Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

International Journal of Zoology
Volume 2016, Article ID 2605404, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2605404
Research Article

Phenotypic Variation in Freshwater Murrel, Channa punctatus (Bloch, 1793) from Northern and Eastern Regions of India Using Truss Analysis

Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226007, India

Received 31 October 2015; Accepted 13 January 2016

Academic Editor: Michel Laurin

Copyright © 2016 Ankur Kashyap et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. X. Cadrin, “Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stocks,” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 91–112, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Kashyap, M. Awasthi, and M. Serajuddin, “Intraspecific diversity of freshwater murrel, Channa punctatus,” International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 166–173, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Verma, A. Kashyap, and M. Serajuddin, “Phylogeny based on truss analysis in five populations of freshwater catfish: Clupisoma garua,” International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1414–1418, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Kashyap, M. Awasthi, and M. Serajuddin, “Geographic morphometric variations of freshwater murrel, Channa punctatus from northern and eastern parts of India,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. L. Hauser, G. R. Carvalho, and T. J. Pitcher, “Morphological and genetic differentiation of the African clupeid Limnothrissa miodon 34 years after its introduction to Lake Kivu,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 47, pp. 127–144, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. G. Bembo, G. R. Carvalho, N. Cingolani, E. Arneri, G. Giannetti, and T. J. Pitcher, “Allozymic and morphometric evidence for two stocks of the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus in Adriatic waters,” Marine Biology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 529–538, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Turan, “A note on the examination of morphometric differentiation among fish populations: the truss system,” Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol. 23, pp. 259–264, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  8. N. C. Ujjainia and M. P. S. Kohli, “Landmark-based morphometric analysis for selected species of Indian major carp (Catla catla, Ham. 1822),” International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Science, vol. 1, pp. 64–74, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Jayasankar, P. C. Thomas, M. P. Paulton, and J. Mathew, “Morphometric and genetic analyzes of Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) from peninsular India,” Asian Fisheries Science, vol. 17, pp. 201–215, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. M. Sajina, S. K. Chakraborty, A. K. Jaiswar, D. G. Pazhayamadam, and D. Sudheesan, “Stock structure analysis of Megalaspis cordyla (Linnaeus, 1758) along the Indian coast based on truss network analysis,” Fisheries Research, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 100–105, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. A. Khan, K. Miyan, and S. Khan, “Morphometric variation of snakehead fish, Channa punctatus, populations from three Indian rivers,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 637–642, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. J. Rholf, TpsDig, Version 1.40, Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  13. O. Hammer, D. A. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan, “PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis,” Palaeontologia Electronica, vol. 4, article 9, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  14. N. G. Elliott, K. Haskard, and J. A. Koslow, “Morphometric analysis of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) off the continental slope of southern Australia,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 202–220, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Jolicoeur and J. E. Mosimann, “Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis,” Growth, vol. 24, pp. 339–354, 1960. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. M. Humphries, F. L. Bookstein, B. Chernoff, G. R. Smith, R. L. Elder, and S. G. Poss, “Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size,” Systematic Biology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 291–308, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. F. L. Bookstein, “‘Size and Shape’: a comment on semantics,” Systematic Biology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 173–180, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. P. Sundberg, “Shape and size-constrained principal components analysis,” Systematic Zoology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 166–168, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. B. Saila and J. M. Flowers, “Geographic morphometric variation in the American lobster,” Systematic Zoology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 330–338, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Annual Report of National Bureau of Fish Genetic Research, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, India, 2001.
  21. A. G. Murta, “Morphological variation of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Iberian and North African Atlantic: implications for stock identification,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1240–1248, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. C. Pathak, J. I. Mir, and M. Serajuddin, “Morphometric variation among barred spiny eel, Macrognathus pancalus (Hamilton 1822), populations from the Ganges and Brahmaputra river basin, India by using geomorphometrics,” Journal of Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2013. View at Google Scholar