Review Article
Review on Hybrid Carbon/Flax Composites and Their Properties
Table 3
Overview of the components used for the manufacture of hybrid carbon/flax composites.
| CF | (g/m2) | Content CF | FLA | (g/m2) | Content FLA | Content CF & FLA | Matrix | Reference |
| Twill | 300 | 0–52 vol.% | Twill | 350 | 0–39 vol.% | - | EP | [14] | Twill | 300 | 0–55 vol.% | UD fabric | 200 | 0–32 vol.% | - | EP | [24] | Twill 2/2 | 200 | 50 vol.% | Plain | 235 | NS | 32–40.5 vol.% | EP | [19] | Twill 2/2 | 240 | 0–58 vol.% | Hopsack 4/4 Twill 2/2 | 500 420 | NS | - | EP | [18] | UD prepreg | 476 | 37 wt.% (prepreg) | Twill 2/2 prepreg Ribs 4/4 prepreg | 315 190 | 55 wt.% (prepreg) | - | EP | [13] | UD prepreg | 300 | NS | UD prepreg | 180 | NS | 56–62 vol.% | EP | [15] | UD prepreg | NS | NS | Quasi-UD-prepreg | 180 | NS | 50 vol.% | EP | [16] | UD prepreg | NS | 57 vol.% (prepreg) | UD prepreg | NS | 58–60 vol.% (prepreg) | NS | EP | [9] | UD fabric | 320 | NS | Twill Plain | 220 150 | NS | 49–51.5 vol.% | EP | [12] | UD fabric | 448 | 0–61 vol.% | UD fabric | 275 | 0–38 vol.% | 38–61 vol.% | EP | [17] | UD fabric | NS | | UD fabric | NS | | 50 vol.%1 | Bio-EP | [8] | Plain | 197 | 0–66 vol.% | Hopsack 4/4 | 500 | 0–29 vol.% | 29–66 vol.% | EP | [25] | Plain | 200 | 12 wt.% | UD fabric | 380 | 27 wt.% | 53 wt.%2 | EP | [21] | Plain | 200 | ca. 10–20 wt.% | Plain | 435 | ca. 27–31 wt.% | ca. 27–51 wt.% | Bio-EP | [22] | Short rCF (pyrolysis) | - | 100–0 wt.%3 | Short fibers | - | 0–75 wt.% | 35 vol.% | EP | [23] | Short rCF (dry fiber cut-off) | - | 30–0 vol.% | Staple fibers | | 0–30 vol.% | 30 vol.% | EP | [26] | Woven (NS) | 480 | NS | UD mat | NS | NS | NS | EP | [20] |
|
|
Note: CF: carbon fibers; FLA: flax fibers; EP: epoxy; ρ: density; rCF: recycled carbon fibers; NS: not stated. 1Planned fiber volume fraction. 2Third fiber type used: 14 wt.% basalt fibers. 3Relative indication compared to other specimens.
|