A Service-Oriented Component-Based Framework for Dynamic Reconfiguration Modeling Targeting SystemC/TLM

Table 2

Comparison with related works.

Ref	DPR support	UML/MARTE use	UML/MARTE DPR semantics covering		Design approach	Modeling paradigm	Target platform	Auto code gen	Transf. tools
			Extended packages	#new stereotypes
[24]	No	UML-ESL	No	No	ESL	Service level	SystemC	Yes	N/A
[25]	No	UML/MARTE	No	No	MDD	Object-oriented	SystemC/TLM	Yes	UML2HIF
						Timing constraints	VHDL		HIF2SC/HIF2VHDL
[26]	No	UML/MARTE	No	No	MDE	Aspect-oriented	VHDL	Yes	GenERTiCA
[30]	Yes	No	No	No	PRM	Process-based	SystemC	No	No
[31]	Yes	No	No	No	SW/HW codesign	Dynamic Module	SystemC/TLM/RTL	No	No
[32]	Yes	No	No	No	System-level	Object-oriented	SystemC/TLM	No	No
						Process-based
[34, 35]	Yes	No	No	No	Y-chart based	CDFG	SystemC/TLM	No	No
[7]	Yes	UML/MARTE	No	No	MDA	Component-based	SystemC/TLM/RTL	Yes	Acceleo/MTL
[38]	Yes	UML/MARTE	No	04	MDE	Component-based	RTL/VHDL/C	Yes	QVTO/Acceleo
[39]	Yes	UML/MARTE	No	05	MDE	Component-based	VHDL	Yes	N/A
[40–42]	Yes	RecoMARTE	HLAM, GCM, HRM, GRM	13	MDE	Component-based	Xilinx XPS	Yes	QVTO
									Acceleo
The proposed framework	Yes	MARTE4DPR	HLAM, GCM, SRM, HRM, GRM, GQAM	50	MDE	Service-oriented component	SystemC/TLM	Yes	ATL
		MARTE4SCTLM							Acceleo