Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Stochastic Analysis
Volume 2013, Article ID 952628, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/952628
Research Article

Sharp Large Deviation for the Energy of -Brownian Bridge

1School of Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
2School of Information, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received 26 April 2013; Accepted 23 October 2013

Academic Editor: Yaozhong Hu

Copyright © 2013 Shoujiang Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We study the sharp large deviation for the energy of -Brownian bridge. The full expansion of the tail probability for energy is obtained by the change of measure.

1. Introduction

We consider the following -Brownian bridge: where is a standard Brownian motion, , , and the constant . Let denote the probability distribution of the solution of (1). The -Brownian bridge is first used to study the arbitrage profit associated with a given future contract in the absence of transaction costs by Brennan and Schwartz [1].

-Brownian bridge is a time inhomogeneous diffusion process which has been studied by Barczy and Pap [2, 3], Jiang and Zhao [4], and Zhao and Liu [5]. They studied the central limit theorem and the large deviations for parameter estimators and hypothesis testing problem of -Brownian bridge. While the large deviation is not so helpful in some statistics problems since it only gives a logarithmic equivalent for the deviation probability, Bahadur and Ranga Rao [6] overcame this difficulty by the sharp large deviation principle for the empirical mean. Recently, the sharp large deviation principle is widely used in the study of Gaussian quadratic forms, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model, and fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (cf. Bercu and Rouault [7], Bercu et al. [8], and Bercu et al. [9, 10]).

In this paper we consider the sharp large deviation principle (SLDP) of energy , where

Our main results are the following.

Theorem 1. Let be the process given by the stochastic differential equation (1). Then satisfies the large deviation principle with speed and good rate function defined by the following: where .

Theorem 2. satisfies SLDP; that is, for any , there exists a sequence such that, for any , when approaches enough, where The coefficients may be explicitly computed as functions of the derivatives of and (defined in Lemma 3) at point . For example, is given by with , and .

2. Large Deviation for Energy

Given , we first consider the following logarithmic moment generating function of ; that is, And let be the effective domain of. By the same method as in Zhao and Liu [5], we have the following lemma.

Lemma 3. Let be the effective domain of the limit of ; then for all , one has with where and . Furthermore, the remainder satisfies

Proof. By Itô’s formula and Girsanov’s formula (see Jacob and Shiryaev [11]), for all and , Therefore, If , we can choose such that . Then where , and . Therefore,

Proof of Theorem 1. From Lemma 3, we have and is steep; by the Gärtner-Ellis theorem (Dembo and Zeitouni [12]), satisfies the large deviation principle with speed and good rate function defined by the following:

Remark 4. Theorem 1 can also be obtained by using Theorem 1 in Zhao and Liu [5].

3. Sharp Large Deviation for Energy

For , let Then where is the expectation after the change of measure

By Lemma 3, we have the following expression of .

Lemma 5. For all , when approaches enough, For , one gets the following.

Lemma 6. For all , the distribution of under converges to distribution. Furthermore, there exists a sequence such that, for any when approaches enough,

Proof of Theorem 2. The theorem follows from Lemma 5 and Lemma 6.

It only remains to prove Lemma 6. Let be the characteristic function of under ; then we have the following.

Lemma 7. Whenapproaches,belongs to and, for all, Moreover, with where for some positive constant, andis some positive constant.

Proof. For any, By the same method as in the proof of Lemma 2.2 in [7] by Bercu and Rouault, there exist two positive constantsandsuch that therefore, belongs to, and by Parseval’s formula, for some positive constant, let we get whereis some positive constant.

Proof of Lemma 6. By Lemma 3, we have Noting that, and for any by Taylor expansion, we obtain therefore, there exist integers, and a sequenceindependent of  ; whenapproaches, we get whereis uniform as soon as.
Finally, we get the proof of Lemma 6 by Lemma 7 together with standard calculations on thedistribution.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the National Natural Science of Tianyuan Foundation under Grant 11226202.

References

  1. M. J. Brennan and E. S. Schwartz, “Arbitrage in stock index futures,” The Journal of Business, vol. 63, pp. 7–31, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Barczy and G. Pap, “Asymptotic behavior of maximum likelihood estimator for time inhomogeneous diffusion processes,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1576–1593, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. M. Barczy and G. Pap, “Explicit formulas for Laplace transforms of certain functionals of some time inhomogeneous diffusions,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 380, no. 2, pp. 405–424, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. H. Jiang and S. Zhao, “Large and moderate deviations in testing time inhomogeneous diffusions,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 141, no. 9, pp. 3160–3169, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. S. Zhao and Q. Liu, “Large deviations for parameter estimators of α-Brownian bridge,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 695–707, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. R. R. Bahadur and R. Ranga Rao, “On deviations of the sample mean,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 31, pp. 1015–1027, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. B. Bercu and A. Rouault, “Sharp large deviations for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process,” Rossiĭskaya Akademiya Nauk. Teoriya Veroyatnosteĭ i ee Primeneniya, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 74–93, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. B. Bercu, F. Gamboa, and M. Lavielle, “Sharp large deviations for Gaussian quadratic forms with applications,” European Series in Applied and Industrial Mathematics. Probability and Statistics, vol. 4, pp. 1–24, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. B. Bercu, L. Coutin, and N. Savy, “Sharp large deviations for the fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process,” SIAM Theory of Probability and Its Applications, vol. 55, pp. 575–610, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Bercu, L. Coutin, and N. Savy, “Sharp large deviations for the non-stationary Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process,” Stochastic Processes and their Applications, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 3393–3424, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. J. Jacod and A. N. Shiryaev, Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes, Springer Press, Berlin, Germany, 1987. View at MathSciNet
  12. A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni, Large Deviations Techniques and Applications, vol. 38, Springe, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 1998. View at MathSciNet