International Journal of Zoology

International Journal of Zoology / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 5431041 |

Muhammad Amirul Arib Md Adzhar, Ruhana Hassan, "Relationships among Tomistoma schlegelii in Malaysia Based on Cyt b-Control Region Gene Analysis", International Journal of Zoology, vol. 2017, Article ID 5431041, 6 pages, 2017.

Relationships among Tomistoma schlegelii in Malaysia Based on Cyt b-Control Region Gene Analysis

Academic Editor: Hynek Burda
Received16 Feb 2017
Revised04 May 2017
Accepted19 Oct 2017
Published15 Nov 2017


Tomistoma schlegelii is a slender snout crocodile, secretive in nature which is currently under Appendix I of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES). Limited information is currently available on its wild population, especially in Malaysia. Thus this study aims to describe genetic relationship of T. schlegelii populations from Malaysia which was done using partial sequencing of Cytochrome b-control region mtDNA gene. The study reveals that the genetic diversity among T. schlegelii is high, ranging from 0.16% to 3.34%, suggesting healthy populations. Analysis showed that there is gene flow among populations (Da = 1.71% to 2.21%) within Western Sarawak, Peninsular Malaysia, and other geographical regions coherent with Sundaland theory, suggesting that there is ancient river system connecting the two regions of Peninsular Malaysia and West Borneo when the Sunda Shelf was exposed. Unique haplotypes had been observed in Northern Sarawak (SAM01 and SAM02) as well as in Sumatera; thus each T. schlegelii deserved its own management strategies to ensure the survival of the species.

1. Introduction

Tomistoma, Tomistoma schlegelii, is a vulnerable slender snout crocodile, which is currently under Appendix I of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna CITES (IUCN 2014) with an estimated population of less than 2500 individuals left in the wild [1]. The population is endemic to Malaysia and Indonesia [1, 2]. Reports on T. schlegelii sightings in Kalimantan and Sumatera from the 1990s to 2000s were published by [24] while in Malaysia sightings have been rare since the late 1980s [58].

The main threat of T. schlegelii is habitat loss due to deforestation, illegal logging, palm oil plantation, urbanization, fishing activities, and forest fires at peat swamps [24]. Currently, wild specimens could be found in captivity in zoos and farms and by individuals who acquired T. schlegelii illegally. Zoos and farms in Malaysia have approximately 77 specimens [9] while Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia have collectively 88 specimens. Zoos and farms in Europe and the United States of America hold approximately 57 specimens. In Malaysia and Indonesia, study of T. schlegelii concentrated on surveys of T. schlegelii natural habitats and related issues involving conservation.

Genetic information on T. schlegelii is available; for example, [1012] had sequencing Cyt b from T. schlegelii as part of the classification of Family Crocodylia. Besides that, [13] reported based on Cyt b gene that T. schlegelii haplotype in Peninsular Malaysia is unique. Thus, the aim of this study is to infer genetic relationship among T. schlegelii from captive and wild specimens using partial DNA sequencing of the mtDNA control region (Cyt b-CR) gene. The findings are useful for further support of conservation of T. schlegelii in Malaysia and other geographical regions.

2. Materials and Methods

A total 12 T. schlegelii samples are obtained from 4 localities (Figure 1), from Miri Crocodile Farm (), from Crocodile Adventureland Langkawi (CAL) (), Samarahan (), and Serian (). Other data were obtained from GenBank (Table 1).

SamplesGenBank accession numberLocalityCollection site

PM006–PM009HM593981–HM593984,Peninsular MalaysiaZN
PM010–PM013HM593985–HM593988Peninsular MalaysiaMZ
PM014–PM016HM593989–HM593991Peninsular MalaysiaTZ
PM017–PM020HM593992–HM593995Peninsular MalaysiaMZT
HK1–HK4HM594001–HM594004UnknownHKW Park

MWC: Matang Wildlife Centre; ZN: Zoo Negara; MZ: Melaka Zoo; MZT: Mini Zoo Temerloh; TZ: Taiping Zoo; SZ: Singapore Zoo; HKW: Hong Kong Wetland; PTES: PT Eka Nindya, Sumatera; CVS: CV Surya Raya Farm, EK; CWRC: Cikananga WRC, Java.

Total genomic DNA was extracted using the modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [14] with the presence of the proteinase K. The amplification of mtDNA control region (Cyt b-CR) gene fragment was conducted using oligonucleotide primers L14930 (5′-AGC GGG CAA AAT AGA AAA CTGA-3′, forward) and H15630 (5′-ATA GAG ATG CCG GGA TTA CGAA -3′, reverse) [13]. PCR followed [15] using programmable gradient-enabled thermocycler (Bio-Rad MyCycler™ Thermal Cycler).

Approximately, 50–100 ng of the template DNA was amplified in a 25 μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM 10x buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM of dNTPs (Promega), 0.2 mM of each primer, and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). The cycle parameters involved predenaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 47°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 60 s with the final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. All PCR products were subjected to gel electrophoresis using 2% agarose gel stained with two drops of ethidium bromide with TAE buffer for 100 to 120 minutes at 80 V with 100 bp DNA ladder used to estimate the size of the bands. The gel was visualized under the UV light and photographed using UV camera. The PCR products were directly sent to First Base Sdn Bhd to be sequenced.

Multiple alignments of the Cyt b-CR gene sequences were constructed using the CLUSTAL X program v2.0 [16]; the stop codon sequence was removed and subsequently aligned by eye. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA 4.0 software [17], besides PAUP version 4.0b [18] and Mr. Bayes version 3.1.2 [19]. This software was also used to calculate genetic divergence values based on Kimura 2 parameter approach. The measurement of population genetic parameters such as genetic diversity (the probability that two randomly chosen mtDNA sequences differed in the sample) and nucleotide diversity (per nucleotide site, i.e., the probability that two randomly chosen homologous nucleotides differ in the sample) [20] was estimated from the mtDNA dataset using DNASP 4.0 [21]. To be noted, the samples from GenBank abbreviations followed the voucher numbers stated in [13].

3. Results and Discussion

A total 700 bp of mtDNA control region (Cyt b-CR) gene of T. schlegelii had been successfully amplified using L14930 primers for all specimens. The sequence matched T. schlegelii with accession number HM593977 [13].

The overall frequency distributions of nucleotides at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd codon position were as follows: T = 29.5%, C = 28.6%, A = 29.9%, and G = 12.0%; T = 26.0, C = 33.6%, A = 29.1%, and G = 11.2%; T = 30.0%, C = 26.4%, A = 32.6%, and G = 11.3, respectively. A compositional nucleotide bias analysis revealed no significant bias () across the T. schlegelii sequence data. Among the 700 bp of the partial mtDNA control region (Cyt b-CR) gene, only 32 (4.5%) sites were variables with 6 singleton sites, leaving 26 (3.7%) potentially parsimoniously informative characters, indicating that this gene is a reliable marker to infer genetic variations at the population level and 668 (95.5%) sites were conserved. The variable site had also shown that the transition (16 sites) occurred more than transversion (10 sites). Similarly, reports claimed that transition occurs more than transversion in animal mitochondrial genomes [22].

The genetic distance values among individuals were 0.16% to 3.34% (Table 2). The highest genetic distance values had been recorded between sample Langkawi and Serian localities probably because of geographical distance, while samples from Miri and Langkawi have the lowest genetic distance which is 0.16% perhaps due to the same gene pool. The range value was large due to Cyt b-CR region having a high rate of evolution in mtDNA [13].



The analysis also revealed that high genetic distance values were recorded between T. schlegelii populations in which the highest variation of 3.34% was recorded in Langkawi specimen (Table 2). Langkawi population also shows the high genetic distances when compared to Samarahan population as 2.05% to 2.37% genetic distances were recorded among T. schlegelii. The result was different with the findings of [13] which revealed a low level of inter- and intrapopulation genetic distances of 0.08% to 0.18%, respectively. According to [23], the high genetic distance could be explained by several factors including small population size, pass bottleneck event, and physical barriers among population. The genetic variation and structure also increased due to geographical distance [24]. Hence, the population genetic analysis is conducted to further understand the genetic structure of T. schlegelii from Malaysia and other regions.

Among the 68 individuals sequenced (12 from this study and 56 from GenBank) 7 haplotypes were identified in total with 3 haplotypes being shared among them as shown in Table 3, namely, H1, H2, and H5. The sharing of haplotype indicates there is gene flow among them. Moreover, nucleotide divergence analysis revealed that high nucleotide diversity (π) ranges from 0.3% to 0.9% within T. schlegelii population (Table 4). Among populations, high nucleotide diversity (π) was observed which is from 0.3% to 1.9% and 1.7% to 2.0% net nucleotide divergences (Da) (Table 5). The net nucleotide divergence (Da) (Table 5) values were higher when comparing Samarahan with Miri (1.78%) than Samarahan with Langkawi (1.71%) because Samarahan and Langkawi are separated by more than 1200 km distance. It could be due to more genetic drift in Miri population compared to Langkawi from Samarahan specimen. The highest net nucleotide divergence (Da) (Table 5) can be observed among Miri and Langkawi (2.21%) suggesting high genetic differentiation among the population being separated with about 1400 km from each other.


T. schlegeliiHap_1Sarawak, Peninsular Malaysia, unknown, SumateraSZG9 SZG2 J052 J053 J049 J054 J048 HK2 HK1 SZG6 SZG3 SAR003 SAR002 SAR022 PM016 PM019 PM020 SUM037 SUM038 SUM036 PM010 SZG4 SAR023 PM015 PM009 SAR021 SAR005 SAR004 SZG1 HK3 SZG10 HK4 SZG5 J045 SZG7 PM008 SZG8 PM007 J047 PM012 PM014 PM017 PM018

T. schlegeliiHap_2Langkawi (in this study) and Peninsular MalaysiaLTS02 LTS05 LTS01 PM006 PM011 PM013 LTS03 LTS04

T. schlegeliiHap_3Sarawak (in this study)MTS01 MTS05 MTS04 MTS02 MTS03

T. schlegeliiHap_4Sarawak (in this study)SAM01
Hap_5Kalimantan and unknownJ046 J050 KAL041 J051 KAL040 KAL039 KAL043 KAL044

T. schlegeliiHap_6Peninsular MalaysiaPM29 PM30
Hap_7Sarawak (in this study)SAM02

LocalityHPercent (%) pairwise divergenceGene diversityNucleotide diversity

Samarahan10.00.01 ± 0.130.003 ± 0.03
Serian10.00.03 ± 0.230.002 ± 0.03
Miri10.4–0.91.00 ± 0.180.009 ± 0.01
Langkawi10.41.00 ± 0.500.004 ± 0.01

LocalityDistance (km)Nucleotide diversity (π)Net nucleotide divergence (Da)


Phylogenetic analyses of T. schlegelii from Sarawak produced same tree topologies for Neighbour-Joining (NJ) (not shown), Maximum Likelihood (ML) (not shown), maximum parsimony (MP) (Figure 2), and Bayesian inference tree (not shown). They revealed a monophyly T. schlegelii with respect to outgroups G. gangeticus, C. johnsoni, and C. palustris with the bootstrap value of 98% (MP), 99% (NJ), 100% (ML), and 1.0 Bayesian Posterior Probability. The monophyly status of T. schlegelii with respect to outgroup was congruent with [13].

There is only single clade in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) with 4 subclades: T. schlegelii from wild population in this study, namely, SAM01 and SAM02, in the same subclade with all 5 semiwild T. schlegelii from Miri, namely, MTS01, MTS02, MTS03, MTS04, and MTS05 (Subclade 1), with 98% (MP), 99% (NJ), 100% (ML), and 1.0 BPP.

Five T. schlegelii from Langkawi (LT01, LT02, LT03, LT04, and LT05) are closely related to three samples from Peninsular Malaysia (PM06 from Zoo Negara and two other samples, namely, PM011 and PM013, from Melaka Zoo whose locality is in Selangor) in Subclade II with bootstrap value of 99% (MP), 99% (NJ), 100% (ML), and 0.9 BPP. The owner of CAL reported that all T. schlegelii were bought from Singapore in 1980 with unknown locality. This however cannot determine whether the origin of T. schlegelii in Langkawi is Selangor or other places although all T. schlegelii as mentioned are placed in Subclade II. Subclade III comprises specimens from Kalimantan, Peninsular, and Java while Subclade IV comprises all other specimens which form largest subclade. However, with low bootstrap value (50% (MP); 62% (NJ); 54% (ML), and 0.5 BPP) in between Subclade 4 and Subclade 1, the tree is not resolved. More research needs to be done so the information is helpful for the farm in terms of historical information and could be raised during education briefing to the tourists.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, genetic diversity among T. schlegelii is high, ranging from 0.16% to 3.34%, suggesting healthy populations. Analysis showed that there is gene flow among populations (Da = 1.71% to 2.21%) within Western Sarawak, Peninsular Malaysia, and other geographical regions coherent with Sundaland theory, suggesting that there is ancient river system connecting the two regions of Peninsular Malaysia and West Borneo when the Sunda Shelf was exposed. Unique haplotypes had been observed in Northern Sarawak as well as in Sumatera; thus each T. schlegelii deserved its own management strategies to ensure the survival of the species.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


The authors would like to thank Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia for funding the project (FRGS/STWN 10(01)/1066/2013 (12)) and UNIMAS for land transportation and laboratories equipment, chemicals, and consumables. Thanks are due to Sarawak Forestry Corporation, Miri Crocodile Farm, and Crocodile Adventureland Langkawi staffs for the collection of T. schlegelii samples. Thanks are also due to Forest Department, Sarawak, for granting permits to conduct research on biological resources (Permit no. NCCD.907.4.4.4 (jld.10)-255 and Park Permit no. 263/2014). Special thanks go to JPAM staff who had carried out work on catching some of the wild samples.


  1. M. R. Bezuijen, B. M. Shwedick, R. Sommerlad, C. Stevenson, and R. B. Steubing, “Tomistoma Tomistoma schlegelii. Crocodile: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan,” Darwin: Crocodile Specialist Group, p. 133-138, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. Auliya, B. Shwedick, R. Sommerlad, S. Brend, and Samedi, “A short-term assessment of the conservation status of Tomistoma schlegelii (Crocodylia: Crocodylidae) in Tanjung Puting National Park (Central Kalimantan, Indonesia),” A cooperative survey by the Orangutan Foundation (UK) and the Tomistoma Task Force, of the IUCN/SSC Crocodile Specialist Group, CSG Tomistoma Task Force: Bonn, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. R. Bezuijen, G. J. W. Webb, P. Hartoyo, R. W. Samedi, and S. C. Manolis, “The false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) in Sumatra in Crocodiles,” in Proceedings of the 14th Working Meeting of the Crocodile Specialist Group, IUCN–The World Conservation Union, Singapore, Singapore, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. R. Bezuijen, G. J. W. Webb, P. Hartoyo, and Samedi, “Peat swamp forest and the false gharial Tomistoma schlegelii (crocodilia, reptilia) in the Merang River, eastern Sumatra, Indonesia,” Oryx, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 301–307, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Cox and F. Gombek, “A preliminary survey of the crocodile resource in Sarawak, East Malaysia,” World Wildlife Fund Malaysia, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. Sebastian, “The Tomistoma Tomistoma schlegelii in Southeast Asia, a status review and priorities for its conservation in Crocodiles,” in Proceedings of the 12th Working Meeting of the Crocodile Specialist Group, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Pattaya, Thailand, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  7. B. K. Simpson, A. Lopez, S. B. Latif, and A. B. M. Yusoh, “Tomistoma (Tomistoma schlegelii) at Tasek Bera, Peninsular Malaysia in Crocodiles,” in Proceedings of the 14th Working Meeting of the IUCN-SSC Crocodile Specialist Group, pp. 32–45, IUCN: Gland, Gland, Switzerland, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. K. Simpson, “Status Assessment of Tomistoma in Peninsular Malaysia: Peat Swamp Forests of Selangor & Pahang,” Tomistoma Task Force, of the IUCN/SSC Crocodile Specialist Group, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. Stuebing, M. Sah, S. Anuar, E. Lading, and J. Jong, “The Status of Tomistoma schlegelii (Mueller) in Malaysia,” 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. Harshman, C. J. Huddleston, J. P. Bollback, T. J. Parsons, and M. J. Braun, “True and false gharials: A nuclear gene phylogeny of Crocodylia,” Systematic Biology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 386–402, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Janke, A. Gullberg, S. Hughes, R. K. Aggarwal, and U. Arnason, “Mitogenomic analyses place the gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) on the crocodile tree and provide pre-K/T divergence times for most crocodilians,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 620–626, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. R. McAliley, R. E. Willis, D. A. Ray, P. S. White, C. A. Brochu, and L. D. Densmore III, “Are crocodiles really monophyletic? - Evidence for subdivisions from sequence and morphological data,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 16–32, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Kaur, J. R. R. Japning, M. S. Sabki, I. Sidik, L. K. Chong, and A. H. K. Ong, “Genetic diversity of Tomistoma schlegelii inferred from mtDNA markers,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 51, no. 3-4, pp. 275–295, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. J. Doyle and E. E. Dickson, “Preservation of plant-samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis,” TAXON, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 715–722, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. B. Esa, S. S. Siraj, S. K. Daud, K. A. A. Rahim, J. R. R. Japning, and S. G. Tan, “Mitochondrial DNA diversity of Tar douronensis valenciennes (Cyprinidae in Malaysian Borneo,” Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, vol. 29, no. 1 & 2, pp. 47–55, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  16. J. D. Thompson, T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins, “The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 4876–4882, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Tamura, J. Dudley, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, “MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1596–1599, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Swofford and L. Paup, “Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods) 4.0. B5,” 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  19. F. Ronquist and J. P. Huelsenbeck, “MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models,” Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1572–1574, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Nei, “Molecular evolutionary genetics,” Columbia University Press, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  21. J. Rozas, J. C. Sánchez-DelBarrio, X. Messeguer, and R. Rozas, “DNAsp, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods,” Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 2496-2497, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Briolay, N. Galtier, R. M. Brito, and Y. Bouvet, “Molecular Phylogeny of Cyprinidae Inferred fromcytochrome bDNA Sequences,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. T. T. Nguyen, B. Ingram, S. Sungan et al., “Mitochondrial DNA diversity of broodstock of two indigenous mahseer species, Tor tambroides and T. douronensis (Cyprinidae) cultured in Sarawak, Malaysia,” Aquaculture, vol. 253, no. 1-4, pp. 259–269, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. R. Palumbi, “Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation,” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 25, pp. 547–572, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Muhammad Amirul Arib Md Adzhar and Ruhana Hassan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.