International Journal of Vehicular Technology

Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 413821, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/413821

## Performance Analysis of CDMA WLL Systems with Imperfect Power Control and Imperfect Sectorization

Department of Electronic and Electrical Communication Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufiya University, Menouf 32952, Egypt

Received 20 September 2007; Accepted 18 July 2008

Academic Editor: Mohsen Guizani

Copyright © 2008 Sami A. El-Dolil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Wireless local loop (WLL) provides reliable, flexible, and economical access to the local telephone service using radio technology in the place of traditional wireline. In this paper, an analytical model is derived to evaluate the effect of both imperfect power control and imperfect sectorization on the performance of code division multiple access (CDMA) WLL systems. The results show that the capacity degradation, due to imperfect power control, is about 25.8% and 11.5% for single cell and multiple cell systems, respectively. Increasing the overlapping angle from to causes the capacity gain to decrease from 6 to 5.53, while the corresponding sectorization efficiency drops from 100% to 92.3%.

#### 1. Introduction

Wireless local loop (WLL) is a system that connects subscribers to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) using radio signals as a substitute for wireline for all or part of the connection between the subscribers and the switch. It is believed to be a fast and cost-effective mean to provide local phone service in rural areas and third world countries [1]. Since WLL is a fixed radio communication system; narrow-beam antennas can be employed at both the base station (BS) and subscriber's side so that the propagation between BS and subscriber's equipment is very close to free space propagation. This gives many inherent advantages to the WLL system over the traditional cellular systems, such as wider coverage area, reduced interference, higher capacity, no fast fading, and no handoff [2, 3].

CDMA technology has the potential to provide a significant improvement in the capacity of cellular radio systems compared with FDMA and TDMA systems [4]. However, this improvement is dependent upon the effectiveness of the power control system, especially on the reverse link. In the absence of power control, a BS would receive a much stronger signal from a subscriber unit that is geographically close to it than from a subscriber unit that is farther away. This is the so-called near-far problem [5, 6].

This paper presents a theoretical model to evaluate the reverse-link capacity of CDMA WLL systems in terms of outage probability, taking into account the power control error.

Sectorization in cellular CDMA systems increases the capacity in proportion to the number of sectors per cell. In practice, the antenna patterns do not fit the sector area perfectly, and there are overlapping between sectors, which causes additional interference on both the reverse and forward link [7]. The imperfect sectorization effect on the performance of CDMA WLL systems is also considered.

#### 2. Effect of Imperfect Power Control in Single Cell CDMA WLL Systems

Consider a CDMA WLL single cell system consists of subscriber units transmitting to a BS receiver on the reverse-link. A simplified CDMA transmitter is shown in Figure 1.

The signal transmitted from the th user to its BS is given by [5] where is the transmitted power of the th user, is the data sequence of the th user, where each bit has an amplitude of and a duration of , is the spreading code sequence of the th user and each of the chips per code has a duration , is the reverse link-carrier frequency, and is the random phase of the th user carrier.

The received signal at the BS receiver consists of the following: interference from other users in the cell which called intracell interference, the receiver noise , and the received signal from the desired user.

From Figure 2, is given by where represents the path loss of the th user, is the random delay of the th user signal at the receiver, and is the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) of the receiver.

The signal at the output of the matched filter is given by where is the carrier phase angle in the receiver as shown in Figure 2.

The intracell interference at the output of the matched filter is given by

##### 2.1. Perfect Power Control

To reduce the near-far problem, as well as the interference from other users and hence to increase the capacity of CDMA WLL system, it is important to apply a power control on the reverse link so that the received power from each user at the BS is controlled to be the constant target power, , [5] where The total noise power is the sum of the intracell interference power and the AWGN power of the receiver.

The AWGN power at the output of the matched filter is given by [5, 7] as where is the bitrate of the message sequence , is the chiprate, and is the noise power at the receiver input.

Thus, after despreading, the noise power is the input noise power decreased by the processing gain . The intracell interference power is given by [5] where is the variance of intracell interference at the output of the matched filter.

By applying voice activity
detection, users transmit only when speech signal is present. We introduce a
voice activity variable (VAF) which equals 1 with
probability of , and equals 0 with probability of . By
multiplying (7) by and using (5) so,
the intracell interference
to signal power ratio given by (8) is reduced by a factor of after the process of matched filtering. Now, we define the ratio ,
which is the energy per bit to interference density ratio, where , ,
and is the total interference power (sum of and ) so
In (8), the summation of over () users may be expressed as
so that
The
bit error rate (BER) for the binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation can be
expressed as
where is the
complementary error function [5]. For a required BER, a required ,
can be
determined from (12). Given ,
the maximum number of active users, other than the th user, that can be
supported by the system is given by (11) as
where represent the largest integer that is smaller
than or equal . Provided
that the number of active users does not exceed . However, when the
number of active users
is larger than , the BER will be greater than the required BER, and
this situation is referred
to as *system outage*. The outage probability of the single cell system is
defined as
The outage probability is defined as the
probability that the number of active users being greater than , that is,

##### 2.2. Imperfect Power Control

In a practical system, the power control is not perfect. So, the received signal power from the th user at its BS will differ from the target power level by dB. This power error is a random variable with a standard deviation . There are several reasons for being nonzero, such as the power measurement error at the BS and the inability to adjust the subscriber unit transmitted power sufficiently fast to force to zero [5, 8]. The signal power at the output of the matched filter for the th user can be expressed as and the intracell interference power is The intracell interference to signal power ratio at the output of matched filter becomes where and are two mutually independent random variables of power control errors of the signal and the intracell interferers, respectively. By setting (18) becomes where is a random variable with zero mean and a standard deviation . Following the same procedure as in the perfect power control case, the ratio can be written as

In order to evaluate the system performance, we introduce the outage probability that is defined as the probability of a system’s BER being greater than , that is, where is the required to ensure that the BER is less than . If the number of active users inside the cell is , then (22) can be rewritten as The probability in (23) is given by [5] where The mean of the term in (24) can be derived as following: and the variance of the is given by Now, consider the probability that there are active intracell users, , which is given by [5] The performance of the reverse link in a single cell CDMA WLL system, shown in Figure 3, is evaluated for 20 dB/dec, where WLL has a fixed-to-fixed link so propagation exponent of 2 is used [2], [9], , , , a signal-to-AWGN ratio of 20 dB at the output of the matched filter and a BER outage threshold of were used in the calculations.

For perfect power control and an outage probability of 2%, the single cell system can support up to 89 users/cell as shown in Figure 3. The outage probability of the imperfect power-controlled system having different standard deviations of power control error is also shown in the figure. For an outage probability of 2% and a standard deviation of power control errors of 2 dB, the system can support 66 users per cell. The capacity degradation, due to imperfect power control, is about 25%.

Table 1 shows the number of users per cell for different values of the standard deviation (STD) of power control errors and the percentage decrease in users due to imperfect power control, for an outage of 2%.

#### 3. Effect of Imperfect Power Control in Multiple Cell CDMA WLL Systems

In addition to the intracell interference, there is now interference from neighboring cells, which called intercell interference. The received signal at the BS includes: the desired signal, intracell interference, the AWGN at the receiver input, and intercell interference. Figure 4 shows the reverse-link communication system, where the arrangement for the transmitter and BS receiver is the same as those shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.

The received signal at the BS is given by [5] where the intercell interference from the surrounding cells is where represents the effects of path loss, is the random time delay of the th user in the th cell, and is the signal transmitted by the th user in the th cell.

For a particular user, say the zeroth one, the signal at the output of the matched filter is given by where is the carrier phase difference. The first term is the desired signal, the second term is the intracell interference component, the third term is the intercell interference component, while the last term is the AWGN component. The intercell interference at the output of the matched filter is given by

##### 3.1. Perfect Power Control

Similar to the approach in deriving the intracell interference power, the intercell interference power at the output of the matched filter, , can be shown to be The intercell interference to signal ratio is given by where is the interference to signal power ratio from the th cell.

Let us consider one of the interfering cells, say , where its BS is at a distance from as shown in Figure 5. The interference term in (34) is the interference power from all the users in to the , [5, 10].

If the interfering user in is located at a distance from its BS and from the , the interfering user, when active, produces an interference to the given by [11] where the first term is, due to the attenuation, caused by distance and blockage to the given BS, while the second term is the effect of power control to compensate for the corresponding attenuation to the BS of the out-of-cell interferer, , , and all are random variables with zero mean and standard deviation , , and is given by Replace the summation in (34) by an integration over the area of the , so will be where is the user density, assuming users are uniformly distributed in a circular cell of radius , , is the unit area in Figure 5, is the constraint function for the interfering users in the , which can be defined as [5, 11]

It is necessary to calculate the mean and variance of the intercell interference power in order to calculate the outage probability. From (35) into (37) and by taking the mean, we obtain [11] where . The variance of can be given by [11] The total interference-power-to-signal-power ratio for all the surrounding cells, , in (34) has a mean and variance of the following: The ratio at the output of the matched filter can be written as The system performance in terms of the outage probability that has a BER greater than is

##### 3.2. Imperfect Power Control

The received signal power from a user at its BS will differ from the target power level by dB. This error power is a random variable with standard deviation . Using (16) and (35), the interfering power to received signal power ratio will be where is the power error for the th user in . The total intercell interference-to-signal ratio is The ratio can be written as Following the same procedure as employed in the perfect power control case, is found as where and are two independent Gaussian distributed random variables, whose mean and variance may be expressed as

The performance of the reverse-link CDMA WLL system is shown in Figure 6. For an outage probability of 2%, the perfect power-controlled system can support 52 users/cell for a VAF of 3/8. The number of users per cell for different values of the standard deviation of power control errors and the percentage decrease in users, due to imperfect power control, are displayed in Table 2 for an outage of 2%.

#### 4. Effect of Imperfect Sectorization in CDMA WLL Systems

In the case of perfect directional antennas, there is a sharp separation between the sectors. Due to overlap and sidelobe of practical antenna, the BS still receives some interference from users in other sectors [11, 12].

Figure 7 shows a sectorized cell arrangement having overlapping sectors, each with an angle of , where is the overlapping angle. If there is no overlapping, that is, , then of the total interference is received, and the capacity gain, due to sectorization, is times that of an unsectorized cell.

In a sectorized cell, only of the total interference from the surrounding is received. For this condition, the capacity gain, due to sectorization, is times that of the unsectorized cell.

We define the efficiency of sectorization as the ratio of the capacity gain with the sector antennae pattern having an overlapping angle to the nonoverlapping antennae pattern of , so So, the imperfect sectorization capacity gain will be In WLL system, due to fixed-to-fixed link, six sectors per cell arrangement can be used, the capacity gain due to sectorization and its corresponding sectorization efficiency for different values of overlapping angle in degrees is shown in Figure 8. From the figure, the interference on the reverse link increases as the overlapping angle is increased, which causes the capacity gain and sectorization efficiency to decrease proportionally. Increasing from to causes the capacity gain to decrease from 6 to 5.53, while the corresponding sectorization efficiency drops from 100% to 92.3%.

#### 5. Conclusion

CDMA technology has the potential to provide a significant improvement in the capacity of WLL systems compared with FDMA and TDMA systems. However, this improvement is dependent upon the effectiveness of the power control system, especially on the reverse link. In this paper, a theoretical model to evaluate the reverse-link capacity of CDMA WLL systems in terms of outage probability, taking into account the power control error, is obtained.The results show that the capacity degradation, due to imperfect power control, is about 25.8%, and 11.5% for single cell and multiple cell systems, respectively. The effect of imperfect sectorization on the performance of CDMA WLL systems is also considered. The interference on the reverse link increases as the overlapping angle is increased, which causes the capacity gain and sectorization efficiency to decrease proportionally as shown in Figure 8.

#### References

- W. Webb,
*Introduction to Wireless Local Loop*, Artech House, Norwood, Mass, USA, 1998. - D. Lee and C. Xu, “The effect of narrowbeam antenna and multiple tiers on system capacity in CDMA wireless local loop,”
*IEEE Communications Magazine*, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 110–114, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - H. Stellakis, A. Giordano, A. Aksu, and W. Biagini, “Reverse link performance of wireless local loop CDMA networks,”
*IEEE Communications Letters*, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49–51, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - P. Jung, P. W. Baier, and A. Steil, “Advantages of CDMA and spread spectrum techniques over FDMA and TDMA in cellular mobile radio applications,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - R. Steele, C.-C. Lee, and P. Gould,
*GSM, cdmaOne and 3G Systems*, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2001. - W. C. Y. Lee, “Overview of cellular CDMA,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 291–302, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - C.-C. Lee and R. Steele, “Effect of soft and softer handoffs on CDMA system capacity,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 830–841, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - W.-M. Tam and F. C. M. Lau, “Analysis of power control and its imperfections in CDNA cellular systems,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1706–1717, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - V. K. Garg and E. L. Sneed, “Digital wireless local loop system,”
*IEEE Communications Magazine*, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 112–115, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - K. I. Kim, “CDMA cellular engineering issues,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 345–350, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - M. G. Jansen and R. Prasad, “Capacity, throughput, and delay analysis of a cellular DS CDMA system with imperfect power control and imperfect sectorization,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - A. Ahmad, “A CDMA network architecture using optimized sectoring,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 404–410, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar