Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 931530 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/931530

Stefania Zanetti, Sara Cannas, Paola Molicotti, Alessandra Bua, Marina Cubeddu, Silvia Porcedda, Bruno Marongiu, Leonardo Antonio Sechi, "Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Properties of the Essential Oil of Myrtus communis L. against Clinical Strains of Mycobacterium spp.", Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, vol. 2010, Article ID 931530, 3 pages, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/931530

Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Properties of the Essential Oil of Myrtus communis L. against Clinical Strains of Mycobacterium spp.

Academic Editor: Jonathan Mayer
Received09 Jun 2009
Revised23 Nov 2009
Accepted15 Apr 2010
Published29 Jul 2010

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the etiological agent of tuberculosis. The World Health Organization has estimated that 8 million of people develop active TB every year and the situation is complicated by an increase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains resistant to drugs used in antitubercular therapy: MDR and XDR-TB. Myrtle leaf extracts, used as an antiseptic in Sardinian traditional medicine, have strong antibacterial activity as several investigations showed. In this study we investigated the antimicrobial properties of the essential oil of Myrtus communis against clinical strains of M. tuberculosis and M. paratuberculosis.

1. Introduction

Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) is an evergreen shrub belonging to the family of Mirtaceae that grows spontaneously throughout the Mediterranean area. In Italy it grows along the coast and in the inner hills, and it is spread especially in the islands,where it is one of the most characteristic species. Myrtus communis had history in the popular and traditional medicine: the essential oil obtained from leaves and, sometimes, flowers and berries has been used for its tonic and balsamic properties, and it is used in flavour and fragrance industries. In Sardinia natural formations are still the main source for the production of a traditional liqueur, that every year reaches 3 million bottles. Essential oils are gaining remarkable interest for their potential multipurpose use as antioxidant, antibacterial, and antiseptic agent [14]; the essential oil obtained from the leaves was used in the past for the treatment of lung disorders.

The isolation of essential oils from Myrtus communis leaves is usually obtained by hydrodistillation method with a Clevenger-type apparatus, according to the Italian Official Pharmacopoeia. The chemical composition of the essential oils, analysed by Gas/Cromatography (G/C), generally exhibits -pinene, 11%; 1,8-cineole, 16%; linalool, 12%; -terpineol, 7%; and limonene, 5%. The Sardinian myrtle oil is characterized by the lack of myrtenyl acetate and by a higher content of limonene.

Romani et al. [5] showed the biological activities of tannins, including anticancer and antioxidant. In our previous studies (data not published) the antimicrobial properties of myrtus essential oil against several clinical strains and in particular against Helicobacter pylori [6] were studied, and we obtained encouraging results. Considering these results, in this study, we have used this essential oil towards strains of M. tuberculosis and strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis.

2. Materials and Methods

In this study we investigated the antimicrobial properties of the essential oil of Myrtus communis against two reference strains: M. tuberculosis H37Rv (virulent strain) and M. tuberculosis H37Ra (avirulent strain) and 8 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis resistant to one or more drugs, collected in the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Microbiology of the University of Sassari, Italy.

We also studied the antimicrobial properties of the essential oil towards two human strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (1515 and 1517).

The antibacterial activity of the oil was assessed by the proportional method used for Mycobacterium tuberculosis as described in NCCLS-National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [7].

Briefly, isolate suspensions of M. tuberculosis in 7H9 broth were adjusted to an optical density of 1 McFarland, and two dilutions, 10−2 and 10−4, were plated onto 7H10 agar with a different concentration of essential oil (16%, 14%, 12%, 10%, 8%, 4%, 2%, 1%, and 0.17% v/v).

We also investigated the antimicrobial properties of some components of M. communis and, in particular, limonene, 1-8 cineole and -pinene, using the proportional method [7].

3. Results and Discussion

In Table 1 we report the data obtained with the essential oil in toto.


StrainsMICAntitubercular Drug*
M. tuberculosisMyrtus communis % (v/v)SMINHRIFETHPZACLACIP

H37Rv0.17%SSSS
H37Ra0.17%SSSS
M. tuberculosis0.17%SSRS
M. tuberculosis0.17%SSRS
M. tuberculosis0.17%SRRS
M. tuberculosis0.17%RSRS
M. tuberculosis0.17%RRSS
M. tuberculosis0.17%RRSR
M. tuberculosis0.17%RRRSRRR
M. tuberculosis0.17%SSSS
M. paratuberculosis (1515) 2%
M. paratuberculosis (1517) 2%

*SM: streptomicin; INH: isoniazid; RIF: rifampicin; ETH: ethambutol; PZA: pyrazinamide; CLA: clarithromycin; CIP: ciprofloxacin.

Towards all the strains of M. tuberculosis, including the extensively drug-resistant (XDR), the oil of M. communis tested showed an MIC of 0.17% (v/v), whereas against the two M. paratuberculosis strains showed an MIC of 2% (v/v).

Subsequently we tested each different compound (limonene, 1-8 cineole, -pinene) to see if it had different antimicrobial properties.

As far as limonene concerned, it showed towards all the strains an MIC of 2% (v/v); about 1-8 cineole, for 4 strains, including H37Rv, the MIC was of 2% (v/v), while the MIC shown for other 4 strains was of 16% (v/v); -pinene showed an MIC of 1% (v/v) for 3 strains, and for one strain an MIC of 2% (v/v), for 3 others an MIC of 8% (v/v), and for only one MIC was of 16% (v/v) (Table 2). Limonene and -pinene are monoterpenic that, according to the literature, are used as expectorant, antalgic, revulsive, antitussive, mucolitic, and decongestant; about 1-8 cineole it is an oxide used as expectorant, mucolitic, and decongestant [8].


StrainsMICMIC % (v/v)
M. tuberculosisMyrtus communis % (v/v)Extracts of Myrtus communis oil
Limonene1-8 Cineole Pinene

H37Rv0.17%0.17%21
H37Ra0.17%
M. tuberculosis0.17%221
M. tuberculosis0.17%2 168
M. tuberculosis0.17%221
M. tuberculosis0.17%2216
M. tuberculosis0.17%2 168
M. tuberculosis0.17%2 162
M. tuberculosis0.17%2 168
M. tuberculosis0.17%
M. paratuberculosis (1515) 2%
M. paratuberculosis (1517) 2%

We compared the activity of our essential oil with four standard antitubercular drugs: streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol, performing according to international protocols [7]. About the mycobacterial strains, one clinical strain was susceptible to all the drugs. Two clinical strains were rifampicin resistant, three strains were resistant to 2 drugs (one streptomicin and rifampicin resistant, one streptomicin and isoniazid resistant, and one isoniazid and rifampicin resistant), one was resistant to 3 drugs (streptomicin, isoniazid, and ethambutol). The last one was a XDR strains. The essential oils screened in toto have a better antimicrobial activity than each single compound against all mycobacteria tested. The results presented here may contribute to the knowledge of the antimicrobial properties of myrtle and our aim is to carry on further studies.

4. Conclusions

The chemical composition of the essential oil of M. communis exhibited qualitative differences that depended on different geographical areas and from the season in which the leaves were picked up. The essential oil that we used for antimicrobical in vitro assay contained a high quantity of monoterpenic and oxide that, according to literature, do not have antimicrobical activity. From our studies emerged that the essential oil in toto might have a good activity towards M. tuberculosis, although the individual compounds (except -pinene) showed in all the strains a higher MIC. It may be the consequence of a sinergic effect of all the compounds together.

The results from the myrtle oil in toto showed a good activity towards M. tuberculosis but not toward M. paratuberculosis. The MIC registered against M. tuberculosis was 0.17% (v/v) in comparison with an MIC of 2% (v/v) observed toward M. paratuberculosis.

A limit of our study is the small amount of the essential oil that did not allow to perform the MIC towards all the strains used. These data are encouraging even if further additional “ in vitro” testing and large clinical studies are necessary to verify the potential use of the essential oils of myrtle as antitubercular drug. Given the excellent results that we obtained in this study, we would expand the research with further studies, to value the possible cytotoxic effects, and eventually to perform tests using “in vivo” mouse model.

References

  1. G. Alem, Y. Mekonnen, M. Tiruneh, and A. Mulu, “In vitro antibacterial activity of crude preparation of myrtle (Myrtus communis) on common human pathogens,” Ethiopian Medical Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  2. G. Appendino, L. Maxia, and L. Maxia, “Antibacterial galloylated alkylphloroglucinol glucosides from myrtle (Myrtus communis),” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 251–254, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. H. Bonjar, “Antibacterial screening of plants used in Iranian folkloric medicine,” Fitoterapia, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 231–235, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. T. Gündüz, Ş. A. Gönül, and M. Karapinar, “Efficacy of myrtle oil against Salmonella Typhimurium on fresh produce,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 147–150, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Romani, R. Coinu, S. Carta, P. Pinelli, C. Galardi, F. F. Vincieri, and F. Franconi, “Evaluation of antioxidant effect of different extracts of Myrtus communis L,” Free Radical Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Deriu, G. Branca, and G. Branca, “In vitro activity of essential oil of Myrtus communis L. against Helicobacter pylori,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 562–563, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. NCCLS-National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Antimycobacterial susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tentative standard M24-T, Villanova, Pa, USA, 1995.
  8. A. Camporese, Oli Essenziali e Malattie Infettive, Tecniche nuove, 1998.

Copyright © 2010 Stefania Zanetti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views3667
Downloads1437
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.