Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Rotating Machinery
Volume 2014, Article ID 297861, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/297861
Research Article

A Miniature Four-Hole Probe for Measurement of Three-Dimensional Flow with Large Gradients

Thermal Turbomachines Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai 600 036, India

Received 28 May 2014; Revised 11 August 2014; Accepted 12 August 2014; Published 2 September 2014

Academic Editor: Mark McQuilling

Copyright © 2014 Ravirai Jangir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. L. Treaster and A. M. Yocum, “The calibration and application of five-hole probes,” nstrumentation Society of America Transactions, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 23–34, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. J. Pisasale and N. A. Ahmed, “A novel method for extending the calibration range of five-hole probe for highly three-dimensional flows,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 13, no. 1-2, pp. 23–30, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Pissasale and N. A. Ahmed, “Theoretical calibration for highly three-dimensional low-speed flows of a five-hole probe,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1100–1107, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Pissasale and N. A. Ahmed, “Development of a functional relationship between port pressures and flow properties for the calibration and application of multihole probes to highly three-dimensional flows,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 422–436, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Yasa and G. Paniagua, “Robust procedure for multi-hole probe data processing,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 26, pp. 46–54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. G. Dominy and H. P. Hodson, “Investigation of factors influencing the calibration of five-hole probes for three-dimensional flow measurements,” Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 513–519, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. W. Lee and S. B. Jun, “Reynolds number effects on the non-nulling calibration of a cone-type five-hole probe for turbomachinery applications,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1632–1648, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Telionis, Y. Yang, and O. Rediniotis, “Recent developments in multi-hole probe technology,” in Proceedings of 20th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM '09), Gramado, Brazil, November 2009.
  9. S. J. Lien and N. A. Ahmed, “An examination of suitability of multi-hole pressure probe technique for skin friction measurement in turbulent flow,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 153–164, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. M. Ligrani, B. A. Singer, and L. R. Baun, “Miniature five-hole pressure probe for measurement of three mean velocity components in low-speed flows,” Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 868–876, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. Chernoray and J. Hjärne, “Improving the accuracy of multihole probe measurements in velocity gradients,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, pp. 125–134, Berlin, Germany, June 2008. View at Scopus
  12. J. Town, A. Akturk, and C. Camci, “Total pressure correction of a sub-miniature five-hole probe in areas of pressure gradients,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition (GT '12), pp. 855–861, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. T. Hoenen, R. Kunte, P. Waniczek, and P. Jeschke, “Measuring failures and correction methods for pneumatic multihole probes,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo : Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition (GT '12), pp. 721–729, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. R. Erwin, “Experimental techniques: instrumentation,” in High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion, vol. 5 of Aerodynamics of Turbines and Compressors, p. 173, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  15. N. K. Maheshwari, D. Saha, R. K. Sinha, and V. Venkat Raj, Velocity Measurement in the Three Dimensional Flow Fluid in a Nuclear Reactor Calandria Using Four Hole Probe, Reactor Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India, 1998.
  16. AC-flow., http://ac-flow.com/upload/files/4-hole%20wedge%20type%20probe.pdf.
  17. A. Heneka, “Instantaneous three dimensional flow measurements with a four hole wedge probe,” in Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines, Aachen, Germany, 1983.
  18. R. W. Ainsworth, J. L. Allen, and J. J. M. Batt, “The development of fast response aerodynamic probes for flow measurements in turbomachinery,” ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 625–634, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. P. Schlienger, Evolution of unsteady secondary flows in a multistage shrouded axial turbine [dissertation], ETH, Zürich, Switzerland, 2003, ETH no. 15230.
  20. I. C. Shepherd, “A four hole pressure probe for fluid flow measurements in three dimensions,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 590–594, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Sitaram and A. L. Treaster, “A simplified method of using four-hole probes to measure three dimensional flow fields,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Sitaram and K. Srikanth, “Effect of chamfer angle on the calibration curves of five hole probes,” in Proceedings of the 39th National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Paper No. FMFP2012-240, p. 10, SVNIT, Surat, India, December 2012.
  23. N. Sitaram and S. Kumar, “Look up table method for five hole probe data reduction,” in Proceedings of the 38th National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, vol. 8 of Paper No. EM05, MANIT, Bhopal, India, December 2011.
  24. D. Sumner, “A comparison of data-reduction methods for a seven-hole probe,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 523–527, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Crowley, I. I. Shinder, and M. R. Moldover, “The effect of turbulence on a multi-hole Pitot calibration,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 33, pp. 106–109, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Sitaram, B. Lakshminarayana, and A. Ravindranath, “Conventional probes for the relative flow measurement in a turbomachinery rotor blade passage,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 406–414, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus