Table of Contents
International Journal of Superconductivity
Volume 2014, Article ID 317974, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/317974
Research Article

The Stratified Superconductivity in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 Single Crystal: Direct Measurement of Energy Gap between Homo-, and Inhomogeneous States

1P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the RAS, Moscow 119991, Russia
2Institute of Solid State Physics RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia
3L.V. Kirensky Institute of Physics, Siberian Branch of RAS, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia

Received 30 September 2013; Revised 18 December 2013; Accepted 19 December 2013; Published 2 March 2014

Academic Editor: Zigang Deng

Copyright © 2014 L. N. Zherikhina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The existence of space inhomogeneous superconductor insulator state (SISIS) found out earlier in polycrystalline samples of high- system ( K) is confirmed on single crystal. At ( K) the transition from the homogeneous superconducting state into the SISIS occurs. SISIS is characterized by the appearance of two gaps on the Fermi surface, semi- and superconducting, which are modulated in space in antiphase, the electric transport between superconducting regions being carried out due to Josephson tunneling. Thus the whole sample becomes a multiple Josephson system. Nonlinear curves are observed on single crystal at temperatures below . Dependence of curves on temperature and magnetic field, typical to a Josephson system, was found out. Besides, a step-like peculiarity at the values of voltage of the order of one and two superconducting gaps shows up. These peculiarities are suppressed by magnetic field much earlier than critical current. The new data firstly correlate with the model of SISIS and secondly permit for the first time to determining directly the energy gap between homogeneous and stratified superconductor states.

1. Introduction

High-temperature superconductor (HTSC) has a cubic lattice and has no copper atoms or any other magnetic ions (has been found out in 1988 [1, 2]). These features distinguish it from other HTSC compounds and do not allow one to justify its HTSC properties on the bases of layered structure or internal magnetic ions. Relative towards high-   is the system [3] famous even before the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity [4] and in behaviour of which different anomalies [5], answering to the spatially inhomogeneous superconductivity, were observed already at the end of the seventies. In subject plan the spectrum of implemented to date researches of high- system appears to be rather wide. Not being exhaustive, the list displayed below illustrates this thematic latitude:(i)problems of synthesis, composition, and structure of high- [611];(ii)transport, phonon, and electron-phonon effects [1214];(iii)heat capacity, thermal expansion, and so forth [1520];(iv)investigation of magnetic response, accompanying superconducting transition, anisotropy of magnetic properties, and irreversibility effects in remagnetization [2124];(v)electronic structure and mechanisms of superconductivity [2536];(vi)superconductivity stratification and phase transitions metal-dielectric [3740];(vii)Josephson and microwave properties and nonlinear effects under the microwaves action [4146].

We chose the system for investigation, since, being a HTSC, this compound has relatively low critical temperature and low critical field . As a result, curves can be measured and hence phase transition can be observed over a wide temperature range. In experiment we managed to investigate different parameters, characterizing superconducting transition, in the temperature interval . Measurements of critical field in performed by us [47] revealed negative curvature of temperature dependence , which is rather typical feature for majority of high- systems, but only in this negative curvature happened to be followed down to . At the same time we have found a number of unusual anomalies in behaviour of investigated initially in polycrystalline form.

Figures 14 demonstrate the observed anomalies which are(i)the recovery of the resistive state from the superconducting state (reentrant behavior) as the temperature decreases at (Figure 1, curve T), which is caused by the nonmonotonic temperature dependence of the critical current [47];(ii)presence of superconducting phase in the volume of the sample, being in the high electric resistance state, that was caused by magnetic field or electric current action; it is apparent from low-frequency contactless induction measurements that presence of superconducting phase keeps safe until full destruction of this high-resistance state by a strong current (Figure 2, [48]);(iii)hysteretic curves (Figure 3) with nonmonotonic temperature dependence of the critical current having maximum at  K (Figure 3(b), upper inset [47]);(iv)the suppression of a critical current by microwave radiation (Figure 3(b), bottom inset [49]);(v)nonstationary Josephson effect in polycrystalline samples at (Figure 4 [50]).

317974.fig.001
Figure 1: Temperature dependence of electric resistance in polycrystals of when for different magnetic fields at “big” operating current (1 mA). Fields in are put at corresponding curves. On inset: magnetoresistance of the sample at fixed temperature ( K,  mA). The unusual dependence of resistance from magnetic field (the inset to Figure 1) is that varies with field nonmonotonically, demonstrating negative magnetoresistive effect: at first resistance increases and then decreases sharply down to —the value of resistance in the normal state just above the superconducting transition. The maximum value of resistance depends on temperature and at low temperatures can exceed for several orders of magnitude.
317974.fig.002
Figure 2: Dependence of static resistance from current, introduced in a sample, shows that when the system transfers into resistive () state, while its magnetic susceptibility remains virtually permanent relative to the homogenous superconductivity state. On return course when current decreases the nonzero resistance is retained until current value , which answers hysteresis character of the volt-ampere characteristic, on the basis of which the dependence was obtained.
fig3
Figure 3: Current-voltage characteristics of ceramic sample at different temperatures and magnetic fields: (a) = 4.8 K: 1; = 0 T, 2; 0.64 T, 3; 1.6 T, 4; 3.2 T, 5; 4.8 T, and 6; 6.4 T; (b) = 0 T: 1; T = 4,8 K, 2; 10 K, 3; 15 K, 4; 18 K, and 5; 22 K. On inset to (a) the dependence of the critical current versus magnetic field, built from hysteretic curves on (a), is given. Top inset to (b): the nonmonotone dependence of the critical current versus temperature, with maximum at  K. Bottom inset to (b): the effect of suppression of critical current under the action of microwave radiation, which demonstrates possible presence of Josephson properties of system below .
317974.fig.004
Figure 4: The top graph: volt-ampere characteristic—the dependence of sample voltage on operating current (on inset conventional VCC of sample with regular arrangement of reference axes ) is shown. The middle graph: averaged component of sample response to periodical variation of microwave irradiation frequency of backward-wave tube, registered on modulation frequency . The bottom graph: averaged component of sample response on amplitude modulation with a depth reduced to deviation factor of frequency modulation (6%). The appreciable exceeding of response on FM relative to response on AM is the evidence for synchronicity of low frequency oscillations of Shapiro voltage steps, corresponding to different Josephson junctions. These junctions are formed below  K due to appearance of spatial inhomogeneity of superconducting phase distribution in the sample.

Temperature dependence of resistance obtained at different magnetic fields , as it can be seen from Figure 1, agrees with field dependence of voltage-current characteristics (VCC), presented in Figure 3(a). In this case, the nonmonotone dependence of the critical current in zero field (inset to Figure 3(b)) has a maximum at  K.

In our further investigations, performed on single crystal samples , a number of anomalies have been found in the vicinity of  K (it should be mentioned that critical currents of single crystals turned out to be so large that observation of VCC, at least in first experiences, appeared impossible). The anomalies, observed on single crystals, are presented in Figures 5 and 6:(i)kink of temperature dependence of residual magnetizations of single crystal near  K (Figure 5) [38];(ii)reentrance of resistive state of single crystal sample on “low-current” when  K (Figure 6) [38];(iii)magnetooptic visualization of stratification effect—appearance of spatially inhomogeneous state superconductor-insulator in single crystals at temperatures below 17-18 K [40].

317974.fig.005
Figure 5: Temperature dependence of residual magnetization of crystal. Values of residual magnetization were obtained from hysteresis loops of sample magnetization at different temperatures, presented in the insets: low temperatures ( K): left inset; high temperatures ( K): right inset. Sample magnetization was measured by the Hall-effect sensor. Rapid growth of irreversibility below  K confirms the fact of appearance of spatial inhomogeneity of superconducting phase distribution in a sample, which can cause additional pinning.
317974.fig.006
Figure 6: Temperature dependence of sample resistances in magnetic field 270 Oe. Curve 1 corresponds to “large” current (100 mkA) through the single crystal sample and curve 2 to “small” current (10 mkA). Reentrance of resistive state on “small” current testifies S-like form of crystal’s VCC. On polycrystalline samples S-like VCC was also observed (the inset of Figure 4).

It is necessary to note one more anomaly observed in single [44, 45]: the temperature dependence of the second and the third harmonics microwave emission exhibited two peaks, one just below and the second around  K. Since a peak of the harmonic signals generally occurs just below the transition temperature, the lower peak might be a sign of the transition from homogeneous to stratified state.

2. The Model of Stratified State in High- Superconductor Ba0.6K0.4BiO3

The data given above can be explained in terms of the model proposed in [5153], which implies the self-consistent coexistence of superconducting and dielectric phases in the system under study. The dielectric phase accounts for the field-induced increase of the resistance at temperatures below , and the complete suppression of superconductivity in a magnetic field is accompanied by the breaking of the coexistent dielectric phase, which results in the decrease of the resistance (Figure 1) to its value in the normal state . According to the model of [5153], HTSC systems are considered as strongly doped semiconductors with a Fermi level that satisfies the nesting condition, which causes instability with respect to the transition into the ordered space inhomogeneous state. Such a long-range order causes a gap in an excitation spectrum at the Fermi level (correspondingly, a pseudogap in the case of a short-range order). The appearance of additional carriers above the gap upon doping decreases this gap and, hence, the chemical potential . This decrease in cannot be compensated by the increase in the kinetic energy that, in turn, is hindered because of the high density of states at the gap edge. As a result, the derivative of the chemical potential with respect to the number of particles turns out to be negative: . This nonmonotonic behavior of results in the instability of the state with a constant concentration (.): this state decomposes to form many coexistent regions with high (metal or superconductor) and low (dielectric) values of . At  K, superconducting regions are coupled through Josephson tunneling, which is indicated by the hysteretic curves and the nonstationary Josephson effect; dielectric layers here should be rather thin. In this temperature range  K the critical current (the Josephson current ) decreases with decreasing due to an increase of the dielectric-layer thickness or insulator gap width. The strong exponential dependence of the Josephson critical current on the layer thickness or barrier height explains the noticeable decrease in with decreasing temperature. The breaking of the weak Josephson coupling in a magnetic field causes electrical resistance in the stratified phase, and this resistance turns out to be higher than that in the normal phase, since it is specified by the tunneling resistance of dielectric regions in the stratified phase. Thus, the anomalous temperature dependence and , the hysteresis of the curves (Figures 1 and 3 inset), and presence of superconducting phase in resistive state (Figure 2) can be explained in terms of the model of a spatially inhomogeneous state insulator-superconductor (SISIS) with Josephson tunneling between superconducting regions.

The set of collected experimental data allows in the context of (SISIS) model speaking about three possible states existing in : normal, homogenous superconducting, and stratified (Figure 7 [54, 55]). Below superconducting and dielectric regions coexist in the sample; therefore, the stratified state has the lowest energy; the homogeneous superconducting phase is located above this state on the energy scale, and the normal state is located higher (energy diagram in Figure 7).

317974.fig.007
Figure 7: Temperature dependencies of free energies of different states in :  : energy gap between homogeneous superconductor and stratified (i.e., SISIS) states; : superconducting gap.

3. Samples

The single crystals of , grown up by the method of chemical transport reactions, had dimensions of the order of  mm3 [56].

4. Direct Measurement of Energy Gap between Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous States

In the course of experiments, set recently with single crystals, we happened to estimate energy parameters of diagram of equilibrium phases. In one of series of these experiments a new phenomenon was observed: a distinct temperature and magnetic field dependent step-like peculiarity on voltage-current characteristics. VCC of single crystal obtained at different temperatures in zero magnetic field are presented in Figure 8. On low temperature curves one can see distinct step-like peculiarities. The second step on each curve happened at the voltage twice more than the voltage , corresponding to the position of the first step on the curve (Figure 8). The peculiarities on the 2 and 4,2 K curves had a complex S-like form.

317974.fig.008
Figure 8: Voltage-current characteristics of single crystal at different temperatures. The regions analogous to the 1st and 2nd Shapiro steps are outlined on the curve for  K.

The dependence of VCC on magnetic field is demonstrated in Figure 9.

317974.fig.009
Figure 9: Voltage-current characteristics of single crystal at  K in various magnetic fields.

The step was displaced and spread both with temperature rise and magnetic field enhancing, but influence of magnetic field was nonlinear. Absence of noticeable action of magnetic field on dependence in the magnetic field range 0–0.1 T is explained apparently by the quadratic dependence of effect, and as a result influence of field  T will make just 1% from the effect of  T.

Figure 10 demonstrates temperature dependence of the first step position , determined from curves, registered at zero magnetic field (black points) and at  T (grey points). Black curve is a guide line through experimental data. We drew the gray curve through gray point congruently to the black one supposing that effect of temperature in both cases in zero and nonzero magnetic fields is similar.

317974.fig.0010
Figure 10: Temperature dependence of step position on VCC. The black curve is built from Figure 8 data and responds to zero magnetic field. The gray curve is based on Figure 9 and responds to the field  T.

decreases with temperature rise. The extrapolation of the dependence to zero voltage value crosses axes at temperature near  K (Figure 10 black curve). Comparison of Figure 7 and the black curve in Figure 10 convinced us that the step is related to the existence of stratified state in single crystals, since temperature dependence of step position and of the difference between free energies of homogeneous and stratified superconducting states is quite similar. It permits us to propose the following explanation of the step appearance. Suppose that occasionally it turns out that between potential contacts is a single Josephson junction. It may be an occasional mechanical microdefect. The voltage drop on potential contacts of the sample (displayed as on VCC) due to comparatively high resistance of separately occurred Josephson junction in practice appears to be applied just entirely to this transition. When voltage drops on Josephson junction, as is known [57, 58], the last one generates microwave radiation with frequency ( “active” nonstationary Josephson effect). If radiation quantum coincides with energy gap between homogeneous and stratified states of superconductor (Figure 7) the system falls within resonance conditions that should affect its VCC due to nonstationary Josephson effect under self-radiation of the junction (“passive” nonstationary Josephson effect [56, 59]). The manifestation of such [60] “active/passive” nonstationary Josephson effect explains temperature dependence of (Figure 10) and disappearance of the step at temperatures near . Multiple peculiarities on VCC observed in these experiments are quiet analogous to Shapiro steps with different (Figure 8,  K) and it provides evidence in favor of registration the phenomena, related to self-action of Josephson generation (the “active/passive” effect [59]). Noticeable S-like form of step (Figures 8 and 9,   K, 4.2 K ) seems to be caused by the low of resonator, from which Josephson radiation, affecting thereafter back on the transition, is reflected. Base frequency of this low- resonator corresponds to energetic gap between homogenous and inhomogeneous superconductor states in (Figure 7).

The amplitude and phase of reflected emission depend on tuning out of generated frequency   from resonant one. According to elementary theory of “passive” nonstationary Josephson effect the value of superconducting components of tunnel current, determining the Shapiro step height, in its turn depends on the amplitude and phase of radiation, affecting transition. As voltage drop on Josephson junction overloads “resonant value” module of superconducting components of tunnel current at first grows out of zero point due to well-known dependence on phase ~. Then owing to dependence on amplitude ~ tunnel current starts to fall gradually in concert with (here is phase difference between reflected and incident radiation, determined by conventional phase/frequency dependence of resonance system, , Bessel function, magnetic flux quantum, and amplitude of variable voltage component on contact). About so with growth from point the “top” bell-shaped peculiarity, forming the local peak, is to be plotted on the background of undisturbed VCC. Analogously, on the back course starting from value should be plotted the “bottom” bell-shaped peculiarity, forming the local minimum. It will be noticed that “bottom” peculiarity corresponds to the interval of phase values on phase-frequency resonance characteristic and “top” to , correspondingly. To explain the observed S-like step it is necessary to show why the “top” bell-shaped peculiarity begins actually before the “bottom” terminates. Josephson oscillator binds together with irradiated resonator either increasing its efficient inertia or raising efficient rigidity, depending on phase sine. In the first case efficient resonance frequency is reduced and in the second increase. As a result the top peculiarity on VCC crosses with the bottom one. Eventually, the observed S-shaped step is formed (Figures 8 and 9). With temperature increasing the gap is reduced (Figure 7), which leads to additional lowering of effective -factor and “smoothing” of S-like step. If one regards Shapiro step appearance as the synchronization effect of internal oscillations of current and voltage in Josephson junction (arising when and ) by outer oscillations source [61], then “transformation” of step into the S-shaped region in VCC is possible to interpret, to an extent, as the effect of oscillator frequency pulling by the external cavity.

Values of energy gap between homogenous and inhomogeneous states in , taken from Figure 10 as , it is possible to compare quantitatively with the result of extrapolation of temperature dependence of sample resistance in weak field (Figure 1,   T). Let us present the dependence at low fixed magnetic field in the form . The presence of linear region on dependence in logarithmic scale (Figure 1) allows, in case , representing the contribution in the form of where energy gap plays the role of barrier height, overcome by the charge carriers, involved in transport current in stratified sample. Since the gap is simultaneously the parameter of stratified phase, its temperature dependence according to Ginzburg-Landau theory can be written as linear in expansion . Then linear region of the curve , presented in half log scale (Figure 1) may be approximately described as Brackets mean the averaging over temperature interval, corresponding to linear region of the curve, which for curve under consideration corresponds to . The slope of linear region, according to Figure 1, is Using the data obtained, one can estimate the value of energy gap at  K from the formula

One should note that presented estimation coincides with value, taken from Figure 10, with uncertainty less than one percent.

Returning to dependence of step-wise peculiarity on VCC (Figure 9) from magnetic field, applied to single crystal sample , one can note the likeness of curves corresponding to cases of  T,  K in Figure 9 and  T,  K in Figure 8. This similarity gives an indication of certain equivalence of influence on VCC of magnetic field and temperature: either ways with the increase of and with the increase of the peculiarity is smoothed, and stoops down to zero point when . The dependence of from applied magnetic field may be approximately derived from analogy with . Hence for stratified state . Then using it is possible to supplement the dependence on Figure 10 by analogous approximate dependence for nonzero field ( T, the grey curve on Figure 10). Since there is strong relation between and gap width it is possible to transfer approximate dependence at  T onto the energetic state diagram and in consequence obtain free energy of SISIS at  T (Figure 11 “grey” curve) on the base of Figure 7. “Dislodged” (grey) curves, built on Figure 11 with maintenance of mutual proportions, show magnetic field induced shifts of phase transitions parameter in system (shift of critical temperature, corresponding to  T, was measured directly in the course of experiments with single crystals).

317974.fig.0011
Figure 11: Change of temperature dependence of free energies of different phase states in under the action of external magnetic field.

Thus the new data firstly correlate with the model of SISIS and secondly permit for the first time to determine directly the energy gap between homogeneous and stratified superconductor states.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests concerning the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the program of Russian Academy of Sciences “Strongly Correlated Electrons in Solid State Matter and Structures.”

References

  1. L. F. Mattheiss, E. M. Gyorgy, and D. W. Johnson Jr., “Superconductivity above 20 K in the Ba-K-Bi-O system,” Physical Review B, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 3745–3746, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. J. Cava, B. Batlogg, J. J. Krajewski et al., “Superconductivity near 30 K without copper: the Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 perovskite,” Nature, vol. 332, no. 6167, pp. 814–816, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. W. Sleight, J. L. Gillson, and P. E. Bierstedt, “High-temperature superconductivity in the BaPb1-xBixO3 systems,” Solid State Communications, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 27–28, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Muller, “Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system,” Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, vol. 64, pp. 189–193, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. M. Gabovich and D. P. Moiseev, “Metal oxide superconductor BaPb1-xBixO3: unusual properties and new applications,” Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 29, pp. 1135–1150, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. L. Norton and H. Tang, “Superconductivity at 32 K in electrocrystallized barium potassium bismuth oxide,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 3, pp. 431–434, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Z. Zhao and M. L. Norton, “XPS study of Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Chinese Journal of Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 425–428, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. L. Rehspringer and D. Niznansky, “Preparation of Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 pure superconducting powder,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds C, vol. 195, pp. 73–76, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. Hou, H. Steinfink, L. Rabenberg, C. Hilbert, and H. Kroger, “Superconducting Ba0.6K0.4BiO3: thin film preparation by RF magnetron sputtering,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1798–1804, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H.-T. Kim, K.-Y. Kang, W.-J. Kim, Y.-N. Choi, B.-J. Kim, and Y. C. Kim, “Synthesis of Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 superconductors and structural analysis using neutron powder diffraction experiment,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1013–1018, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. Raghuveer and A. Manthiram, “Effect of BaBiO3 and Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 additives on the rechargeability of manganese oxide cathodes in alkaline cells,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1329–1332, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. I. Golovashkin, A. V. Gudenko, L. N. Zherikhina, A. M. Tskhrovrebov, and M. L. Norton, “The electron-phonon mechanism for resistivity in the high-temperature superconductor system Ba1-xKxBiO3,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 163–169, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Braden, W. Reichardt, A. S. Ivanov, and A. Y. Rumiantsev, “Anomalous dispersion of LO phonon branches in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 531–536, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Varshney, S. Shah, and R. K. Singh, “Superconductivity and normal state resistivity of Ba0.6K0.4BiO3: an optical phonon approach,” Superlattices and Microstructures, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 409–422, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. E. Graebner, L. F. Schneemeyer, and J. K. Thomas, “Heat capacity of superconducting Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 near Tc,” Physical Review B, vol. 39, no. 13, pp. 9682–9684, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. F. Hundley, J. D. Thompson, and G. H. Kwei, “Specific heat of the cubic high-Tc superconductor Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Solid State Communications, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1155–1158, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. J. Collocott, N. Savvides, and E. R. Vance, “Specific heat of polycrystalline Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 from 0.5 to 20 K,” Physical Review B, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 4794–4796, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. K. Panova, A. A. Shikov, B. I. Savel'ev et al., “Specific heat of the noncuprate oxide superconductor in magnetic fields,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 76, no. 2, p. 302, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  19. E. B. Nyeanchi, D. F. Brewer, T. E. Hargreaves et al., “Specific heat of single crystal Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 at low temperatures,” Solid State Communications, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 175–178, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. I. Golovashkin and A. P. Rusakov, “Experimental studies of the thermal and electronic properties of Ba1-xKxBiO3 and other perovskite-like oxide HTSC systems,” Physics-Uspekhi, vol. 43, pp. 184–187, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. E. McHenry, M. P. Maley, G. H. Kwei, and J. D. Thompson, “Flux creep in a polycrystalline Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 superconductor,” Physical Review B, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 7339–7342, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Baran, H. Szymczak, R. Szymczak, S. N. Barilo, V. I. Gatalskaya, and S. V. Shirayev, “Growth-induced anisotropy in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 superconducting single crystal,” Applied Physics A, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 413–416, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Hall, R. G. Goodrich, C. G. Grenier, P. Kumar, M. Chaparala, and M. L. Norton, “Magnetization measurements on single crystals of superconducting Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Philosophical Magazine B, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. A. Balaev, D. M. Gokhfel'd, L. A. Klinkova et al., “Increase of magnetization loop width in superconductor Ba0.6K0.4BiO3. Possible manifesting of phase separation,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 118, no. 1, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  25. M. S. Hegde, P. Barboux, C. C. Chang et al., “Electronic structure of high-Tc Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,” Physical Review B, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 4752–4755, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. Schlesinger, R. T. Collins, J. A. Calise et al., “Superconducting energy gap and a normal-state excitation in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Physical Review B, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 6862–6866, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. Jin, M. H. Degani, R. K. Kalia, and P. Vashishta, “Superconductivity in Ba1-xKxBiO3,” Physical Review B, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 5535–5546, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. G. Goodrich, C. Grienier, D. Hall et al., “De Haas-van Alphen measurements in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1251–1258, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Y. Lee and P. A. Deymier, “Two-electron states in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 via discretized path integral molecular dynamics,” Solid State Communications, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 653–657, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. V. Meregalli and S. Y. Savrasov, “Electron-phonon coupling and properties of doped BaBiO3,” Physical Review B, vol. 57, no. 22, pp. 14453–14469, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Jung and E. K. Choi, “Differences of structural and electronic properties in Ba1-xKxBiO3,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1045–1048, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Yu. Yakubovskii, S. V. Gudenko, N. V. Anshukova, A. I. Golovashkin, L. I. Ivanova, and A. P. Rusakov, “EPR observations of anomalous triplet states in Ba1-xKxBiO3 and BaPbyBi1-yO3,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 732–737, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Varshney and M. P. Tosi, “Pairing mechanism and superconducting state parameters of cubic perovskite Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 683–688, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. Varshney, R. P. Kumhar, S. Shah, and R. K. Singh, “Effect of plasmons on superconducting transition temperature of Ba0.6K0.4BiO3: a three square well approach,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 879–886, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. P. Menushenkov, I. A. Troyan, and M. I. Eremets, “Resonant Raman scattering in superconducting Ba1-xKxBiO3,” JETP Letters, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 521–525, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. É. Tsydynzhapov, A. F. Shevchun, M. R. Trunin et al., “Observation of a transition from BCS to HTSC-like superconductivity in Ba1-xKxBiO3 single crystals,” JETP Letters, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 405–409, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. V. Anshukova, A. I. Golovashkin, L. I. Ivanova, O. T. Malyuchkov, and A. P. Rusakov, “Insulator-metal phase transition and superconductivity in Ba1-xKxBiO3,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1163–1170, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  38. A. I. Golovashkin, L. N. Zherikhina, G. V. Kuleshova, A. M. Tskhovrebov, and M. L. Norton, “Self-consistent spatially inhomogeneous state in HTSC Ba1-xKxBiO3 single crystals,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 603–615, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Fujishita, T. Yamada, S. Nakada et al., “Spontaneous strain in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” Physica C, vol. 470, no. 1, pp. S770–S771, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. I. Golovashkin, A. M. Tskhovrebov, L. N. Zherikhina, L. S. Uspenskaya, and M. Norton, “Visualization of space inhomogeneous superconductor-insulator state in high-Tc system Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 by magnetooptic method,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 150, no. 4, Article ID 042043, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Q. Huang, J. F. Zasadzinski, K. E. Gray, D. R. Richards, and D. G. Hinks, “Ideal tunneling characteristics in Ba1-xKxBiO3 point-contact junctions with Au and Nb tips,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 57, no. 22, p. 2356, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  42. Y. Liu, J. F. Whitaker, and C. E. Platt, “Terahertz spectroscopy of superconducting thin film Ba0.6K0.4BiO3,” OSA Proceeding on Ultrafast Electronics and Optoelectronics, vol. 14, pp. 238–241, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  43. M. R. Trunin, “Surface impedance of HTSC single crystals in the microwave band,” Physics-Uspekhi, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 843–863, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. A. Gallitto, M. Guccione, M. Guccione, and M. Li. Vigni, “Microwave third harmonic emission by Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 crystals,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 13, no. 9-10, pp. 1163–1168, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Agliolo Gallitto, M. Guccione, and M. Li Vigni, “Nonlinear microwave emission in Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 crystals near Tc,” Physica C, vol. 330, no. 3, pp. 141–149, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. Fricano, M. Bonura, A. A. Gallitto, M. Li Vigni, L. A. Klinkova, and N. V. Barkovskii, “Microwave properties of Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 crystals,” European Physical Journal B, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 313–318, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. N. V. Anshukova, V. B. Ginodman, A. I. Golovashkin et al., “Anomalies in the temperature dependences, resistance, critical current, and critical magnetic field in Ba1-xKxBiO3,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 923–928, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  48. L. N. Zherildfina, A. I. Golovashkin, A. V. Gudenko, and A. M. Tskhovrebov, “The de-current destruction of superconducting state and hysteresis effects in Ba-K-Bi-O,” Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, vol. 46, supplement 2, pp. 851–852, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. V. Anshukova, V. B. Ginodman, A. I. Golovashkin et al., “I-V characteristics hysteresis in superconducting Ba1-XKXBiO3 under microwave radiation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on High Temperature Superconductivity and Localization Phenomena, p. J14, Moscow, Russia, 1991.
  50. A. I. Golovashkin, A. N. Zherikhin, L. N. Zherikhina, G. V. Kuleshova, and A. M. Tskhovrebov, “Observation of latent coherent effects in randomized systems,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 370–378, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. A. Gorbatsevich, V. Y. Kopaev, and I. V. Tokatly, “Stratification and superconducting droplets in high-Tc superconductors,” JETP Letters, vol. 52, p. 95, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  52. A. A. Gorbatsevich, V. Y. Kopaev, and I. V. Tokatly, “Band theory of phase stratification,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 74, p. 521, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  53. A. A. Gorbatsevich, V. Y. Kopaev, and I. V. Tokatly, “Phase separation and dielectric correlations in HTSC,” Physica C, vol. 223, no. 1-2, pp. 95–105, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. L. N. Zherikhina, A. I. Golovashkin, A. V. Gudenko, G. V. Kuleshova, A. M. Tskhovrebov, and M. L. Norton, “H-T phase diagram of high-Tc Ba-K-Bi-O,” Physica C, vol. 388-389, pp. 451–452, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. I. Golovashkin, L. N. Zherikhina, G. V. Kuleshova, and A. M. Tshkovrebov, “Magnetic properties of high-Tc system BaKBiO in superconducting state,” in Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Fundamental Problems of High Temperature Superconductivity, p. 139, Zvenigorod, Russia, 2004.
  56. L. A. Klinkova, M. Uchida, Y. Matsui, V. I. Nikolaichik, and N. V. Barkovskii, “Noncubic layered structure of Ba1-xKxBiO3 superconductor,” Physical Review B, vol. 67, no. 14, Article ID 140501, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. B. D. Josephson, “Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling,” Physics Letters, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 251–253, 1962. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. I. K. Yanson, V. M. Svistunov, and I. M. Dmitrenko, “Experimental observation of the tunnel effect for cooper pairs with the emission of photons,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 21, pp. 650–652, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  59. S. Shapiro, A. R. Janus, and S. Holly, “Effect of microwaves on josephson currents in superconducting tunneling,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 223–225, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. K. K. Likharev and B. T. Yl’rik, Sistemy s dzhozefsonovskimi kontaktami (Systems with Josephson Contacts), Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, Russia, 1978.
  61. H. Kanter and F. L. Vernon Jr., “High-frequency response of Josephson point contacts,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 3174–3183, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus