Research Article  Open Access
A 7Level Single DC Source Cascaded HBridge Multilevel Inverter with a Modified DTC Scheme for Induction MotorBased Electric Vehicle Propulsion
Abstract
This paper presents a new hybrid cascaded Hbridge multilevel inverter motor drive DTC scheme for electric vehicles where each phase of the inverter can be implemented using a single DC source. Traditionally, each phase of the inverter requires DC source for output voltage levels. In this paper, a scheme is proposed that allows the use of a single DC source as the first DC source which would be available from batteries or fuel cells, with the remaining () DC sources being capacitors. This scheme can simultaneously maintain the capacitors of DC voltage level and produce a nearly sinusoidal output voltage due to its high number of output levels. In this context, high performances and efficient torque and flux control are obtained, enabling a DTC solution for hybrid multilevel inverter powered induction motor drives intended for electric vehicle propulsion. Simulations and experiments show that the proposed multilevel inverter and control scheme are effective and very attractive for embedded systems such as automotive applications.
1. Introduction
Currently, automotive applications such as EV’s seem to constitute an increasingly effective alternative to conventional vehicles, allowing vehicle manufacturers to fulfill users requirements (dynamic performances and fuel consumption) and environmental constraints (pollutant emissions reduction) [1].
The electric propulsion system is the heart of EV. It consists of the motor drive, transmission device, and wheels. In fact, the motor drive, comprising the electric motor, the power converter, and the electronic controller, is the core of the EV propulsion system. The motor drive is configured to respond to a torque demand set by the driver [2].
The induction motor seems to be a very interesting solution for EV’s propulsion. FOC and DTC have emerged as the standard industrial solutions to achieve high dynamic performance [3–5]. However some drawbacks of both methods have motivated important research efforts in the last decades. Particularly for DTC, the high torque ripple and the variable switching frequency introduced by the hysteresis comparators have been extensively addressed [6, 7]. In addition, several contributions that combine DTC principles together with PWM and SVM have been reported to correct these problems. This approach is based on the load angle control, from which a voltage reference vector is computed which is finally modulated by the inverter [8]. Although one major feature of classic DTC is the absence of modulators and linear controllers, this approach has shown significant improvements and achieves similar dynamic performance.
On the other hand, power converter technology is continuously developing, and cascaded multilevel inverters have become a very attractive solution for EV applications, due to its modular structure, higher voltage capability, reduced common mode voltages, near sinusoidal outputs, and smaller or even no output filter [9–12]. In general, cascaded multilevel inverter may be classified in two groups. The first one refers to the amplitude of isolated DC sources devoted to supply each Hbridge cell. If the amplitude of all sources is equal, then the inverter is called symmetrical; otherwise, if at least one of the sources presents different amplitude, then it will be called asymmetrical. The second classification labels the multilevel inverter whether hybrid or not. If the converter is implemented with different semiconductor device technologies, different nature of DC sources (fuel cells, batteries, and supercapacitors) and/or if it presents a hybrid modulation strategy, then it is classified as hybrid [13–15]. This structure greatly simplifies the converter complexity.
The proposed control algorithm eliminates the need of additional isolated DC sources. The control strategy regulates the DC link voltages of capacitors connected to the smallest voltages of a twocell 7level cascaded Hbridge inverter [16]. Specifically and in comparison to previous works [17, 18], the proposed control does not use an angle for capacitor voltage regulation but a comparison voltage level. This will facilitate a DSP implementation.
The carried out simulations and experiments validate the voltage control strategy and confirm the high dynamic performance of the proposed method, presenting very low torque ripple.
2. Multilevel Inverter Topology
The power circuit of the cascaded Hbridge multilevel inverter is illustrated in Figure 1. The inverter is composed by the series connection of power cells, each one containing an Hbridge inverter and an isolated DC source. In the particular case of asymmetric inverters these sources are not equal (). The asymmetry of the input voltages can reduce or, when properly designed, eliminate redundant output levels, maximizing the number of different levels generated by the inverter. Therefore, this topology can achieve the same output voltage quality with less number of semiconductors, space, costs, and internal fault probability than the symmetric fed topology.
A particular cell can generate three voltage levels . The total inverter output voltage for a particular phase is then defined by where is the total output voltage of phase (resp., the neutral of the inverter ), the output voltage of cell of phase, and the switching state associated to cell.
It should be noticed how the output voltage of one cell is defined by one of the four binary combinations of the switching state, with “1” and “0” representing the “On” and “Off” states of the corresponding switch, respectively.
The inverter generates different voltage levels (e.g., an inverter with cells can generate () different voltage levels). When using threephase systems, the number of different voltage vectors is given by , where is the number of levels. For example, for the case with 31 levels there are 2791 different voltage vectors. Table 1 summarizes the output levels for an asymmetric 7level inverter using only cells per phase (only phase voltage is given). An example of the voltage waveform for an asymmetric 7level inverter is illustrated by Figure 2.

3. DTCPWM Control
3.1. DTC Basic Principles
The stator voltage space vector () of an induction motor is related to the stator flux vector in a stator fixed coordinate system by
Neglecting the voltage drop in the stator resistance , the stator flux vector is the time integral of the stator voltage vector. Hence, for a small sampling period , (2) can be expressed by
On the other hand, the motor torque is related to the stator and rotor fluxes by where . If both flux magnitudes are kept constant in (4), the torque can be controlled directly by changing the load angle. This can be easily achieved, since variations in the stator flux vector change the load angle due to slower rotor flux dynamics.
Considering (3) and (4) it follows that the stator voltage vector can be used to manipulate the load angle and consequently to control the torque.
3.2. Flux and Torque Control by Load Angle Tracking
In traditional DTC, the influence over the load angle of each voltage vector generated by the inverter is determined and stored in a lookup table, according to the stator flux position in the complex plane. This is difficult to extend for multilevel inverter fed drives, where the complexity increases in huge proportions in relation to the levels generated by the inverter. Therefore, it is easier to look at the problem in a different way: the torque error can be used to generate a reference load angle necessary to correct the torque behavior. Then the desired load angle can be used to compute the exact voltage vector that will produce the necessary flux variation . This principle is illustrated in Figure 3. Note that once provided the reference load angle , the reference stator flux vector can be computed by where is the fixed stator flux amplitude reference, and is the rotor flux vector angle. Note that () corresponds to the reference stator flux vector angle .
Then the desired stator voltage vector can be obtained by
Finally has to be generated by the inverter. This is commonly performed with PWM or SVM for 2level inverters [19]. The use of a multilevel inverter will reduce the torque ripple amplitude due to the reduction of the rate of change of the commonmode voltage (number of step variations in a fixed time span), and, in this case, using the hybrid modulation method [20], a fixedfrequency output voltage will be obtained concentrating the voltage spectrum around the carrier frequency of the small power cell. Hence the most important drawbacks of traditional DTC are corrected. A simplified control diagram of the proposed strategy is shown in Figure 4. The outer speed control loop is omitted.
4. Hybrid Modulation Strategy
The hybrid modulation is specially conceived for the asymmetric multilevel Hbridge inverter structure [14].
The basic idea is to take advantage of the different power rates among the cells to reduce switching losses and improve the converter efficiency. From Figure 5 it can be seen that the inverter generates a rectangular waveform, which is at the same frequency of the reference (turnon and off only one time during a half reference cycle). The remaining of the output voltage, second trace in Figure 5, is synthesized by the auxiliary inverter at high switching frequency (with sinusoidal PWM). This completes the generation of a multilevel stepped waveform with a highfrequency component (similar to a multicarrierbased PWM), but with the difference that fewer switching losses are produced to achieve it. Typical output waveform of the inverter using this modulation is shown in the third trace of Figure 5. Note that the output has 7 different voltage levels given by all the possible combinations of the series connection of () and ().
5. Capacitor Voltage Control
Capacitor voltage control in the auxiliary inverter is a challenging task [14, 21]. The proposed control method is based on a hybrid modulation that consists of adjusting the main inverter turnon. This indeed corresponds to adjusting the active and reactive powers that the main inverter injects to the load (if is chosen to be exactly 18°, the main inverter injects only active power). By shifting the voltage waveform synthesized by the main inverter (Figure 6), one could also inject some reactive power, which can be used to charge or discharge the auxiliary inverter capacitor.
Therefore, the proposed algorithm, illustrated by Figure 7, regulates the capacitor voltage by an appropriate adjustment of which is given by the PI regulator and acts directly on the variation of the comparison level that controls the main inverter turnon and off. The closed loop regulation for each phase is done by measuring the capacitor voltage. From the capacitors voltage error, the PI regulator gives directly the necessary to be added to the initial comparison level which leads to changing the conduction angle of the main inverter that allows the secondary inverter capacitor charging.
6. Experimental and Simulations Results
6.1. Hybrid Modulation Strategy Implementation
The abovediscussed hybrid modulation strategy has been experimentally implemented (Figure 8). The proposed hybrid modulation strategy main results are illustrated by Figure 9. As abovementioned, the inverter generates a rectangular waveform, which is at the same frequency of the reference (Figure 9(a)). The remaining of the output voltage is synthesized by the auxiliary inverter at high switching frequency with sinusoidal PWM (Figure 9(b)). Figure 9(c) shows the typical output waveform of the 7level inverter under hybrid modulation.
(a) Main Hbridge inverter voltages
(b) Secondary Hbridge inverter voltages and auxiliary source (feeding the Hbridge) current
(c) The main outputs
6.2. Simulation Tests on an Induction MotorBased EV Propulsion
To evaluate the dynamic performances of the proposed control strategy, numerical simulations have been carried out on an EV propelled by an induction motor supplied with 7level single DC source cascaded multilevel inverter (Figure 4).
Simulations were done using the standardized ECE15 and EUDC driving cycle [22]. The achieved performances are illustrated by Figures 10 to 15.
The simulation results show that the speed reference required by the driver is welltracked as shown by Figure 10. One can see that the induction motor developed torque presents fewer ripples compared to a traditional DTC (Figure 11). This is due to the quality of the voltage supplying the inverter (Figure 12). Consequently, the stator currents are almost sinusoidal (Figure 13) and better dynamics are obtained; operating practically with constant flux (Figure 14).
(a) Flux magnitude
(b) Flux locus
(a) Phase a
(b) Phase b
(c) Phase c
(d) Capacitor voltage comparison zoom
Figure 15 shows the capacitor voltages waveforms which supply each auxiliary Hbridge of the three phase hybrid multilevel inverter. One can notice the oscillations around the reference. Moreover, these voltages are quiet identical. However, their difference becomes very large when there is a significant acceleration or deceleration requested by the driver. Indeed, in these cases, different amounts of energy are required due to the induction motor operating point fast variation.
The abovepresented simulation results confirm that, independently of the requested speed and torque, the capacitor voltages are controlled and the validity of the proposed control approach is proven.
7. Conclusion
In this paper a control strategy has been proposed for a hybrid cascaded multilevel inverter with a modified DTC scheme intended for induction motorbased EV propulsion. In this case, the main inverter uses a single DC voltage source, and the auxiliary inverter capacitor voltages are controlled in each phase. In addition, DTCPWM allows the operation with a fixed switching frequency, the reduction in the torque ripple without output filter, and highperformance torque and flux control.
The proposed control method simplifies the DTC application in embedded systems by reducing the inverter cost and complexity (by decreasing the semiconductor and the source numbers). Moreover, there is no need for hysteresis comparators and lookup tables. All these key features make the proposed control approach very attractive for embedded systems such as automotive applications.
Appendix
See Table 2.

Nomenclature
EV:  Electric vehicle 
DTC:  Direct torque control 
FOC:  Fieldoriented control 
PWM:  Pulse width modulation 
SVM:  Space vector modulation 
:  Stator (rotor) index 
:  Voltage (current) 
:  Flux 
:  Electromagnetic torque 
:  Resistance 
:  Inductance (mutual inductance) 
:  Leakage coefficient, 
:  Load angle 
:  Pole pair number. 
References
 C. C. Chan, A. Bouscayrol, and K. Chen, “Electric, hybrid and fuel cell vehicles: architectures and modelling,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 589–598, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Zeraoulia, M. E. H. Benbouzid, and D. Diallo, “Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems: a comparative study,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1756–1764, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. O. Neacsu and K. Rajashekara, “Comparative analysis of torquecontrolled IM drives with applications in electric and hybrid vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 240–247, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Haddoun, M. E. H. Benbouzid, D. Diallo, R. Abdessemed, J. Ghouili, and K. Srairi, “A lossminimization DTC scheme for EV induction motors,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Casadei, G. Serra, A. Tani, L. Zarri, and F. Profumo, “Performance analysis of a speedsensorless induction motor drive based on a constant switchingfrequency DTC scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 476–484, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. A. Martins, X. Roboam, T. A. Meynard, and A. S. Carvalho, “Switching frequency imposition and ripple reduction in DTC drives by using a multilevel converter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 286–297, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Rodríguez, J. Pontt, S. Kouro, and P. Correa, “Direct torque control with imposed switching frequency in an 11level cascaded inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 827–833, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. S. Buja and M. P. Kazmierkowski, “Direct torque control of PWM inverterfed AC motors—a survey,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 744–757, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Malinowski, K. Gopakumar, J. Rodriguez, and M. A. Perez, “A survey on cascaded multilevel inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2197–2206, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Cortes, A. Wilson, S. Kouro, J. Rodriguez, and H. AbuRub, “Model predictive control of multilevel cascaded Hbridge inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2691–2699, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Dixon, J. Pereda, C. Castillo, and S. Bosch, “Asymmetrical multilevel inverter for traction drives using only one DC supply,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 3736–3743, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Rodriguez, J.S. Lai, and F. Z. Peng, “Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724–738, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Khoucha, S. M. Lagoun, K. Marouani, A. Kheloui, and M. E. H. Benbouzid, “Hybrid cascaded Hbridge multilevelinverter inductionmotordrive direct torque control for automotive applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 892–899, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Du, L. M. Tolbert, B. Ozpineci, and J. N. Chiasson, “Fundamental frequency switching strategies of a sevenlevel hybrid cascaded Hbridge multilevel inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 24–22, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Rech and J. R. Pinheiro, “Impact of hybrid multilevel modulation strategies on input and output harmonic performances,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 967–977, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Khoucha, A. Ales, A. Khoudiri, K. Marouani, M. E. H. Benbouzid, and A. Kheloui, “A 7level single DC source cascaded Hbridge multilevel inverters control using hybrid modulation,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM ’10), pp. 1–5, Rome, Italy, September 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Liao, K. Corzine, and M. Ferdowsi, “A new control method for singleDCsource cascaded Hbridge multilevel converters using phaseshift modulation,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC '08), pp. 886–890, Austin, Tex, USA, February 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Kouro, R. Bernai, H. Miranda, J. Rodríguez, and J. Pontt, “Direct torque control with reduced switching losses for asymmetric multilevel inverter fed induction motor drives,” in Proceedings of the 41st IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, pp. 2441–2446, Tampa, Fla, USA, October 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Casadei, F. Profumo, G. Serra, and A. Tani, “FOC and DTC: two viable schemes for induction motors torque control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 779–787, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Veenstra and A. Rufer, “Control of a hybrid asymmetric multilevel inverter for competitive mediumvoltage industrial drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 655–664, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Liao, K. Wan, and M. Ferdowsi, “Cascaded Hbridge multilevel inverters—a reexamination,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC '07), pp. 203–207, Arlington, Va, USA, September 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Haddoun, M. E. H. Benbouzid, D. Diallo, R. Abdessemed, J. Ghouili, and K. Srairi, “Modeling, analysis, and neural network control of an EV electrical differential,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2286–2294, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Farid Khoucha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.