-A. Yang, J. Yeom, B. W. Hwang, A. S. Hoffman, and S. K. Hahn, “In situ-forming injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine,” Progress in Polymer Science., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1973–1986, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Park, B. Choi, J. Hu, and M. Lee, “Injectable chitosan hyaluronic acid hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4779–4786, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Hu, Y. Hou, H. Park et al., “Visible light crosslinkable chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1730–1738, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S. Koutsopoulos and S. Zhang, Multi-layered injectable self-assembling peptide scaffold hydrogels for long-term sustained release of human antibodies, Google Patents, 9700521B2, Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  55. S. Koutsopoulos and S. Zhang, “Two-layered injectable self-assembling peptide scaffold hydrogels for long-term sustained release of human antibodies,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 451–458, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. F. Corrente, H. M. Abu Amara, S. Pacelli, P. Paolicelli, and M. A. Casadei, “Novel injectable and in situ cross-linkable hydrogels of dextran methacrylate and scleroglucan derivatives: preparation and characterization,” Carbohydrate polymers., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 1033–1039, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Pacelli, P. Paolicelli, I. Dreesen, S. Kobayashi, A. Vitalone, and M. A. Casadei, “Injectable and photocross-linkable gels based on gellan gum methacrylate: a new tool for biomedical application,” International journal of biological macromolecules., vol. 72, pp. 1335–1342, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. O. Yom-Tov, L. Neufeld, D. Seliktar, and H. Bianco-Peled, “A novel design of injectable porous hydrogels with in situ pore formation,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 4236–4246, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Q. Chen, L. Zhu, C. Zhao, Q. Wang, and J. Zheng, “A robust, one-pot synthesis of highly mechanical and recoverable double network hydrogels using thermoreversible sol-gel polysaccharide,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 30, pp. 4171–4176, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. T. Hattori, K. Ishii, T. Tominaga, Y. Osada, and T. Tahara, “A fluorescence study on the local environment of hydrogels: double-network hydrogels having extraordinarily high mechanical strength and its constituent single-network hydrogels,” Chemical Physics., vol. 419, pp. 172–177, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. H. Yin, T. Akasaki, T. Lin Sun et al., “Double network hydrogels from polyzwitterions: high mechanical strength and excellent anti-biofouling properties,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B., vol. 1, no. 30, pp. 3685–3693, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. H. Shin, B. D. Olsen, and A. Khademhosseini, “The mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan gum biomacromolecules,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 3143–3152, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. J. Buwalda, K. W. M. Boere, P. J. Dijkstra, J. Feijen, T. Vermonden, and W. E. Hennink, “Hydrogels in a historical perspective: from simple networks to smart materials,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 190, pp. 254–273, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. T. Kataoka, Y. Ishioka, M. Mizuhata, H. Minami, and T. Maruyama, “Highly conductive ionic-liquid gels prepared with orthogonal double networks of a low-molecular-weight gelator and cross-linked polymer,” ACS applied materials & interfaces., vol. 7, no. 41, pp. 23346–23352, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and W. Liu, “Dipole–dipole and H-bonding interactions significantly enhance the multifaceted mechanical properties of thermoresponsive shape memory hydrogels,” Advanced Functional Materials., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 471–480, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. Y. H. Na, “Double network hydrogels with extremely high toughness and their applications,” Korea-Australia Rheology Journal., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 185–196, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. C. Chassenieux and C. Tsitsilianis, “Recent trends in pH/thermo-responsive self-assembling hydrogels: from polyions to peptide-based polymeric gelators,” Soft Matter, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1344–1359, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. A. Haque, T. Kurokawa, and J. P. Gong, “Super tough double network hydrogels and their application as biomaterials,” Polymer, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1805–1822, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. C. Chang, K. Han, and L. Zhang, “Structure and properties of cellulose/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels prepared by IPN strategy,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1329–1334, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J.-Y. Sun, X. Zhao, W. R. K. Illeperuma et al., “Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels,” Nature, vol. 489, no. 7414, pp. 133–136, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. Döring, W. Birnbaum, and D. Kuckling, “Responsive hydrogels–structurally and dimensionally optimized smart frameworks for applications in catalysis, micro-system technology and material science,” Chemical Society Reviews., vol. 42, no. 17, pp. 7391–7420, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. C. Koetting, J. T. Peters, S. D. Steichen, and N. A. Peppas, “Stimulus-responsive hydrogels: theory, modern advances, and applications,” Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports., vol. 93, pp. 1–49, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. X. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Xue, H. Wang, X. Qiu, and Z. Liu, “Thermo-sensitive hydrogel PLGA-PEG-PLGA as a vaccine delivery system for intramuscular immunization,” Journal of Biomaterials Applications., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 923–932, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. Krogsgaard, M. A. Behrens, J. S. Pedersen, and H. Birkedal, “Self-healing mussel-inspired multi-pH-responsive hydrogels,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 297–301, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. Katchalsky, “Rapid swelling and deswelling of reversible gels of polymeric acids by ionization,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 319-320, 1949. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. P. M. Dicker, I. P. Bond, J. M. Rossiter, C. F. J. Faul, and P. M. Weaver, “Modelling and Analysis of pH Responsive Hydrogels for the Development of Biomimetic Photo-Actuating Structures,” MRS Proceedings, vol. 1718, pp. 65–70, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. Scherzinger, A. Schwarz, A. Bardow, K. Leonhard, and W. Richtering, “Cononsolvency of poly-N-isopropyl acrylamide (PNIPAM): microgels versus linear chains and macrogels,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 84–94, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Y. Işikver and D. Saraydin, “Environmentally sensitive hydrogels: N-isopropyl acrylamide/acrylamide/mono-, Di-, tricarboxylic acid crosslinked polymers,” Polymer Engineering & Science., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 843–851, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J. Wang, Q. Zhong, J. Wu, and T. Chen, “Thermo-responsive textiles,” in Handbook of Smart Textiles, pp. 1–27, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. W. Wei, X. Hu, X. Qi et al., “A novel thermo-responsive hydrogel based on salecan and poly (N-isopropylacrylamide): synthesis and characterization,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces., vol. 125, pp. 1–11, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. C. H. Hofmann, F. A. Plamper, C. Scherzinger, S. Hietala, and W. Richtering, “NEXT Cononsolvency Revisited: Solvent Entrapment by N-Isopropylacrylamide and N,N-Diethylacrylamide Microgels in Different Water/Methanol Mixtures,” Macromolecules, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 523–532, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. P. Mukhopadhyay, K. Sarkar, S. Bhattacharya, A. Bhattacharyya, R. Mishra, and P. P. Kundu, “pH sensitive N-succinyl chitosan grafted polyacrylamide hydrogel for oral insulin delivery,” Carbohydrate polymers., vol. 112, pp. 627–637, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. T. Garg, S. Singh, and A. K. Goyal, “Stimuli-sensitive hydrogels: an excellent carrier for drug and cell delivery,” Critical Reviews™ in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 369–409, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. J. Yang, J. Chen, D. Pan, Y. Wan, and Z. Wang, “pH-sensitive interpenetrating network hydrogels based on chitosan derivatives and alginate for oral drug delivery,” Carbohydrate polymers., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 719–725, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. J. Liu, Y. Huang, A. Kumar et al., “pH-sensitive nano-systems for drug delivery in cancer therapy,” Biotechnology advances., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 693–710, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. Naficy, J. M. Razal, P. G. Whitten, G. G. Wallace, and G. M. Spinks, “A pH-sensitive, strong double-network hydrogel: poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylates–poly (acrylic acid),” Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 423–430, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Y. Wang, A. Dong, Z. Yuan, and D. Chen, “Fabrication and characterization of temperature-, pH- and magnetic-field-sensitive organic/inorganic hybrid poly (ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects., vol. 415, pp. 68–76, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S. Roy, A. Baral, and A. Banerjee, “An amino-acid-based self-healing hydrogel: modulation of the self-healing properties by incorporating carbon-based nanomaterials,” Chemistry–A European Journal., vol. 19, no. 44, pp. 14950–14957, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. H.-P. Cong, X.-C. Ren, P. Wang, and S.-H. Yu, “Macroscopic multifunctional graphene-based hydrogels and aerogels by a metal ion induced self-assembly process,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 2693–2703, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. H. Hezaveh and I. I. Muhamad, “Impact of metal oxide nanoparticles on oral release properties of pH-sensitive hydrogel nanocomposites,” International journal of biological macromolecules., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1334–1340, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. M. Yadollahi, I. Gholamali, H. Namazi, and M. Aghazadeh, “Synthesis and characterization of antibacterial carboxymethyl cellulose/ZnO nanocomposite hydrogels,” International journal of biological macromolecules., vol. 74, pp. 136–141, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. Y.-C. Wang, J. Wu, Y. Li, J.-Z. Du, Y.-Y. Yuan, and J. Wang, “Engineering nanoscopic hydrogels via photo-crosslinking salt-induced polymer assembly for targeted drug delivery,” Chemical Communications., vol. 46, no. 20, pp. 3520–3522, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. C. W. Peak, J. J. Wilker, and G. Schmidt, “A review on tough and sticky hydrogels,” Colloid and Polymer Science., vol. 291, no. 9, pp. 2031–2047, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. Y. Cui, M. Tan, A. Zhu, and M. Guo, “Strain hardening and highly resilient hydrogels crosslinked by chain-extended reactive pseudo-polyrotaxane,” RSC Advances., vol. 4, no. 100, pp. 56791–56797, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. M. Du, Y. Zhang, Y. Song, and Q. Zheng, “Negative velocity dependence of friction for poly (2-acrylamido-2-methyl propanesulfonic acid) hydrogel sliding against a glass surface in the low-velocity region,” Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 765–772, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. T. Sakai, H. Murayama, S. Nagano et al., “Photoresponsive slide-ring gel,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 2023–2025, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. G. Fleury, G. Schlatter, C. Brochon et al., “Topological polymer networks with sliding cross-link points: the “sliding gels”. Relationship between their molecular structure and the viscoelastic as well as the swelling properties,” Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 535–543, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. K. Barker, S. K. Rastogi, J. Dominguez et al., “Biodegradable DNA-enabled poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels prepared by copper-free click chemistry,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 22–39, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. I. Y. Tóth, G. Veress, M. Szekeres, E. Illés, and E. Tombácz, “Magnetic hyaluronate hydrogels: preparation and characterization,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials., vol. 380, pp. 175–180, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. L. Kaisang, W. Siyu, F. Lijun, P. Daoyan, C. J. Xian, and S. Jie, “Adipose-derived stem cells seeded in Pluronic F-127 hydrogel promotes diabetic wound healing,” Journal of Surgical Research., vol. 217, pp. 63–74, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. O. Tacar, P. Sriamornsak, and C. R. Dass, “Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 157–170, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. C. Gong, T. Qi, X. Wei et al., “Thermosensitive polymeric hydrogels as drug delivery systems,” Current medicinal chemistry., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 79–94, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  103. G. W. Ashley, J. Henise, R. Reid, and D. V. Santi, “Hydrogel drug delivery system with predictable and tunable drug release and degradation rates,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences., vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 2318–2323, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. S. L. Steffensen, M. H. Vestergaard, E. H. Møller et al., “Soft hydrogels interpenetrating silicone—a polymer network for drug-releasing medical devices,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials., vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 402–410, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. S. Selvakumaran, I. I. Muhamad, and S. I. Abd Razak, “Evaluation of kappa carrageenan as potential carrier for floating drug delivery system: effect of pore forming agents,” Carbohydrate polymers., vol. 135, pp. 207–214, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. L. M. Lira and S. I. Córdoba de Torresi, “Conducting polymer–hydrogel composites for electrochemical release devices: synthesis and characterization of semi-interpenetrating polyaniline–polyacrylamide networks,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 717–723, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. S. Mongkolkitikul, N. Paradee, and A. Sirivat, “Electrically controlled release of ibuprofen from conductive poly(3-methoxydiphenylamine)/crosslinked pectin hydrogel,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences., vol. 112, pp. 20–27, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. Y. Liang, M. V. Coffin, S. D. Manceva, J. A. Chichester, R. M. Jones, and K. L. Kiick, “Controlled release of an anthrax toxin-neutralizing antibody from hydrolytically degradable polyethylene glycol hydrogels,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. D. Codoni, J. Cowan, J. Bradley, W. J. McAuley, M. A. O'Connell, and S. Qi, “Disc-shaped polyoxyethylene glycol glycerides gel nanoparticles as novel protein delivery vehicles,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 496, no. 2, pp. 1015–1025, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. N. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Liao, and W. Liu, “High-strength photoresponsive hydrogels enable surface-mediated gene delivery and light-induced reversible cell adhesion/detachment,” Langmuir, vol. 30, no. 39, pp. 11823–11832, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. B. Boonkaew, M. Kempf, R. Kimble, P. Supaphol, and L. Cuttle, “Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel silver hydrogel dressing compared to two common silver burn wound dressings: Acticoat™ and PolyMem Silver®,” Burns, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. E. Pinho, M. Grootveld, G. Soares, and M. Henriques, “Cyclodextrin-based hydrogels toward improved wound dressings,” Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 328–337, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. X. Chen, M. Zhang, S. Chen et al., “Peptide-modified chitosan hydrogels accelerate skin wound healing by promoting fibroblast proliferation, migration, and secretion,” Cell Transplantation., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1331–1340, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. B. Singh, S. Sharma, and A. Dhiman, “Design of antibiotic containing hydrogel wound dressings: biomedical properties and histological study of wound healing,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 457, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. Y. Loo, Y.-C. Wong, E. Z. Cai et al., “Ultrashort peptide nanofibrous hydrogels for the acceleration of healing of burn wounds,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 4805–4814, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. D. Singh, A. Singh, and R. Singh, “Polyvinyl pyrrolidone/carrageenan blend hydrogels with nanosilver prepared by gamma radiation for use as an antimicrobial wound dressing,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition., vol. 26, no. 17, pp. 1269–1285, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. S.-M. Lee, N. Han, R. Lee et al., “Real-time monitoring of 3D cell culture using a 3D capacitance biosensor,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics., vol. 77, pp. 56–61, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. I. Zhitomirsky, “Electrodeposition of organic-inorganic films for biomedical applications,” in 224th ECS Meeting, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, October 27–November 1, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  119. M. S. Belluzo, L. F. Medina, A. M. Cortizo, and M. S. Cortizo, “Ultrasonic compatibilization of polyelectrolyte complex based on polysaccharides for biomedical applications,” Ultrasonics sonochemistry., vol. 30, pp. 1–8, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. I. Khimji, E. Y. Kelly, Y. Helwa, M. Hoang, and J. Liu, “Visual optical biosensors based on DNA-functionalized polyacrylamide hydrogels,” Methods, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 292–298, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. M. S. Abdelaty and D. Kuckling, “Synthesis and characterization of new functional photo cross-linkable smart polymers containing vanillin derivatives,” Gels., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. Z. Wang, L. Zhang, and Y. Tian, “A durable non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor for monitoring H2O2 in rat brain microdialysates based on one-step fabrication of hydrogels,” The Analyst, vol. 140, no. 11, pp. 3788–3793, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. J. P. Devadhasan and S. Kim, “An ultrasensitive method of real time pH monitoring with complementary metal oxide semiconductor image sensor,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 858, pp. 55–59, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. J. S. Wolffsohn, S. Mroczkowska, O. A. Hunt, P. Bilkhu, T. Drew, and A. Sheppard, “Crossover evaluation of silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 1063–1068, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. G. Su, T. Zhou, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and A. Zhang, “Microdynamics mechanism of D2O absorption of the poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-based contact lens hydrogel studied by two-dimensional correlation ATR-FTIR spectroscopy,” Soft Matter, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1145–1157, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. S. Mikhalovsky, L. Mikhalovska, W. A. Akande, and S. James, Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) macroporous cryogel for extracorporeal medical devices, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan city, Republic of Kazakhstan, 2015.
  127. E. García-Millán, S. Koprivnik, and F. J. Otero-Espinar, “Drug loading optimization and extended drug delivery of corticoids from pHEMA based soft contact lenses hydrogels via chemical and microstructural modifications,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 487, no. 1-2, pp. 260–269, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. T. Billiet, M. Vandenhaute, J. Schelfhout, S. Van Vlierberghe, and P. Dubruel, “A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 26, pp. 6020–6041, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. L. E. Bertassoni, M. Cecconi, V. Manoharan et al., “Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs,” Lab on a Chip., vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 2202–2211, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. P. Matricardi, C. Di Meo, T. Coviello, W. E. Hennink, and F. Alhaique, “Interpenetrating polymer networks polysaccharide hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering,” Advanced drug delivery reviews., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1172–1187, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. H. K. Cheung, T. T. Y. Han, D. M. Marecak, J. F. Watkins, B. G. Amsden, and L. E. Flynn, “Composite hydrogel scaffolds incorporating decellularized adipose tissue for soft tissue engineering with adipose-derived stem cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1914–1923, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. H. Tan and K. G. Marra, “Injectable, biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications,” Materials., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1746–1767, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. P. Gentile, V. Chiono, I. Carmagnola, and P. V. Hatton, “An overview of poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering,” International journal of molecular sciences., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3640–3659, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. J. Van Hoorick, M. Markovic, A. Ovsianikov et al., “Hydrogel-polyester combination scaffolds for tissue engineering purposes,” in Conference on Advanced Materials for Biomedical Applications (AMBA 2014), Ghent, Belgium, 2014-11-18. View at: Google Scholar
  135. I. De Marco, L. Baldino, S. Cardea, and E. Reverchon, “Effect of process parameters on cellulose acetate scaffolds morphology obtained by supercritical CO2 phase inversion,” in Applied Engineering Sciences: Proceedings of the 2014 AASRI International Conference on Applied Engineering Sciences, p. 135, CRC Press, Hollywood, LA, USA, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  136. T. N. Vo, S. R. Shah, S. Lu et al., “Injectable dual-gelling cell-laden composite hydrogels for bone tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 83, pp. 1–11, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. K. Ren, C. He, C. Xiao, G. Li, and X. Chen, “Injectable glycopolypeptide hydrogels as biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 51, pp. 238–249, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. B. Yang, F. Yao, T. Hao et al., “Development of electrically conductive double-network hydrogels via one-step facile strategy for cardiac tissue engineering,” Advanced Healthcare Materials., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 474–488, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Ke Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.