Research Article

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Etoricoxib versus Celecoxib and Nonselective NSAIDs in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in Norway

Table 3

Parameters (and distributions) for cost-effectiveness evaluation.

ParameterValueUncertainty range/95% credible intervalAssumed uncertainty distributionSource

Efficacy
Change from baseline BASFI
 Etoricoxib (90 mg)−17.87−22.16; −13.64No distribution assumed; posterior distributions directly obtained from mixed treatment comparison of extracted data and simultaneously forwarded into Markov model. For MTC, noninformative prior distributions were used. Barkhuizen et al. [26];
Van der Heijde et al. [16]
Dougados et al. [27];
Sieper et al. [17]
 Celecoxib (200 mg)−10.12−12.34; −7.932
 Celecoxib (400 mg)−11.8−14.52; −9.10
 Diclofenac−11.51−15.68; −7.34
 Naproxen−14.82−17.69; −11.98
Change from baseline BASDAI
 Etoricoxib (90 mg)−28.53−32.06; −25.05Van der Heijde et al. [16];
Sieper et al. [17]
 Celecoxib (200 mg)−18.47−24.12; −12.9
 Celecoxib (400 mg)−21.77−26.95; −16.51
 Diclofenac/naproxen−23.46−26.96; −19.96
Probability of discontinuation
 Etoricoxib (90 mg)0.0630.027; 0.117
 Celecoxib (200 mg)0.2250.165; 0.292Barkhuizen et al. [26]
 Celecoxib (400 mg)0.1770.113; 0.255Van der Heijde et al. [16]
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.1490.105; 0.202Dougados et al. [27]
BASFI without treatment4540; 50Uniform (40, 50)Based on baseline characteristics of trials included in MTC (see Table 1)
BASDAI without treatment4540; 50Uniform (40, 50)
Disease progression measured using annual changes in BASFI0.50; 0.10Uniform (0, 0.10)Kobelt et al. [6];
Ara et al. [20]
BASFI with anti-TNFα2320; 26Uniform (20, 26) Ara et al. [20]
BASDAI with anti-TNFα1918; 20Uniform (18, 20)
BASFI when stopped with anti-TNFα5550; 60Uniform (50, 60)
BASDAI when stopped with anti-TNFα5247; 57Uniform (47, 57)
Annual probability of discontinuation from anti-TNFα treatment0.100.05; 0.15Beta (13.2, 118.8)Ara et al. [20]

Safety and treatment (annual probabilities)
PUBs
 Etoricoxib0.01110.0074; 0.0159No distribution assumed; posterior distribution directly obtained from indirect comparison analysis of extracted data and simultaneously forwarded into Markov model. For indirect comparison of safety, noninformative prior distributions were used. Ramey et al. [11];
Silverstein et al. [14]
 Celecoxib0.01340.0075; 0.0221
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.02700.0216; 0.0334
Suspected PUBs
 Etoricoxib0.00160.0000; 0.0061No distribution assumed; posterior distribution directly obtained from analysis of extracted data and simultaneously forwarded into Markov model. For indirect comparison of safety, noninformative prior distributions were used. Ramey et al. [11]
 Celecoxib0.00160.0000; 0.0061
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.00300.0000; 0.0115
Minor GI events MEDAL study [15]
 Etoricoxib/celecoxib0.04630.0420; 0.0506
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.07040.0650; 0.0759

PUB risk reduction with PPI0.40Moore et al. [29]
Dying from PUB0.036 Ramey et al. [11];
Laine et al. [28]
Hospitalization given PUB0.210.056; 0.358Uniform (0.056, 0.358)Bloom et al. [39];
Maetzel et al. [40];
Knill-Jones et al. [41];
Singh and Ramey, [42];
de Pouvourville [43];
Jönsson and Haglund, [44];
Gabriel and Matteson, [45],
Smalley et al. [46];
Edelson et al. [47]

Surgery given hospitalization0.250.12; 0.39Uniform (0.12, 0.39)Maetzel et al. [40];
Knill-Jones et al. [41];
Jönsson and Haglund, [44];
Gabriel et al. [48];
Johnson et al. [49];
Kong et al. [50]
Inpatient tx given suspected PUB0.250.18; 0.32Beta (36.5, 109.5)Maetzel et al. [40]
Treatment given minor GI1Assumption
Thrombotic CV event rateNo distribution assumed; posterior distribution directly obtained from indirect comparison analysis of extracted data and simultaneously forwarded into Markov model. For indirect comparison of safety, noninformative prior distributions were used.
 Etoricoxib0.01240.0111; 0.01381 Cannon et al. [15];
Curtis et al. [30]
 Celecoxib0.01240.0111; 0.01381
 Diclofenac0.01310.0117; 0.01454
 Naproxen0.00770.0039; 0.01381
Death from thrombotic CV event Cannon et al. [15]
 Etoricoxib/celecoxib0.13
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.128
Edema MEDAL [15]
 Etoricoxib/celecoxib0.01060.0086; 0.0127Beta (101.4, 9459.7)
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.00700.0054; 0.0088Beta (64.9, 9165.4)
Hypertension
 Etoricoxib/celecoxib0.02290.0200; 0.0260Beta (218.9, 9342.0)
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.01530.0129; 0.0179Beta (141.2, 9088.8)
Coronary heart failure
 Etoricoxib/celecoxib0.00440.0032; 0.0058Beta (42.1, 9518.9)
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.00260.0017; 0.0037Beta (24.7, 9490.5)
Hepatic events
 Etoricoxib/celecoxib0.00360.0025; 0.00489Beta (34.4, 9526.6)
 Diclofenac/naproxen0.02180.0189; 0.0249Beta (201.2, 9028.8)
Renal events
 Etoricoxib/Celecoxib0.01140.0094; 0.0136Beta (109.0, 9452.0)
 Diclofenac/Naproxen0.01000.0081; 0.0120Beta (92.3, 9137.7)

Utility
Relation between EQ-5d and BASFI and BASDAIAra et al. [20]
 Constant0.9240.890; 0.957Normal (0.924, 0.0172)
 BASFI−0.004−0.0057; −0.0029Normal (−0.004, 0.00072)
 BASDAI−0.004−0.0056; −0.0024Normal (−0.004, 0.00082)

Disutility due to adverse events (adjusted for duration)
Surgery for PUB0.0800.069; 0.092Beta distributions Moore et al. [29]
Inpatient treatment for PUB0.0620.052; 0.072
Outpatient treatment for PUB0.0510.042; 0.060
Inpatient investigation for suspected PUB0.0620.052; 0.072
Outpatient investigation for suspected PUB0.0250.021; 0.030
Minor GI symptoms requiring treatment0.0150.012; 0.019
Minor GI symptoms not requiring treatment0.000040.00000; 0.00032
Thrombotic CV event0.2940.256; 0.331Moore et al. [29]
Edema0.0200.016; 0.024Revicki [33]
Hypertension0.0010.000; 0.002Stason and Weinstein, [34]
Hepatic0.0550.040; 0.072Nichol et al. [35]
CHF0.0020.001; 0.002Wong et al, [36]
Renal0.0200.016; 0.024Revicki [33]

Costs of events (NOK)
Surgery for PUB22,90418,900; 27,300
Inpatient treatment for PUB22,90418,900; 27,300
Outpatient treatment for PUB2,2312,038; 2,437Gamma distributions Resource use from Jansen et al. [19]; drug acquisition costs from NoMA (September 2007); GP costs from Norwegian Medical Association; DRG prices from ISF 2007 [37];
Inpatient investigation for suspected PUB22,29518,240; 26,700
Outpatient investigation for suspected PUB1,2971,157; 1,445
Minor GI symptoms requiring treatment568507; 636
Thrombotic CV event95,555NoMA (September 2007); ISF 2007 [37];
CHF45,958NoMA (September 2007); ISF 2007 [37];

Annual drug costs (NOK)
Etoricoxib (90 mg)4,654NoMA (September 2007)
Celecoxib (200 mg)3,318
Celecoxib (400 mg)6,636
Diclofenac (150 mg)1,588
Naproxen (1000 mg)1,380
PPI (omeprazole)3,050
Aspirin (75 mg)383
Anti-TNFα tx cost143,322NoMA (September 2007)