Research Article

Mouthpart Morphology of Three Sympatric Native and Nonnative Gammaridean Species: Gammarus pulex, G. fossarum, and Echinogammarus berilloni (Crustacea: Amphipoda)

Table 1

Main differences in morphology of mouthparts and other structures involved in food acquisition.

StructureGammarus pulexGammarus fossarumEchinogammarus berilloni

Antennal flagellumAnnuli medio-laterally broadened; each with a row of 12 posteriorly directed setae together building a flag-like brushEach annulus with a group of 2–5 simple setae on median and lateral sideAntero-posteriorly flattened and therefore broadened; setation sparse; setae short

Cuspidate setae on distal
margin of basipodal endites of maxillula
Lateral setae with three finger-like secondary spines2-3 lateral setae distally flattened and broadened like chisels with three humps on distal edge4 lateral setae with thickened shafts, distally flattened; distal margin blunt with 2-3 humps

Setation of carpus and propodus of 2nd gnathopodLong and closely arranged setae with curled distal endsLong and closely arranged setae with curled distal endsLess numerous and shorter setae than in G. pulex and G. fossarum

Third uropodEndopod 3/4 as long as exopod; plumose setae on medial and lateral margins of endopod and exopodEndopod half as long as exopod, plumose setae on median margin of endopod and exopod; simple setae on lateral margin of exopodEndopod very short; only simple setae on lateral and median margin of exopod