International Journal of Zoology

International Journal of Zoology / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 564105 |

Brian Wade Jamandre, Jean-Dominique Durand, Wann-Nian Tzeng, "High Sequence Variations in Mitochondrial DNA Control Region among Worldwide Populations of Flathead Mullet Mugil cephalus", International Journal of Zoology, vol. 2014, Article ID 564105, 9 pages, 2014.

High Sequence Variations in Mitochondrial DNA Control Region among Worldwide Populations of Flathead Mullet Mugil cephalus

Academic Editor: Thomas Iliffe
Received07 Nov 2013
Revised29 Jan 2014
Accepted11 Feb 2014
Published02 Apr 2014


The sequence and structure of the complete mtDNA control region (CR) of M. cephalus from African, Pacific, and Atlantic populations are presented in this study to assess its usefulness in phylogeographic studies of this species. The mtDNA CR sequence variations among M. cephalus populations largely exceeded intraspecific polymorphisms that are generally observed in other vertebrates. The length of CR sequence varied among M. cephalus populations due to the presence of indels and variable number of tandem repeats at the hypervariable domain. The high evolutionary rate of the CR in this species probably originated from these mutations. However, no excessive homoplasic mutations were noticed. Finally, the star shaped tree inferred from the CR polymorphism stresses a rapid radiation worldwide, in this species. The CR still appears as a good marker for phylogeographic investigations and additional worldwide samples are warranted to further investigate the genetic structure and evolution in M. cephalus.

1. Introduction

The advent of next generation sequencing started an era of discovery for a wide array of genetic markers for population genetics, phylogeny, and so forth. However, we have only scratched the surface on the analyses of these new markers and most researchers still resort to using the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) for population and biodiversity studies. Furthermore, the nonrecombining nature due to maternal inheritance and fast evolution rate compared to the nuclear genome [1] makes mtDNA a popular marker for studying vertebrate population genetics [24]. Within the mitochondrial genome, evolutionary rates are highly variable among genes. For example, in salamanders, nucleotide substitution rates may range from 0.1 to 1 substitution/site/million years (MY) [5]. Among the coding genes, the cytochrome b (cyto b) and cytochrome oxidase I (COI) present the highest evolutionary rates; however, the noncoding region of the mitochondrial genome (i.e., the control region (CR)) evolves 2–5 times faster [6]. Because of this exceptionally high mutation rate characteristic, the CR was quickly considered of great utility for addressing intraspecific evolutionary questions [7, 8].

In Teleostei, the CR is located between and . Structurally, the CR is composed of a central conserved domain flanked by two highly variable (left and right) domains (Figure 1). In these large domains, several short (approximately <30 bp) but conserved sequenced blocks (CSBs) have been described and varied in occurrence between taxa [2]. In the central conserved domain, the CSB-D is involved in the heavy strand replication, including initiation by a 3-strand displacement loop (D-loop) [9]. The CSB-I, CSB-II, and CSB-III are located in the right domain. The functions of these CSBs are not well understood but in mammals the transition to DNA synthesis occurs in the region surrounding CSB-II, which is also evident in flounder fishes [2]. Within the regions of the CR, the end (extreme 5′ end) is a popular chosen marker for evolutionary and population genetics studies because of its rapid evolutionary rate compared to other mitochondrial genes and nuclear coding regions [2, 10]. In fishes, this region is also widely used for inter- and intraspecies investigations, but its hypervariability cannot be generalized to all taxa [10]. For example, in some salmonids (brown trout) the end of the mtDNA CR seems to evolve at a lower rate [11, 12]. Indeed, differences in sequence patterns and evolutionary rate of the CR are evident but poorly understood [2, 10].

Intraspecific diversity recovered from the CR is quite variable between fish taxa and among them, the cosmopolitan flathead mullet, Mugil cephalus, which occurs between 42°N–42°S latitudes mostly in the tropical and subtropical areas of the world [13], shows exceptionally high CR diversity [1416]. Between remote populations from Atlantic and Pacific oceans, Rocha-Olivares et al. [15] showed a level of divergence ranging from 38 to 75%. More recently, Jamandre et al. [16] observed CR haplotypes with sequence divergence of 48% between sympatric populations of M. cephalus in continuous sampling locations along the northwest Pacific. Such exceptional level of sequence divergence brought Rocha-Olivares et al. [15] to question the origin of the CR amplified in their study, as nuclear pseudogenes stemming from the duplication of mtDNA regions can greatly diverge from their mitochondrial copies. However, by sequencing M. cephalus CR they successfully demonstrated the mitochondrial origin of all haplotypes observed in Pacific and Atlantic populations of this species. The levels of divergence observed might be due to an accelerated evolutionary rate in the Mugil lineage as suggested earlier by Caldara et al. [17]. In this context, CR would be an interesting marker to investigate the worldwide phylogeographic structure of M. cephalus because all phylogeographic investigations to date, using different markers (mtDNA RFLP, allozymes), failed to highlight any significant genetic structure consistent with the geography [18, 19]. However, before utilizing it in such way, determining the basic properties of this marker for phylogenetic usefulness is warranted, especially by checking the level of homoplasy that may blur phylogenetic signals.

In this study, we describe a remarkably high evolutionary rate of mtDNA CR in M. cephalus by analyzing its sequence structure and mutations from previously reported and new worldwide samples. Since Mugil liza from South America belongs to the M. cephalus clade as demonstrated by Fraga et al. [20], Heras et al. [21], and Durand et al. [22], we also included samples of this species in this study.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Data Gathering, Sample Collection, and DNA Extraction

To provide a general and worldwide view of sequence variations and genetic diversity in M. cephalus, we gathered all available M. cephalus CR sequences in GenBank ( (Table 1). These sequences or haplotypes belong to the different M. cephalus lineage previously described by Rocha-Olivares et al. [14, 15], Miya et al. [4], and Jamandre et al. [16]. New M. cephalus samples were also added and analyzed from Senegal and Togo in West Africa and South Africa . It was stressed by Fraga et al. [20], Heras et al. [21], and Durand et al. [22] that Mugil liza belongs to the M. cephalus clade. Thus, a sample of M. liza from French Guyana (and also to represent the southwest Atlantic) was added in this study to further investigate M. cephalus and M. liza relationships.

Location Accession numberSource

Northwest Pacific126EU663629-3754 Rocha-Olivares et al. [15]
Japan1NC003182Miya et al. [4]
Hawaii (Central Pacific)19AF108232-69Rocha-Olivares et al. [14, 15]
Gulf of Mexico/Atlantic96AF108271-352Rocha-Olivares et al. [14, 15]
South Africa1GU120874This study
Togo/Senegal (West Africa)3GU120871-73This study
Mugil liza (French Guyana)1GU120875This study

For each specimen collected, muscle tissues and fin clips were taken and preserved in the 95% ethanol-water solution and brought back to the laboratory. Genomic DNA was then extracted from a small piece of either muscle tissue or fin clips, using a commercially available total genomic DNA extraction kit (Bioman Scientific Co. Ltd., Taiwan).

2.2. PCR and Sequencing

The primers used to amplify the complete CR are described in Jamandre et al. [16]. After an alignment of sequences from northwest Pacific samples, internal primers were designed to amplify West and South African samples and M. liza (mulCR-IPF: GCATTCTCTCCACAGGGGCC; mulCR-IPR: GGCCCCTGTGGAGAGAATGC); MulCR-IPF and mulCR-IPR were paired to MulPhe [14] and McepCR-F [16], respectively.

PCR amplification was carried out in a 25 μL total volume containing 0.5 μL DNA template, 0.25 μL taq polymerase, 1 μL of each primer, 2.5 μL PCR buffer, 0.5 μL 10x DNTP, and 19.25 μL ddH2O. Thermal cycling was performed as follows: 2 mins at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles consisting of 30 sec at 94°C denaturation, 45 sec at 58°C annealing, and 45 sec at 70°C extension, and a final elongation of 10 min at 70°C. PCR products were visualized on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Afterwards, the products were sequenced with forward and reverse primers using dye-terminator cycle sequencing on an ABI 373A sequencer.

2.3. Sequence Analyses

CR sequences were aligned using the software MAFFT version 6 [23] with default parameters and manual improvement. Multiple sequence alignment is a crucial step in the analysis of any genomic data especially for sequences with many overlapping and nonoverlapping gaps. As such, the software MAFFT was used to align the M. cephalus CR data set, since it uses both iterative and progressive methods of alignment, which has been proven to be more accurate and consistent in dealing with gaps, compared to other popular alignment software [24].

The mtDNA CR domains (5′ and 3′ hypervariable domain and central conserved region), termination associated sequences (TAS), and conserved sequence blocks (CSBs) were identified by alignment with reference to the previously published M. cephalus control region sequences [14, 15] and other fish: Crossostoma lacustre [25], Chanos chanos [26], Dascyllus trimaculatus [27], Notopterus notopterus [28], Perca fluviatilis [3], Padogobius nigricans [29], and Sinipercine fishes [30].

Intraspecific nucleotide diversity and variability were assessed from all sequence data available. Sequence divergence was estimated accounting for different rates of transition and transversion, unequal base frequencies, and among site variation rates because evolutionary relationships might be blurred by homoplasic mutations (i.e., multiple substitutions) at a specific site [31]. To assess the level of saturation of CR, the number of nucleotide substitutions per site for transitions and transversions was plotted against genetic divergent distances. In this case the Tamura and Nei’s (TrN-G) model was used. Genetic divergences between groups were calculated using the MEGA 4.1 software [32, 33].

The appropriate DNA substitution model was obtained via testing alternative models of evolution using the Modeltest software version 3.7 [34]. Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree was constructed with MrBayes v3.1.2 [33] using the model of evolution indicated by Modeltest. Four Metropolis-coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo chains with generations were sampled every 1,000th step. 500 trees were discarded as burn-in and a consensus phylogram of the 1,500 recorded trees and posterior probability were calculated.

3. Results

3.1. Control Region Sequence Structure and Variability

The observed lengths of M. cephalus control region varied among sampling locations. The complete CR sequences of M. cephalus from northwest Pacific ranged from 909 to 1015 bp, whereas in central Pacific (Hawaii), it ranged from 919 to 930 bp. The Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico M. cephalus CR sequences ranged from 884 to 894 bp while the West and South African individuals ranged from 899 to 912 bp and 911 bp, respectively. The CR length of the Mugil liza individual is 906 bp.

By comparing M. cephalus CR sequences to CR of other fishes species (see Table 2), three domains were highlighted, namely, the left and right hypervariable domain and the central conserved domain (Figure 1). Several conserved sequence blocks (CSBs) were located at the central conserved region and at the right hypervariable domain (Figure 2). CSB-I, -II, and -III are commonly found in vertebrate CR. These were also present in all sequences of M. cephalus. Putative CSB-D was also found in the sequences (Figure 2). Pyrimidine tract was also identified at the central conserved domain.


Mugil cephalus
 NW Pacific

—: not identified.

Insertions and deletions (indels) were found in both the left and right hypervariable domain and generally associated with repetitive sequences (Figure 2). The percent composition of nucleotide varied from 35.96 to 37.50% (A), 29.80 to 34.57% (T), 16.88 to 20.64% (C), and 11.29 to 13.27% (G), which infers that M. cephalus CR is AT rich and poor in G.

The transition/transversion (Ts/Tv) rate ratios are (purines) and (pyrimidines). An overall Ts/Tv ratio of 5.131 was estimated from the dataset (Figure 3). A linear relationship between the number of nucleotide substitutions per site and the sequence divergence was observed for both, transversion and transitions mutations (Figure 3). Slope of the transitions /divergence regression indicates a higher transition rate than transversion rate.

3.2. Phylogenetic Relationship and Sequence Divergence

NW Pacific M. cephalus were subdivided into lineages 1 and 2 as described in Jamandre et al. [16]. The CR sequence from the whole mtDNA genome (a sample from Japan) was incorporated and assigned to the lineage 2 of NW Pacific M. cephalus. Hawaii was assigned as the central Pacific population. NW Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico M. cephalus were grouped together as no genetic divergence was found among these locations as described in Rocha-Olivares et al. [14, 15]. Togo and Senegal individuals were grouped as West Africa and South Africa has its own lineage. M. liza was assigned as a SW Atlantic M. cephalus group. Consensus sequence was obtained at each group, and these were eventually used for further phylogenetic and sequence divergence analyses.

The most appropriate model for the CR data set was the GTR + G model with a gamma distribution shape parameter . Phylogenetic relationships of M. cephalus revealed no geographic structuring. Unrooted Bayesian tree showed short branch lengths stemming from the ancestral nodes (Table 2, Figure 4). The star-like tree had nodes with moderate (71%) to highly significant (100%) posterior probability values. Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic samples gained the longest branch lengths implying high divergence from all of the other populations. M. liza individuals from French Guyana did not present a divergence level higher than the divergence observed within M. cephalus sensu stricto.

4. Discussion

We compiled and analyzed new sequences and extracted from GenBank database of NCBI all available complete CR sequences of M. cephalus from different populations around the world. The total length of the CR varies greatly among population/lineage. The longest CR sequences were found in individuals belonging to the NW Pacific (909–1015 bp), whereas the shortest were observed in individual samples in the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico (884–894 bp). Such size variation is consistent with observation from other teleost fish (e.g., Cichlid—888 bp; Atlantic cod—996 bp; sturgeon—976; salmon—1071; yellowtail 1600; from (2)). However, to date, there are no other reports of fish species with such highly intraspecific sequence length difference. The observed CR length variations in M. cephalus are either due to the presence of variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) at the right hypervariable domain (Figure 2) and indels. Indels in M. cephalus were already described by Rocha-Olivares et al. [14]; however they only gave general descriptions on indels patterns and phylogenetic significance. In the sequence alignment presented here, there are two sets of permanent deletions unique to lineage 1 of northwest Pacific samples: 22 bp deletion (starting at position 857 bp in the alignment; Figure 2) and 7 bp deletion 45 bp following the former. However, the lineage 1 of northwest Pacific has tandem repeats (ATn) located at 30 bp after CSB-I, which cannot be found in the other populations. Second, West African samples were found to have 10 to 14 bp deletions at the central conserved domain/region.

Lastly, both the left and right hypervariable domain contain considerable amount of indels that greatly affected the sequence length of CR among populations of M. cephalus. An 88 bp indel due to repeated sequence (TATAATATn) was found again in the 3′ or left hypervariable domain in lineage 1 of NW Pacific when the consensus sequences among populations were aligned (Figure 2). These indels seem to be unique to lineage 1 of NW Pacific individuals. Indels in CR are common in teleost fish [35]. However large deletions are uncommon and only reported in some fish: an 86 bp indel in the 3′ region of Oncorhynchus mykiss [36], 40 bp indel in central conserved region of the rockfish Sebastes capensis [37], and 48 bp indel in milkfish Chanos chanos [26]. These studies focused more on the interspecies sequence variation with the exception of the milkfish. The large deletions found in this study are intraspecific comparison and seem to be very rare in fish. This is the first study to show large deletions in CR within the M. cephalus species and the family Mugilidae. These indels were hypothesized not to affect the organism due to the noncoding nature of CR [1]; however these indels might be of importance for population identification. The CSBs observed in M. cephalus are commonly found in other teleosts with slight length variations. Comparing the CSB-I to other fish (Table 2), it is obvious that the CSB-I in M. cephalus is shorter than the other fishes. CSB-I appears in M. cephalus to be more conserved than CSB-II and CSB-III. The two latter CSBs show a few nucleotide indels in the alignment.

The phylogenetic tree inferred from CR shows that M. cephalus may have experienced quick radiation due to short branch lengths stemming from the ancestral node. Such branching pattern can indicate either homoplasic mutations that can limit resolution of ancient nodes or a quick ancestral radiation. Rapid evolutionary rate as reported in CR of Chaetodontidae [10] may result in an excess of homoplasic mutations mutations that reached a “ceiling.” Because no transition or transversion saturation was detected in M. cephalus CR sequences, this assumption was not considered. However, comparing between samples from different locations, the long branch lengths can be attributed to deep divergences between these samples. Livi et al. [38] described that these divergences observed among worldwide samples of M. cephalus might have been due to both demographic (bottleneck events, etc.) and geographic and temporal isolations.

The star-like shaped phylogenetic tree was already observed in cichlids of the African lakes, which was interpreted as a rapid radiation [3941]. Such an evolutionary event can be attributed to both allopatric and sympatric speciation, which is due to geological events, reproductive isolation, and other selections caused by intrinsic and extrinsic forces [41]. In the case of a South American silverside Odontesthes perugiae species complex (a strictly freshwater species), rapid evolution was assumed to be due to its marine-estuarine origin and geological events [38, 42].

Lastly, the star shaped pattern of the phylogenetic tree inferred no geographic patterning according to the sequence analysis. Previous phylogenetic studies using other regions of mtDNA have also shown no geographic pattern among worldwide population of M. cephalus genetic structure [18, 19, 21]. In conformity with other studies and the comprehensive Mugilidae molecular phylogeny by Durand et al. [22], we clearly confirmed the presence of M. liza in the M. cephalus clade because there are no other or any long branches present to differentiate this species from other M. cephalus haplotypes. The high CR sequence divergence leads Rocha-Olivares et al. [14, 15] to reconsider the real taxonomical status of M. cephalus which was also questioned by Heras et al. [21]. This indicates the presence of M. liza in the M. cephalus clade.

5. Conclusion

This study presents a very high sequence and genetic divergence within groups of the same species. Applying the definition of the biological species concept is hard for globally distributed species, mainly due to difficulties in the determination of interbreeding levels between populations or species. In congruence to the growing evidence and as indicated in this study, on a worldwide scale, M. cephalus should be regarded as a complex species.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This research project was funded by the National Science Council of the Executive Yuan, Taiwan (Contract nos. SC95-2915-I-002-108 and 96-2923-I-002-001 awarded to Professor Wann-Nian Tzeng).


  1. W. M. Brown, M. George Jr., and A. C. Wilson, “Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1967–1971, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  2. W.-J. Lee, J. Conroy, W. H. Howell, and T. D. Kocher, “Structure and evolution of teleost mitochondrial control regions,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. L. Nesbø, M. O. Arab, and K. S. Jakobsen, “Heteroplasmy, length and sequence variation in mtDNA control regions of three percid fish species (Perca fluvatilis, P. nua, Stizostedion luciperca),” Genetics, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 1907–1919, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. Miya, A. Kawaguchi, and M. Nishida, “Mitogenomic exploration of higher teleostean phylogenies: a case study for moderate-scale evolutionary genomics with 38 newly determined complete mitochondrial DNA sequences,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1993–2009, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. L. Mueller, “Evolutionary rates, divergence dates, and the performance of mitochondrial genes in Bayesian phylogenetic analysis,” Systematic Biology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 289–300, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Meyer, “Evolution of mitochondrial DNA in fishes,” in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes. Molecular Biology Frontiers, P. W. Hochachka and T. P. Mommsen, Eds., vol. 2, pp. 1–38, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  7. G. G. Brown, G. Gadaleta, G. Pepe, C. Saccone, and E. Sbisa, “Structural conservation and variation in the D-loop-containing region of vertebrate mitochondrial DNA,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 503–511, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. R. Palumbi, “Nucleic Acids II: the polymerase chain reaction,” in Molecular Systematics, D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Marble, Eds., pp. 205–247, Sinauer Associates Inc., 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  9. D. A. Clayton, “Replication and transcription of vertebrate mitochondrial DNA,” Annual Review of Cell Biology, vol. 7, pp. 453–478, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  10. W. O. McMillan and S. R. Palumbi, “Rapid rate of control-region evolution in Pacific butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae),” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 473–484, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Bernatchez, R. Guyomard, and F. Bonhomme, “DNA sequence variation of the mitochondrial control region among geographically and morphologically remote European brown trout Salmo trutta populations,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 161–173, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  12. A. P. Apostolidis, C. Triantaphyllidis, A. Kouvatsi, and P. S. Economidis, “Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and phylogeography among Salmo trutta L. (Greek brown trout) populations,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 531–542, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. M. Thomson, “The grey mullets,” Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 301–335, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. Rocha-Olivares, N. M. Garber, and K. C. Stuck, “High genetic diversity, large inter-oceanic divergence and historical demography of the striped mullet,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1134–1149, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Rocha-Olivares, N. M. Garber, A. F. Garber, and K. C. Stuck, “Structure of the mitochondrial control region and flanking tRNA genes of Mugil cephalus,” Hidrobiologica, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  16. B. W. Jamandre, J.-D. Durand, and W. N. Tzeng, “Phylogeography of the flathead mullet Mugil cephalus in the north-west Pacific as inferred from the mtDNA control region,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 393–407, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Caldara, L. Bargelloni, L. Ostellari, E. Penzo, L. Colombo, and T. Patarnello, “Molecular phylogeny of grey mullets based on mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis: evidence of a differential rate of evolution at the intrafamily level,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 416–424, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Crosetti, W. S. Nelson, and J. C. Avise, “Pronounced genetic structure of mitochondrial DNA among populations of the circumglobally distributed grey mullet (Mugil cephalus),” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. R. Rossi, M. Capula, D. Crosetti, L. Sola, and D. E. Campton, “Allozyme variation in global populations of striped mullet, Mugil cephalus (Pisces: Mugilidae),” Marine Biology, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 203–212, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Fraga, H. Schneider, M. Nirchio, E. Santa-Brigida, L. F. Rodrigues-Filho, and I. Sampaio, “Molecular phylogenetic analyses of mullets (Mugilidae, Mugiliformes) based on two mitochondrial genes,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 598–604, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Heras, M. I. Roldán, and M. G. Castro, “Molecular phylogeny of Mugilidae fishes revised,” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 217–231, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J.-D. Durand, K.-N. Shen, W.-J. Chen et al., “Systematics of the grey mullets (Teleostei: Mugiliformes: Mugilidae): molecular phylogenetic evidence challenges two centuries of morphology-based taxonomy,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 73–92, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Katoh, K. Misawa, K.-I. Kuma, and T. Miyata, “MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 3059–3066, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  24. T. Golubchik, M. J. Wise, S. Easteal, and L. S. Jermiin, “Mind the gaps: evidence of bias in estimates of multiple sequence alignments,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2433–2442, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C.-S. Tzeng, C.-F. Hui, S.-C. Shen, and P. C. Huang, “The complete nucleotide sequence of the Crossostoma lacustre mitochondrial genome: conservation and variations among vertebrates,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 4853–4858, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  26. R. G. Ravago, V. D. Monje, and M. A. Juinio-Meñez, “Length and sequence variability in mitochondrial control region of the milkfish, Chanos chanos,” Marine Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–50, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  27. C. A. Chen, M. C. A. Ablan, J. W. McManus et al., “Variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTRs), heteroplasmy, and sequence variation of the mitochondrial control region in the three-spot Dascyllus trimaculatus (Perciformes: Pomacentridae),” Zoological Studies, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 803–812, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  28. A. P. Takagi, S. Ishikawa, T. Nao et al., “Tandem repeat sequence segments in control region of bronze featherback Notopterus notopterus mitochondrial DNA,” Fisheries Science, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 1319–1321, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Cervelli, M. Bianchi, M. Scalici, G. Gibertini, M. Oliverio, and P. Mariottini, “Length and sequence variation in the mitochondrialDNA control region of the Etruscan freshwater goby Padogobius nigricans (Teleostei, Gobiidae),” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 71, pp. 141–147, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J.-L. Zhao, W.-W. Wang, S.-F. Li, and W.-Q. Cai, “Structure of the mitochondrial DNA control region of the Sinipercine fishes and their phylogenetic relationship,” Acta Genetica Sinica, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 793–799, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. L. Swofford, G. L. Olsen, P. J. Wadell, and D. M. Hillis, “Phylogenetic inference,” in Molecular Systematics, D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, Eds., pp. 407–514, Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass, USA, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  32. S. Kumar, K. Tamura, and M. Nei, “MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 150–163, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  33. J. P. Huelsenbeck and F. Ronquist, “MR-BAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees,” Bioinformatics, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 754–755, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  34. D. Posada and K. A. Crandall, “Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution,” Bioinformatics, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 817–818, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  35. N. Billington and P. D. N. Hebert, “Mitochondrial DNA diversity in fishes and its implications for introductions,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 48, no. 1, supplement, pp. 80–94, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. L. Nielsen, M. C. Fountain, J. C. Favela, K. Cobble, and B. L. Jensen, “Oncorhynchus at the southern extent of their range: a study of mtDNA control-region sequence with special reference to an undescribed subspecies of O. mykiss from Mexico,” Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7–23, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Rocha-Olivares, R. H. Rosenblatt, and R. D. Vetter, “Cryptic species of rockfishes (Sebastes: Scorpaenidae) in the Southern Hemisphere inferred from mitochondrial lineages,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 404–411, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Livi, L. Sola, and D. Crosetti, “Phylogeographic relationships among worldwide populations of the cosmopolitan marine species, the striped gray mullet (Mugil cephalus), investigated by partial cytochrome b gene sequences,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. C. Johnson, C. A. Scholz, M. R. Talbot et al., “Late pleistocene desiccation of Lake Victoria and rapid evolution of cichlid fishes,” Science, vol. 273, no. 5278, pp. 1091–1093, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  40. C. J. Allender, O. Seehausen, M. E. Knight, G. F. Turner, and N. Maclean, “Divergent selection during speciation of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes inferred from parallel radiations in nuptial coloration,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 14074–14079, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. O. Seehausen, “African cichlid fish: a model system in adaptive radiation research,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 273, no. 1597, pp. 1987–1998, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. L. B. Beheregaray, P. Sunnucks, and D. A. Briscoe, “A rapid fish radiation associated with the last sea-level changes in southern Brazil: the silverside Odontesthes perugiae complex,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 269, no. 1486, pp. 65–73, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Brian Wade Jamandre et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.