Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Volume 2014, Article ID 578193, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/578193
Research Article

Adequacy of the Endometrial Samples Obtained by the Uterine Explora Device and Conventional Dilatation and Curettage: A Comparative Study

1Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Khalid University Hospital, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Pathology, King Saud University, Faculty of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, P.O. Box 2925 (32), Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Khalid University Hospital, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia
4Sheikh Abdullah Bahamdan’s Research Chair for EBHC-KT, King Saud University and King Khalid University Hospital, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia

Received 18 August 2013; Accepted 2 December 2013; Published 8 January 2014

Academic Editor: Yves Jacquemyn

Copyright © 2014 Maria Abdulrahim Arafah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to Cite this Article

Maria Abdulrahim Arafah, Ammar Cherkess Al-Rikabi, Rakia Aljasser, and Yaser Adi, “Adequacy of the Endometrial Samples Obtained by the Uterine Explora Device and Conventional Dilatation and Curettage: A Comparative Study,” International Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 578193, 5 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/578193.