Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis
Volume 2006, Article ID 60824, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JAMSA/2006/60824

Installment options close to expiry

1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
2Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7

Received 6 December 2005; Revised 5 June 2006; Accepted 31 July 2006

Copyright © 2006 G. Alobaidi and R. Mallier. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Alobaidi and R. Mallier, “Asymptotic analysis of American call options,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 177–188, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. G. Alobaidi and R. Mallier, “On the optimal exercise boundary for an American put option,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. G. Alobaidi and R. Mallier, “American lock-in options close to expiry,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 409–429, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. G. Alobaidi, R. Mallier, and A. S. Deakin, “Laplace transforms and installment options,” Mathematical Models & Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1167–1189, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. G. Barles, J. Burdeau, M. Romano, and N. Samsoen, “Critical stock price near expiration,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 77–95, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  6. F. Black and M. Scholes, “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,” The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 637–654, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. D. M. Chance, Essays in Derivatives, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.
  8. M. Chesney and R. Gibson, “State space symmetry and two factor option pricing models,” Advances in Futures and Operations Research, vol. 8, pp. 85–112, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. H. A. Davis, W. Schachermayer, and R. G. Tompkins, “Pricing, no-arbitrage bounds and robust hedging of instalment options,” Quantitative Finance, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 597–610, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. M. H. A. Davis, W. Schachermayer, and R. G. Tompkins, “Installment options and static hedging,” The Journal of Risk Finance, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 46–52, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. N. Dewynne, S. D. Howison, I. Rupf, and P. Wilmott, “Some mathematical results in the pricing of American options,” European Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 381–398, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. A. R. Dixit and R. S. Pindyck, Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1994.
  13. J. D. Evans, R. Kuske, and J. B. Keller, “American options of assets with dividends near expiry,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 219–237, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. J. Hakala and U. Wystup, Foreign Exchange Risk: Models, Instruments and Strategies, Risk, London, 2002.
  15. F. Karsenty and J. Sikorav, “Installment plan,” Risk Magazine, vol. 6, pp. 36–40, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Knessl, “A note on a moving boundary problem arising in the American put option,” Studies in Applied Mathematics, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 157–183, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. R. E. Kuske and J. B. Keller, “Optimal exercise boundary for an American put option,” Applied Mathematical Finance, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  18. Y. K. Kwok, Mathematical Models of Financial Derivatives, Springer Finance, Springer, Singapore, 1998. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. S. Majd and R. S. Pindyck, “Time to build, option value, and investment decisions,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7–27, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. R. Mallier and G. Alobaidi, “Laplace transforms and American options,” Applied Mathematical Finance, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 241–256, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  21. R. Mallier and G. Alobaidi, “The American put option close to expiry,” Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae. New Series, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. R. McDonald and M. Schroder, “A parity result for American options,” The Journal of Computational Finance, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 5–13, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. C. Merton, “Theory of rational option pricing,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 141–183, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. P. A. Samuelson, “Rational theory of warrant pricing,” Industrial Management Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 13–31, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Stamicar, D. Ševčovič, and J. Chadam, “The early exercise boundary for the American put near expiry: numerical approximation,” The Canadian Applied Mathematics Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 427–444, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. L. N. Tao, “The Stefan problem with arbitrary initial and boundary conditions,” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 223–233, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. L. N. Tao, “Free boundary problems with radiation boundary conditions,” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  28. L. N. Tao, “On free boundary problems with arbitrary initial and flux conditions,” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 416–426, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  29. L. N. Tao, “On solidification problems including the density jump at the moving boundary,” The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 175–185, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  30. L. N. Tao, “On solidification of a binary alloy,” The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 211–225, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. L. N. Tao, “The analyticity of solutions of the Stefan problem,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 285–301, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. L. N. Tao, “The exact solutions of some Stefan problems with prescribed heat flux,” Journal of Applied Mechanics. Transactions of the ASME, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 732–736, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. L. N. Tao, “The Cauchy-Stefan problem,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 45, no. 1-2, pp. 49–64, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  34. L. N. Tao, “The Stefan problem with an imperfect thermal contact at the interface,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 715–720, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. P. Wilmott, Paul Wilmott on Quantitative Finance, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2000.